Illustrated Physics
physics, drawn
The collection

Every essay — page 8

One idea per essay, ordered so that the earlier ones set up the later ones — but nothing here depends on being read in sequence.

Mechanics

Motion, force, and the quantities that refuse to change.

Two pivots with one period, and the length between them. The period of a uniform bar 1 m long swung about a pivot, against the distance of that pivot from its centre of mass. Close to the centre the period runs away, because there is almost no restoring torque; far from it the bar behaves more and more like a simple pendulum. In between is a minimum at h = k = 0.2887 m, the radius of gyration, and because there is a minimum every period above it belongs to two pivots at once — here 0.4 m and 0.2083 m, whose product is k² and whose periods agree to 2.2e-16 seconds. Suspend the bar from those two knife edges in turn, adjust until the periods match, and the equivalent simple pendulum is the distance between them: 0.6083 m. Then g = 4π²(h+h′)/T² gives 9.8100 m/s², recovered from the drawing to 1.8e-16. The mass of the bar, the distribution of that mass, and the position of the centre of mass appear nowhere in the answer.

The length nobody has to measure

A pendulum's period depends on its length, so a pendulum will measure gravity — except that a real swinging bar has no single length, and finding where its mass effectively sits is far harder than timing it. Kater's answer was to build the instrument so that the awkward quantity cancels, leaving a distance between two knife edges that a rule can read to five figures.

4 figures · part 4 on Pendulum

Waves

Oscillation, and everything that turns out to be an oscillation.

The lowest note a pipe will carry. The dispersion relation of a guided wave for three cutoffs, in units where the free wave speed is one. Each curve leaves the vertical axis at its own cutoff and bends toward the diagonal, which is the free wave. Above the cutoff the phase velocity is the slope of the line from the origin and always exceeds one, while the group velocity is the slope of the curve and never does: at k = 2 their product is 1.0000, 1.0000, 1.0000, which is one to four decimal places in every case and is an identity rather than a coincidence. Below the cutoff there is no curve, because there is no travelling wave to draw.

The pipe that will not carry a low note

A wave squeezed sideways acquires a lowest frequency. Below it nothing travels — the field is there, it is large, and it goes nowhere. Above it the guide is dispersive whether or not anything in it is, and the pattern inside runs faster than light while the signal does not.

5 figures · part 1 on Guided waves The frequencies a repeat will not carry. The band structure of a medium made of quarter-wave layers of index 1 and 2, repeated for ever: frequency against Bloch phase across one cell, in the reduced zone. Inside a band the phase runs from 0 to π and the wave travels. Between bands there is no real phase at all, and the shaded strips are frequencies at which the medium supports nothing — not a weakly transmitted wave, no wave. Gap 1 runs from 0.784 to 1.216; Gap 2 runs from 2.784 to 3.216, in units of the quarter-wave design frequency. The first, measured off the drawn band edges, is 0.4327 wide against the 0.4327 of (4/π)·arcsin|r| — the same number computed from the Fresnel ratio of the two indices alone, agreeing to 2.6e-14 per cent. Every band edge sits where the phase is 0 or π, which is to say where the wave's own period fits the repeat a whole number of times: the gap is a property of the periodicity, and the materials only decide how wide it is.

The gap a repeat opens

Stack two transparent materials in alternating layers and there is a band of frequencies the stack will not carry — not weakly, not with loss, but not at all. Nothing has been absorbed and neither material has a resonance there. What forbids those frequencies is the repeat itself, and the width of the band has a closed form containing only the ratio of the two indices.

5 figures · part 1 on Periodic media A lens with two flat faces. Rays entering a rod whose refractive index falls parabolically from the axis outward, parallel to the axis and at -2.4, -1.2, 0, 1.2, 2.4 mm from it. The ray equation in such a medium is the harmonic oscillator's, so each path is a cosine of the same period whatever height it started at — which is exactly the condition for a focus, and the reason all of them cross the axis together at 12 mm. Nothing is curved anywhere: the faces are flat and the bending is done by the inside of the glass. Cut the rod at a quarter of the period and it images; cut it at half and it relays the beam parallel again, inverted. The period is a property of the profile alone, which is why a rod like this is specified by a length rather than by a curvature.

The channel with no walls

A pipe will not carry a note below its cutoff, and no length of pipe helps. Replace the walls with nothing but a region where the wave travels slightly slower, and the cutoff disappears — however weak the contrast and however thin the channel, at least one mode is bound. The difference is not a matter of degree; it is the difference between a boundary condition and a potential well.

7 figures · part 2 on Guided waves

Optics

Light, and the small number of rules it obeys.

Stationary, and not always shortest. Three mirrors through the same point, with the same source and the same detector, and the length of the reflected path against where on the mirror the ray strikes. The actual ray is the one at the centre in all three, because the tangent there is horizontal and the two angles are equal whatever the curvature. Its path is a minimum at 0.6× the ellipse's curvature, every path equal at 1× the ellipse's curvature, a maximum at 1.6× the ellipse's curvature. On the most curved mirror every path the light did not take is shorter than the one it did, so the principle cannot be stated as least time and survive; it has to be stated as stationary time, and the difference is not a technicality.

The path that takes the longest time

Light is said to take the quickest route. Put a source and a detector in front of a mirror curved a little more than the ellipse through them, and the route it takes is slower than every route beside it — by construction, not by exception. The principle was never about least; it was about stationary, and the difference is where optics stops being geometry.

4 figures · part 3 on Fermat The most any concentrator is allowed. The greatest concentration a receiver can be given, against the half-angle it accepts, both logarithmically, for a receiver in a medium of index 1. The upper curve is a three-dimensional concentrator, n²/sin²θ; the lower is a trough, which concentrates in one direction only, n/sin θ. The Sun's angular radius is 0.267°, so sunlight can be concentrated by at most 46165 times in a dish and 215 times in a trough — marked. Nothing about glass, mirrors, wavelength or aperture appears in either expression. The bound is thermodynamic: a receiver that accepts light out to θ also radiates out to θ, and the concentration at which what it emits balances what it absorbs is exactly where these curves are.

The brightness no lens can increase

A lens can make an image smaller and therefore hotter, and there is a temperature at which it stops — the temperature of the source. Every arrangement of glass and mirrors ever built obeys a bound that contains no wavelength, no aperture and no material — only the angle the receiver is allowed to accept — and the bound comes from thermodynamics rather than from optics.

5 figures · part 1 on Etendue What the return journey does to each of them. The rotation of the plane after a beam has gone through a rotator, been reflected, and come back, against the length of the rotator — divided by the one-way rotation, so the two answers are 0 and 2 and nothing else can happen. A naturally active medium is handed with respect to the beam: reverse the beam and the sense of the rotation reverses with it, and the second pass undoes the first exactly, at every length and every wavelength. A Faraday rotator is handed with respect to the field, which does not care which way the light is going, so the second pass adds to the first and the round trip is twice the single one: 1 mm of it gives 21.7° out and 43.4° back; 2 mm of it gives 43.4° out and 86.8° back; 4 mm of it gives 86.8° out and 173.6° back; 8 mm of it gives 173.6° out and 347.2° back. That is a violation of reciprocity, and it is only available because a magnetic field is odd under time reversal. Everything a passive optical component can do — a lens, a mirror, a waveplate, a piece of quartz — looks the same run backwards, and none of them can be made into a one-way street. This can.

The rotation a return trip doubles

Quartz turns the plane of polarisation and so does glass in a magnetic field. The two look identical on the way through and are opposites on the way back — the crystal undoes its own rotation exactly, and the magnet adds to it. That difference is the whole of why a one-way street for light can be built at all, and why nothing passive will ever be one.

8 figures · part 4 on Polarisation

Electromagnetism

Charge, field, and the lines drawn between them.

The field a polarised sphere makes inside itself. A uniformly polarised sphere, its bound surface charge drawn at the size the cosine gives it, the uniform field that charge makes inside, and the exact dipole field it makes outside. The internal field is the same everywhere and points against the polarisation — that is what makes it a depolarising field — and its size is P/3ε₀, the third being the sphere's share of the one unit the three axes divide between them.

The field the matter takes away

Put a piece of glass in an electric field and the field inside it is smaller. How much smaller is not a property of glass. A needle of it keeps almost the whole field, a sphere keeps three-quarters, a slab across the field keeps a seventh — same material, same applied field, three answers, and the difference is arithmetic about shape.

5 figures · part 1 on Dielectrics Where a magnet actually sits on its own curve. The second quadrant of a magnet's B–H curve, for a material with a remanence of 1.28 T, and the load lines four shapes of it impose. A magnet's own poles put it in a reverse field of N·M, so the working point is where the curve meets the line B = −μ₀(1−N)/N·H. A long thin magnet with N = 0.02 keeps 98 per cent of its remanence and a squat one with N = 0.7 keeps 30 per cent — the same material, cut differently.

The magnet that has to fight its own field

A bar magnet's own poles put it in a reverse field, so the same material cut short and fat is weak and cut long and thin is strong. And a magnetised material does not have a magnetisation — it has a magnetisation and a history, which is why the word for what it does is the Greek for coming late.

5 figures · part 1 on Magnetisation The shell of news, and the kink inside it. A charge that was moving at 0.6c to the right, stopped over a short interval, and has been at rest ever since. Outside the sphere of radius ct nothing has heard: the field there still points at the position the charge would have reached had it carried on, marked ahead of it. Inside, the field is that of a charge at rest. In between is a shell one deceleration-time thick, and across it the field line has to bend, because a field line cannot simply stop in empty space — the two ends are joined here to 8.5e-14 pixels. That bend is transverse to the radius, and it is the radiation. It is not an extra thing the charge emitted; it is the join between two static fields that do not line up, and it travels outward at c because that is where the news front is.

The field that points where the charge is now

The field here was set by what the charge was doing a distance over c ago, so it ought to point at where the charge used to be. For a charge moving steadily it points at where the charge is — not approximately, exactly — and nothing has outrun light. What breaks the arrangement is a change of motion, and the break is the whole of radiation.

7 figures · part 1 on Retardation Angular momentum that was in nothing at all. A ring carrying 10⁻⁶ C on a freely pivoted disc, with a solenoid on the axis threading 0.002 Wb through it, switched off over 1 second. Nothing is turning at the start and nothing has been touched. The collapsing flux drives a circumferential electric field round the ring, the ring is torqued, and the disc ends up spinning with 3.183·10⁻¹⁰ kg m²/s of angular momentum. Where was it? The two curves are the field's share, ε₀∫r × (E × B), and the matter's share integrated from the torque — computed by different routes and summing to a constant to 4.2e-15 of the total throughout. So the angular momentum was there before the switch was thrown, in a static electric field crossed with a static magnetic one, in a room where nothing whatever was moving. It is qΦ/2π, it does not depend on the radius of the ring or the shape of the solenoid, and it is the plainest demonstration available that the field is not a bookkeeping device for forces between distant charges.

The angular momentum that is in nothing at all

A charged ring and a solenoid, both at rest, with nothing moving anywhere. Switch the solenoid off and the ring starts to turn. Angular momentum is conserved, so it was there before the switch was thrown — and it was not in the matter, because nothing was moving. It was in the field, and it is qΦ over 2π whatever the geometry.

5 figures · part 2 on Field energy

Thermodynamics

Heat, disorder, and the one law with a direction in it.

The average position of something that is only shaking. The mean displacement of an oscillator against temperature, taken as a Boltzmann average over each well rather than from any expansion of it, with the temperature measured against each well's own depth so that unlike bonds can share an axis. A symmetric well gives exactly zero at every temperature — heating a harmonic solid makes it vibrate harder and does not make it larger. The others drift outward, because the outward side is the shallower one, and the measured slopes are a pendulum 0.000, a chemical bond 0.766, a pair of atoms 0.150. Thermal expansion is not a property a spring has; it is one a spring lacks.

Why heating a perfect spring changes nothing

A harmonic solid vibrates harder when heated and does not get any longer. Thermal expansion lives entirely in the term that the harmonic approximation throws away — and so does the fact that a solid conducts heat at a finite rate, which is the same discarded term doing a second job nobody would have connected to the first.

5 figures · part 3 on Harmonic approximation Two straight lines that are not the same line. Half the difference between the liquid and vapour densities, in units of the critical density, against the distance from the critical temperature — both logarithmic, over 5 decades. The van der Waals curve is solved for the coexisting pair at each temperature and its slope in the last decade is 0.500, which is the mean-field ½. Real fluids give 0.326. The two differ by 11 per cent at t = 0.1 and by a factor of 7.9 at the bottom of the axis, which is why an equation with the wrong exponent in it looked right for eighty years.

The point at which the two become one

Heat a sealed tube of carbon dioxide and the meniscus inside it does not boil away — it fades, the two densities converging until there is nothing to separate. Twenty millikelvin before that happens the fluid turns milky, and the exponent describing the last approach is a number van der Waals got wrong and could not have got right.

5 figures · part 4 on Phase change

Relativity

Space and time, drawn on the same axes.

Pushing one way and going another. The angle between an applied force and the acceleration it produces, against the angle between the force and the body's velocity, at four speeds. At 0° and 90° the two are parallel, because those are the two directions the γ³ and γ divisors do not mix. Everywhere between, they are not: at 0.99c the worst case is 73.9°, reached with the force at 8.0°. A body under a steady sideways-ish push does not travel along it.

The push that does not point where the body goes

Newton's second law survives relativity in the form F = dp/dt and in no other. Written as F = ma it fails outright, and not merely by a factor — at high speed a body pushed at forty-five degrees accelerates at eighty, because the same force is divided by γ³ along the motion and by γ across it.

5 figures · part 1 on Relativistic dynamics What a boost can and cannot do to a field. The electric and magnetic magnitudes of three fields, plotted against each other as the observer is boosted from -0.98c to 0.98c across them. Each field slides along a hyperbola, because E² − c²B² does not change: the recomputed value drifts by at most 2.6e-15 over every point drawn. The diagonal is E = cB, and which side of it a field starts on is permanent. Below it there is a speed at which the electric field vanishes; above it, one at which the magnetic field does; on it, a wave that no observer can slow, dim or unbalance.

The field nobody can transform away

A wire's magnetic field is an electric field seen from the wrong frame, and a charged plate's electric field is a magnetic one seen the same way. Neither trick works on a light wave. Two combinations of E and B are the same for every observer, and which side of one line a field sits on is a fact nothing about the observer can alter.

4 figures · part 2 on Field transformation

Quantum

Where the continuous picture runs out, and what replaces it.

Twenty-four decades of lifetime from a factor of two in energy. The half-lives of 7 alpha emitters against the reciprocal square root of the alpha's energy — the Geiger–Nuttall coordinates — with the measured values as points and a one-line tunnelling model as the open ones. The energies span a factor of 2.2 and the half-lives span 24 decades, which is what an exponent does. The model has no fitted parameter in it and reproduces every lifetime to within 0.5 decades — bad arithmetic by any ordinary standard, and a hundred-thousandth of the range it is predicting.

A wall that a factor of two makes impassable

Polonium-212 lives three tenths of a microsecond. Thorium-232 lives fourteen billion years. The alpha particles they emit differ in energy by a factor of two, and the lifetimes differ by twenty-four decades — because the quantity that decides is not the energy but an exponent built from it, and an exponent is where small differences go to become enormous.

5 figures · part 2 on Tunnelling How fast a spinning electron would have to turn. The equatorial speed of a uniform sphere with the electron's mass and an angular momentum of ħ/2, against the radius it is given, both logarithmically. The expression is 5ħ/4mr and it passes the speed of light at 4.83e-13 m — half a picometre, which is four hundred times larger than a hydrogen nucleus. Giving it a smaller radius only makes the answer worse: at the experimental upper bound, 10⁻¹⁸ m the equator would move at 4.8e+5 times the speed of light; at the classical electron radius the equator would move at 1.7e+2 times the speed of light; at the reduced Compton wavelength the equator would move at 1.3e+0 times the speed of light. No radius the electron is permitted to have gets anywhere near a legal answer, and the experimental bound is off the scale by eight orders of magnitude. So the angular momentum is not the angular momentum of anything going round. It is a property the particle has, in the same way a charge is, and the only thing it shares with a spinning top is the algebra it obeys — which is, admittedly, the whole of what angular momentum means in physics.

The angular momentum that is not a rotation

An electron has angular momentum, and it is not going round anything. A sphere of its mass carrying that much angular momentum would need its equator moving at half a million times the speed of light at any size the electron is allowed to have. What survives of the analogy is the algebra — and the algebra turns out to require that turning the thing all the way round leaves it changed.

4 figures · part 1 on Spin A quarter of the time, an object is found without being touched. The outcomes of sending one photon into a balanced interferometer, with and without an opaque object in one arm, computed from the same amplitudes. With the arm clear, every photon leaves by the bright port and the dark port receives nothing. With the object in place, 50 per cent of photons are absorbed by it, 25 per cent reach the bright port and say nothing, and 25 per cent reach the dark port — which is impossible unless something is in the arm, and which happens with the object still sitting there unabsorbed and unlit. The photon that produced that click did not go through the blocked arm, because a photon that goes through a blocked arm is absorbed. So an object has been located by light that never met it. The price is that 50 per cent of attempts destroy the thing being looked for: an efficiency of 33 per cent, which the Zeno version of the apparatus takes as close to one as one likes.

The measurement that never touched it

A balanced interferometer sends every photon to one output and none at all to the other. Put an object in one arm and the empty port starts clicking — and a click there is caused by a photon that cannot have gone near the object, because a photon that goes near it is absorbed. The object has been found by light that never met it.

6 figures · part 2 on Measurement

Fluids

Matter that will not hold a shape, and the forces that act in it anyway.

The same block, one of them with no upthrust at all. Two identical blocks 0.8 m tall with their tops 1.2 m under the surface, drawn with the pressure on every wetted face at its true relative size. On the right the block is clear of the floor and the pressure on its underside exceeds that on its top by 7.8 kPa, which is ρgh and is exactly Archimedes' 7.8 kPa. On the left the bedding is perfect and there is no water under it, so nothing pushes up: the resultant is 11.8 kPa downward and the block presses on the floor with more than its own weight. Buoyancy is not something the fluid has. It is what the bottom face is doing, and a face the fluid cannot reach does nothing.

The block the water does not lift

A block bedded flat on the bottom of a tank, with no water underneath it, feels no upthrust at all. It is fully submerged, Archimedes' principle is not suspended, and it presses on the floor with more than its own weight — because buoyancy is not something a fluid has, it is what the bottom face is doing, and a face the water cannot reach does nothing.

7 figures · part 4 on Buoyancy Solid and liquid are answers about a duration. The relaxation time of seven materials, on a logarithmic axis spanning 39 decades, against the length of one observation. A material behaves as a solid when its relaxation time is longer than the observation and as a liquid when it is shorter, so the vertical line is what decides which — and it is a property of the observer. At 1 s, 4 of these are solids. Move the line six decades to the right and pitch joins the liquids; move it far enough left and water is a glass, which is not a figure of speech but what a picosecond pulse measures.

The liquid that remembers

Pitch shatters like glass under a hammer and flows through a funnel over a decade. Neither behaviour is the true one. What decides which a substance shows is not the substance but the length of the observation, and the ratio between the two has a name and a number.

5 figures · part 2 on Rheology The stress that stops growing with depth. Vertical stress against depth in a silo of radius 0.5 m holding grain of bulk density 1500 kg/m³, with a wall friction coefficient of 0.5 and Janssen's ratio K = 0.5. The straight line is what a liquid of the same density would do — ρgz, with no length in it anywhere. The curve is what grains do: wall friction, mobilised by the sideways stress the grains themselves exert, removes weight from the column at a rate proportional to the stress, so the stress saturates at ρgλ over a screening length λ = R/2μK = 1.00 m. Read off the drawn curve at the 8 m base, the stress is 14.7 kPa against the 117.7 kPa the liquid delivers — 88 per cent of the weight is standing on the walls. Another twenty metres of grain would move the floor's reading by less than a pascal.

The silo that does not weigh what it holds

Pour water into a tall vessel and the pressure at the bottom is the depth times the density times g, whatever the shape above it. Pour grain in and the floor stops learning anything new after the first couple of metres, because the walls have quietly taken the rest — and the length over which they take it contains no property of the grain at all.

8 figures · part 1 on Granular matter The column a dissolved thing holds up. Two arms of one vessel, joined below by a membrane that passes water and not solute. On the right is 10 mol/m³ of dissolved particles at 25 °C; on the left, pure water. Water crosses into the solution until the extra weight of the right-hand column has raised its pressure by the osmotic pressure — 24.8 kPa, which is 2.53 m of water, drawn here to scale. Nothing is pulling. The solvent is at a lower chemical potential where it is mixed, so it moves that way, and it stops when mechanical pressure has made up the difference. A solute a thousand times more dilute than seawater lifts a column taller than a person.

The pressure that comes from counting

Dissolve a teaspoon of anything in a litre of water, put a membrane between it and pure water, and the solution will hold up a column of water two and a half metres tall. Nothing is pulling. The pressure does not depend on what was dissolved, only on how many particles it made — which is the ideal gas law, with the solute in place of the gas.

5 figures · part 1 on Osmosis

Astrophysics

Gravity read as geometry, and the laws carried where no laboratory can follow.

How long an orbit has before the waves take it. The time a circular orbit has left before gravitational radiation brings it together, against its separation, for four pairs of masses. Both axes are logarithmic and every curve has the same measured slope, 4.00: the lifetime goes as the fourth power of the separation, so halving an orbit shortens its remaining life by a factor of sixteen. The Earth's orbit is 13 decades above the age of the universe and the neutron-star binary is below it, which is the whole difference between a system that is losing energy and a system that is going to merge.

The orbit that has to shrink

Two masses in orbit radiate gravitational waves and lose energy, so the orbit tightens, so they go faster and radiate harder. The runaway takes 10²³ years for the Earth and the Sun and eight minutes for the last thousand kilometres of a black-hole pair — and the same one-line formula gives both.

5 figures · part 2 on Gravitational waves The line that slopes the wrong way. Mean temperature against total energy, for a self-gravitating sphere at nine radii. The points fall on a straight line of negative slope: taking energy away makes the body hotter. The heat capacity read off the drawing is -4.10e+34 J/K against the -4.10e+34 J/K the theorem gives, and the sign is the whole content. The dashed line is an ordinary gas in a rigid box, whose temperature rises when energy is added, as everything one can put a thermometer in does.

The ball of gas that heats up as it cools

Take energy away from a self-gravitating cloud and its temperature rises. Its heat capacity is negative, which nothing else stable does, and the consequence is that a star radiating into cold space is not cooling down — it is running up, and its whole life is a slow fall it cannot stop.

4 figures · part 2 on Self-gravity

Every field · every reading path · every object named · every figure · what is taught wrongly · search