Illustrated Physics
physics, drawn
The collection

Every essay — page 14

One idea per essay, ordered so that the earlier ones set up the later ones — but nothing here depends on being read in sequence.

Mechanics

Motion, force, and the quantities that refuse to change.

The same top, let go four ways. The path traced by the top of the axis, seen from directly above, over 1.2 precession periods. The dashed circle is the tilt the top was released at and the outer circle is 46.8° from the vertical. Released from rest the axis falls, and the fall is what generates the sideways motion: the path comes to a cusp each time it returns to the starting tilt, because at that instant the precession rate is momentarily zero. Launched at exactly the steady rate the path is a circle and the nutation is absent. Launched slower it waves; launched faster it loops: at 0× the steady rate the path comes to cusps, at 0.45× the steady rate the path waves, at 1× the steady rate the path stays a circle, at 1.9× the steady rate the path waves. Every one of these is the same equation with the same top and the same spin.

The top that nods before it settles

A spinning top let go from rest does not begin to precess. It falls, catches itself, and comes back up, over and over, at a frequency that has nothing to do with gravity — and the steady precession every textbook draws is what is left after friction has removed the nod.

5 figures · part 6 on Rotation 5 balls whose contact force goes as the overlap to the three halves, touching. The velocity of every ball in a line of 5, against time in units of one binary contact, with the first arriving at unit speed. Nothing about collisions is assumed: neighbours push on each other with k times their overlap raised to the power 1.5, and the equations of motion are integrated. With the balls touching there is no such separation — several overlaps are non-zero at once and the disturbance crosses the line as a single compression wave. The far ball leaves at 0.989 of the striking speed and the others keep 0.011 between them, which is why a real cradle's balls do not quite come to rest. Momentum and energy are conserved to 4.4e-16 and 4.1e-8, so the difference between the two cases is the contact law and not the bookkeeping.

Five balls, and the law that does not choose

The usual account of a Newton's cradle says that momentum and energy conservation force one ball out at the striking speed. For three balls or more they do no such thing: the two laws leave a whole curve of possible outcomes, and what picks one is the shape of the force between two touching spheres.

6 figures · part 5 on Momentum How much a wrap holds, against how many turns it is. The ratio of the two tensions a rope can hold across, against the number of turns it is wrapped, for coefficients of 0.1, 0.25, 0.5. The axis is logarithmic because the law is exponential, so each line is straight and its slope is the coefficient. At µ = 0.1 one turn multiplies by 1.9, two turns by 4 and three by 7 — so a person pulling with the strength of one arm holds a load that a small crane would be needed to lift. The practical consequence is the one a sailor states as a rule: turns are cheap and each is worth as much as the one before it, which is a statement about a constant factor rather than a constant force.

The part of the wrap that is actually gripping

The capstan equation gives the largest tension ratio a wrap can hold, and almost nothing spends its life at that limit. Below it the wrap divides in two: an idle arc doing nothing at all and an active arc creeping and carrying the whole exponential — and the division explains a belt's speed loss and its squeal.

5 figures · part 4 on Friction Two principles, two classes of path, two things left free. On the left, five curves from the same launch point to the same target: the true trajectory of a particle of energy 0.7 in a uniform field, and four deformations of it that share both ends. On the right, four quantities computed along that family and plotted as departures from their values on the true path. Maupertuis' abbreviated action ∫p·ds, computed at fixed energy, is stationary — flat at the centre. Hamilton's action ∫L dt, computed at fixed duration, is stationary too. The other two are not: the time a fixed-energy path takes changes at first order in the deformation, and so does the energy a fixed-duration path carries. That is the whole difference between the two principles. Each holds one of those quantities fixed and lets the other vary, and neither can hold both.

The principle that fixes the energy instead of the clock

There are two principles of least action, they compare different sets of paths, and they are not the same statement. One holds the duration fixed and lets the energy vary; the other holds the energy fixed and lets the duration vary — and written that way, mechanics turns into optics with a refractive index.

5 figures · part 4 on Least action Every value the orbit of x → r x(1 − x) settles on. The values a long orbit of x → r x(1 − x) visits, one column of the picture for each of 320 settings of r between 2.8 and 4. A single point means the orbit settles to one value, two means it alternates, and each branching doubles the count with the gaps shrinking by a constant factor. The superstable settings marked run 3.23607, 3.49856, 3.55464, located by bisection on the map itself. They accumulate at r = 3.569946, and past it the orbit visits a band of values rather than a list of them. The bands are not noise: the map has no random number in it, and the same initial value gives the same orbit every time.

The map a dripping tap turns out to be

A universal result about one-dimensional maps is worth nothing to a physicist unless a real system is one, and a tap, a convection cell and a driven circuit are continuous systems with no map in sight. What makes them maps is dissipation — and the systems that have none take a different route entirely.

5 figures · part 4 on Chaos A drive at one frequency, and what comes back at three times it. The Fourier components of the steady motion of an oscillator driven at a single frequency ω = 1.35, for drive strengths of 0.02, 0.05, 0.1. The equation is a harmonic oscillator with a cubic term added, and the components are projected out of the integrated motion rather than assumed. A linear oscillator answers only in the first column. This one answers in the third as well, because x³ of a cosine contains a cosine of three times the angle. The third harmonic grows as the drive to the power 3.00 where the fundamental grows as the power 1.00, so it is negligible at small drive and not at large — which is why nonlinearity in an instrument is a specification rather than a yes or no.

The oscillator that answers at three times the question

Push a spring hard enough that the parabola stops being the whole story, and three things happen that a linear oscillator cannot do: it emits frequencies nobody supplied, its resonance leans over, and its amplitude at one drive frequency depends on where the drive has been.

5 figures · part 4 on Harmonic approximation

Optics

Light, and the small number of rules it obeys.

The same source measured by amplitude and by intensity. The degree of coherence of a 47 milliarcsecond disc at 550 nm, and its square, against the separation of two apertures. A Michelson interferometer measures the upper curve, because fringe contrast is |γ|. Correlating the intensities at the two apertures instead measures the lower one, because the excess correlation of two thermal beams is |γ|² — the same information about the source, since one curve determines the other, and reaching zero at the same baseline of 2.94 m. What is lost is the phase of γ, which the intensity correlation never sees; what is bought is that a path error of many wavelengths does not matter, because the quantity being correlated is a slow fluctuation of brightness rather than a wave. The half-coherence baselines differ — 1.71 m against 1.25 m — which is the practical statement that the squared curve is the steeper one to measure against.

The correlation that survives what the phase does not

Two telescopes can measure a star's diameter by interfering the light, which requires holding two paths equal to a fraction of a wavelength through an atmosphere that will not hold still. Or they can throw the phase away entirely and correlate the brightness fluctuations, which needs the paths equal to a few metres and works.

4 figures · part 5 on Coherence

Electromagnetism

Charge, field, and the lines drawn between them.

The only part of the field that can pull. A dielectric slab part-way into a parallel-plate capacitor. Everywhere except at the slab's edge the field is perpendicular to the plates and therefore perpendicular to the direction the slab can move, so it exerts no force along that direction at all: inside the parallel-plate model, which is uniform between the plates and zero outside them, nothing pulls the slab anywhere. The force lives in the bowed lines drawn at the edge, where the field leaks past the end of the dielectric and acquires a component along the plates. Those lines are what the model throws away as a small correction near the boundary, and they are the entire mechanism. The energy method sidesteps the drawing altogether: differentiate the total energy with respect to the insertion and the answer is 1.328e-3 newtons, inward, without ever asking where on the slab the force is applied.

The force that lives where the model is not

A slab of glass held at the mouth of a charged capacitor is pulled in. Inside the parallel-plate model there is no force at all — the field is perpendicular to the slab's motion everywhere — and the same model's energy nevertheless gives the pull exactly right. The mechanism is entirely in the part of the field the model throws away.

4 figures · part 4 on Dielectrics The outward pull on a charged surface. Electrostatic pressure against the field at a conductor's surface. The quantity is ½ε₀E², the energy density of the field itself, and it is outward whatever the sign of the charge — like charges repel, and a charged surface is trying to fly apart. The factor of a half is the interesting part and is where a first attempt goes wrong: the field is σ/ε₀ outside and zero inside, and the layer of charge feels neither of those but their mean, because no charge exerts a force on itself. 0.5 MV/m gives 1.1 Pa, 1 MV/m gives 4.4 Pa, 2 MV/m gives 17.7 Pa, 3 MV/m gives 39.8 Pa, 5 MV/m gives 110.7 Pa. Those are small pressures — three megavolts per metre is the breakdown field of air and pulls with about a hundredth of an atmosphere — which is why electrostatic forces shape soap films and dust and not much that is stiffer, and why the same pressure set against surface tension has a definite size of drop at which it wins.

The pressure a charge puts on its own metal

Charge on a conductor sits on the surface and tries to leave. The outward pull is half epsilon-nought E squared, the half is because a charge exerts no force on itself, and setting that pull against surface tension gives the largest a charged drop is allowed to be — a number Rayleigh wrote down in 1882 and an industry now depends on.

5 figures · part 5 on Conductors How much of μ₀N²A/ℓ a real coil actually has. The inductance of a 140-turn coil of radius 10 mm, divided by the long-solenoid formula μ₀N²A/ℓ, against how long the coil is compared with its diameter. The inductance is computed as a sum of Maxwell's mutual inductances between every pair of turns plus each turn's own, so the long-coil formula appears nowhere in it. At a length equal to the diameter the real coil has 68% of what the formula promises, and at a quarter of the diameter about a third. The reason is that the formula assumes every turn is threaded by the full interior field, and near the ends of a short coil the field has already begun to spread. The ratio is Nagaoka's coefficient, tabulated since 1909, and the computed points agree with the table.

The circuit that fights its own change

Every circuit is threaded by the field its own current makes, so every circuit resists having that current altered. It is the reason a coil takes time to start and the reason breaking one makes a voltage a thousand times the supply's.

5 figures · part 5 on Induction The current crowding into a contact spot. A meridional section through a circular contact between two solids, with the spot at the centre. The closed curves are equipotentials and the curves running through the spot are current lines, each carrying an equal share. Both are exact: in the coordinates built on the spot's rim the equipotentials are confocal spheroids and the current lines confocal hyperboloids, and in this section they are ellipses and hyperbolas. What the picture shows is that the current has to converge from a region many spot radii across and then spread again, and that the potential falls almost entirely within a few radii of the contact. The equipotential drawn at 12% of the drop sits 5.2 radii away, and everything beyond it contributes that last 12%.

The resistance that is a length

Two metals touching do not touch over the area they appear to. Current crosses at a few small spots and has to converge into each one, and the resistance of that convergence contains no area and no path length — only the size of the spot, divided into the resistivity.

5 figures · part 6 on Conductors A magnetisation curve, and the same curve magnified. On the left, the position of a domain wall against the applied field, over the whole of a crystal. It looks like a curve. On the right, a window 2.0% of its width, taken 42% of the way across, at the magnification a sensitive measurement reaches: the wall does not move at all while the field rises, then jumps, then stops again. The largest jump in the window covers 0.67 units of wall position in no field change at all. There is nothing smooth underneath this — the smooth curve on the left is a staircase with 1400 steps in it, drawn small.

The curve that is really a staircase

A magnetisation curve is drawn as a smooth line and is nothing of the sort. Measured finely enough it is a sequence of jumps of every size, audible as a crackle in a coil, with no typical jump and no smooth motion underneath.

5 figures · part 3 on Magnetisation The rotation that mixes electricity into magnetism. The two Lorentz invariants of a field — E² − c²B² across and 2E·cB up — as the field is rotated by the duality transformation that takes E into cB and cB into −E. Every configuration moves on a circle, so the combination of the two invariants is preserved while neither is. A light wave sits at the origin and stays there, which is why a wave cannot be turned into anything else by this rotation; a static charge starts on the positive axis and is carried round to a pure magnetic field a quarter turn later. The source-free equations are unchanged by the whole family, so a universe with no charges in it has no way to say which field is which.

The symmetry one missing charge would complete

Maxwell's equations with no sources are unchanged by rotating the electric field into the magnetic one. With sources they are not, and the only thing missing is magnetic charge — which, if one existed anywhere, would force every electric charge in the universe to be a multiple of a fixed unit.

5 figures · part 4 on Maxwell equations

Thermodynamics

Heat, disorder, and the one law with a direction in it.

The year, arriving underground at four different times. Temperature against depth in soil of diffusivity 0.5 mm²/s, at four times of year, measured from the annual mean. The surface swings by ±12 K; the swing underground is smaller and later, and both are governed by one length, δ = √(2D/ω) = 2.24 m. The amplitude falls as e^(−z/δ) — the dashed envelope — and the phase lags by z/δ radians, so the curves lean over as they go down and cross the axis at different depths. At 7.0 m the lag is half a year: the ground there is at its coldest in August and its warmest in February, in antiphase with the sky, with a swing of 0.52 K left. That is a cellar, and it is also why a water main below about a metre and a half does not know that it froze last week.

The summer that reaches the cellar in December

Drive the diffusion equation at its boundary instead of releasing something into it and the solution is a decaying, lagging oscillation with a single length in it. That length governs both the shrinking and the delay, which is why the depth at which the ground is coldest in August is fixed by the same number as the depth at which the seasons stop being felt at all.

4 figures · part 5 on Diffusion Three curves that can only meet at a point. Water's phase diagram within a kelvin of its triple point, with each boundary drawn at the slope Clausius and Clapeyron give it from measured latent heats and densities: 44.4 Pa/K for boiling, 50.3 for sublimation, and -135 bar per kelvin for melting — negative, and so steep that it is drawn vertical here, because ice is the less dense phase and pressure therefore melts it. Two things follow that no amount of measurement could adjust. The three slopes are not independent: the sublimation and vaporisation curves differ in slope by 5.92 Pa/K, which is exactly what the fusion latent heat predicts, because going solid → gas directly and solid → liquid → gas must cost the same enthalpy. And the sublimation curve is the steeper of the two, so the two cross rather than touch — which is why the triple point is a crossing and not a tangency, and why ice sublimes below it and melts above it.

Why the triple point is a point

Three phases of one substance coexist at one temperature and one pressure and nowhere else, and the reason is arithmetic rather than chemistry: count the numbers that describe the state, count the conditions equilibrium imposes, and subtract. The same subtraction says four phases of one substance are impossible, and it says so without knowing what the substance is.

5 figures · part 8 on Phase change

Relativity

Space and time, drawn on the same axes.

One factor, defined by an experiment rather than by a transformation. A observer A stays at x = 0 and flashes a light every 1 second by their own clock. B recedes at 0.6c. The flashes are the diagonal lines; where each meets B's worldline is where B receives it. B's clock reads a longer gap between arrivals than A's read between departures, by the factor k = 2.0000, and it is the same factor between every consecutive pair — measured here off the drawn meetings rather than assumed. That single number is the whole apparatus. Nobody has written down a coordinate transformation, chosen a convention for distant simultaneity, or drawn a tilted axis; the only thing used is that light travels on the diagonals and that neither observer is special, so B's flashes reach A stretched by the same k. From it: γ = (k + 1/k)/2 = 1.2500, and β = (k² − 1)/(k² + 1) = 0.6000.

Everything from an exchange of pulses

Send a flash every second and ask how often the far observer receives them. That one measured ratio generates time dilation, the composition of velocities and the twin result, with no coordinate transformation written down anywhere and no convention chosen about what "at the same time" means far away.

7 figures · part 7 on Doppler The turnaround, made gentler and gentler, and the difference that does not move. A round trip to a star 4 light-years away at 0.6c, with the turnaround done at nine different accelerations from a tenth of a gravity to a thousand. The upper curve is the age difference between the twins and the lower one is how much of that difference the turnaround itself contributes. At 0.1 g the turn accounts for 51 per cent of it; at 1000 g it accounts for 0.00 per cent, and it keeps falling. The total does not follow it down: it tends to 2.67 years, which is what the instantaneous-turnaround cartoon gives. So the acceleration is not what makes the twins differ. It is what makes one twin's path the bent one, and a bent path through spacetime is shorter for the same reason a bent path on a map is longer — but the amount is in the legs, not in the corner, and the corner's contribution can be made as small as anyone likes without the difference going away.

The clock that does not feel the turn

Proper time is the integral of dt over gamma, which presumes that a clock's rate depends on its speed and on nothing else — not on its acceleration, not on how long it has been accelerating. That is an assumption about clocks rather than a theorem about spacetime, and the twin result is empty without it.

4 figures · part 4 on Accelerated frames

Quantum

Where the continuous picture runs out, and what replaces it.

An average that follows Newton's law exactly. The centre of a wavepacket in a harmonic well, and the classical orbit started from the same place, drawn on top of each other. They agree to 5.5e-6 over 2.2 periods, which is the split-step integrator's own error and not a physical gap. This is exact and it is exact for every state of a harmonic oscillator, however wide, however lumpy, however far from classical: the theorem needs ⟨−V′(x)⟩ = −V′(⟨x⟩), which for a linear restoring force is true term by term. It is worth being suspicious of how strong that looks. The harmonic oscillator is the one potential where the average force over a state and the force at the state's centre cannot differ, so it is the worst possible example from which to conclude that quantum averages follow classical paths.

The average that obeys Newton

Ehrenfest's theorem says the centre of a wavepacket moves according to the average force over the state. That is exact, it is often quoted as the reason classical mechanics survives, and the two statements are not the same — because the average of a force is the force at the average only when the force is linear, which is to say almost never.

4 figures · part 2 on Correspondence Two barriers, and the energies at which they stop being barriers. Transmission against energy on a logarithmic scale, for one barrier of width 0.9 and height 20, and for two of them separated by a well of width 2. Below the top of the barrier the single one transmits an exponentially small amount and does so smoothly. The pair does not: at particular energies the transmission climbs by orders of magnitude and reaches 1.000000 — one, to every digit the arithmetic has — even though each barrier on its own passes 3.9e-2 of what arrives. Multiplying the two single-barrier transmissions would give 1.5e-3, which is wrong by 6e+2: amplitudes are what compose, not probabilities, and the region between the barriers is a box whose quasi-bound levels are where the amplitudes reinforce. The resonances sit at 6.438, 13.915 and the levels of an infinite well of the same width are at 2.467, 9.870 — near, and not equal, because a well with leaky walls has states that are not quite bound.

Two walls that let more through than one

Put a second barrier behind the first and the transmission does not fall — at particular energies it rises to exactly one, through a pair of walls each of which stops all but a few per cent. Probabilities cannot do that. Amplitudes can, and the region between the barriers is a box whose levels say where.

4 figures · part 4 on Tunnelling The bands bend by the amount the Fermi levels differed. A junction between 1e+17 cm⁻³ p-type and 1e+16 cm⁻³ n-type silicon at equilibrium, with the Fermi level flat by construction — that is what equilibrium means — and the two band edges carrying the whole of the 0.774 V drop. The bending happens over 331.8 nm, and it is not symmetric: the depletion reaches 301.6 nm into the lightly doped side and only 30.2 nm into the heavily doped one, because the same exposed charge is reached sooner where there is more of it. An electron in the n-side conduction band therefore faces an uphill barrier of 0.774 V to reach the p side, while an electron already on the p side rolls downhill without any barrier at all — which is the asymmetry the whole device is, and it is drawn here before any current has been mentioned.

One level, and the field that bends the bands

Two pieces of the same crystal doped differently have their Fermi levels at different heights. Joining them cannot leave both, because a difference in electrochemical potential is precisely what makes charge move — and everything a diode does is the accounting of what had to happen for that one difference to reach zero.

7 figures · part 4 on Bands

Fluids

Matter that will not hold a shape, and the forces that act in it anyway.

The speed of a wave that carries no pressure. Second-sound speed against temperature, computed from the two-fluid equations with the normal component treated as a phonon gas — which it is below about six-tenths of a kelvin. The upper line is ordinary sound at 238 m/s, which moves the two components together. The lower curve is the other mode, and at low temperature it sits at 137.4 m/s, which is 238/√3 to three figures: a result with no adjustable constant in it, and the reason to believe the two-fluid model rather than merely to use it. What oscillates in this wave is not the density — the two components move in opposite directions and their sum stays put — but the fraction that is normal, which is a temperature. So a temperature disturbance in helium II propagates, with a speed, a reflection and a resonance, where in every ordinary liquid it diffuses and has none of those. Above a kelvin the rotons take over from the phonons and the measured curve falls to about 20 m/s; the model here is the low-temperature one and it is drawn only where it holds.

The heat that arrives as a wave

Two fluids with two velocities give two wave equations, not one. In the first the components move together and the density oscillates, which is ordinary sound. In the second they move oppositely, the density stays put, and what oscillates is the temperature — so a heat pulse in liquid helium has a speed, a front and a reflection.

5 figures · part 4 on Superfluidity The two holes a grain can fall through, and their exact sizes. Three equal spheres in contact, and four, drawn with the largest sphere that passes between them. The numbers are geometry and nothing else. Three mutually touching spheres put their centres on an equilateral triangle of side 2R, whose circumradius is 2R/√3, so the gap admits a sphere of radius 0.154701R — about a seventh. Four in a square admit 0.414214R, nearly half. A real packing contains both arrangements and everything between, so a grain smaller than the first threshold gets through everywhere, one larger than the second gets through nowhere, and one in between percolates slowly through the loosest routes. That is the whole size-dependence of segregation by percolation, and it is why the effect is reliable below about a seventh and erratic between a seventh and a half.

The big one comes to the top

Shake a jar of mixed grains and it sorts itself, which is the opposite of what shaking a mixture of gases does. There is no thermodynamic paradox in it because there is no temperature to speak of — and the mechanism is a piece of geometry with an exact number in it: a sphere fits through the gap between three touching spheres only below a radius ratio of 0.1547.

6 figures · part 4 on Granular matter

Astrophysics

Gravity read as geometry, and the laws carried where no laboratory can follow.

The one place in a plasma where the charges do not balance. The potential and the two densities through a sheath, in Debye lengths from the sheath edge, for a plasma of hydrogen ions. The potential is measured downward in units of the electron temperature and reaches 2.84 at the wall — the value at which the two fluxes balance. The layer is 15.1 Debye lengths thick — for 3 eV electrons at 1e+16 per cubic metre, a Debye length of 129 µm and a sheath of 1.9 mm. Inside it the electron density falls as the Boltzmann factor while the ion density falls only as the ions speed up, so the two separate: at the wall the ion density exceeds the electron density by 85 per cent of itself. That is the whole of the difference between a sheath and the plasma it borders — quasineutrality is not an assumption that can be made here, and Poisson's equation has to be solved instead of replaced.

The wall a plasma builds against itself

A plasma is quasineutral everywhere except where it touches something. Electrons are faster than ions by the square root of the mass ratio, so any surface is struck by far more of them, charges negative, and goes on charging until the two arrivals balance — leaving a layer a few Debye lengths thick in which the charges do not cancel at all.

7 figures · part 5 on Plasma oscillation A force that points across the beam, not along it. The intensity of a beam focused to a waist of 0.5 µm, and the force it exerts on a 60 nm polystyrene sphere in water, across the beam. The force is not a pressure and does not point along the light: it is the pull on an induced dipole sitting in a non-uniform field, proportional to the gradient of the intensity rather than to the intensity, and it points up the gradient — towards the bright axis from either side. It vanishes exactly on the axis, which is what makes the axis a trap rather than a place. The well is 47 times kT deep at 100 milliwatts, which is why the particle stays: thermal motion explores it and does not escape it. The stiffness near the bottom is 3.070 piconewtons per micrometre, and a particle in a spring that stiff wanders 36 nanometres from centre.

The light that pulls rather than pushes

Radiation pressure is momentum arriving, and it points along the beam. A gradient of intensity does something else entirely — it polarises a particle and then pulls the induced dipole up the gradient — so a focused beam holds a particle at its waist against the push, and the force that does it is not a pressure at all.

4 figures · part 4 on Radiation pressure

Every field · every reading path · every object named · every figure · what is taught wrongly · search