Illustrated Physics
physics, drawn
Series

Equivalence principle — the series

7 essays on one idea, from the one that introduces it to the one that assumes the rest.
  1. Light crossing an accelerating box. A pulse crosses a box 6 m wide while the box accelerates at 9.81 m/s². The crossing takes 2·10⁻⁸ s, in which the far wall gains 1.96·10⁻⁷ m/s, so the pulse lands 1.96·10⁻¹⁵ m below the height it left at — and the path is a parabola. An observer sealed inside cannot tell that from a beam of light bending in a gravitational field, and the equivalence principle says there is nothing to tell. The sag is drawn 5.6·10¹⁴ times its true size.

    The floor that cannot be told from gravity

    Seal a laboratory, take away the windows, and no experiment inside it can distinguish standing in a gravitational field from accelerating through empty space. That is not a philosophical remark — it forces light to bend, forces clocks to disagree, and has a size at which it stops being true.

    part 1 · astrophysics
  2. How large a box may be before gravity shows in it. The largest freely falling laboratory in which nothing can be detected, against how long the experiment runs, for an instrument resolving 10⁻⁹ m. Free fall removes the field and leaves the gradient: two masses released a distance apart converge across the fall and separate along it, by (GM/r³)Lt²/2, so the box that stays undetectably flat shrinks as the square of the time. At one second the limits are 1.30 mm at the Earth's surface, 5.07 mm at the Sun's surface, 8.61 nm at a white dwarf, 1.86·10⁻¹⁷ m at a neutron star, 3.88·10⁻¹⁷ m at a stellar black hole, 388 mm at a giant black hole. Two things are worth reading off it. The equivalence principle is local in time as much as in space, on the same footing and with a worse exponent — patience is more expensive than room. And the tidal parameter GM/r³ falls with mass at a horizon, so a large enough black hole is one an experimenter could fall through with a metre-sized laboratory and a very good interferometer and detect nothing at all: the curve for the giant lies above the Earth's, not below it.

    The term free fall cannot remove

    Fall freely and gravity disappears. It disappears only to the extent that the falling laboratory is small — what survives is the gradient, which pulls two released masses together across the fall and apart along it. Given an instrument, the size of the box in which nothing is detectable is computable, and that number is the whole content of the word "locally".

    part 2 · astrophysics
  3. Three centuries of finding nothing. The upper limit on η against the year it was set, on a logarithmic scale. Newton (1687) reached 1e-3; Bessel (1832) reached 2e-5; Eötvös (1922) reached 5e-9; Dicke (1964) reached 1e-11; Braginsky (1972) reached 1e-12; Eöt-Wash (2008) reached 2e-13; MICROSCOPE (2022) reached 1e-15. That is 12 orders of magnitude in 335 years, and every one of those measurements returned zero. A sequence of null results is not a sequence of failures. Each one is a statement that a principle assumed by every theory of gravity holds to a new level, and each new level excludes a class of theories that would have shown a departure there — a long-range force coupling to something other than mass-energy, a scalar partner to the graviton, a violation arising at some energy scale. The measurement is worth making again precisely because it has always come out the same way, which is what makes any departure decisive.

    The fall that does not depend on what is falling

    Everything falls at the same rate, and the statement has been tested for three hundred years by people looking for the exception. Twelve orders of magnitude have been added to the limit and every measurement has returned zero. The last three orders came not from a better instrument but from finding something bigger to fall towards.

    part 3 · astrophysics
  4. The month a binding energy would bend. The Moon's orbit seen with the Sun held off to the right, drawn as it would be if the Earth's binding energy fell towards the Sun more weakly than the rest of it. The Earth is bound by 4.5 × 10⁻¹⁰ of its mass-energy and the Moon by 1.9 × 10⁻¹¹, so with the Sun pulling at 5.93 mm/s² the Moon is pushed sunward relative to the Earth by 2.6 × 10⁻¹² m/s² for every unit of η. That push turns once a synodic month relative to the orbit, 29.53 days, and Hill's equations about a circular orbit — integrated from the forced solution and held on it to 4 × 10⁻¹¹ over twelve months — give a radial displacement of 8.0 m times η times the cosine of the lunar phase: outward at new moon, inward at full. The complete lunar theory, with the Sun's tide on the orbit included, gives 13.1 m. The displacement is drawn about 7 × 10⁶ times larger than it would be at η = 1.

    The binding energy that has to fall too

    Every laboratory test of the equivalence principle compares bodies whose own gravity is a part in 10²⁵ of their mass, so none of them can ask whether gravitational binding energy falls like everything else. The Earth is bound by five parts in ten billion and the Moon by twenty times less, and if that difference fell differently the Moon's orbit would lean towards the Sun once a month — by a distance lasers have been measuring since 1969.

    part 4 · astrophysics
  5. The centre of charge, and whether it moves. A pulsar of 1.46 and a white dwarf of 0.181 solar masses in a circular orbit, drawn twice about their fixed centre of mass (the cross). On the left each body carries a charge in exact proportion to its mass, as gravitational charge is under the equivalence principle: the centre of charge sits on the centre of mass and never moves, so the dipole moment is constant and nothing is radiated at dipole order. On the right the pulsar carries 60 per cent less charge per unit mass than its companion — an exaggerated mismatch, chosen so that the motion is visible at this scale — as a compact body's scalar charge would in a theory where its own binding energy couples differently: the centre of charge now circles the centre of mass at 12.6 per cent of the separation, once per orbit, and a dipole turning at the orbital frequency radiates.

    The radiation a difference in falling would make

    Gravitational waves start at the quadrupole because the equivalence principle removes the dipole: when every body's gravitational charge is its mass, the centre of charge is the centre of mass and cannot move. If a neutron star's own gravity fell even slightly differently, a binary containing one would radiate a dipole — louder than Einstein's quadrupole in slow orbits — and a pulsar with a white dwarf in an 8.5-hour orbit has been listening for it.

    part 5 · astrophysics
  6. Two pulls that should be equal and opposite. Two bodies of equal passive mass, one of an ordinary material and one of a material whose active mass is 30 per cent larger than its passive mass (the difference exaggerated to be seen). Each pulls the other with its active mass and is pulled on its passive mass. The pull the unusual body exerts is therefore larger than the pull it receives, the two arrows are not equal and opposite, and the pair, with nothing outside it, accelerates towards the ordinary body. Newton's third law and the conservation of momentum both require the ratio of active to passive mass to be the same for every material, and that is a separate claim from the one torsion balances test, that passive and inertial mass agree.

    The pull that has to equal the pull back

    Every test of the equivalence principle drops two things and asks whether gravity pulls them equally. None of them asks whether they pull equally. A body's mass enters gravity twice — once as what is pulled and once as what does the pulling — and if the two ratios differed from one material to another, Newton's third law would fail and a lopsided body could push itself through space. The first test of this used a plastic cylinder floating in a liquid. The best uses the Moon, whose light crust is thicker on the side that never faces the Earth.

    part 6 · astrophysics
  7. Which way the atoms leave, against the bias. A toy version of the 2023 ALPHA-g measurement: the fraction of trapped antihydrogen atoms that leave through the bottom mirror as both mirrors are lowered over twenty seconds, against the magnetic bias, in units of the gravitational tilt, for three assumed accelerations. Each atom is given an energy between 0.02 and 0.5 K and a random starting phase, bounces between the mirrors, and leaves through the first one it reaches that has dropped below its energy. With no bias, 100 per cent leave downward if antihydrogen falls normally, 49 per cent if it does not fall and 0 per cent if it falls up. Each curve crosses one half exactly where the bias cancels the assumed gravity, and the crossing point is what the experiment measures. The curves are not steps — each falls from nine-tenths to one-tenth over about 0.6 g of bias — because the mirrors keep falling during the few milliseconds an atom takes to cross the trap: an atom that happens to arrive at the higher mirror just after it has dropped below its energy leaves that way. ALPHA-g's measured balance gave an acceleration of 0.75 g, with an uncertainty of about 0.2 g, ruling out falling upwards.

    The antiatom that had to be weighed anyway

    Every test of the equivalence principle for three centuries compared two lumps of ordinary matter. Whether antimatter falls down was settled on paper in the 1950s, by an engine that would run for ever if it fell up and by the electrostatic energy of nuclei, part of which is carried by fleeting positrons. It was not measured until 2023, because on a charged antiparticle gravity is ten million times weaker than a field of one volt per metre. The measurement needed neutral antihydrogen, held at half a kelvin in a magnetic bottle a quarter of a metre tall and let out over twenty seconds. It falls down, at 0.75 g with an uncertainty of a fifth of a g.

    part 7 · astrophysics

All series