Illustrated Physics
physics, drawn
Concept

Torsion balance — where it appears

A beam hung from a fine fibre that twists under tiny horizontal forces, the most sensitive instrument for weak forces between masses. It measured G, tests the equivalence principle to parts in 10¹³ and tested active gravitational mass.

Named by 2 essays across one field — each of them below, with the objects they name alongside it.

Three centuries of finding nothing. The upper limit on η against the year it was set, on a logarithmic scale. Newton (1687) reached 1e-3; Bessel (1832) reached 2e-5; Eötvös (1922) reached 5e-9; Dicke (1964) reached 1e-11; Braginsky (1972) reached 1e-12; Eöt-Wash (2008) reached 2e-13; MICROSCOPE (2022) reached 1e-15. That is 12 orders of magnitude in 335 years, and every one of those measurements returned zero. A sequence of null results is not a sequence of failures. Each one is a statement that a principle assumed by every theory of gravity holds to a new level, and each new level excludes a class of theories that would have shown a departure there — a long-range force coupling to something other than mass-energy, a scalar partner to the graviton, a violation arising at some energy scale. The measurement is worth making again precisely because it has always come out the same way, which is what makes any departure decisive.

The fall that does not depend on what is falling

Everything falls at the same rate, and the statement has been tested for three hundred years by people looking for the exception. Twelve orders of magnitude have been added to the limit and every measurement has returned zero. The last three orders came not from a better instrument but from finding something bigger to fall towards.

astrophysics · Equivalence principle Two pulls that should be equal and opposite. Two bodies of equal passive mass, one of an ordinary material and one of a material whose active mass is 30 per cent larger than its passive mass (the difference exaggerated to be seen). Each pulls the other with its active mass and is pulled on its passive mass. The pull the unusual body exerts is therefore larger than the pull it receives, the two arrows are not equal and opposite, and the pair, with nothing outside it, accelerates towards the ordinary body. Newton's third law and the conservation of momentum both require the ratio of active to passive mass to be the same for every material, and that is a separate claim from the one torsion balances test, that passive and inertial mass agree.

The pull that has to equal the pull back

Every test of the equivalence principle drops two things and asks whether gravity pulls them equally. None of them asks whether they pull equally. A body's mass enters gravity twice — once as what is pulled and once as what does the pulling — and if the two ratios differed from one material to another, Newton's third law would fail and a lopsided body could push itself through space. The first test of this used a plastic cylinder floating in a liquid. The best uses the Moon, whose light crust is thicker on the side that never faces the Earth.

astrophysics · Equivalence principle

Named alongside it

The objects these essays reach for when they reach for this one.

Equivalence principleGravitational massInertial massNull experimentActive gravitational massCentrifugal forceFree fallLunar laser rangingMeasurementModulationMomentum conservationNewtons third law

All concepts