Illustrated Physics
physics, drawn
The collection

Every essay — page 9

One idea per essay, ordered so that the earlier ones set up the later ones — but nothing here depends on being read in sequence.

Mechanics

Motion, force, and the quantities that refuse to change.

Thrust against the air it is supposed to be pushing on. The thrust of one F-1 engine against ambient pressure, in atmospheres. It is 6.78 meganewtons at sea level and 7.77 in vacuum — 14.6 per cent more with the air taken away. The line falls at exactly 9.787 newtons per pascal, which is the nozzle's exit area, because the term is (p_e − p_a)·A_e: the ambient pressure pushes on the exit plane from outside and there is nothing to push back on it. The account in which the exhaust shoves against the atmosphere makes the opposite prediction — thrust falling with the pressure and vanishing in vacuum — and it is not a small disagreement about a coefficient. It has the sign wrong. A rocket works better in vacuum than in air, and every engine ever fired has said so.

The push that needs nothing to push against

A rocket engine produces more thrust in vacuum than at sea level — fifteen per cent more, for the engine drawn here, and the extra is exactly the ambient pressure times the nozzle's exit area. The account in which the exhaust shoves against the atmosphere does not merely overstate a coefficient. It has the sign wrong, and every engine ever fired has said so.

5 figures · part 3 on Momentum

Waves

Oscillation, and everything that turns out to be an oscillation.

The one frequency a broken repeat lets through. Transmission through a quarter-wave stack whose repeat is broken once, on a logarithmic scale, against frequency in units of the quarter-wave design frequency. The perfect stack forbids this whole band; adding a single half-wave layer at the centre opens one line inside it, at exactly the middle of the gap, through which the stack transmits everything. With 4 pairs either side the line is 2.50e-3 wide, a quality factor of 400, on a background of 4.5e-4; With 6 pairs either side the line is 1.56e-4 wide, a quality factor of 6410, on a background of 6.3e-6; With 8 pairs either side the line is 1.00e-5 wide, a quality factor of 100000, on a background of 9.2e-8. The line narrows geometrically as the mirrors are made thicker, because the field inside the defect leaks out through a barrier whose transmission falls exponentially with its thickness — so the useful quantity of a band gap turns out to be not what it excludes but how well it can trap what a single flaw is allowed to hold.

The mode that lives in the mistake

A perfect stack of alternating layers refuses a whole band of frequencies — not weakly, not with loss, but not at all. Break the repeat once, by inserting a single layer of the wrong thickness, and exactly one frequency inside that band passes through the whole stack with a transmittance of one. The useful thing about a forbidden band turns out to be not what it excludes but what a single flaw is thereby allowed to hold.

7 figures · part 2 on Periodic media

Optics

Light, and the small number of rules it obeys.

What arrives in the back focal plane. A grating of pitch 1.2 µm illuminated at 550 nm, and the spectrum that appears in the objective's back focal plane. Each spatial frequency in the object leaves at its own angle, sinθ = mλ/d, and the bar heights are the Fourier coefficients of the object's transmittance. The aperture admits everything inside sinθ = 0.65, which here is orders -1, 0, 1 — 2 of them carrying information about the pitch. Orders outside it are drawn faint and are simply lost: they never reach the image plane, and no amount of magnification afterwards recovers them. This is where a microscope's resolution is decided — not at the image, not by the eyepiece, but by which of these bars the front of the objective is wide enough to catch.

The image that is a diffraction pattern twice

A lens does not project an object onto a screen. It takes the object's spatial frequencies apart, spreading them across its own back focal plane at an angle each, and then puts them back together — so an image is the object's spectrum, filtered by whatever the aperture admits, transformed back. With only the zeroth order through, the image is a uniform grey with no information in it at all.

4 figures · part 3 on Imaging Nine planes behind a grating, with no lens anywhere. The intensity across two periods of a 20 µm grating, at nine planes between it and the Talbot distance z_T = 2d²/λ = 1.26 millimetres, illuminated at 633 nm. The top profile is the grating itself and the bottom is the plane at z_T, and they agree to 2.8e-14: free space has reproduced the object with no imaging element of any kind. The middle profile, at half the Talbot distance, is the object shifted sideways by half a period, to 1.1e-14. At a quarter of the way the grating's own period has vanished entirely — its amplitude there is 1.3e-16 — because the odd orders have all turned by the same right angle and the even ones have not. With this grating open for half of each period there are no even orders either, so the plane is uniform: 9.6e-3 at twice the frequency as well, and a screen there shows no grating at all. None of this is interference between two beams; it is the whole spectrum of the object arriving with the phases exp(−iπλzm²/d²), which are all multiples of 2π when z is z_T.

The grating that photographs itself

Put a grating in a beam of light and hold a screen behind it. At one particular distance the screen shows the grating again — sharp, at full contrast, right way up, with no lens anywhere in the apparatus. Half way there it shows the grating shifted sideways by half a period. A quarter of the way there, a half-open grating shows nothing at all.

4 figures · part 4 on Diffraction N when the phases are random, N² when they are not. Scattered intensity against the number of scatterers, both logarithmic, for two ways of adding the same amplitudes. The lower curve averages 400 draws of N unit amplitudes with independent random phases and grows as N^1.000; the upper one adds them in phase and grows as N². At 3000 scatterers the two differ by a factor of 2921. Nothing about the scatterers is different between the two — same number, same strength, same wavelength. Only the arrangement is, and it is worth three decades here.

Why a litre of water is not blue for the reason the sky is

The same molecules that make the sky blue also make the refractive index of air, and the two numbers agree because the sideways sum has random phases and the forward one does not. Condense those molecules into a liquid and the sideways sum collapses by a factor of sixteen — and what is left is thirty-four times smaller than the absorption that actually colours the water.

9 figures · part 3 on Scattering

Electromagnetism

Charge, field, and the lines drawn between them.

The field a classical partition function cannot see. The momentum plane of one classical charge, in units of the root-mean-square thermal momentum. With no field the Boltzmann weight is a set of circles about the origin; with a field the same circles sit about p = qA, displaced and otherwise unaltered, because the energy depends on p only through p − qA. Integrating over the whole plane therefore cannot notice the displacement, and the numbers beside the drawing are that integral evaluated at 6 displacements: the largest departure from the zero-field value is 3.3e-16, which is the precision of the arithmetic and not a physical effect. The classical free energy has no B in it, so the classical magnetisation is exactly zero at every field and every temperature — no paramagnetism, no diamagnetism, no ferromagnetism. Every magnetic material is therefore evidence of something classical mechanics does not contain.

The magnetism classical physics forbids

Write down the partition function of any collection of classical charges in a magnetic field, and the field cancels out. Not approximately, not to leading order — the integral is over all of momentum space and the field only shifts where the middle of it is. So classical statistical mechanics predicts no paramagnetism, no diamagnetism and no ferromagnetism, and a compass needle is a quantum instrument.

4 figures · part 2 on Magnetisation Water's permittivity across six decades of frequency. The real and imaginary parts of water's permittivity against frequency, on logarithmic axes, from 10 to 16 in powers of ten hertz. ε′ begins at 80.1 — the number a textbook prints — falls through the Debye relaxation near twenty gigahertz, is dragged down again by the librational, bending and stretching bands of the molecule, and settles at 1.777 in the visible, whose square root is 1.3330: water's refractive index. The identity n = √ε_r is exact and is an identity between two numbers taken at the same frequency; using the static permittivity in it predicts an index of 8.9 and is the most instructive wrong answer in the subject. The curve is a Debye term and four Lorentz oscillators, with two parameters solved so that the two plateaus are the measured ones rather than fitted by eye.

The constant that depends on how fast it is asked

Water's relative permittivity is 80.1. Its refractive index is 1.333, and the square of 1.333 is 1.777. The identity n = √ε_r is exact, the two numbers differ by a factor of forty-five, and nothing is wrong with either — because a permittivity is a function of frequency and the two measurements were made eight orders of magnitude apart.

4 figures · part 2 on Dielectrics Every line that goes in has to come out. Field lines of a 5:1 solenoid in the plane through its axis, each traced by stepping along the local direction of a field summed turn by turn from Biot–Savart. Inside the winding they are parallel and evenly spaced, which is the picture the textbook argument is about. Outside they are not absent: they are spread over the whole of the rest of space, which is why the field there is small — 1.60e-2 of the centre value at 2 radii off the axis — and why it cannot be zero. A line has no end, so every one of the lines through the bore returns outside, and a field with no outside would be a field whose lines stop.

The field outside the solenoid, which is not zero

Ampère's law says the field outside a solenoid vanishes, and every step of that argument is exact — for a winding of infinite length. A real one is a bar magnet seen from outside, its external field falls as the inverse square of its length rather than to nothing, and the "exactly zero" that makes the derivation so satisfying is the one part of it a laboratory cannot have.

10 figures · part 2 on Ampere law

Thermodynamics

Heat, disorder, and the one law with a direction in it.

The work one molecule and one bit are worth. The pressure of a gas of one molecule against its volume, at 300 K, in units of the volume it starts in. The shaded area is the work the molecule does pushing a partition out isothermally, and it is measured here by integrating the drawn curve rather than written down: expanding by 1.5× yields 0.4055 kT against ln 1.5 = 0.4055; expanding by 2× yields 0.6931 kT against ln 2 = 0.6931; expanding by 4× yields 1.3863 kT against ln 4 = 1.3863; expanding by 8× yields 2.0794 kT against ln 8 = 2.0794, agreeing to 2.0e-10. The doubling is the one that matters, because a partition inserted in the middle leaves the molecule on one side or the other, and knowing which is what lets the load be attached to the right face. That single expansion delivers kT·ln2 = 2.87 zeptojoules at 300 K. It looks like work extracted from one temperature, and it is — until the engine is asked to run again, which requires forgetting which side the molecule was on.

The bit that has to be paid for

One molecule in a box, a partition, and the knowledge of which side it went — enough, between them, to extract work from a single reservoir, which the second law forbids. The engine is real and the arithmetic is right. What closes the loophole is that the cycle does not finish until the knowledge has been thrown away, and throwing away one bit costs exactly what the expansion delivered.

4 figures · part 6 on Entropy The ceiling, the estimate, and three power stations. Two efficiencies against the ratio of the cold reservoir's temperature to the hot one. The upper curve is Carnot's 1 − Tc/Th, which is a ceiling on the work per unit of heat and is reached only by an engine that runs infinitely slowly, because a reversible heat flow needs a vanishing temperature difference to drive it and therefore infinite time. The lower curve is 1 − √(Tc/Th), the efficiency of an engine with finite thermal contact run for the most power rather than the most work. Three measured plants are marked: West Thurrock, coal runs at 36 per cent against a ceiling of 64 and a finite-time estimate of 40; CANDU, nuclear runs at 30 per cent against a ceiling of 48 and a finite-time estimate of 28; Larderello, geothermal runs at 16 per cent against a ceiling of 33 and a finite-time estimate of 18. Every one of them is closer to the lower curve — within 4.4 points at worst, against 16.5 at best from the ceiling. The second law is not what limits a working power station. What limits it is that somebody wants the electricity this year.

The engine that has to finish

Carnot's ceiling is exact and it is reached only by an engine that takes for ever, because a reversible heat flow needs a vanishing temperature difference to drive it. Ask instead for the most power rather than the most work per joule of heat, and the answer is a different function of the same two temperatures — and three measured power stations sit on it rather than on the ceiling.

4 figures · part 3 on Heat engines What a coordinate is worth, by the shape of its energy. The mean energy stored in one coordinate, in units of kT, against the power with which that coordinate enters the energy. The curve is 1/n and the points are the same average obtained by integrating the Boltzmann weight numerically, agreeing to 3.3e-7 per cent at worst. an energy going as |x|^1 holds 1.0000 kT; an energy going as |x|^1.5 holds 0.6667 kT; an energy going as |x|^2 holds 0.5000 kT; an energy going as |x|^3 holds 0.3333 kT; an energy going as |x|^4 holds 0.2500 kT; an energy going as |x|^6 holds 0.1667 kT. The familiar half a kT is the case n = 2 and nothing more general than that: a coordinate whose energy is linear in it — the momentum of an ultrarelativistic particle, or a field with no restoring force but a constant tension — carries a whole kT, and one confined by a very steep wall carries almost nothing. Equipartition is a theorem about quadratic terms, and calling it a theorem about degrees of freedom is the substitution that makes it fail.

The share that is not half a kT

Equipartition is quoted as half a kT for every degree of freedom, and it is nothing of the kind. It is half a kT for every *quadratic* term. A coordinate whose energy is linear in it carries a whole kT, and a gas hot enough that its particles' energy is pc rather than p²/2m therefore holds twice what the counting says — which drops its ratio of specific heats to four thirds and puts a star on the edge of being able to hold itself up.

7 figures · part 2 on Equipartition What a thermal camera reads off a shiny surface. The temperature a camera calibrated for a black body reports, against the emissivity of the surface it is pointed at, for surfaces truly at 323 K, 373 K, 473 K in a room at 293 K. Every curve begins at the true temperature when the emissivity is one and ends at the room's temperature when it is zero, because a surface that emits nothing reflects everything and the camera is then looking at the room. polished aluminium at 0.05 reads 312 K; stainless steel, oxidised at 0.8 reads 451 K; matt black paint at 0.95 reads 468 K; human skin at 0.98 reads 471 K for a surface truly at 473 K. That is not a fault in the instrument. It follows from Kirchhoff's law — a poor emitter is a poor absorber and therefore a good reflector — so the shortfall in a shiny surface's own glow is made up almost exactly by whatever is reflected in it, and no measurement of the light leaving a surface can separate the two without knowing the emissivity in advance.

The glow that says nothing about the surface

A thermal camera pointed at a saucepan of boiling water reads a hundred degrees. Pointed at a polished aluminium block at the same temperature it reads about twenty-five, and the instrument is working perfectly. What it is measuring is emissivity as much as temperature — and a surface's emissivity is forced to equal its absorptivity, at every wavelength and every angle, by an argument with no physics of matter in it at all.

4 figures · part 2 on Blackbody Each stage takes 25.0 per cent of what is left. Entropy against temperature for a spin-½ paramagnet at 0.25 T and 1 T, with the cooling cycle drawn between them: a vertical drop is isothermal magnetisation, a horizontal move is adiabatic demagnetisation. Starting from 1 K the treads are at 1.000 K, 0.250 K, 0.062 K, 0.016 K, 3.91 mK. Each is 0.2500 of the one before — a ratio read back off the drawn treads rather than written into them, and equal to the field ratio 0.25/1 because this refrigerant's entropy depends on the field and the temperature only through their quotient. The steps therefore shrink in proportion to what is left, and no finite number of them arrives.

The staircase that never reaches the floor

Absolute zero is unreachable, and the reason is not that the apparatus is not good enough. Every stage of cooling removes a fixed fraction of what is left rather than a fixed amount, so the steps shrink in proportion to the distance remaining — and the fixed fraction cannot be made one, because the entropy curves at two field strengths are required to meet where the axis is.

7 figures · part 1 on Third law

Relativity

Space and time, drawn on the same axes.

Two rockets that keep their distance, and the string that does not. Two rockets 0.5 unit apart in the laboratory, given identical acceleration programmes there, drawn in units where the light speed is one and c²/a is one. Their laboratory separation is constant for ever — the two worldlines are the same curve shifted sideways, and every horizontal line meets them 0.5 apart. The slanted lines are the rockets' own lines of simultaneity, and the distance between the worldlines measured along those is what a string tied between them has to span: at 0.3c it is 0.512, a stretch of 2 per cent; at 0.6c it is 0.557, a stretch of 11 per cent; at 0.8c it is 0.631, a stretch of 26 per cent; at 0.9c it is 0.710, a stretch of 42 per cent. The γL that is always quoted — 0.524, 0.625, 0.833, 1.147 here — is the limit of that measurement for a vanishing gap, and at a gap of 0.5 in these units it overstates the stretch by up to 38.1 per cent; shrinking the gap a hundredfold brings the two within 0.46 per cent. Either way the string is stretched and breaks, while the gap in the laboratory never changes by a millimetre. Length contraction is not something that happens to a rod. It is a statement about which events count as simultaneous, and a rod that is not allowed to contract is a rod that is being pulled apart.

The string that breaks between two rockets

Two rockets a metre apart, given identical acceleration programmes, stay a metre apart in the laboratory for ever. A string tied between them breaks anyway. Nothing pulls on it, nothing in the laboratory moves relative to anything else, and the string is stretched — because the distance it has to span is measured on the rockets' slices of simultaneity and not on the laboratory's.

4 figures · part 4 on Length contraction What a collision has to spend, against what it is given. The energy available in a proton–proton collision, against the energy of one beam, on logarithmic axes. Against a stationary target the available energy is √(2mE) and the line has slope one half; head-on it is 2E and the slope is one. Bevatron at 6.2 GeV per beam reaches 3.7 GeV; SPS fixed target at 450 GeV per beam reaches 29.1 GeV; LEP at 104.5 GeV per beam reaches 209.0 GeV; Tevatron at 980 GeV per beam reaches 1960.0 GeV; LHC at 6500 GeV per beam reaches 13000.0 GeV. The gap is the whole architecture of the subject: the LHC's beams give 13000 GeV head-on and would give 110 GeV against a stationary proton, a factor of 118. Reaching the same 13000 GeV in fixed-target mode would need a beam of 90.1 million GeV. What the missing energy has gone into is not lost: it is the kinetic energy of the centre of mass, which every product has to carry away and which no experiment can use.

The collision that wastes most of the energy

The LHC's two beams carry 6,500 GeV each and 13,000 GeV are available. Fire one of those beams at a stationary block of copper instead and 110 GeV are available — the other 12,890 have gone into the motion of the wreckage and cannot be used for anything. The difference is a square root, and every accelerator built since 1970 is a consequence of it.

4 figures · part 2 on Relativistic dynamics The mass of two things that have none. The invariant mass of a pair of photons of equal energy, in units of E/c², against the angle between them. It is computed from the total energy and the vector sum of the two momenta, and agrees with 2E·sin(θ/2) to 1.0e-14. at 0° the pair weighs 0.000 E/c²; at 30° the pair weighs 0.518 E/c²; at 60° the pair weighs 1.000 E/c²; at 90° the pair weighs 1.414 E/c²; at 120° the pair weighs 1.732 E/c²; at 180° the pair weighs 2.000 E/c². Two photons flying in the same direction have no mass between them at all, because their momenta add to exactly the energy over c; anything else and they do. Nothing has been added: the constituents are massless at every angle, and the mass of the system is a property of the arrangement. At 180° the pair weighs 2E/c², which is every joule it contains — the case of a sealed box of light, where the two beams cancel in momentum and the whole energy shows up on the scales.

The box of light that weighs something

Two photons flying apart have a mass between them, though neither has one. Seal them in a mirrored box and the box is heavier than it was empty, by exactly the energy inside divided by c². Mass is not a property of stuff and it does not add up — it is a property of a system, and 99 per cent of the mass of everything anybody has ever weighed is of this kind.

4 figures · part 4 on Mass-energy

Quantum

Where the continuous picture runs out, and what replaces it.

Four predictions no list of answers can keep. The four measurements a three-particle GHZ state predicts with certainty, and what the best possible list of pre-agreed answers does with them. Each row is a choice of which quantity to measure on each of the three particles; the quantum value is not an average but a certainty, so a single run of any row has a determined outcome. Every list of answers assigns a value to X and to Y at each particle, which is sixty-four lists in all, and the enumeration finds that 32 of them get three of the four right and 32 get one. None gets four, and none can: multiplying the four left-hand sides together gives every X and every Y twice, so the product is +1 for any list whatever, while the product of the four quantum values is −1. The column on the right is one such list, which agrees with the first three rows and is then forced into the opposite of the fourth. That is the whole argument, and it needs no inequality, no average and no repetition: measure the first three rows on three copies, and the fourth is predicted with certainty and comes out the other way.

The disagreement that one run settles

Bell's argument is a statistical one — a correlation of 2.828 where a pre-agreed list of answers is stuck at 2, dug out of hundreds of coincidences. Add a third particle and the argument stops being about how often. Three measurements predict a fourth with certainty, every list of answers that gets the three right gets the fourth exactly backwards, and one run of the experiment is enough.

5 figures · part 2 on Entanglement One level, split by the speed of the electron in it. Hydrogen's n = 2 level on the left at the scale of the whole spectrum, and the same level on the right at a scale ten thousand times finer. The gross structure puts it 3.4014 electronvolts below the ionisation limit; the relativistic and spin–orbit corrections then split it into a lower pair, j = ½, and an upper, j = 3/2, separated by 45.3 microelectronvolts. That gap is 1.331e-5 of the level's own binding energy, which is exactly α²/4 — so the size of the splitting is a measurement of how fast the electron is going, α being its speed in units of c on the innermost orbit. The same physics in sodium is larger by four orders of magnitude: its two D lines at 588.995 and 589.5924 nanometres differ by 2.133 millielectronvolts, which is 1.01e-3 of the transition energy, because the outer electron of sodium penetrates to where the nuclear charge is far from screened and the correction goes as the fourth power of the charge it sees.

The line that is really two

Sodium's yellow line is two lines six-tenths of a nanometre apart, and the gap is not a property of the light. It is a splitting of the atom's own level, caused by the electron's magnetic moment sitting in the field it sees because it is moving — and its size, relative to the level it splits, is exactly α²/4.

4 figures · part 2 on Atomic spectra A band 3.60 eV wide, and the curvature is the whole story. Energy against wavenumber for one tight-binding band, α + 2β·cos(ka), with α = -4 eV, β = -0.9 eV and a repeat of 300 pm. The band is 3.60 eV from floor to ceiling and periodic in k, so the zone boundary at ka = π is not an edge of anything: it is where the curve turns over. Near the bottom it is a parabola, which is the free-electron dispersion with a different coefficient — a mass of 0.470 m_e rather than one — and near the top it is a parabola the other way up, a mass of -0.470. The inflection between them is at ka = π/2, and it is the point at which a constant force stops producing any acceleration.

The mass a curve decides

An electron in a solid answers a force with a mass that is nothing to do with the mass of an electron. It is set by how sharply the band bends, it is smaller than the free value in a wide band and larger in a narrow one, and near the top of any band it is negative — which is why aluminium's Hall voltage has the sign of a positive carrier and no adjustment to an electron count can repair it.

9 figures · part 2 on Bands Flat, then exponential, then a power law. Survival probability against time in lifetimes, both logarithmic, for a resonance 20 linewidths above the bottom of its band and 400 below the top. The straight dashed line is exp(−Γt), and the computed curve sits on it through the middle — a fitted rate of 0.9998 per lifetime between one and eight — and leaves it at both ends. Below 1.57e-2 lifetimes the curve is flat, falling as (t/τ_z)² with τ_z = 0.1253 lifetimes; beyond 22.6 lifetimes it is an inverse square, which any exponential eventually loses to. Both departures are forced: the head by the state being normalisable and the tail by the band having a bottom.

The exponential that is only true in the middle

A decay law is not an assumption about nuclei; it is the Fourier transform of an energy distribution. Do that transform honestly and the exponential fails at both ends — flat at the start, because the state is normalisable, and an inverse square at the end, because no system has states of arbitrarily negative energy. Neither departure is a correction that could be made small.

7 figures · part 2 on Decay

Fluids

Matter that will not hold a shape, and the forces that act in it anyway.

Circulation against how fast the bucket turns. The circulation round the rim of a bucket of radius 1 mm, against the angular velocity it is spun at. An ordinary liquid ends up rotating with the bucket, and its circulation is 2Ω times the area — the straight dashed line, continuous in Ω and with no special value anywhere on it. A superfluid's velocity is the gradient of a phase, so it can carry circulation only in whole units of h/m = 9.969e-8 m²/s. Below 0.256 radians per second it carries none at all: the bucket turns and the liquid does not, which is what Hess and Fairbank measured. Above it the circulation is a staircase of 13 steps, each exactly one quantum high and each 1.59e-2 radians per second wide. The staircase runs below the classical line by the ln(R/a) quanta the threshold costs, a fixed lag: at 102 radians per second the two agree to 0.24 per cent, which is why a rotating superfluid looks like a rotating liquid at any speed a bucket is normally spun at.

The whirlpool that comes in one size

Spin a bucket of ordinary liquid and it ends up turning with the bucket. Spin a bucket of superfluid helium slowly and it does not turn at all. Spin it faster and it does not turn either — until a threshold, at which a single line of circulation appears, carrying not some amount but exactly h/m. There is nothing in between, because the velocity is the gradient of a phase and a phase has to come back to itself.

5 figures · part 2 on Superfluidity

Astrophysics

Gravity read as geometry, and the laws carried where no laboratory can follow.

A lens with no focal length. Where a ray crosses the axis, against how far off the axis it passed the deflecting body, for 1 solar mass of radius 1 solar radius. A glass lens deflects a ray by an angle proportional to its distance off axis, which is precisely the condition for every ray to arrive at one point — the flat dashed line. Gravity deflects by 4GM/c²b, which grows smaller further out, so the crossing distance goes as b² and each ray has its own focus. The grazing ray crosses at 548 astronomical units and a ray passing at 12 radii crosses at 78857; the square law is verified on the drawn curve to 1.5e-16. So there is no image plane at all, only a half-line of foci beginning at the first of those and running outward for ever. Anything placed on that line sees not an image but a ring, and moving along it does not refocus anything — it selects which rays are being seen.

The lens with no focal length

A glass lens bends a ray by an angle proportional to how far off the axis it passes, which is precisely the condition for every ray to arrive at one point. Gravity bends by an angle that falls with distance off the axis, so every ray has its own focus and there is no image plane anywhere — only a half-line of foci, beginning 548 astronomical units from the Sun and running outward for ever.

6 figures · part 3 on Light deflection The figure a static field is not allowed to close. A spacetime diagram of two clocks held at fixed heights 22.5 metres apart, drawn as though spacetime were flat: time upward, height to the right, light at forty-five degrees. The lower clock sends two pulses; the upper clock receives them. Because the field does not change with time, nothing about the second pulse's journey differs from the first's, so the two null lines are congruent and the four worldlines bound a parallelogram. Opposite sides of a parallelogram in flat spacetime have equal length, so the proper time between emissions must equal the proper time between receptions, and the two clocks must agree. They do not: the measured fractional difference across a tower this tall is 2.455e-15, which Pound and Rebka established in 1960 and Pound and Snider confirmed to one per cent in 1964. Every step above is either a definition, an assumption of staticity, or a theorem of flat geometry — so the measurement refutes the flatness. No field equation has been written down, and none is needed: a laboratory result twenty-two metres tall is already incompatible with a flat spacetime.

The parallelogram that will not close

Two clocks twenty-two metres apart in a lift shaft run at different rates, by two parts in a thousand million million. That measurement, on its own, is enough to prove that spacetime cannot be flat — and the proof needs no field equation, no curvature tensor and no astronomy. It needs one drawing and the fact that opposite sides of a parallelogram are the same length.

4 figures · part 2 on Gravitational redshift The field near a neutral point. Field lines near a magnetic null, traced by following the local field direction rather than plotted from the closed form. The field is B ∝ (y, k²x) with k = 1, whose lines are the hyperbolae y² − k²x² = constant and whose separatrices are the straight lines y = ±1x. At k = 1 the X is symmetric and the current density is exactly zero: the field is curl-free, and nothing is stored in it beyond the field itself. The four quadrants are four separate flux systems, and which of them a given line belongs to is the quantity a frozen-in field is not allowed to alter.

The knot the field cannot untie

A perfectly conducting fluid cannot change which field line joins which piece of it. So two flux systems pushed together may be squashed indefinitely and can never merge, and the energy of the squashing accumulates with nowhere to go. The release happens only where the perfect conductivity locally fails — in a sheet three metres thick inside a structure ten thousand kilometres across — and the rate that follows is a hundred thousand times too slow for the flares that are observed.

4 figures · part 2 on Flux freezing

Every field · every reading path · every object named · every figure · what is taught wrongly · search