The blackbody spectrum, against what classical physics predicted
At its defaults it draws the blackbody spectrum, against what classical physics predicted. Spectral exitance against wavelength for a blackbody at 3000, 4000, 5000 kelvin, in kilowatts per square metre per nanometre. Each curve peaks at the wavelength Wien's displacement law gives — 966 nm at 3000 K, 724 nm at 4000 K, 580 nm at 5000 K — and falls to nothing at short wavelengths.
planck-spectrum is one function in lib/figures/quantum.js —
the quantum of light and the wave of matter. Everything below came out
of it during this build, at parameters taken from the essays rather than invented for this
page. A figure here is the figure a reader meets in an essay, and if the generator changes,
this page changes with it.
At its defaults
Drawn even though every essay passes options, because a default nothing exercises is a trap for the next essay to call this with none — which has happened here twice.
Spectral exitance against wavelength for a blackbody at 3000, 4000, 5000 kelvin, in kilowatts per square metre per nanometre. Each curve peaks at the wavelength Wien's displacement law gives — 966 nm at 3000 K, 724 nm at 4000 K, 580 nm at 5000 K — and falls to nothing at short wavelengths.
The bath does push back, by an unmeasurable amount
The options are the ones The bath that pushes back passes. A branch drawn at its own defaults instead would be a picture no essay asked for and no assertion has been run against.
The retarding force on a perfectly absorbing body moving through isotropic radiation at 2.725 kelvin, against its speed, for three areas. Moving through a bath of radiation is not free: the radiation arriving from ahead is blue-shifted and more intense and the radiation from behind is red-shifted and weaker, so the body absorbs more momentum from the front than from the back and decelerates. A square metre at half the speed of light feels 3.7e-14 newtons. That is the reason a preferred frame exists without relativity being violated: the laws are the same in every frame and the radiation is not — it is a physical system with a state, and its state picks out the frame in which it is isotropic, exactly as a body of water does.
A blackbody in every direction, at a different temperature in each
The options are the ones The bath that pushes back passes. A branch drawn at its own defaults instead would be a picture no essay asked for and no assertion has been run against.
The spectrum of a blackbody at 2.725 kelvin in its own frame, seen by an observer it is moving past at 0.4 of the speed of light, in 3 directions. Each curve is a Planck spectrum exactly — the Planck form survives a Doppler shift, with the temperature multiplied by the shift — and the temperatures run from 1.78 kelvin looking one way to 4.16 looking the other. So the body is a perfect blackbody in each direction and has no single temperature. A thermometer placed in the radiation reads something between, and what it reads depends on where it is put and on how much of the sky it sees — which is the reason a transformation law for temperature was argued about for sixty years without being found.
The same push, where it decides the answer
The options are the ones The bath that pushes back passes. A branch drawn at its own defaults instead would be a picture no essay asked for and no assertion has been run against.
The time an electron takes to lose most of its energy to a 2.725-kelvin bath of radiation, against its Lorentz factor, both logarithmic. The mechanism is the drag of the previous figure applied to a single electron, which scatters the radiation rather than absorbing it: the cross-section is Thomson's, and the energy it loses per second goes as the square of the Lorentz factor while its own energy goes as the first power — so the cooling time falls as the reciprocal of the factor. An electron at a Lorentz factor of 10 takes 2.3e+11 years and one at 1e+5 takes 2.3e+7. The steep dependence is what makes the process matter: it is negligible for anything slow and it is the dominant loss for the fast electrons in radio galaxies, whose spectra steepen from the top down as the fastest ones go first.
The same push, where it decides the answer
The options are the ones The bath that pushes back passes. A branch drawn at its own defaults instead would be a picture no essay asked for and no assertion has been run against.
The time an electron takes to lose most of its energy to a 2.725-kelvin bath of radiation, against its Lorentz factor, both logarithmic. The mechanism is the drag of the previous figure applied to a single electron, which scatters the radiation rather than absorbing it: the cross-section is Thomson's, and the energy it loses per second goes as the square of the Lorentz factor while its own energy goes as the first power — so the cooling time falls as the reciprocal of the factor. An electron at a Lorentz factor of 1000 takes 2.3e+9 years and one at 1e+7 takes 2.3e+5. The steep dependence is what makes the process matter: it is negligible for anything slow and it is the dominant loss for the fast electrons in radio galaxies, whose spectra steepen from the top down as the fastest ones go first.
The bath does push back, by an unmeasurable amount
The options are the ones The bath that pushes back passes. A branch drawn at its own defaults instead would be a picture no essay asked for and no assertion has been run against.
The retarding force on a perfectly absorbing body moving through isotropic radiation at 5772 kelvin, against its speed, for three areas. Moving through a bath of radiation is not free: the radiation arriving from ahead is blue-shifted and more intense and the radiation from behind is red-shifted and weaker, so the body absorbs more momentum from the front than from the back and decelerates. A square metre at half the speed of light feels 7.5e-1 newtons. That is the reason a preferred frame exists without relativity being violated: the laws are the same in every frame and the radiation is not — it is a physical system with a state, and its state picks out the frame in which it is isotropic, exactly as a body of water does.
What checks it
physicscheck asserts something about planck-spectrum that
could fail — it draws it and measures the result against a value reached some other
way.
Across the library: 100 interrogated, 2 exercised only, 1 untouched, of 103. Read out of the gate's source by the gate's own two patterns — and the gate's last claim fails the build if that read disagrees with what it was handed while running.
Where it is called
Changing this generator changes every figure on this list. That is what makes the list worth publishing rather than keeping in a check script.
The bath that pushes back
Moving through a bath of radiation is not free. The light arriving from ahead is blue-shifted and more intense and the light from behind is weaker, so a body absorbs more momentum from the front than from the back and slows down. That drag picks out the frame in which the radiation is isotropic — without violating relativity, because the laws are the same in every frame and the radiation is not.
RelativityThe body that has no temperature when it moves
Energy, momentum, length, duration and field strength all change when the observer moves. Temperature was argued about for sixty years, with three transformation laws proposed and each defended by people making no mistake. The resolution is that a moving blackbody is a perfect blackbody in every direction at a different temperature in each — so a thermometer's reading depends on where it is put, and the quantity the law was for is not there.
RelativityThe count that no observer can disagree about
A moving body, it turns out, has no temperature. What it does have is an entropy, and every observer agrees about it — because entropy is the logarithm of a count of arrangements, and a count is a number. That one invariant, with energy and momentum being parts of one object, is enough to compute everything a temperature could not: what happens to the energy density, the entropy density, and the relation between them that having a temperature consists of.
QuantumThe curve that would not come down
Classical physics predicted that a warm object radiates infinite power at short wavelengths. Every step of the derivation was correct, the prediction was absurd, and closing the gap required assuming that energy comes in lumps.
ThermodynamicsThe gas that nobody counted
A box of gas holds however many molecules were put in it. A box of radiation holds however many photons the temperature says, because the walls make and destroy them until the free energy is least — and one dropped assumption changes every result. The pressure becomes a third of the energy density instead of two thirds, the entropy goes as the cube of the temperature, and the adiabatic index comes out at exactly four thirds.
ThermodynamicsThe glow that carries a voltage
Thermal radiation has no chemical potential, because walls make and destroy photons freely. A light-emitting diode is a body that glows at room temperature with a voltage written into its light — Planck's law with the voltage as the photons' chemical potential — which is why its light can be as bright as a surface thousands of kelvin hot, why at low voltage it can put out more light than the power it draws and cool itself doing so, and why a reverse voltage makes a surface look colder than it is.
ThermodynamicsThe glow that says nothing about the surface
A thermal camera pointed at a saucepan of boiling water reads a hundred degrees. Pointed at a polished aluminium block at the same temperature it reads about twenty-five, and the instrument is working perfectly. What it is measuring is emissivity as much as temperature — and a surface's emissivity is forced to equal its absorptivity, at every wavelength and every angle, by an argument with no physics of matter in it at all.
ThermodynamicsThe height a planet is seen from
A body in sunlight settles where it radiates away what it absorbs, and that takes two numbers and one line of arithmetic. It gets the Moon right and Earth wrong by thirty-three kelvin. The correction is not that the atmosphere traps heat but that it moves the level space sees the planet from, and the rest is done by a lapse rate that is not a radiative quantity at all.