Illustrated Physics
physics, drawn
Series

Light deflection — the series

8 essays on one idea, from the one that introduces it to the one that assumes the rest.
  1. Two predictions, a factor of two apart. The deflection of light passing a mass, against impact parameter, on logarithmic axes. The lower line is what a Newtonian photon does — it falls while it crosses, and comes out bent by 2GM/bc². The upper line is what a geodesic does in curved spacetime, which is exactly twice that. At the surface of a body of 1.99·10³⁰ kg the two are 0.88″ and 1.75″. Both are straight lines of slope minus one, so the ratio is two everywhere and the measurement is a choice between two theories rather than a fit.

    The bend Newton got half right

    A photon treated as a falling body passes a mass and comes out deflected. So does a photon treated as a straight line in curved spacetime — by exactly twice as much. The factor of two is not a refinement; it is the sharpest available statement that gravity is geometry.

    part 1 · astrophysics
  2. A radar echo past the Sun, delayed by 233 microseconds. The extra time a round-trip radar signal takes when its path passes close to the Sun, against how close, for a reflector 0.723 AU away. Grazing the Sun's limb the delay is 233 microseconds — about 70 kilometres of light travel, on a path of hundreds of millions — and it falls only as the logarithm of the impact parameter, so the effect is still tens of microseconds ten solar radii out. That slow falloff is what makes the measurement possible: the delay can be watched building and fading as the geometry changes, rather than having to be caught at one instant. The dashed curves are the delay the solar corona's plasma adds at three radio frequencies. It is the competing effect, it is larger than the gravitational one close in, and it falls as the square of the frequency while the gravitational delay does not depend on frequency at all — which is how the two are separated, and why the sharpest measurement of this was made with a spacecraft carrying three radio links instead of one.

    The delay that is not a bend

    The same metric that bends a ray also slows it, and the two are different tests. A radar echo from Venus arrives 233 microseconds late when its path grazes the Sun — and half of that delay is accumulated more than twenty solar radii away, in a field thousands of times weaker.

    part 2 · astrophysics
  3. A lens with no focal length. Where a ray crosses the axis, against how far off the axis it passed the deflecting body, for 1 solar mass of radius 1 solar radius. A glass lens deflects a ray by an angle proportional to its distance off axis, which is precisely the condition for every ray to arrive at one point — the flat dashed line. Gravity deflects by 4GM/c²b, which grows smaller further out, so the crossing distance goes as b² and each ray has its own focus. The grazing ray crosses at 548 astronomical units and a ray passing at 12 radii crosses at 78857; the square law is verified on the drawn curve to 1.5e-16. So there is no image plane at all, only a half-line of foci beginning at the first of those and running outward for ever. Anything placed on that line sees not an image but a ring, and moving along it does not refocus anything — it selects which rays are being seen.

    The lens with no focal length

    A glass lens bends a ray by an angle proportional to how far off the axis it passes, which is precisely the condition for every ray to arrive at one point. Gravity bends by an angle that falls with distance off the axis, so every ray has its own focus and there is no image plane anywhere — only a half-line of foci, beginning 548 astronomical units from the Sun and running outward for ever.

    part 3 · astrophysics
  4. Four bodies sent past one mass at 30 masses, at four speeds. Paths traced from the exact geodesic of a non-rotating mass, every one aimed at the same impact parameter of 30 masses and differing only in speed. The slower the body, the harder it is turned: 0.4c by 32.9°, 0.6c by 16.6°, 0.8c by 11.1°, light by 8.5°. The weak-field rule (2GM/bv²)(1 + v²/c²) gives 27.7°, 14.4°, 9.8°, 7.6° — close for the fast bodies and increasingly short for the slow ones, which pass near enough to feel the field's strong part. The angles are the true ones: near a compact mass nothing has to be exaggerated.

    The half of the bend a slow body never feels

    Light passing the Sun is bent by twice Newton's angle, and the factor of two is usually read as a fact about light. It is the end point of a curve every body lies on. A body at speed v is bent by (2GM/bv²)(1 + v²/c²) — the 1 from the curvature of time, which a slow body feels in full, and the v²/c² from the curvature of space, which is the same absolute angle for a comet as for a photon and is simply swamped when the body is slow.

    part 4 · astrophysics
  5. Five images of one source, and the curves where they are made. The sky around a lens with a core of 0.10 and an external shear of 0.15, in Einstein radii, with its two critical curves: an outer one near the Einstein ring and a small inner one round the core. A source at (0.06, 0.04) in the source plane — inset, with the caustics the critical curves map to — lies inside the diamond-shaped caustic and has 5 images. Their magnifications are +4.99, −3.76, +3.42, −2.63, +0.01 — a minus sign for an image turned over — and the parities sum to +1. Four sit near the outer curve and carry nearly all of the 14.8-fold total; the fifth, at the centre, is magnified by only 0.013. A source further out, at (0.55, 0.1), has 3.

    The fifth image a galaxy hides

    A single star bends light into two images of whatever lies behind it. A galaxy, whose mass is spread out, has to make an odd number — one, three or five — because the map from the sky to the source is smooth and has nowhere to put an even count. The famous cross of four quasar images is therefore five images, with the fifth thousands of times too faint to see, sitting at the centre of the galaxy that made it. Images are born and destroyed only in pairs, and only on the curves where the map folds.

    part 5 · astrophysics
  6. Rays that leave the far side of a compact star. Light rays leaving the surface of a star of radius 2.9 Schwarzschild radii — a neutron star of 1.4 solar masses and about 12 km — and travelling to an observer far off to the right, traced along the exact paths of Schwarzschild's geometry, shown above and below the line of sight. The last ray to escape leaves the surface tangentially from a point 121° round from the point facing the observer, so the bright arc — everything the observer sees — covers 76 per cent of the surface rather than the half that straight rays would show. The dashed circle is the horizon a star of the same mass would have if it were compressed inside it.

    The star whose far side can be seen

    Look at a ball and half of it faces you; the other half is hidden behind it. That half is a fact about straight lines, and near a neutron star the lines are not straight. Light leaving the surface is bent round the star on its way out, so a distant observer sees three-quarters of a typical neutron star at once — and a star squeezed to 1.76 times its own Schwarzschild radius would show every point of its surface, the point directly behind it included.

    part 6 · astrophysics
  7. A lens that cannot focus a wave longer than itself. How much a point mass brightens a wave passing behind it — the factor on the wave's power, on a logarithmic scale — against the dimensionless frequency w = 8πGMf/c³, for a source exactly behind the lens and 0.1, 0.3, 1.0 Einstein radii off it, from the exact diffraction integral. Geometric optics puts the magnification at 10.0, 3.4 and 1.34 for the three offsets and at infinity on the axis, whatever the frequency. The wave disagrees: at w = 0.01 every curve is within 1.6 per cent of 1 — a wave a hundred times longer than the lens passes as if it were not there — and on the axis the power factor is πw/(1 − e^(−πw)): 3.28 at w = 1, 31.4 at w = 10, finite at every frequency. The off-axis curves rise to their geometric values only above w ≈ 1 and then oscillate about them, as the two images begin to interfere.

    The lens a long wave walks round

    Geometric optics says that a star passing exactly in front of a source magnifies it infinitely. No real wave agrees, because a wave cannot be focused to a point, and for the gravitational waves the detectors hear the disagreement is the whole story. A star, or a black hole of a few tens of suns, is smaller than one of those waves in the only measure that matters — the delay between paths round it — and the wave flows past it almost untouched. What decides whether a mass lenses a wave is not the mass's size, which is millions of kilometres, but its Schwarzschild radius set against the wavelength.

    part 7 · astrophysics
  8. The bend that depends on when the planet was there. The difference, in microarcseconds, between the quasar's deflection computed from Jupiter's position when the light passed it — its position as seen from the Earth, 53 minutes earlier — and from its position at the moment of observation, over the day of the 2002 pass. In those 53 minutes Jupiter moves 40998 km, 0.57 of its own radius, and the deflection, a vector of 1.14 mas pointing away from the planet, turns and shrinks by up to 46 µas — about one twenty-fifth of itself. That small term was what the experiment was designed to see. The VLBA measured 51 ± 9 µas, the value general relativity predicts for a deflection pointing away from the position light reveals.

    The bend a moving planet gives

    Jupiter bends starlight by sixteen thousandths of an arcsecond at its edge, a hundredth of what the Sun manages, and in 2002 radio telescopes spread across a continent measured the bend on a quasar three and a half arcminutes from the planet. The experiment was designed to see something smaller still: the fact that Jupiter moves, by half its own width in the time light takes to reach the Earth, so that the bend depends on where the planet was when the light went past. The measured term was announced as the speed of gravity, and the argument over whether it was anything of the kind is the clearest lesson there is in what an experiment's number is a number of.

    part 8 · astrophysics

All series