Illustrated Physics
physics, drawn
The collection

Every essay — page 20

One idea per essay, ordered so that the earlier ones set up the later ones — but nothing here depends on being read in sequence.

Mechanics

Motion, force, and the quantities that refuse to change.

The stress a temperature change puts into a bar that cannot move. The stress in a member held between supports that will not let it change length, against how much its temperature changes, for four materials. Each line is EαΔT, computed here from a free expansion and the force needed to undo it, and checked by evaluating it for a bar half a metre long and one thirty-seven metres long: the two agree to every figure carried, because neither the length nor the cross-section appears in the answer. steel develops 2.40 MPa for every kelvin and reaches yield at 104 K; aluminium develops 1.59 MPa for every kelvin and reaches yield at 151 K; concrete develops 0.30 MPa for every kelvin and reaches cracking at 10 K; invar develops 0.17 MPa for every kelvin and reaches yield at 1655 K. Concrete reaches its cracking stress after ten kelvin, which is less than a sunny afternoon, and is why every slab has movement joints in it. Invar is in the comparison because it was made to have a small product: it is as stiff as steel and develops a fourteenth of the stress, which is a statement about the expansion coefficient and nothing else.

The load nobody applied

A redundant structure develops forces with nothing on it. Change its temperature and the same extra constraint that made statics unanswerable also refuses the expansion — and a restrained steel member reaches its yield stress after a hundred and four kelvin, a figure that contains no length, no area and no load.

5 figures · part 4 on Free-body Four stress states in one beam, and only one of them has no tension. Stress across the depth of a 300 by 600 millimetre concrete section at the middle of an eight-metre span, compression to the right, for four conditions. Under the load alone the bottom fibre is in tension at 11.1 MPa, which is four times what concrete can carry, so an ordinary reinforced beam cracks there and relies on steel to hold the crack together. With 1,500 kilonewtons of prestress 120 millimetres below the centroid and the full load applied, the section runs from 9.8 to 3.6 MPa and every fibre of it is in compression. The second case is the one that surprises: with the prestress applied and nothing whatever to oppose it, the top fibre is in tension at 1.7 MPa, because a force below the centroid bends the beam upwards. A prestressed beam is at its most vulnerable when nothing is on it, and what rescues it is its own weight: adding that alone brings the top back to 0.3 MPa of compression. Each stress block is checked by integrating it and recovering the force and the moment that produced it.

A state no load could reach

The free direction a redundant structure leaves open can be driven on purpose. Tighten a tendon through a concrete beam and its whole stress state moves into the half of the range the material is good at; tighten a bolt hard and the load it carries fluctuates by a fifth of what is applied to it. Both put the structure somewhere no arrangement of external loads could.

5 figures · part 5 on Free-body Four tolerances, four elastic answers, one collapse load. The force in each of a table's four legs against the load on it, for four different manufacturing errors, with the legs made of a material that yields at 25 kilonewtons. While everything is elastic the short diagonal pair takes more than its share by a fixed amount that depends on the error and not at all on the load, so the load at which the first leg reaches its capacity runs from 25 to 100 kilonewtons — a spread of more than a factor of three. Past that point the yielded legs hold a constant force and the others take the rest, and the difference the tolerance made is erased. Every one of the four cases collapses at 100 kilonewtons, which is four times one leg's capacity, checked here to a part in a million across the four. The quantity nobody could compute and the quantity that decides whether the structure stands are not the same quantity.

The one number the tolerances cannot touch

A redundant structure's load sharing depends on stiffnesses and manufacturing errors that nobody knows. Its collapse load does not depend on either. Once members yield they hold a known force instead of a force proportional to a displacement, the compatibility equations that needed the unknowns drop out, and the load at which the structure becomes a mechanism follows from a work balance with no stiffness in it at all.

6 figures · part 6 on Free-body

Waves

Oscillation, and everything that turns out to be an oscillation.

How far the vacuum is from being a nonlinear medium. The size of the vacuum's departure from linearity, as a fraction, against the electric field it is subjected to — thirteen decades of field and twenty-eight of correction, both logarithmic. The scale is the Schwinger field, computed here from the electron's mass and the fundamental constants as 1.32e+18 volts per metre: the field at which a pair gains its own rest energy over a Compton wavelength, and therefore the field at which the vacuum stops being a passive backdrop. The marks are the strongest fields that exist. a laboratory magnet, 10 T is 2.3e-9 of it; a hydrogen atom's own field is 3.9e-7 of it; a 10²² W/cm² laser focus is 2.1e-4 of it; the Schwinger field is 1.0e+0 of it; a magnetar, 10¹¹ T is 2.3e+1 of it. So a laboratory is twenty-eight decades from making the effect large, and a magnetar's field is above the critical one — which is why the only places the vacuum's nonlinearity has been seen are the two where the fields are not human: the ultraperipheral collision of two heavy nuclei, and the surface of a neutron star.

The one medium that was supposed to add exactly

Superposition holds because an equation is linear, and every material stops being linear at some amplitude. Empty space was the exception: Maxwell's equations are linear exactly, and two beams cross with no interaction of any kind. Quantum electrodynamics says otherwise — light scatters light, and a strong field makes the vacuum birefringent — at a field of 1.3 × 10¹⁸ volts per metre, which no laboratory has come within four decades of.

6 figures · part 3 on Superposition Two guides, and the two solutions they have. The transverse field of the two modes a pair of identical slab guides supports, against position across them, for guides half a micrometre wide separated by a gap of 300 nanometres at a wavelength of 1550 nanometres. A single guide has one fundamental mode; two guides side by side have two, and neither of them lives in one guide. The symmetric one is a single hump spanning both, the antisymmetric one has a node exactly between them — checked here to be exactly zero rather than nearly so — and they have slightly different propagation constants because the symmetric one has more of its field in the high-index gap region. That difference, computed from the slab's own dispersion condition, is 4.60e-2 per micrometre. Everything else about a coupler follows from it: a wave launched into one guide alone is the sum of the two supermodes in equal parts, they run at different speeds, and the interference between them moves the power from one guide to the other and back. There is no leakage in the account anywhere — only two solutions beating.

Two tails that swap everything

Bring two guides close enough for their evanescent tails to overlap and they do not leak a little power into each other. They exchange all of it, and then exchange it back, over a length fixed by the splitting between two modes that belong to neither guide — so a coupler is cut to a length rather than tuned to a ratio, and the length depends exponentially on a gap of a few hundred nanometres.

5 figures · part 5 on Guided waves The ripple that sits on top of an absorption edge. The Cu K absorption of copper foil, 293 K through its edge and for seven hundred electronvolts above it, with the smooth atomic background it would have if the absorbing atom were alone drawn beneath it. The difference between the two is the fine structure: a modulation reaching 11 per cent, dying away as the photon energy rises, and entirely absent from a free atom. It is there because the ejected electron is a wave that the neighbouring atoms scatter back onto the atom that emitted it, so the absorption depends on whether the returning wave arrives in step with the outgoing one — which depends on the distance to the neighbour and on nothing else about the sample.

The ripple that counts the neighbours

An absorption edge is drawn as a step and it is a step with a ripple on it — a modulation of eleven per cent in copper, five in a zinc site buried in a protein. The ripple is the ejected electron's own wave, scattered back onto the atom that emitted it, so its period is a distance. It is the only way of measuring where an atom's neighbours are that does not need a crystal.

7 figures · part 5 on Attenuation The edge that is a straight line, not a step. The absorption of gallium arsenide near its own band gap of 1.424 electronvolts, on a logarithmic axis, at 4 temperatures. Below the gap the absorption does not stop; it falls exponentially, along a straight line whose slope is an energy, and the straightness holds over several decades. Raising the temperature makes the line shallower — the tail reaches further below the gap — and the slope runs from 5.6 millielectronvolts at 10 kelvin to 7.5 at 300, a factor of 1.33. The lines pivot about a point just above the gap rather than rotating about nothing, which is what makes the slope a single number worth quoting. The band gap's own shift with temperature has been removed here, so that the fan is the tail's doing and not the gap's.

Below the gap, where there is nothing to absorb

A semiconductor is supposed to be transparent below its band gap, and it is not. The absorption falls exponentially instead, over seven decades, along a straight line whose slope is an energy of a few millielectronvolts — and the description that produces that line has no states in the gap at all. What the slope measures is how much the gap itself is moving about.

6 figures · part 6 on Attenuation

Optics

Light, and the small number of rules it obeys.

The étendue, tiled. The phase space of a one-dimensional optical system: position across a twenty-micrometre aperture, against the optical direction cosine n·sinθ, for a system accepting ±0.1. The shaded rectangle is what the beam occupies, and its area — 4 micrometre-radians — is the one-dimensional étendue, the quantity no arrangement of lenses can reduce. Divided by a wavelength of 500 nanometres it is 8, and the rectangle is tiled here with exactly 8 cells of area one wavelength each. That is the whole content of the count: a cell of phase-space area λ is the smallest patch a field can be confined to, because squeezing it in position spreads it in direction by the same relation that gives a slit its diffraction pattern, so an étendue is a number of modes and its conservation is the conservation of a count. The cells are drawn four wide and two high, which is arbitrary: only a cell's area is fixed, not its shape — a beam may be confined tightly in position and loosely in angle or the other way round, and the trade is what an optical system is for.

The invariant that is a count

Étendue is an area times a solid angle, and ray optics gives it no floor — nothing in a ray has a size. Divide it by the square of the wavelength and it becomes a number of modes, its conservation becomes the conservation of a count, and the count has a least value of one. That is where the ray bound hands over to diffraction, and the handover is the same number written two ways.

6 figures · part 4 on Etendue Two temperatures for the same sunlight. Sunlight described two ways, against how much it has been concentrated. The flat line is the temperature its spectrum belongs to — 5,762 K, the Sun's surface, which concentration does not change because a mirror does not alter a photon's energy. The rising curve is the temperature a blackbody would need in order to radiate the flux actually arriving: 394 K unconcentrated, 2213 K under a parabolic dish, and 5771 K at the geometric limit, where the two meet — computed here and checked against the Sun's own temperature, because a perfect concentrator reproduces the source's radiance and cannot exceed it. The gap between the two curves is the dilution, and dilution is entropy: the same energy spread over a hundred thousand times more directions occupies a hundred thousand times more modes. That is what a converter has to carry, and it is why the ceiling on solar conversion is not the Carnot efficiency between 5,762 K and 300 K.

The work a diluted beam will not do

Sunlight at the top of the atmosphere has the spectrum of a body at 5,762 kelvin and the energy flux of one at 394. The mismatch is not an accident of units: the light has been spread over a hundred thousand times more modes than it left in, and that dilution is entropy. Run it through a heat engine unconcentrated and five per cent of it is available as work.

6 figures · part 5 on Etendue Four rays that arrive together. Meridional rays through a fibre whose index falls as the square of the distance from the axis, launched at four angles, drawn against distance along the fibre in millimetres and radius in units of the core radius. Each path is integrated from the ray equation. A steep ray swings out to where the index is lower and travels faster; a shallow one stays near the axis where the index is highest and travels slowest, and in a parabolic profile the two effects cancel: the four rays cross the axis within 0.36 per cent of a pitch of each other, measured off the traced paths rather than assumed. The pitch is 1.11 millimetres and it contains no launch angle, which is the whole of the result. Nothing about what the fibre accepts has changed — the acceptance cone is what the invariant fixed and it is untouched — and everything about when the light arrives has.

The same cone, and a different arrival

The invariant fixes what a guide accepts and says nothing about when it arrives, and the two turn out to be nearly independent. Shaping the index so that the rays which travel furthest also travel fastest cuts the spread in arrival times by a factor of five hundred, at the cost of exactly half the light — and the acceptance cone the invariant governs is untouched throughout.

5 figures · part 6 on Etendue

Electromagnetism

Charge, field, and the lines drawn between them.

Two energies with opposite slopes, and the width between them. The energy per unit area of a domain wall in iron, against the width the wall is assumed to have, split into the two terms that decide it. The exchange term falls as one over the width, because a reversal spread over more atoms turns through a smaller angle between each neighbouring pair. The anisotropy term rises in proportion to the width, because every atom inside the wall points away from an easy direction and pays for it. The sum has a least value, found here by scanning four hundred thousand widths: 92.9 nanometres and 4.46 millijoules per square metre. Neither constant is a dimension of the sample, so neither is the width: it is the first length in magnetism that belongs to the material. The assumed profile turns at a uniform rate, which is not the cheapest way to turn, so this width is 41 per cent above the conventional πδ of the exact profile, and this energy 11 per cent above the exact 4√(AK). A trial function can only ever overestimate, and eleven per cent is how much this one costs.

The first length that belongs to the substance

Every length in magnetism so far has been a length of the sample — a demagnetising factor is a shape, an avalanche cutoff is a sample's own restoring field. A domain wall's width is not. It is √(A/K), made of two material constants and nothing else, and across seven ordinary magnets it runs from two and a half nanometres to nine hundred.

6 figures · part 5 on Magnetisation The barrier a reverse field takes away. The energy of a single-domain particle against the direction its moment points, in units of its anisotropy energy, for four strengths of reverse field along the easy axis. With no field the two directions are equally good and the barrier between them is exactly the anisotropy energy. A reverse field tilts the landscape and lowers the barrier out of the forward well as the square of the field: at 0.0 of the anisotropy field the barrier is 1.000 KV, at 0.1 of the anisotropy field the barrier is 0.810 KV, at 0.3 of the anisotropy field the barrier is 0.490 KV, at 0.6 of the anisotropy field the barrier is 0.160 KV. Each barrier is located by scanning two hundred thousand directions for the stationary points rather than by substituting the formula. The whole of the argument follows from the barrier being finite: a particle does not need the field that removes the barrier, only time enough to be shaken over what is left of it.

Nothing keeps a magnetisation for ever

A magnetised particle sits in a well with a barrier between it and the other direction, and a barrier of finite height is crossed eventually. So remanence has a lifetime, coercivity is a different number depending on how fast it is measured, and a grain below about twenty nanometres of iron forgets within a second at room temperature.

6 figures · part 6 on Magnetisation

Thermodynamics

Heat, disorder, and the one law with a direction in it.

The condition three modes never quite satisfy. By how much three modes of a thirty-two mass chain fail to be in resonance — the sum of two mode frequencies minus the frequency of their sum, on a logarithmic scale, against the second of the two modes for four choices of the first. The leading nonlinear term couples modes in threes and the exchange accumulates only where this quantity is zero. It never is: the chain's dispersion is a sine, a sine is concave, and the sum of two of its values always exceeds the value at their sum. The smallest mismatch anywhere on the chain is at the two lowest modes and equals 2.156e-4 — which the scan finds and which is the cube of pi over four times the cube of one more than the mode count, checked here on chains from eight masses to two hundred and fifty-six. That closed form is the whole of why this is a finite-chain problem: the mismatch falls as the cube of the length, so a long enough chain is arbitrarily close to resonant and the continuum limit is exactly resonant, which is where the solitary waves come from.

The condition three modes never meet

Whether two modes of a chain can hand energy to a third is arithmetic on the dispersion relation, and for a chain of masses the answer is never: a sine is concave, so the sum of two frequencies always exceeds the frequency of their sum. The smallest shortfall anywhere on a chain of N masses is π³/4(N+1)³ — never zero, and never far from it — and a shortfall turns a transfer into a beat.

5 figures · part 5 on Equipartition The modes of a wire, counted. Nyquist's argument of 1928, with its count performed. Two resistors joined by a lossless line are in equilibrium, and the line is a one-dimensional cavity whose standing waves are spaced c/2L apart in frequency. Each mode has an electric and a magnetic energy, both quadratic, so equipartition gives it kT — the same half a kT per quadratic term that a heat capacity counts. The upper points are how many modes fall in a band of a hundred and thirty-seven megahertz, for five line lengths, from 17 on a thirteen-metre line to 8,558 on one of six kilometres. The lower points are the power each end therefore receives, as a fraction of kTΔf, and they converge on one: a longer line has proportionally more modes and takes proportionally longer to deliver them, so the length cancels. The longest line lands within 0.005 per cent and the shortest is 4.5 per cent low, because thirteen metres holds only seventeen whole modes in the band and the remainder is a real granularity rather than an error. What is left in the limit is kTΔf — a noise power with no resistance in it at all, and none of the line's properties either.

Half a kT in a piece of wire

Count the quadratic terms in a molecule's energy and equipartition gives a heat capacity. Count them on a transmission line instead and the same theorem gives a resistor's noise voltage — 4kTRΔf, with nothing in it about what the resistor is made of. A fifty-ohm input at room temperature says 0.91 nanovolts in every root hertz, and no design removes it.

5 figures · part 6 on Equipartition Twice the kinetic energy, and what it equals. Twice the time-averaged kinetic energy of a bound orbit, divided by its time-averaged potential energy, against the power with which that potential depends on separation. Each point is a measurement: an eccentric orbit integrated for more than a hundred radial periods, with the two averages accumulated along it, and the radius checked to vary by at least a fifth so that the orbit is not trivially circular. The line is the exponent itself, and the points miss it by at most 6.6e-4. Two cases carry everything. At n = 2, a harmonic well, the two energies are equal — which is the ordinary equipartition statement, half a kT to the kinetic term and half a kT to the potential one. At n = −1, which is gravity and the Coulomb force, twice the kinetic energy equals minus the potential energy, so the total energy of a bound system is minus its kinetic energy. Nothing about temperature entered, and nothing about equilibrium: the relation holds for one orbit averaged over time as well as for a crowd averaged over members.

Weighing what cannot be put on a scale

Summed over every coordinate of a bound system, equipartition stops being a statement about temperature and becomes a relation between two averages: twice the kinetic energy equals n times the potential energy for a potential going as the nth power. For gravity that fixes a bound system's total energy from how fast its parts move — so a Doppler shift and an angular size return a mass, and for the Coma cluster the mass they return is fifty times the mass that shines.

6 figures · part 7 on Equipartition

Relativity

Space and time, drawn on the same axes.

How large now is, on this planet. By how much a synchronisation carried around a region of the rotating Earth fails to come back to itself, against the size of that region — from a metre to the whole planet, both axes logarithmic. The three horizontal lines are what three kinds of clock can resolve, and where each crosses the curve is where that clock can detect that 'now' is not a global notion: a good wristwatch at 785 thousand km, a quartz oscillator at 25 thousand km, a caesium clock at 785 km. Carried the whole way round the equator the defect is 207 nanoseconds, which is sixty metres of light travel and is the correction every satellite-navigation system applies. The effect is not small and not exotic; it is a routine engineering term, and the reason it was not an engineering term before 1955 is that nothing could measure it. A wristwatch's now is global out past the Moon; a caesium clock's reaches about the width of a large country.

How big now is

Three earlier arguments have established that a global now is a choice, that part of the choice is convention, and that for a rotating observer no consistent global choice exists at all. What survives is a size. Every observer has a local now, and how local is computable: on the rotating Earth it is 785 kilometres to the nanosecond, and a freely falling frame is inertial over the tolerance times the distance to the centre, divided by two.

6 figures · part 5 on Simultaneity

Quantum

Where the continuous picture runs out, and what replaces it.

Four outcomes, one of which happened. The correlation between the two outer particles' measurements, against the angle between their analysers, for each of the four results the middle measurement can give. Every one of the four leaves the outer pair maximally entangled — each curve reaches one and minus one — so every outcome is as good as any other, and the outer parties have a perfect Bell pair whichever it was. What differs is which correlation they have, and the four are shifted and reflected versions of each other. The flat line is their average, which is zero at every angle, checked here at seven hundred and twenty angles to twelve figures. That vanishing is the whole reason the operation cannot be used to send anything: until the middle party's two classical bits arrive by an ordinary channel, the outer parties' data is indistinguishable from noise, and no correlation appears at all. The entanglement is created instantly and is useless until a message travelling no faster than light says which of the four it is.

A link between two that never met

Take two entangled pairs sharing no particle, measure the two inner particles jointly, and the two outer ones — which have never interacted, never been in the same place, and have no history in common — are entangled. Nothing travelled between them. What has to travel is two classical bits saying which of four results occurred, and until those arrive the outer parties see nothing at all.

6 figures · part 4 on Entanglement How much a block knows about the rest. The entanglement between a block of a one-dimensional chain and everything outside it, against how long the block is, for three states of the same number of particles. The straight line is a randomly chosen state, whose entanglement is the block's length times the logarithm of two — a volume law, and what almost every state in Hilbert space does. The flat curve is the ground state of a chain with a gap: it saturates, varying by less than a twentieth of a per cent from a block of eight to one of forty, because the boundary of a one-dimensional block is two points however long the block is. The middle curve is the ground state of a gapless chain, which grows as the logarithm of the size with a coefficient measured here as 0.333 against the third that conformal field theory gives. Both ground states are enormously less entangled than a random state, and that is not a detail about chains: it is why a ground state can be written down at all.

The corner of Hilbert space that is ever visited

Monogamy between three parties says how much of a correlation a pair may hold. Read across a boundary in a many-body system it says something much stronger: the entanglement between a region and the rest scales with the boundary rather than the volume, for the ground state of anything with local interactions. That is why such a state can be written down at all — and why almost every state in Hilbert space is one that nothing ever prepares.

5 figures · part 5 on Entanglement

Fluids

Matter that will not hold a shape, and the forces that act in it anyway.

A body at an interface, and the difference that holds it. The net upward force on a ten-centimetre cube straddling the boundary between two fluids, against how far its underside sits below that boundary — each curve scaled by its own largest value so that three very different cases fit on one axis. The displaced weight has to be counted twice, once with each density, so the force is linear in the displacement with a stiffness set by gravity, the cube's cross-section and the difference of the two densities — the difference, and neither of them alone. air over water holds the cube with its underside 60 per cent of the way through, at a stiffness of 97.8 newtons per metre; oil over water holds the cube with its underside 47 per cent of the way through, at a stiffness of 14.5 newtons per metre; water over mercury holds the cube with its underside 24 per cent of the way through, at a stiffness of 1229.4 newtons per metre. Both numbers are read off the drawn curve rather than substituted. The consequence is the one worth the figure: a body at an oil–water interface is held six times less stiffly than the same body at an air–water one, because the density difference is six times smaller, and the ordinary intuition that a denser fluid holds a body more firmly is exactly wrong — what matters is the contrast across the surface the body is sitting in.

The body that displaces two things

Every earlier argument has a body wetted by one fluid, so the displaced weight is a volume times a density. A body at an interface displaces two, and what holds it is the *difference* between them — so the same block is held six times less stiffly at an oil–water boundary than at an air–water one. In a continuously stratified column the neutral depth becomes stable, which is the exact opposite of the compressible case.

6 figures · part 5 on Buoyancy The four vortices a standing wave leaves behind. Streamlines of the steady flow that a standing sound wave sets up in a channel, over half an acoustic wavelength, with the horizontal axis in units of the wave's own phase and the vertical axis scaled to the channel. The sound itself is a back-and-forth motion that averages to nothing; this is what does not average to nothing. Four closed cells fill each wavelength, two above the centreline and two below, turning in opposite senses, with the fluid moving along the walls toward the velocity nodes and back along the centre. The boundary layer that generates all of it is 69 micrometres thick, which is 0.7 per cent of the channel and is thinner than the width of a line in this drawing. The cells are not in the layer; they fill the channel.

The drift a sound leaves behind

A sound wave moves fluid back and forth and puts it back where it started. Over many cycles it does not: a steady circulation appears, four cells to a wavelength, driven entirely from inside a boundary layer seventy micrometres thick. Its speed contains the sound speed and the amplitude, and it contains no viscosity at all — so making the fluid thinner does not make the drift weaker.

5 figures · part 5 on Viscosity The pressure at which an oil becomes a glass. Viscosity against pressure for 4 liquids on a logarithmic axis, from Barus's rule with the pressure coefficient each one actually has. The rule is an exponential, so a gigapascal multiplies an ordinary oil's viscosity by a hundred million or more, and the curves cross the line conventionally taken to mark a glass — a million million pascal-seconds — at 1.37 GPa for a mineral oil, 0.98 GPa for a traction fluid. The vertical line is the peak pressure inside the loaded contact this figure is about, 1.32 gigapascals, computed from the Hertz solution for that geometry and load. Water is drawn for contrast: its pressure coefficient is thirty times smaller, it never approaches a glass over this range, and that is why it is useless as a lubricant in a rolling contact however clean it is. Each curve is drawn solid up to the glass line and dashed above it, because past that point the material is not a liquid and its viscosity is not what decides how it shears — the exponential continues, and the substance it was written for does not.

The oil that is a glass for a quarter of a millisecond

Every other account of viscosity here varies the temperature. Pressure does something larger and in the same direction for every liquid: viscosity rises exponentially, by a factor of ten to the eight or more at the gigapascal inside a loaded gear tooth. That is not a curiosity — it is the only reason there is a film there at all. Remove the pressure dependence from the calculation and the predicted film is five nanometres, under the roughness, and the surfaces touch.

6 figures · part 6 on Viscosity 14 decades of fluid, and a floor none of them reaches. The ratio of viscosity to entropy density for 8 substances, in units of the proposed lower bound, on a logarithmic axis. The quantity is a viscosity divided by how much entropy a cubic metre of the substance holds, and it has the dimensions of Planck's constant over Boltzmann's — so a bound on it is a statement with no material properties in it at all. The span here is a factor of 1.6e+14, from pitch at 20 °C at the top to the quark–gluon plasma at the bottom, which sits a factor of 1.6 above the floor. The values marked as computed are worked out from a viscosity and a tabulated entropy; the rest are quoted from the compilations, because a minimum along an isobar is an inference from many measurements rather than a single one.

Whether a fluid can be made arbitrarily thin

Viscosity has no units anybody would call fundamental, and nothing obviously stops it being as small as you like. Divide it by the entropy in a cubic metre and the units become Planck's constant over Boltzmann's — and a conjecture from 2005 says that ratio has a floor. Across fourteen decades of ordinary fluid nothing has been measured below it, the closest thing to it is the hottest matter ever made, and a kinetic-theory argument reaches the same number from the opposite direction.

5 figures · part 7 on Viscosity

Astrophysics

Gravity read as geometry, and the laws carried where no laboratory can follow.

The one prediction the Planck scale makes. The energy density the vacuum should have, from summing the zero-point energy of a field's modes up to a cutoff, against where that cutoff is put — thirty decades of cutoff energy and a hundred and thirty of density, both logarithmic. The horizontal line is what is measured: 5.34e-10 joules per cubic metre, the dark energy that accounts for sixty-nine per cent of the universe. Cutting the sum off at the Planck energy — which is where dimensional analysis says every description available runs out — overshoots it by 10^121. That is the largest disagreement between an estimate and a measurement anywhere in physics, and the slope of the line is why it cannot be argued away: the density goes as the fourth power of the cutoff, so cutting off at the electroweak scale still overshoots by 10^54 and cutting off at one electronvolt — below which no physics is in doubt at all — still overshoots by 10^8. The cutoff that would give the right answer is 8.0e-3 electronvolts, which is a wavelength of about a tenth of a millimetre and corresponds to no known physics whatever.

The estimate that misses by a hundred and twenty

Every argument about the Planck scale is an argument about consistency rather than about data, with one exception. The zero-point energy of the quantum fields gravitates, dimensional analysis at the Planck cutoff says how much, and what is measured is 10¹²¹ times smaller. It is the largest disagreement between an estimate and a measurement anywhere in physics, and lowering the cutoff does not rescue it.

5 figures · part 3 on Planck scale How large the hidden dimensions would have to be. The size extra dimensions would need, for gravity's true scale to be at a TeV rather than at 10¹⁹ GeV, against how many of them there are — a logarithmic axis of metres, for three choices of the true scale. The relation is the one that makes the arrangement work: the Planck mass observed in four dimensions is M_*^(2+n)Rⁿ, so gravity is weak because its field spreads into a volume nothing else can enter. Solved for R at a true scale of a TeV: 1 dimension needs 2.9e+13 m, 2 dimensions needs 2.4e-3 m, 3 dimensions needs 1.0e-8 m, 4 dimensions needs 2.2e-11 m, 5 dimensions needs 5.4e-13 m, 6 dimensions needs 4.5e-14 m. The two horizontal lines are where experiment has been. One extra dimension would have to be of order a hundred astronomical units, which would have wrecked the orbits of the planets and is excluded absolutely. Two would have to be of order a millimetre — which is what made the arrangement famous, because a millimetre is a distance a laboratory can test, and torsion balances have since verified the inverse-square law down to fifty-two micrometres and excluded it. Three or more sit below a nanometre, where no gravitational measurement reaches, and are untouched.

The scale that may not be where it looks

Every Planck number assumes gravity is four-dimensional all the way down. If it is not — if the field spreads into dimensions compact enough to have escaped notice — the true scale where gravity becomes strong could be at a TeV, and the whole remoteness of the Planck scale would be an artefact of where the field lines go. It is the one part of the subject an experiment can address, and the experiments have addressed it.

5 figures · part 4 on Planck scale

Every field · every reading path · every object named · every figure · what is taught wrongly · search