Illustrated Physics
physics, drawn
Theme

Where the model stops — part 2 of 3

Every picture in physics has a domain of validity, and the interesting physics usually lives at its edge.
An average that follows Newton's law exactly. The centre of a wavepacket in a harmonic well, and the classical orbit started from the same place, drawn on top of each other. They agree to 5.5e-6 over 2.2 periods, which is the split-step integrator's own error and not a physical gap. This is exact and it is exact for every state of a harmonic oscillator, however wide, however lumpy, however far from classical: the theorem needs ⟨−V′(x)⟩ = −V′(⟨x⟩), which for a linear restoring force is true term by term. It is worth being suspicious of how strong that looks. The harmonic oscillator is the one potential where the average force over a state and the force at the state's centre cannot differ, so it is the worst possible example from which to conclude that quantum averages follow classical paths. Quantum

The average that obeys Newton

Ehrenfest's theorem says the centre of a wavepacket moves according to the average force over the state. That is exact, it is often quoted as the reason classical mechanics survives, and the two statements are not the same — because the average of a force is the force at the average only when the force is linear, which is to say almost never.

 The turnaround, made gentler and gentler, and the difference that does not move. A round trip to a star 4 light-years away at 0.6c, with the turnaround done at nine different accelerations from a tenth of a gravity to a thousand. The upper curve is the age difference between the twins and the lower one is how much of that difference the turnaround itself contributes. At 0.1 g the turn accounts for 51 per cent of it; at 1000 g it accounts for 0.00 per cent, and it keeps falling. The total does not follow it down: it tends to 2.67 years, which is what the instantaneous-turnaround cartoon gives. So the acceleration is not what makes the twins differ. It is what makes one twin's path the bent one, and a bent path through spacetime is shorter for the same reason a bent path on a map is longer — but the amount is in the legs, not in the corner, and the corner's contribution can be made as small as anyone likes without the difference going away. Relativity

The clock that does not feel the turn

Proper time is the integral of dt over gamma, which presumes that a clock's rate depends on its speed and on nothing else — not on its acceleration, not on how long it has been accelerating. That is an assumption about clocks rather than a theorem about spacetime, and the twin result is empty without it.

 The one place in a plasma where the charges do not balance. The potential and the two densities through a sheath, in Debye lengths from the sheath edge, for a plasma of hydrogen ions. The potential is measured downward in units of the electron temperature and reaches 2.84 at the wall — the value at which the two fluxes balance. The layer is 15.1 Debye lengths thick — for 3 eV electrons at 1e+16 per cubic metre, a Debye length of 129 µm and a sheath of 1.9 mm. Inside it the electron density falls as the Boltzmann factor while the ion density falls only as the ions speed up, so the two separate: at the wall the ion density exceeds the electron density by 85 per cent of itself. That is the whole of the difference between a sheath and the plasma it borders — quasineutrality is not an assumption that can be made here, and Poisson's equation has to be solved instead of replaced. Astrophysics

The wall a plasma builds against itself

A plasma is quasineutral everywhere except where it touches something. Electrons are faster than ions by the square root of the mass ratio, so any surface is struck by far more of them, charges negative, and goes on charging until the two arrivals balance — leaving a layer a few Debye lengths thick in which the charges do not cancel at all.

 5 balls whose contact force goes as the overlap to the three halves, touching. The velocity of every ball in a line of 5, against time in units of one binary contact, with the first arriving at unit speed. Nothing about collisions is assumed: neighbours push on each other with k times their overlap raised to the power 1.5, and the equations of motion are integrated. With the balls touching there is no such separation — several overlaps are non-zero at once and the disturbance crosses the line as a single compression wave. The far ball leaves at 0.989 of the striking speed and the others keep 0.011 between them, which is why a real cradle's balls do not quite come to rest. Momentum and energy are conserved to 4.4e-16 and 4.1e-8, so the difference between the two cases is the contact law and not the bookkeeping. Mechanics

Five balls, and the law that does not choose

The usual account of a Newton's cradle says that momentum and energy conservation force one ball out at the striking speed. For three balls or more they do no such thing: the two laws leave a whole curve of possible outcomes, and what picks one is the shape of the force between two touching spheres.

 How much of μ₀N²A/ℓ a real coil actually has. The inductance of a 140-turn coil of radius 10 mm, divided by the long-solenoid formula μ₀N²A/ℓ, against how long the coil is compared with its diameter. The inductance is computed as a sum of Maxwell's mutual inductances between every pair of turns plus each turn's own, so the long-coil formula appears nowhere in it. At a length equal to the diameter the real coil has 68% of what the formula promises, and at a quarter of the diameter about a third. The reason is that the formula assumes every turn is threaded by the full interior field, and near the ends of a short coil the field has already begun to spread. The ratio is Nagaoka's coefficient, tabulated since 1909, and the computed points agree with the table. Electromagnetism

The circuit that fights its own change

Every circuit is threaded by the field its own current makes, so every circuit resists having that current altered. It is the reason a coil takes time to start and the reason breaking one makes a voltage a thousand times the supply's.

 A magnetisation curve, and the same curve magnified. On the left, the position of a domain wall against the applied field, over the whole of a crystal. It looks like a curve. On the right, a window 2.0% of its width, taken 42% of the way across, at the magnification a sensitive measurement reaches: the wall does not move at all while the field rises, then jumps, then stops again. The largest jump in the window covers 0.67 units of wall position in no field change at all. There is nothing smooth underneath this — the smooth curve on the left is a staircase with 1400 steps in it, drawn small. Electromagnetism

The curve that is really a staircase

A magnetisation curve is drawn as a smooth line and is nothing of the sort. Measured finely enough it is a sequence of jumps of every size, audible as a crackle in a coil, with no typical jump and no smooth motion underneath.

 One measurement that separates unpolarised from polarised. What a rotating linear polariser passes, against its angle, for beams of the same total intensity and degrees of polarisation 0, 0.35, 0.7, 1. Every curve has the same average — a polariser passes half of any beam over a whole turn, whatever its state — and they differ only in how deeply they modulate. The depth of the modulation is the degree of polarisation, exactly: a fully polarised beam goes to zero at one angle and a beam with no preferred direction gives a flat line at a half. That is the whole measurement, and it is why "unpolarised" is a statement about a modulation depth rather than about what a wave is doing. Optics

The light with no direction of shaking

Unpolarised light is not a state of a wave; it is the absence of one, and no description of a single wave can represent it. What can is a set of four numbers, all of them powers a detector reads — and they describe every beam there is, including the ones that are neither polarised nor not.

 The surface that focuses 1 into 1.52 with no error at all. A Cartesian oval: the locus of points for which 1 times the distance from the object plus 1.52 times the distance to the image is a constant. Every ray drawn takes exactly the same optical path, so every one arrives at the image point — not nearly, and not for small angles, but exactly, for rays at any angle the surface reaches. There is no spherical aberration because there is no approximation: this is what Fermat's principle asks for, solved rather than expanded. The surface is not a sphere, not a conic in general, and not anything a grinding machine makes easily, which is most of why lenses are spherical and aberrated instead. Optics

The surface that images one point exactly

Fermat's principle says every ray from an object to its image must take the same time. Written as an equation, that is a curve Descartes found — a surface with no aberration at all, at any angle. It exists, it is easy to compute, and it images exactly one pair of points and nothing else.

 The cross term, and the fact that it averages to nothing. The intensity of two waves of amplitude 1 and 0.7 added together, against the phase difference between them, in turns. A detector reads the square of the summed amplitude, which is the sum of the two intensities plus a cross term that swings between plus and minus twice the product. At no phase difference the reading is 2.89 and at half a turn it is 0.09; the flat line is what the two would give with no interference, 1.49, and it is exactly the average of the curve over a whole turn. Interference redistributes and does not create — which answers the question of where the energy goes at a dark fringe by saying that it never left. Waves

What adding does to the energy

Waves add their amplitudes and detectors read squares, so two waves together do not deliver the sum of what each delivers. Where the two get dimmer, the natural question is where the energy went — and the answer depends entirely on whether the sources can feel each other.

 The chain's dispersion, and the frequency it stops at. Frequency against wavenumber for a chain of equal masses joined by equal springs, in units where the spacing, the mass and the spring are one. At long wavelength the curve is a straight line through the origin — the chain behaves as a continuous string with a sound speed, and the departure from the line is second order in the wavenumber, which is why a lattice is invisible until the wavelength approaches the spacing. At the zone edge, where neighbouring masses move in exact opposition, the curve flattens: the frequency stops rising, the group velocity falls to zero, and the mode is a standing wave that carries nothing. Above that frequency there is no travelling solution at all. Waves

The frequency a lattice cannot carry

A continuous string carries every note. A row of masses joined by springs does not: there is a highest frequency, set by nothing but the time one mass takes to be pushed back by its neighbours, and above it a disturbance does not travel at all.

 A ratio in the exponent. The Boltzmann factor against the energy of a state measured in units of kT, with the logarithm up the axis so that the straight line is the whole content. Every kT of energy costs a factor of e, so 5, 12, 20 times kT are factors of 10^-2.2, 10^-5.2, 10^-8.7. At 295 K, kT is 25.4 meV, so a barrier of 0.4 eV is 15.7 kT and a factor of 1.5e-7. That is the sense in which a third of an electronvolt is not a small energy: it is small compared with a chemical bond and enormous compared with kT, and it is the second comparison that decides whether anything happens. Thermodynamics

The temperature a molecule does not have

Temperature fixes a system's average energy and nothing more. The actual energy wanders, by an amount tied to the heat capacity, and the relative size of the wandering falls as one over the square root of the number of degrees of freedom — so a mole has a temperature and a molecule does not.

 The delay that stops caring how thick the wall is. The Wigner phase time — how late the transmitted packet's peak arrives, compared with a free particle covering the same distance — for an electron under a 3 eV barrier, at 0.2 nm, 0.5 nm, 1 nm thick. 0.2 nm: 0.3728 fs at half the barrier height; 0.5 nm: 0.4372 fs at half the barrier height; 1 nm: 0.4388 fs at half the barrier height. The widths span a factor of 5.0 and the times span 1.18. A thicker barrier is exponentially harder to cross and the delay in crossing it barely moves — which is either a remarkable fact about tunnelling or a sign that the phase time is not a traversal time, and the rest of the essay is about which. Quantum

How long the crossing takes

Tunnelling has a probability, and asking how long it takes turns out to be a different kind of question. The delay a transmitted packet shows stops growing once the barrier is opaque, so a thicker wall is crossed in the same time — and several defensible clocks give several different answers.

 Two pairs, and only one of them may cheat. The CHSH value a party shares with a second, against the value the same party shares with a third. Every quantum state lies inside a quarter circle whose radius is Tsirelson's bound, 2.8284, because the sum of the two squared values cannot exceed eight. The classical limit is 2 on each axis, and the square that would hold both violations sticks out of the circle everywhere except at its corner: the best both can manage at once is exactly 1.999998, which is the classical value and no violation at all. So a party maximally entangled with one other is correlated with everybody else exactly as a classical object would be. Nothing about the measurement or the apparatus was assumed; this follows from the state alone. Quantum

What two have they cannot give a third

Entanglement will not be shared. A pair that violates a Bell inequality is correlated with everything else exactly as a classical object would be, and the trade is exact enough to be drawn: two CHSH values must fit inside a circle of radius 2√2.

 The point that does not notice the collision. Two bodies of rest mass 1 and 2, approaching at 0.8c and -0.3c, colliding elastically and leaving at -0.6168c and 0.5969c — speeds obtained by reversing the motion in the zero-momentum frame, with the total energy and momentum checked to a part in a million million. The third line is the energy-weighted centre. It runs straight through the collision at 0.1872c, which is the total momentum divided by the total energy, and it has no kink — verified at two hundred instants. Nothing here is the centre of mass: the rest masses are unchanged by the collision but the energies are redistributed, and it is the energies that do the weighting. Relativity

The centre that is not a place

The centre of mass is replaced in relativity by the centre of energy, which moves uniformly and does everything the old point did — except be the same point for everybody. Boost a spinning body and its centre moves, so a spinning object has no centre at all.

 The wedge that proves it. A wedge of water 4 mm on its vertical side, at a depth of 3 m, with the pressure on each of its three faces as an unknown. The two force balances decide them. Horizontally, the sloping face's push has a component that must exactly cancel the vertical face's, and since the sloping face is longer by exactly the factor its slope reduces the component by, the two pressures are equal — the geometry cancels, at every angle, for every size. Vertically the same cancellation happens except for the wedge's own weight, which needs the bottom face to carry 0.0667 per cent more. That excess falls in proportion to the size of the wedge, so at a point it is nothing and the three pressures are one number. Pressure being the same in every direction is the conclusion of that argument, not an assumption in it. Fluids

The push that has no direction

That the pressure at a point in a still fluid is the same whichever way the surface faces is not a definition. It is a theorem, and its proof is an argument about how two kinds of force scale with size — which is also the exact statement of when it stops being true.

 The hourglass that keeps time. Discharge against how much is left above the opening, for grain and for liquid through the same 40 mm hole, each as a fraction of its own rate at a full hopper. The grain rate is a horizontal line: it does not appear in Beverloo's law at all, because the pressure at the outlet does not depend on the head — the walls carry the weight, which is what Janssen's argument establishes, so the grains at the opening are pushed by their immediate neighbours and by nothing else. The liquid falls as the square root of the head and is down to 32 per cent by the time a tenth is left. That is why an hourglass keeps time and a water clock does not, and why the water clocks that worked were built with a float and an overflow to hold the head constant. Fluids

The hourglass that keeps time

Grain leaves a hopper at a rate that does not depend on how much is above it, and that goes as the orifice to the five-halves power rather than the one half a liquid gives. Both facts follow from the same thing: the weight is carried by the walls, not by the grains at the opening.

 Colder the bigger it is. The Hawking temperature against mass, on logarithmic axes, with the microwave background drawn across it. The slope is minus one exactly, so a heavier hole is colder — a negative heat capacity, which is the fact everything else here follows from. The two lines cross at 4.50e+22 kg, about a hundredth of the Moon's mass. Anything heavier than that is colder than the sky it sits in and absorbs more than it emits, so it grows rather than evaporates. A stellar-mass hole is at 6.2e-8 kelvin and will not begin to lose mass until the background has cooled below that, which takes something like 10¹² years. Evaporation is not something happening now to any hole anybody has observed. Astrophysics

The hole that outlives everything and then does not

A black hole radiates at a temperature that rises as it shrinks, so losing energy makes it lose faster. The whole history follows from that one sign: a life proportional to the cube of the mass, nearly nothing happening for almost all of it, and an end that arrives in a second.

 The power at stake, which is none. The power an electron radiates by Larmor's formula, against its acceleration, with 5 cases marked. a charge on a table: 9.8e+0 m/s², 5.49e-52 W; a laboratory centrifuge: 1.0e+6 m/s², 5.71e-42 W; a proton at the LHC: 1.9e+16 m/s², 2.06e-21 W; an electron in a linac: 2.0e+19 m/s², 2.28e-15 W; an electron in a hydrogen atom: 9.0e+22 m/s², 4.62e-8 W. The slope is two, measured on the drawn line. A charge held at one gravity radiates 5.49e-52 watts, which over the whole age of the universe comes to 2.39e-34 joules — far less than one photon of any kind. So the question of whether it radiates is not an experimental question about a charge on a table, and never has been. Every number here is a straight line on logarithmic axes with an exponent the figure measures. Astrophysics

Whether a charge on a table glows

The equivalence principle says a charge at rest in a gravitational field is a charge accelerating in empty space, and an accelerating charge radiates. Nothing is supplying the energy. The argument has run for eighty years, and its resolution is that radiation is not something a single observer can define.

 Two terms, and the distance neither can beat. The smallest distance a probe of a given momentum can resolve, as the sum of two terms. The falling one is the uncertainty relation: more momentum, shorter wavelength, finer resolution. The rising one is gravity: the probe's own energy curves the region it is probing, and past a point it makes a horizon larger than the thing being looked at. With the gravitational term at 1× the Planck area, the least resolvable distance is 2.286e-35 m — each located by scanning the drawn curve over four hundred thousand momenta rather than by substituting into a formula. There is no momentum at which the resolution is better than that, so the ordinary procedure for measuring a distance has a floor, and the floor is the Planck length up to a factor of order one. Astrophysics

The length no experiment can resolve

Measuring a small distance needs a short wavelength, a short wavelength needs a large energy, and a large energy in a small region makes a horizon. Past a point, pushing harder makes the probe bigger — and the distance where that turns round is the Planck length.

 The energy a spin is allowed, and the only direction it can go. A body with principal moments 1.000, 3.000, 4.000 spinning with a fixed angular momentum. Every possible motion has an energy somewhere in the band drawn here, and the three marks are the three principal-axis spins: energy L²/2I, so the largest moment of inertia gives the smallest energy. The band runs from 0.1250 to 0.5000 in units where the momentum is one — a ratio of 4.0. Anything inside the body that flexes and warms takes energy out and leaves the momentum untouched, so the state can only move leftwards along this band, and there is exactly one place for it to stop. A spin about the axis of least inertia is at the far right: it is a perfectly good solution of the equations of motion, stable against small disturbances in a perfectly rigid body, and it sits at the top of a hill the smallest leak will roll it off. Mechanics

The axis a leak of energy chooses

A body spinning with nothing pushing on it keeps its angular momentum exactly, and keeps its kinetic energy only while nothing inside it flexes. At fixed momentum the energy is least for a spin about the axis of greatest inertia — so any leak, however small, has a destination. The first American satellite found this out in orbit.

 The bowl a lens actually focuses onto. Where a lens of 50 mm focal length brings each part of a flat scene to a focus, against distance from the centre of the field, out to 21.6 mm — the corner of a 35 mm frame. The surface of best focus is a sphere of radius 76 mm curving towards the lens, and the corner of the frame sits 3.13 mm in front of the plane the centre is focused on. The shaded band is the depth of focus at f/8, which is 0.070 mm — 45 times smaller than the sag it has to cover. The curvature is not an error in the lens. It is what Σ1/nf comes to for this stack, and it depends on the powers and the glasses and on nothing else: bending the surfaces, moving the stop or stopping down changes every other aberration and leaves this one exactly where it was. Optics

The flat scene that comes back curved

A lens does not image a plane onto a plane. It images it onto a bowl, and the curvature of that bowl is fixed by the powers and the glasses alone — not by the shapes of the surfaces, not by where the stop is, and not by stopping down. Everything a designer usually plays with leaves it exactly where it was.

 One temperature, four pawls, and nothing gained. The net rate of a ratchet whose gas and whose pawl are at the same temperature, against the load, for notches 2, 5, 10, 20 times the thermal energy deep. Every curve passes through zero at zero load and is negative everywhere else. The device is not merely unable to lift a weight; under any load at all it turns the wrong way and lets the weight down, converting its potential energy into heat in the gas. Making the notch deeper slows everything down — an exponential in the depth — and does not change the sign anywhere. That is the second law arriving as a mechanism rather than as a prohibition. Nothing was assumed about entropy; the pawl was simply allowed to be as warm as everything else, and its own fluctuations undo exactly the rectification it was there to provide. Any rectifier small enough for thermal noise to matter has this problem, and the rectifier being clever does not help, because the same noise reaches the cleverness. Thermodynamics

The engine a fluctuation cannot run

A ratchet lets a shaft turn one way and not the other. Put a paddle in a gas on the same shaft and molecular collisions appear to become a lifted weight — an engine running on one reservoir. It does not work, and following exactly why turns the second law from a prohibition into a mechanism: the pawl is as warm as the gas, and it lifts whenever it is asked to.

 The temperature a planet ought to be. Each body's measured surface temperature against the temperature at which it would radiate away exactly the sunlight it absorbs — computed from two numbers, the sunlight reaching it and the fraction it reflects, with no other property of the body used. Points on the diagonal are bodies the one-line argument gets right. the Moon: balance 270 K, surface 250 K, −20 K with no atmosphere; Mercury: balance 433 K, surface 340 K, −93 K with no atmosphere; Mars: balance 210 K, surface 210 K, +0 K; Earth: balance 255 K, surface 288 K, +33 K; Venus: balance 227 K, surface 737 K, +510 K. The airless bodies fall below the line rather than on it, and the reason is the fourth power: a surface running from noon heat to night cold radiates like its hottest parts and averages like its coldest, so a mean thermometer reading is lower than the temperature that matches the emitted flux. Mars, whose atmosphere is thin and whose surface is nearly isothermal by comparison, sits on the line. Everything with a substantial atmosphere sits above it, by tens of kelvin on Earth and hundreds on Venus, and always in the same direction. Nothing here explains why. What the figure fixes is the size and the sign of what has to be explained. Thermodynamics

The height a planet is seen from

A body in sunlight settles where it radiates away what it absorbs, and that takes two numbers and one line of arithmetic. It gets the Moon right and Earth wrong by thirty-three kelvin. The correction is not that the atmosphere traps heat but that it moves the level space sees the planet from, and the rest is done by a lapse rate that is not a radiative quantity at all.

 One boost, three constants, three pictures. The axes of a frame moving at 0.5 in units where the constant is one, drawn for the three signs the constant can have. The faint cross is the original frame's axes; the two heavy lines are the moving frame's, obtained by boosting them rather than by tilting them by hand. With a positive constant the two axes close in on one another symmetrically, and the line they are closing on is the invariant speed. With a zero constant only the time axis tilts and the space axis stays where it was, which is absolute simultaneity — every frame agrees which events are at the same time. With a negative constant the pair rotates rigidly, like a pair of axes turned in a plane. Nothing about light has been used to draw any of them. The three are the whole of what homogeneity, isotropy, the group property and the relativity principle permit, and choosing between them is a measurement rather than a postulate. Relativity

The transformation that never mentions light

Assume space and time are homogeneous, that space is isotropic, that two changes of frame compose into a third, and that the relativity principle holds. Those four leave exactly one free constant — and three possible worlds, one of them Galileo's and one of them Einstein's. Light appears nowhere in the derivation; it enters only when the constant has to be measured.

 Two solutions, and nothing in the equations to choose between them. A spherical pulse leaving a point and a spherical pulse arriving at one, each drawn at three times 0.35, 0.6, 0.85 in units where the speed is one. Both are exact solutions of the same wave equation, which is checked here by differencing the drawn samples twice in space and twice in time and requiring the residual to vanish for each. The one on the left is what is always used; the one on the right is discarded, and the equations do not do the discarding. The incoming pulse grows as it converges for the same reason the outgoing one decays as it spreads — the same energy through a smaller sphere — and it is as consistent with conservation as its mirror image is. Electromagnetism

The solution that is thrown away

Maxwell's equations admit a field that converges on a charge exactly as readily as one that leaves it, and nothing in them prefers either. Retardation is a boundary condition rather than a law. Which boundary condition is right has been argued about for a century, one of the answers makes the arrow of time a property of there being absorbers, and the laboratory version of the question — whether an atom emits at all — has a measured answer that depends on what is listening.

 Two intersections, and the rule that picks one. The phase-matching construction for light arriving at 40° from a medium of index 1 into one of index -1. The circles are each medium's own relation between wavevector and frequency; the vertical line is the tangential wavenumber, which the boundary conserves. The line crosses the second circle twice, and the construction alone does not say which point is the answer — the rule that does is that energy must travel away from the interface. For a positive index the energy runs along the wavevector and the upper point is taken. For a negative one the energy runs against it, so the lower point is taken, the wavevector points back toward the boundary, and the ray leaves at -40.0° — on the same side of the normal as it arrived. Nothing in the drawing has changed except which intersection is circled. Optics

The ray on the wrong side of the normal

The phase-matching construction draws a circle and a line, and the line crosses the circle twice. Every earlier construction silently took the upper intersection. Which one is physical is decided by where the energy goes rather than by where the wavevector points, and in a medium whose group velocity opposes its phase velocity the answer is the other one — so the refracted ray leaves on the same side of the normal it arrived on, a flat slab focuses, and a lens can beat the diffraction limit until loss stops it.

 The half-life that depends on the electrons. Half-lives of 3 nuclides as neutral atoms and as bare nuclei, measured at a heavy-ion storage ring where fully stripped ions can be kept circulating for months. The changes are not corrections. ¹⁸⁷Re goes from 41.6 billion years to 32.9 — a factor of 1.26 billion — because a beta decay whose available energy is only 2.5 keV cannot put an electron into the continuum but can put one into an empty K orbital, and stripping the atom opens that channel. ¹⁶³Dy is stable as an atom and decays in 47 days as a bare nucleus, for the same reason. The rate is a property of the nucleus and of what surrounds it, not of the nucleus alone. Quantum

The half-life that chemistry can change

A nucleus has no clock, the usual account goes, and nothing outside it touches the rate. That is very nearly true and it is not exactly true. Electron capture takes an electron from the nucleus's own position, so its rate is proportional to how many electrons are there — which is chemistry, worth a per cent. And a nucleus stripped of every electron can gain a decay channel it did not have: rhenium-187 goes from forty-two billion years to thirty-three.

 The entropy a substance keeps depends on how fast it was cooled. The entropy of a supercooled liquid in excess of its crystal's, against temperature, for a substance melting at 305 K with an entropy of fusion of 43 joules per kelvin per mole and a liquid heat capacity exceeding the crystal's by 62. The equilibrium curve — the one the liquid follows while it can still relax — falls steadily and would reach the crystal's entropy at 152.4 kelvin. It never gets there, because the liquid falls out of equilibrium first, at a temperature that depends on how long it is given: 0.01 s/K freezes at 196.1 K with 15.61 left, 1 s/K freezes at 188.1 K with 13.03 left, 100 s/K freezes at 182.1 K with 11.03 left. Ice's residual entropy is a count and does not move; a glass's is whatever it happened to have when it stopped being able to change, and that is a property of the experiment. Thermodynamics

The entropy that depends on how fast it was cooled

Ice's residual entropy is a count, and it comes out the same whoever measures it. A glass's does not. A glass keeps whatever entropy it happened to have when its own relaxation time crossed the experiment's, so cooling ten times more slowly leaves less behind — and extrapolating the equilibrium liquid below that point takes its entropy under the crystal's at a finite temperature, which cannot happen and does not, for a reason that is still argued about.

 A hill that is always ahead of the atom. The light-shift potentials of the two ground sublevels of a spin-½ atom in two counter-propagating beams with crossed linear polarisations, over one and a half wavelengths, in units of the well depth. The polarisation of the light turns from σ+ to linear to σ− every quarter wavelength, and the two sublevels see sinusoidal potentials a quarter wavelength out of step. Optical pumping transfers the atom from one sublevel to the other fastest exactly where its own potential is highest — the fastest pumping and the hilltop coincide, which the figure checks — and that is the bottom of the other potential. The heavy line is an atom that starts with 3.3 well depths of kinetic energy: each time it reaches a hilltop it is pumped down by exactly one well depth, climbs the next hill, and is pumped down again, 3 times, until it no longer has the energy to reach a hilltop and is left oscillating in one well. The energy is carried off by the pumping photon, which leaves bluer than the light that drove it by the depth of the well. Astrophysics

The limit that belonged to a simpler atom

The theory of laser cooling predicted a floor, and the first careful measurement came in six times below it. Nothing was wrong with the measurement or the arithmetic. The floor belonged to an atom with one ground state, and real atoms have several — which lets the light build a hill in front of every atom, move it to the bottom before it can roll back, and repeat the trick until the atom is a few microkelvin from rest.

 Radiated while the push holds, paid for when it stops. The power a charge radiates, the power the radiation reaction force takes from its motion, and the rate of change of the Schott term mτ a·v, through a push that rises over the first 20 per cent of its duration, holds steady, and falls away over the last 20, in units of mτa₀² where a₀ is the steady acceleration. Radiated power is a², the reaction force's take is −ȧv, and the Schott rate is found by differencing a·v along the trajectory; at every instant the first equals the sum of the other two. While the push is steady the reaction force is exactly zero and the charge still radiates at the full rate, all of it drawn from the Schott term. When the push stops, ȧ is large and negative while the charge is moving fast, and the reaction force takes 0.775 units, more than the 0.750 radiated over the whole push. The difference is what it handed back while the push was starting: then the charge is still slow, the reaction force points along the rising acceleration, and it does 0.025 units of work on the charge instead of taking any. The totals agree to a part in a hundred thousand. Astrophysics

The bill that arrives when the pushing stops

A charge accelerating steadily radiates at the full Larmor rate while the radiation reaction force on it is exactly zero, so for as long as the push holds, nothing about the charge's motion pays a single watt. The energy is lent by the field that travels with the charge, the loan is called the Schott term, and it is repaid the moment the acceleration changes.

 Above a half, the chains stop letting go. The extensional viscosity of a dilute polymer solution, as a multiple of its zero-shear viscosity, against the accumulated stretch (Hencky strain, the stretch rate times the time), on a logarithmic axis, for stretch rates whose product with the relaxation time is 0.1, 0.4, 0.6, 1. The polymer carries 90 per cent of the viscosity. Dashed curves are the Oldroyd-B dumbbell, integrated from its conformation equation and matching its closed form; solid curves are the same chains with a finite length, FENE-P with L² = 400. At 0.1 the Oldroyd-B viscosity reaches 3.37 and the finite chain 3.37 by a strain of 6; at 0.4 the Oldroyd-B viscosity reaches 9.49 and the finite chain 9.25 by a strain of 6; at 0.6 the Oldroyd-B viscosity reaches 58 and the finite chain 49 by a strain of 6; at 1 the Oldroyd-B viscosity reaches 725 and the finite chain 329 by a strain of 6. Below one half the viscosity settles at a few times the shear value. Above it the Oldroyd-B chain stretches without limit and its resistance grows exponentially, while the finite chain grows until it is nearly fully extended and then stops, hundreds of times higher than it began. Fluids

The stretch a chain cannot outrun

A Newtonian liquid pulled into a thread resists exactly three times as hard as it resists being sheared, whatever it is made of. A polymer solution resists three times as hard only until the stretch rate passes one over twice its relaxation time. Past that, its chains can no longer recoil as fast as they are pulled apart, and the same liquid that is barely thicker than water in a stirred beaker becomes hundreds of times stiffer in a thread.

 The floor a state's survival cannot go below. The probability that a quantum state is still found in its initial state, against time measured as its energy spread times time over ħ, for four states with the same spread. The shaded region under cos²(ΔE t/ħ) is forbidden by Mandelstam and Tamm's theorem, and every curve — each a sum of phases over the state's energies — stays out of it. Two equally weighted levels run along its edge and reach an orthogonal state at exactly π/2, the fastest any state with this spread can. The same two levels driven off resonance, with the same spread, never get further than a survival of 0.500. Three equally spaced levels become orthogonal only at 1.7101, 1.0887 times the limit, and a coherent state never does, bottoming out at 0.0183. A spread of energy is permission to change, not an obligation. Quantum

The fastest a state can stop being itself

Time has no operator, so the energy–time relation cannot be the commutator inequality it resembles. What stands in its place is sharper: a state whose energy is spread by ΔE cannot become a different, orthogonal state in less than πħ/2ΔE, and cannot do it faster than its mean energy above the ground state allows either. Two equally weighted levels reach both limits exactly. Nothing else does.

 How close a network gets to a load that stores charge. The fraction of a wave's amplitude reflected from a resistance shunted by a capacitance, with RCωc = 2, against frequency in units of the band edge ωc, for the load alone and for networks of inductors and capacitors whose values, with an ideal transformer at the source, were optimised numerically to keep the reflection low across the band. The bare load holds it to 0.707 across the band; the 1-element network holds it to 0.392 across the band; the 2-element network holds it to 0.320 across the band; the 3-element network holds it to 0.289 across the band. The dashed line is Bode and Fano's floor, exp(−π/RCωc) = 0.208, which no network of any size can go beneath over the whole band; each added element brings the design closer to it, and each buys its flatter band with a reflection that climbs to total just beyond the band edge. Waves

The mismatch no network can remove

A quarter-wave layer or a taper can match a resistance to a resistance as well as anyone likes. Put a capacitance across the load and that stops being true for every network that could ever be built from lossless parts: Bode and Fano proved that the total amount of match available is fixed by the load's resistance and capacitance, so a network can only move it about — and a flat match across a band can never be better than e to the minus π over the load's time constant times the band.

 One slit, four distances, one multiplication. The intensity across the beam behind a slit 5 wavelengths wide, at distances of 0.5, 5, 25, 100 wavelengths, each computed by multiplying the slit's plane-wave spectrum by the phase each wave accumulates and transforming back — no approximation about angles. Close to the slit the pattern is the slit's own shape with ripples at its edges; further out the ripples move inwards and the beam develops a bright centre; far away it spreads into the diffraction pattern. The travelling part of the field keeps its power to 10⁻¹⁰, running it back 100 wavelengths recovers it to 5 × 10⁻¹⁴, and at 100 wavelengths the result matches a direct Fresnel integral to 2.75 per cent rms. Near field and far field are not two theories; they are one multiplication at different distances. Waves

The fan of plane waves inside every beam

Huygens added up wavelets from every point of a front. The same content can be written as a sum over plane waves travelling in every direction, and then propagation stops being an integral and becomes a multiplication: each plane wave picks up a phase in proportion to the distance. One square root in that phase holds all of diffraction, near field and far field alike — and when the square root turns imaginary, it holds the reason no instrument a wavelength away can see detail finer than half a wavelength.

 The interaction that orders a magnet is not the magnetic one. For six ordered magnets, two temperatures on a logarithmic scale: the energy of the magnetic interaction between two neighbouring moments, expressed as a temperature, and the temperature at which the material actually orders. iron orders at 1043 K against a dipolar scale of 0.201 K, a factor of 5182; cobalt orders at 1394 K against a dipolar scale of 0.117 K, a factor of 11961; nickel orders at 627 K against a dipolar scale of 0.015 K, a factor of 42312; gadolinium orders at 293 K against a dipolar scale of 0.790 K, a factor of 371; europium oxide orders at 69 K against a dipolar scale of 0.615 K, a factor of 112; lithium holmium fluoride orders at 1.53 K against a dipolar scale of 1.230 K, a factor of 1.24. The five ferromagnets order between a hundred and forty thousand times above the only interaction their moments have with each other, so whatever aligns them is not magnetism. The sixth is the control: lithium holmium fluoride is a magnet whose ordering really is dipolar, and its two temperatures agree. Electromagnetism

What holds a magnet together is not magnetism

Two neighbouring moments in iron interact magnetically with an energy worth a fifth of a kelvin, and iron keeps its order to 1,043 kelvin. Whatever aligns them is five thousand times stronger than the only force they exert on one another — and it is electrostatic, with the exclusion principle deciding which of two spatial arrangements two electrons may use.

 Four tolerances, four elastic answers, one collapse load. The force in each of a table's four legs against the load on it, for four different manufacturing errors, with the legs made of a material that yields at 25 kilonewtons. While everything is elastic the short diagonal pair takes more than its share by a fixed amount that depends on the error and not at all on the load, so the load at which the first leg reaches its capacity runs from 25 to 100 kilonewtons — a spread of more than a factor of three. Past that point the yielded legs hold a constant force and the others take the rest, and the difference the tolerance made is erased. Every one of the four cases collapses at 100 kilonewtons, which is four times one leg's capacity, checked here to a part in a million across the four. The quantity nobody could compute and the quantity that decides whether the structure stands are not the same quantity. Mechanics

The one number the tolerances cannot touch

A redundant structure's load sharing depends on stiffnesses and manufacturing errors that nobody knows. Its collapse load does not depend on either. Once members yield they hold a known force instead of a force proportional to a displacement, the compatibility equations that needed the unknowns drop out, and the load at which the structure becomes a mechanism follows from a work balance with no stiffness in it at all.

 Two temperatures for the same sunlight. Sunlight described two ways, against how much it has been concentrated. The flat line is the temperature its spectrum belongs to — 5,762 K, the Sun's surface, which concentration does not change because a mirror does not alter a photon's energy. The rising curve is the temperature a blackbody would need in order to radiate the flux actually arriving: 394 K unconcentrated, 2213 K under a parabolic dish, and 5771 K at the geometric limit, where the two meet — computed here and checked against the Sun's own temperature, because a perfect concentrator reproduces the source's radiance and cannot exceed it. The gap between the two curves is the dilution, and dilution is entropy: the same energy spread over a hundred thousand times more directions occupies a hundred thousand times more modes. That is what a converter has to carry, and it is why the ceiling on solar conversion is not the Carnot efficiency between 5,762 K and 300 K. Optics

The work a diluted beam will not do

Sunlight at the top of the atmosphere has the spectrum of a body at 5,762 kelvin and the energy flux of one at 394. The mismatch is not an accident of units: the light has been spread over a hundred thousand times more modes than it left in, and that dilution is entropy. Run it through a heat engine unconcentrated and five per cent of it is available as work.

 The condition three modes never quite satisfy. By how much three modes of a thirty-two mass chain fail to be in resonance — the sum of two mode frequencies minus the frequency of their sum, on a logarithmic scale, against the second of the two modes for four choices of the first. The leading nonlinear term couples modes in threes and the exchange accumulates only where this quantity is zero. It never is: the chain's dispersion is a sine, a sine is concave, and the sum of two of its values always exceeds the value at their sum. The smallest mismatch anywhere on the chain is at the two lowest modes and equals 2.156e-4 — which the scan finds and which is the cube of pi over four times the cube of one more than the mode count, checked here on chains from eight masses to two hundred and fifty-six. That closed form is the whole of why this is a finite-chain problem: the mismatch falls as the cube of the length, so a long enough chain is arbitrarily close to resonant and the continuum limit is exactly resonant, which is where the solitary waves come from. Thermodynamics

The condition three modes never meet

Whether two modes of a chain can hand energy to a third is arithmetic on the dispersion relation, and for a chain of masses the answer is never: a sine is concave, so the sum of two frequencies always exceeds the frequency of their sum. The smallest shortfall anywhere on a chain of N masses is π³/4(N+1)³ — never zero, and never far from it — and a shortfall turns a transfer into a beat.

 The one prediction the Planck scale makes. The energy density the vacuum should have, from summing the zero-point energy of a field's modes up to a cutoff, against where that cutoff is put — thirty decades of cutoff energy and a hundred and thirty of density, both logarithmic. The horizontal line is what is measured: 5.34e-10 joules per cubic metre, the dark energy that accounts for sixty-nine per cent of the universe. Cutting the sum off at the Planck energy — which is where dimensional analysis says every description available runs out — overshoots it by 10^121. That is the largest disagreement between an estimate and a measurement anywhere in physics, and the slope of the line is why it cannot be argued away: the density goes as the fourth power of the cutoff, so cutting off at the electroweak scale still overshoots by 10^54 and cutting off at one electronvolt — below which no physics is in doubt at all — still overshoots by 10^8. The cutoff that would give the right answer is 8.0e-3 electronvolts, which is a wavelength of about a tenth of a millimetre and corresponds to no known physics whatever. Astrophysics

The estimate that misses by a hundred and twenty

Every argument about the Planck scale is an argument about consistency rather than about data, with one exception. The zero-point energy of the quantum fields gravitates, dimensional analysis at the Planck cutoff says how much, and what is measured is 10¹²¹ times smaller. It is the largest disagreement between an estimate and a measurement anywhere in physics, and lowering the cutoff does not rescue it.

 How large the hidden dimensions would have to be. The size extra dimensions would need, for gravity's true scale to be at a TeV rather than at 10¹⁹ GeV, against how many of them there are — a logarithmic axis of metres, for three choices of the true scale. The relation is the one that makes the arrangement work: the Planck mass observed in four dimensions is M_*^(2+n)Rⁿ, so gravity is weak because its field spreads into a volume nothing else can enter. Solved for R at a true scale of a TeV: 1 dimension needs 2.9e+13 m, 2 dimensions needs 2.4e-3 m, 3 dimensions needs 1.0e-8 m, 4 dimensions needs 2.2e-11 m, 5 dimensions needs 5.4e-13 m, 6 dimensions needs 4.5e-14 m. The two horizontal lines are where experiment has been. One extra dimension would have to be of order a hundred astronomical units, which would have wrecked the orbits of the planets and is excluded absolutely. Two would have to be of order a millimetre — which is what made the arrangement famous, because a millimetre is a distance a laboratory can test, and torsion balances have since verified the inverse-square law down to fifty-two micrometres and excluded it. Three or more sit below a nanometre, where no gravitational measurement reaches, and are untouched. Astrophysics

The scale that may not be where it looks

Every Planck number assumes gravity is four-dimensional all the way down. If it is not — if the field spreads into dimensions compact enough to have escaped notice — the true scale where gravity becomes strong could be at a TeV, and the whole remoteness of the Planck scale would be an artefact of where the field lines go. It is the one part of the subject an experiment can address, and the experiments have addressed it.

 How far the vacuum is from being a nonlinear medium. The size of the vacuum's departure from linearity, as a fraction, against the electric field it is subjected to — thirteen decades of field and twenty-eight of correction, both logarithmic. The scale is the Schwinger field, computed here from the electron's mass and the fundamental constants as 1.32e+18 volts per metre: the field at which a pair gains its own rest energy over a Compton wavelength, and therefore the field at which the vacuum stops being a passive backdrop. The marks are the strongest fields that exist. a laboratory magnet, 10 T is 2.3e-9 of it; a hydrogen atom's own field is 3.9e-7 of it; a 10²² W/cm² laser focus is 2.1e-4 of it; the Schwinger field is 1.0e+0 of it; a magnetar, 10¹¹ T is 2.3e+1 of it. So a laboratory is twenty-eight decades from making the effect large, and a magnetar's field is above the critical one — which is why the only places the vacuum's nonlinearity has been seen are the two where the fields are not human: the ultraperipheral collision of two heavy nuclei, and the surface of a neutron star. Waves

The one medium that was supposed to add exactly

Superposition holds because an equation is linear, and every material stops being linear at some amplitude. Empty space was the exception: Maxwell's equations are linear exactly, and two beams cross with no interaction of any kind. Quantum electrodynamics says otherwise — light scatters light, and a strong field makes the vacuum birefringent — at a field of 1.3 × 10¹⁸ volts per metre, which no laboratory has come within four decades of.

 The edge that is a straight line, not a step. The absorption of gallium arsenide near its own band gap of 1.424 electronvolts, on a logarithmic axis, at 4 temperatures. Below the gap the absorption does not stop; it falls exponentially, along a straight line whose slope is an energy, and the straightness holds over several decades. Raising the temperature makes the line shallower — the tail reaches further below the gap — and the slope runs from 5.6 millielectronvolts at 10 kelvin to 7.5 at 300, a factor of 1.33. The lines pivot about a point just above the gap rather than rotating about nothing, which is what makes the slope a single number worth quoting. The band gap's own shift with temperature has been removed here, so that the fan is the tail's doing and not the gap's. Waves

Below the gap, where there is nothing to absorb

A semiconductor is supposed to be transparent below its band gap, and it is not. The absorption falls exponentially instead, over seven decades, along a straight line whose slope is an energy of a few millielectronvolts — and the description that produces that line has no states in the gap at all. What the slope measures is how much the gap itself is moving about.

 The pressure at which an oil becomes a glass. Viscosity against pressure for 4 liquids on a logarithmic axis, from Barus's rule with the pressure coefficient each one actually has. The rule is an exponential, so a gigapascal multiplies an ordinary oil's viscosity by a hundred million or more, and the curves cross the line conventionally taken to mark a glass — a million million pascal-seconds — at 1.37 GPa for a mineral oil, 0.98 GPa for a traction fluid. The vertical line is the peak pressure inside the loaded contact this figure is about, 1.32 gigapascals, computed from the Hertz solution for that geometry and load. Water is drawn for contrast: its pressure coefficient is thirty times smaller, it never approaches a glass over this range, and that is why it is useless as a lubricant in a rolling contact however clean it is. Each curve is drawn solid up to the glass line and dashed above it, because past that point the material is not a liquid and its viscosity is not what decides how it shears — the exponential continues, and the substance it was written for does not. Fluids

The oil that is a glass for a quarter of a millisecond

Every other account of viscosity here varies the temperature. Pressure does something larger and in the same direction for every liquid: viscosity rises exponentially, by a factor of ten to the eight or more at the gigapascal inside a loaded gear tooth. That is not a curiosity — it is the only reason there is a film there at all. Remove the pressure dependence from the calculation and the predicted film is five nanometres, under the roughness, and the surfaces touch.

 14 decades of fluid, and a floor none of them reaches. The ratio of viscosity to entropy density for 8 substances, in units of the proposed lower bound, on a logarithmic axis. The quantity is a viscosity divided by how much entropy a cubic metre of the substance holds, and it has the dimensions of Planck's constant over Boltzmann's — so a bound on it is a statement with no material properties in it at all. The span here is a factor of 1.6e+14, from pitch at 20 °C at the top to the quark–gluon plasma at the bottom, which sits a factor of 1.6 above the floor. The values marked as computed are worked out from a viscosity and a tabulated entropy; the rest are quoted from the compilations, because a minimum along an isobar is an inference from many measurements rather than a single one. Fluids

Whether a fluid can be made arbitrarily thin

Viscosity has no units anybody would call fundamental, and nothing obviously stops it being as small as you like. Divide it by the entropy in a cubic metre and the units become Planck's constant over Boltzmann's — and a conjecture from 2005 says that ratio has a floor. Across fourteen decades of ordinary fluid nothing has been measured below it, the closest thing to it is the hottest matter ever made, and a kinetic-theory argument reaches the same number from the opposite direction.

 The ring does not come back. A ring of freely floating masses at four phases of a passing gravitational wave and once after it has gone. The first four are the familiar picture: stretched one way, then the other, with the area unchanged. The fifth is the one the standard picture does not draw — the ring is permanently deformed, by 25 per cent of the largest deformation the wave itself produced, and nothing brings it back. The masses are not oscillating about a new centre; they are at rest, at new separations. Both the oscillation and the offset are exaggerated enormously: the real strain at 440 megaparsecs is 9.9e-22 and the real permanent offset is 2.5e-22, so the drawing magnifies both by about 2e+20. What is honest in the picture is the ratio between them. Astrophysics

The ring that does not come back

Every picture of a passing gravitational wave shows a ring of free masses stretched, squeezed and let go. The last frame is wrong. The ring ends a different shape — permanently, with the masses at rest at new separations — by about a fifth of the largest distortion the wave itself produced. What sources the offset is the energy the wave carried away, so the wave is remembering itself, and nobody has measured it.

 The peak that is lost to a fraction of a wave. The height of the central peak, relative to a perfect pupil of the same size, against the root-mean-square error of the wavefront in waves, for four kinds of error — each computed from the transform and each normalised to the same rms. The dashed curve is the usual approximation, the exponential of minus the square of two pi times the error. What the figure shows is that to a good approximation it does not matter WHAT the error is, only how large it is in the mean square: four quite different shapes of wavefront give nearly the same peak. A fourteenth of a wave leaves 80 per cent of the peak, which is the conventional definition of diffraction-limited, and it corresponds to a quarter of a wave peak-to-valley for a simple defocus — which is where Rayleigh's quarter-wave rule comes from and why it is a convention laid over a computed number rather than a threshold in the physics. Optics

How accurate a mirror has to be

The pupil's amplitude decides the rings; its phase decides the peak. A wavefront error of a fourteenth of a wave root-mean-square leaves eighty per cent of the peak intensity, which is the whole of what 'diffraction-limited' means — a convention laid over a computed number. And the number barely depends on what the error is, only on how large: four quite different aberrations of the same magnitude give nearly the same answer.

 No beam is narrow enough and wide enough at once. Three lengths at the far end of a Stern-Gerlach magnet 10 centimetres long with a gradient of 1000 tesla a metre, against the width of the beam entering it, for an electron at 100 electronvolts. The spin splitting is a horizontal line at 2.9e-6 metres: it does not depend on the beam's width. The Lorentz blurring rises in proportion to the width, because the field a particle sees depends on where in the beam it is, and the divergence-free condition ties a gradient in one component to a gradient in another. It overtakes the splitting at 1.0e-9 metres. Narrower than that and diffraction has already spread the beam by 3.9e-3 metres, which is larger still. There is no width at which the splitting is the largest of the three, and the magnet's length and gradient cancel out of the comparison entirely — so no magnet helps. Quantum

The experiment that defines spin and cannot be done on it

A Stern–Gerlach magnet separates magnetic moments and is how spin was discovered. It cannot be made to work on a free electron, and the obstruction is not the apparatus: the field gradient that splits the beam also deflects the charge by an amount that varies across it, and the ratio of the splitting to that blurring comes out as the de Broglie wavelength over the beam width — with the magnet's length and gradient cancelling exactly.

 One dimensionless group between an engine and Carnot. The efficiency of a thermoelectric couple against the temperature of its hot side, with the cold side at 300 kelvin, for 4 values of the figure of merit, and the Carnot ceiling drawn above them. The expression has exactly one material quantity in it — the dimensionless group formed from the Seebeck coefficient squared, the electrical conductivity, the temperature and the thermal conductivity — and everything else is the two temperatures. At 600 kelvin, a figure of merit of one gives 10.8 per cent against a Carnot ceiling of 50.0, and a figure of merit of four gives 22.6. The approach to the ceiling is slow: every doubling of the group buys less than the last, so the difference between a good material and a perfect one is smaller than the difference between a poor material and a good one. Thermodynamics

An engine with one number in it

A thermoelectric couple has no moving part and no working fluid, and its efficiency is the Carnot value multiplied by a factor containing exactly one dimensionless group of material properties. Sixty years of effort have moved that group from about one to about two, and the reason it is hard is that its three ingredients are not independent: raising the conductivity ruins the coefficient it is squared against, and the only lever that is really free is the heat the lattice carries.

 A blackbody in every direction, at a different temperature in each. The spectrum of a blackbody at 100 kelvin in its own frame, seen by an observer it is moving past at 0.5 of the speed of light, in 5 directions. Each curve is a Planck spectrum exactly — the Planck form survives a Doppler shift, with the temperature multiplied by the shift — and the temperatures run from 57.74 kelvin looking one way to 173.21 looking the other. So the body is a perfect blackbody in each direction and has no single temperature. A thermometer placed in the radiation reads something between, and what it reads depends on where it is put and on how much of the sky it sees — which is the reason a transformation law for temperature was argued about for sixty years without being found. Relativity

The body that has no temperature when it moves

Energy, momentum, length, duration and field strength all change when the observer moves. Temperature was argued about for sixty years, with three transformation laws proposed and each defended by people making no mistake. The resolution is that a moving blackbody is a perfect blackbody in every direction at a different temperature in each — so a thermometer's reading depends on where it is put, and the quantity the law was for is not there.

 The launches that go in, and one thrower's scatter over them. Every free throw as a point: launch angle across, launch speed up. The dark curve is the launches that put the ball's centre through the centre of the hoop, lowest at the least-speed launch, 51.4° and 7.17 m/s. The shaded band is every launch that passes cleanly through, found at each angle by moving the speed until the ball touches the rim. It does not exist below 46.9°, is a hair thick near the bottom of the curve, and thickens as the launches steepen. The two ellipses are one thrower who scatters ±0.05 m/s in speed and ±1° in angle, drawn at two standard deviations and centred on two aims: the least-speed launch, and 58.5°, the aim that makes a clean pass most likely for that thrower. At the first, the ellipse lies across a band far thinner than itself; at the second, more of it lies inside, although the band there slopes more steeply. Mechanics

The throw most likely to go in

A free throw can be launched at 51.4° with less speed than at any other angle, and there a small error of angle hardly moves the ball at all. It is still not the best aim. Once the question is which throw most often goes in rather than which is cheapest, the thrower's scatter has to be laid over the launches that succeed — and for a hoop the answer moves steeper, while for a board the same scatter moves it flatter.

 The paths in space: orbits of one period, and a throw straight up. The same free falls drawn in space around the Earth, which is the filled disc. All start at the marked point 2 Earth radii from the centre. The circle is the circular orbit. The ellipses, of eccentricity 0.2 and 0.4, have the same period, so they come back to the start at the same moment. The straight line is the thrown clock's path: straight up to 4.46 Earth radii and back down the same line, arriving as the orbits complete one revolution. The Earth's rotation is ignored and it is treated as a point mass for the paths that pass close to it. Relativity

The orbit that ages less than a throw

A clock in orbit and a clock thrown straight up leave the same point at the same moment and meet there again one period later. Both fall freely the whole way, so both follow paths of stationary proper time — and the thrown clock comes back 4.1 microseconds older. Even a clock held still by a rocket, which is not falling at all, beats the orbit. Free fall picks out a path that is stationary, not one that is longest.

 Four states of light, each with the same area of noise. The field of a single mode of light drawn as a point in a plane whose two axes are its two quadratures — the parts of the wave in step with a reference and a quarter-cycle out of step. The distance from the centre is the amplitude and the angle is the phase. Each state is a cloud of 400 sampled measurements with its two-standard-deviation outline, in units where the vacuum's noise is one in every direction. The vacuum is a round cloud at the centre. Steady laser light is the same round cloud moved away from the centre. Light squeezed by 4 dB is an ellipse of the same area: narrower than the vacuum by a factor of 0.63 in one direction and wider by 1.58 in the other. Pointed along the direction from the centre it is quiet in amplitude; pointed across it, quiet in phase. The sampled spreads were checked against each state's widths. Quantum

The noise pushed below the floor

A perfectly steady laser beam still flickers, by an amount set by the vacuum itself, and for most of the twentieth century that flicker was treated as the floor of any optical measurement. It is a floor only for one shape of noise. Light can be made quieter than the vacuum in one property by being made louder in another — and the price, the fragility and the use of that trade are all visible in how the noise is shaped, which is why the world's gravitational-wave detectors now run on it.

 Three bodies of one mass, one field outside, three fields inside. The gravitational field against distance from the centre, both in units of the body's surface values, for 3 spherical bodies of the same mass and radius: a uniform ball; a dense core under a light mantle; a hollow shell. Outside the surface the three curves are one curve — checked at 1.7 radii by adding up the pull of every mass element in each body, which agrees with the pull of a point of the same mass to better than a part in five hundred. Inside they part: the uniform ball's field falls in a straight line, the layered body's rises to 1.24 times the surface value at the top of its core, and the hollow shell's is zero throughout its cavity. Their moment-of-inertia factors are 0.400 (uniform ball), 0.330 (dense core under a light mantle), 0.551 (hollow shell) — a number that no measurement of the field outside can supply. Electromagnetism

The field outside that cannot find the core

Gauss's law gives the field outside a body from what it encloses, and read backwards it is a limit. A uniform ball, a planet with an iron core and a hollow shell of the same mass have identical gravity everywhere outside. The field fixes a list of numbers — the mass, the flattening, higher moments — and leaves free everything else, including the moment of inertia; the Earth's core was weighed by its wobble, not by its pull.

 A rosette: the orbit of a body whose inertia is its energy. An orbit of eccentricity 0.45 under inertia from energy, Newton's pull, integrated for 7 revolutions from the closest approach of a body with k/Lc = 0.35. The dashed curve is the Newtonian ellipse from the same starting position and momentum, which closes on itself. The integrated orbit does not: its closest approach moves forward by 24.3° each revolution, against the exact 24.3° of 2π(1/Γ − 1) with Γ = √(1 − k²/L²c²). The dots are the successive closest approaches. Astrophysics

The orbit special relativity cannot close

An inverse-square orbit closes on itself because of a conserved vector that nothing else has. Give the orbiting body an inertia that grows with its speed, as special relativity requires, and the vector turns — the orbit becomes a rosette, advancing by a sixth of Mercury's famous 43 arcseconds a century. A different theory that respects special relativity just as well turns the rosette backwards by the same amount. The 43 is not special relativity plus a correction; it is a measurement of what gravity pulls on.

 The innermost electron of an atom with Z = 79, with and without relativity. The probability of finding the innermost electron at each distance from a nucleus of charge 79 (Au), with the distance in units of a₀/Z so that the non-relativistic curve is the same for every element. The dashed curve is Schrödinger's, r² e^(−2Zr/a₀). The solid curve is Dirac's exact ground state, r^(2γ) e^(−2Zr/a₀) with γ = √(1 − (Zα)²) = 0.817. It is pulled in towards the nucleus: its mean radius is 0.878 of Schrödinger's, a contraction of 12 per cent, and it has a sharper peak close in. Nothing about the nucleus has changed; the electron, moving at an appreciable fraction of the speed of light near it, simply behaves as a heavier particle, and a heavier particle is bound more tightly and more closely. Quantum

The metal that is yellow because it is heavy

Gold sits directly below silver in the periodic table, with the same arrangement of outer electrons, and by every non-relativistic calculation it should look like silver. It is yellow because its innermost electrons move at more than half the speed of light. The mass that motion adds pulls the s orbitals in, the tightened s level drops towards the d band beneath it, and the gap an absorbed photon must bridge shrinks from the ultraviolet into the blue. The same contraction is why mercury is a liquid.

 Helium's excitations, and the line that decides how fast it can flow. The energy of an elementary excitation in superfluid helium-4 against its momentum, as a smooth fit through published neutron-scattering values: a phonon branch rising at the speed of sound, 238 m/s, a maximum near 13.9 K, and the roton minimum of 8.62 K at 1.92 Å⁻¹. A straight line from the origin has a slope that is a velocity. The steepest line that just touches the spectrum is Landau's critical velocity, 57 m/s, and it touches at 1.98 Å⁻¹, just past the roton minimum. A body moving slower than that cannot make any excitation at all and so cannot lose energy to the liquid; the dashed line is the speed of sound, far above it. Quantum

The speed below which nothing can be made

An object moving through an ordinary liquid always feels drag, because it can always pass some of its energy to the liquid. In a superfluid there may be nothing it can pass it to. Landau's argument turns the question into geometry: an excitation of momentum p and energy ε can be made only by a body moving faster than ε/p, so a liquid flows without friction below the smallest value of that ratio. For helium the smallest value is not the speed of sound but 57 m/s, set by the dip in its spectrum called the roton — and an ideal gas, with no dip and no sound, has no such speed at all.

 A field that oscillates faster than any of its components. The oscillation of (cos x + i·2·sin x) to the power 10 over half a period, with its changing size divided out so that only the turning of its phase shows, beside the fastest wave it contains, cos 10x (dashed). Multiplied out, the function is a sum of waves e^(inx) with n running from −10 to 10 and no further. Yet in the shaded window, |x| < 0.62, it oscillates faster than cos 10x — near the origin like cos 20x, 2 times faster — completing 3.0 cycles there where its fastest component completes 2.0. Outside the window it slows down, and the next figure shows what happens to its size there. Waves

The wiggle faster than any wave in it

Light passing through a lens carries no detail finer than half a wavelength, because no travelling wave in it varies faster than that. It would seem to follow that the light itself cannot vary faster anywhere. It can. A sum of slow waves can be arranged to wiggle faster than any of them over a stretch of any length chosen — and to focus to a spot as narrow as wanted — provided the stretch sits between side lobes that grow exponentially with every extra wiggle.

 Where a moving charge keeps its field's energy and its momentum. Left: the density of field energy and of field momentum around a charged shell moving slowly to the right, by direction, each drawn as the mass per unit volume it contributes — energy density over c², momentum density over velocity. The energy density is the same in every direction; the momentum density goes as sin²θ, zero ahead and behind and largest broadside, because it is ε₀E × B and the magnetic field of a moving charge vanishes along its line of motion. Broadside it is twice the energy's; averaged over all directions sin²θ is 0.6667, and twice that is the 4/3. Right: the fraction of the field's energy, and of its momentum, lying within a distance r of the centre of a shell of radius a. Both are 1 − a/r, because both densities fall as the fourth power of distance: half of each lies within 2a and nine-tenths within 10a. Electromagnetism

The mass a charge's field gets wrong by a third

Give a charged sphere's field its energy U and divide by c², and the field has a mass. Move the sphere and ask the field's momentum what the mass is, and it says four-thirds of that. The discrepancy took from 1881 to the 1960s to understand, and the answer is not a better calculation of the field. It is that a charge cannot hold itself together, and whatever does has energy too.

 A strong oscillator lifts a picowatt to the quantum limit. The signal-to-noise ratio for detecting a 1 pW signal at 1.55 µm in a 1 MHz bandwidth, with a detector of 80 per cent quantum efficiency whose amplifier adds 2 pA/√Hz of noise, against the power of the local oscillator. Detected directly, the signal is 66 dB below the amplifier's noise. Heterodyned, it rises with the oscillator's power — −3.3 dB with a microwatt, 7.4 dB with a hundred — until the oscillator's own shot noise swamps the amplifier's, above about 12 µW, and then it stops rising at 8.0 dB: ηPₛ/(hνB), the number of detected signal photons per resolution time, which no receiver can beat. A stronger oscillator raises the signal and its own noise together. Optics

The faint light a bright one makes measurable

A photodetector does not respond to a light wave's field; it responds to the square of it. Shine a strong beam onto the detector together with a weak one at a slightly different frequency, and the square contains a term that is the weak field multiplied by the strong one — oscillating at the difference frequency, carrying the weak light's phase, and as large as the strong beam cares to make it. That product lifts a picowatt out of an amplifier's noise to the limit set by counting photons, turns an optical frequency shift into a radio one, and carries with it a quantum price that decides why radio telescopes and optical telescopes are built so differently.

 The stiffness that falls below four-thirds. The first adiabatic exponent Γ₁ — how steeply pressure rises when a gas is squeezed without heat escaping — of hot oxygen with its radiation and its equilibrium electron–positron pairs, against temperature, at densities of 10³, 10⁴, 10⁵, 10⁶ g/cm³. At 10³ g/cm³ its least value is 1.222, near 1.2 billion kelvin; at 10⁴ g/cm³ its least value is 1.235, near 1.3 billion kelvin; at 10⁵ g/cm³ its least value is 1.285, near 1.8 billion kelvin; at 10⁶ g/cm³ its least value is 1.339, near 3.1 billion kelvin. A star can hold itself up only if its core's Γ₁ averages above 4/3, the value for a gas of light alone; a core that dips below it has no stable size, and the pair production that pulls it below is strongest where the gas is hot and thin — the cores of the most massive stars. Relativity

The heat that turns into matter

Thermodynamics counts particles and relativity lets them be made. Heat a gas to a billion kelvin and its light carries enough energy to create electrons and positrons, which the gas then holds in equilibrium like any other ingredient. The heat spent making them raises neither the temperature nor the pressure, so the gas grows soft — softer, in the cores of the most massive stars, than a star can survive. Those stars collapse, ignite their oxygen all at once and blow themselves entirely apart; and the same pairs, vanishing a few seconds after the Big Bang, left the universe's light hotter than its neutrinos by a factor that is the cube root of eleven over four.

 A temperature the circuit refuses to go below. The escape temperature — the temperature that would give the measured escape rate if escape were purely thermal — against the actual temperature of the junction, for a 10 µA, 5 pF junction at biases of 0.985 and 0.99 of its critical current. Hot, the two are equal: the phase is kicked over the barrier by thermal noise. Cooled below the crossover, 39 mK at 0.985 and 36 mK at 0.99, the escape temperature stops falling and levels off at 42 mK and 44 mK: the rate no longer depends on the temperature at all. This levelling-off, measured by Michel Devoret, John Martinis and John Clarke in 1985 with the junction's electrical environment carefully characterised, was the evidence that a macroscopic electrical variable tunnels. Quantum

The circuit that goes through a wall

Tunnelling is usually told about electrons and alpha particles — single, small, quantum things passing through barriers they cannot climb. In 1985 it was seen in an electrical circuit: the phase difference across a Josephson junction, a coordinate shared by all the electrons in two pieces of superconducting metal, trapped in a well and escaping from it through the barrier rather than over it. The evidence was a temperature below which the circuit's escape rate stopped caring how cold it was. The same circuit showed discrete energy levels, and its descendants are the qubits of superconducting quantum computers.

 Too small blurs by diffraction, too large by shadow. The size of the image of a distant point through a pinhole 100 mm from the screen, in 550 nm light, against the hole's diameter, both on logarithmic axes. The dashed lines are the two simple estimates: the hole's own shadow, as wide as the hole, and the diffraction spread, 2.44λf/d. The dots are the diameter holding half the light, computed from the Fresnel diffraction integral. They follow the shadow for large holes and the diffraction for small ones, and are least — 0.207 mm — for a hole 0.336 mm across, where the simple sum of the two estimates puts its minimum at 0.366 mm. At the best hole the Fresnel number d²/4λf is 0.51: the sharpest hole, judged by where half the light lands, lets through about half of the first Fresnel zone. Optics

The hole that makes the sharpest picture

A pinhole camera makes a picture without bending any light: a small hole lets through, from each point of the scene, only the rays that reach one small patch of the screen. A smaller hole makes a sharper picture — until it does not. Below a certain size the hole spreads light by diffraction faster than it narrows the shadow, and the picture blurs again. The best hole balances the two, and at that balance it turns out to pass about half of the first Fresnel zone of the incoming wave: the sharpest pinhole is already beginning to behave like a lens.

 Each wavelength sees from a different height. The weighting functions of 7 infrared channels in a carbon-dioxide band — how much each height contributes to the radiance a satellite measures in that channel — for absorption strengths chosen so that the peaks sit at 3, 8, 14, 20, 27, 35, 43 km. Each is scaled to its own maximum. A channel's peak is where the carbon dioxide above that height amounts to one optical depth: deeper, its emission is absorbed on the way out; higher, there is too little gas to emit. Each function is about 17 km wide at half its peak, the same for every channel, because the absorber's density falls with one scale height, 7 km. The dotted curve is the temperature profile of the standard atmosphere, on its own scale from 180 to 300 K, whose cold tropopause and warm stratosphere the channels between them straddle. Quantum

The spectrum that is a thermometer at every height

A satellite looking down at the Earth in the infrared sees, at each wavelength, the glow of whatever layer of air that wavelength escapes from. In the wings of carbon dioxide's great absorption band the air is transparent and the satellite sees the ground; towards the band's centre the gas grows opaque and each wavelength escapes from higher up. A single spectrum is therefore a stack of thermometers at different heights, and weather forecasts are built on reading it. What cannot be read from it is anything much thinner than the ten to twenty kilometres of air each of those thermometers averages over.

 Hydrogen ionised by heat at one end and by crowding at the other. The ionised fraction of hydrogen against the density of nuclei, at 5,000 K, 10,000 K, 20,000 K, from Saha's equation with the binding energy lowered by the neighbouring charges (solid) and without the lowering (dashed). Thin gas is ionised by the room a free electron gains; compression takes the room away and the gas recombines, as the dashed curves continue to do for ever. The solid curves turn round: at 5,000 K the gas is least ionised, 2.5·10⁻⁴ per cent, near 10²⁶ per cubic metre; at 10,000 K the gas is least ionised, 0.41 per cent, near 10²⁷ per cubic metre; at 20,000 K the gas is least ionised, 12 per cent, near 10²⁸ per cubic metre, and by 6·10²⁸ per cubic metre — 0.10 g/cm³ — every curve is fully ionised, because the ground state no longer exists. That density does not depend on the temperature at all. Thermodynamics

The pressure that ionises

Squeeze a hot gas of hydrogen and Saha's equation says it recombines: a free electron has less room to be in, and room was what paid for its freedom. Squeeze it far enough and it comes apart again, completely, at any temperature — not because the room has grown but because the atom has nowhere left to be. Crowded to within a few atomic radii of each other, hydrogen atoms have no bound state, and their electrons, freed by pressure alone, form a metal. Deep inside Jupiter most of the planet's hydrogen is in that state.

 Echoes from a layer that thins to nothing. Synthetic seismic echoes from a layer between two identical rocks — the top reflecting +R, the base −R — for thicknesses of 0, 5, 10, 15, 20, 25, 30, 40, 50, 60, 75, 100 m, sounded with a 30 Hz pulse in rock of 3000 m/s, whose wavelength in the layer is 100 m. Time runs downward; each trace is one thickness. Thick, the layer gives two separate echoes, one from each face, and its thickness can be read from the time between them. As it thins the two echoes overlap and merge. Near 20 m, about a fifth of a wavelength, they interfere constructively and the combined echo is strongest, 1.45 times one face's echo. Thinner still, the combined echo keeps a fixed shape — the pulse's derivative — and simply weakens in proportion to the thickness; nothing in its timing changes. Waves

The layer too thin to see

A seismic survey sends a pulse of sound into the ground and listens to the echoes from every boundary where the rock changes. A thick layer returns two echoes, one from its top and one from its base, and the time between them gives its thickness. A thin one returns one echo, and below about a quarter of a wavelength the timing says nothing more: every thin layer looks the same, just weaker as it thins. It has not become invisible. It has become unmeasurable in the one way that was being used, and its thickness has moved into the echo's strength and its spectrum.

 The proton fraction a cold star settles at. The fraction of nucleons that are protons in cold matter in beta equilibrium, where the neutron's chemical potential equals the proton's plus the electron's, against density on logarithmic axes, for free neutrons, protons and electrons with no nuclear forces. Below 1.22·10⁷ g/cm³ the electrons cannot pay the 1.29 MeV difference between a neutron and a proton and the matter is all protons. Above it the fraction collapses, to 0.014 per cent at its lowest near 7.9·10¹¹ g/cm³, and at nuclear density, 2.66·10¹⁴ g/cm³, it is 0.49 per cent. At higher densities it climbs slowly towards one ninth, 11 per cent, which it never reaches. The dashed part lies where real matter is made of nuclei rather than free nucleons. Thermodynamics

The protons a star cannot afford

A free neutron decays in fifteen minutes into a proton, an electron and an antineutrino. Inside a neutron star it cannot, and the star is made of neutrons because of it. Beta decay is a reaction like any other, and at equilibrium the neutron's chemical potential must equal the proton's plus the electron's. In a crowded star an electron can only be added at the top of a sea tens of megaelectronvolts deep. So the matter settles where protons are rare: half a per cent of the nucleons at nuclear density, if nucleons were free, and never more than one in nine at any density.

 The gas that has to stop expanding. The thermal expansion coefficient at constant pressure times the temperature, αT, against temperature over the Fermi temperature, on logarithmic axes, for an ideal classical gas and an ideal gas of spin-half fermions at the same density. For the classical gas αT is exactly one at every temperature, so α = 1/T grows without limit as the gas is cooled, which the third law forbids: by a Maxwell relation α is minus the pressure derivative of the entropy per unit volume, and that must vanish at absolute zero. The Fermi gas agrees with the classical one when hot and departs from it near the Fermi temperature; at a tenth of it αT is 0.048, and at a hundredth 0.002, falling as π²/2 times the square of the temperature over the Fermi temperature. Its expansion vanishes as the law requires. Thermodynamics

The two laws absolute zero will not allow

The ideal-gas law and Curie's law are the first two equations of state most people meet. The third law of thermodynamics says both must be wrong at low temperature, and it says so without any model of what replaces them. A Maxwell relation turns every derivative of the entropy into something measurable with a ruler or a magnetometer: the thermal expansion, the slope of the magnetisation with temperature. If the entropy stops depending on pressure and field at absolute zero, those must vanish. The classical gas expands as 1/T and Curie's magnetisation climbs as 1/T, and both slopes grow without limit instead.

All themes