Illustrated Physics
physics, drawn
Concept

Plane wave — where it appears

A wave whose fronts are infinite parallel planes, with one direction of travel and one wavelength. Any field can be written as a sum of them, and then propagation through a uniform medium becomes a phase that each component gains in proportion to distance.

Named by 5 essays across 3 fields — each of them below, with the objects they name alongside it.

One slit, four distances, one multiplication. The intensity across the beam behind a slit 5 wavelengths wide, at distances of 0.5, 5, 25, 100 wavelengths, each computed by multiplying the slit's plane-wave spectrum by the phase each wave accumulates and transforming back — no approximation about angles. Close to the slit the pattern is the slit's own shape with ripples at its edges; further out the ripples move inwards and the beam develops a bright centre; far away it spreads into the diffraction pattern. The travelling part of the field keeps its power to 10⁻¹⁰, running it back 100 wavelengths recovers it to 5 × 10⁻¹⁴, and at 100 wavelengths the result matches a direct Fresnel integral to 2.75 per cent rms. Near field and far field are not two theories; they are one multiplication at different distances.

The fan of plane waves inside every beam

Huygens added up wavelets from every point of a front. The same content can be written as a sum over plane waves travelling in every direction, and then propagation stops being an integral and becomes a multiplication: each plane wave picks up a phase in proportion to the distance. One square root in that phase holds all of diffraction, near field and far field alike — and when the square root turns imaginary, it holds the reason no instrument a wavelength away can see detail finer than half a wavelength.

waves · Huygens 3 beams crossing: change the phases and the pattern only slides. The intensity where 3 plane waves of one wavelength cross in a plane, their directions spread evenly round the circle, for three different sets of relative phases, each panel spanning 2.2 wavelengths. Darkest shading is brightest, in five steps of a fifth of the peak. The three patterns are the same lattice of bright spots moved sideways: for each of the altered sets there is a shift that reproduces the first pattern to 2.0 per cent of the peak. With 3 beams in two dimensions there are 2 relative phases and 2 directions to slide in, so every change of phase is a slide.

The lattice no phase can bend

Cross a few laser beams of one colour and they paint a crystal of light in the space where they overlap. The beams' phases drift whenever a mirror trembles, and it would seem the pattern must tremble with them. Whether it does depends on a count. Three beams in a plane, or four in space, give a lattice whose shape no change of phase can alter — the phases can only slide it. One beam more and the phases decide the shape, and must be held still.

waves · Superposition Pushed forward, and left at rest. The path of an electron, initially at rest, overtaken by a 6-cycle pulse of linearly polarised light travelling to the right, for peak field strengths a₀ = 0.5, 1, 2, where a₀ = 1 is the strength at which the electron's quiver becomes relativistic; lengths in wavelengths of the light, the vertical axis along the electric field. While the pulse passes, the electron quivers across the beam and is pushed along it. When the pulse has gone it is at rest again — not moving, with none of the light's energy — but displaced forward by 0.14, 0.56, 2.25 wavelengths respectively, a distance growing as a₀². The quiver's width grows only as a₀: at a₀ = 2 the electron is pushed forward several times further than it swings sideways.

The light that moves an electron and pays it nothing

A pulse of light strong enough to throw an electron forward at a large fraction of the speed of light passes over it, and the electron is left exactly as it was found — at rest, with none of the light's energy — except that it is somewhere else. The reason is two quantities the electron cannot change while a plane wave is passing, and the same two quantities fix the figure eight it traces inside the wave and the angle at which it leaves a real, focused beam carrying the energy it managed to keep.

relativity · Relativistic dynamics An electron that runs into light and loses its energy to it. The energy of an electron of 511 MeV (γ = 1000) as it passes head-on through a 10-cycle pulse of 0.8 µm light, as a fraction of its starting energy, against the number of laser cycles it has crossed, for normalised field strengths a₀ = 30 and 100: with radiation reaction (solid) and without (dashed). Without it, the electron is shaken sideways while in the light and leaves with exactly the energy it brought, as a plane wave requires. With it, each half-cycle near the pulse's peak radiates away a slice: the electron leaves with 76 per cent of its energy at a₀ = 30 and 22 per cent at a₀ = 100, the rest gone as gamma rays.

The light that takes back an electron's energy

An electron at rest in the most intense laser light ever made feels its own radiation as a force a millionth of the light's push — the textbook reason radiation reaction never matters. Send the electron into the light at nearly the speed of light and the arithmetic turns over. In its own frame the light is stronger by twice its Lorentz factor, the power it radiates grows as the square of that, and a pulse a few tens of femtoseconds long can strip it of most of its energy as gamma rays. That is where the classical theory of a radiating charge, argued over for a century, finally has to answer to experiment — and where it starts to fail for quantum reasons.

relativity · Relativistic dynamics A bright core in a set of rings. The intensity across the beam 29 cm beyond an axicon — a glass cone 10 mm across that tilts every ray by 0.5° towards the axis — lit by a 633 nm laser, computed from the Fresnel integral and scaled to its peak (solid). It is the pattern of a cone of plane waves meeting on the axis: a bright core 56 μm across at its first dark ring, at 2.405/kα from the axis, ringed by rings of slowly falling brightness. Dashed: a Gaussian laser beam focused to a spot of the same size, with no rings. The rings are not a flaw of the axicon; they are where the beam keeps the power that the core is short of.

The beam that does not spread and the price it pays

Pass a laser beam through a shallow cone of glass and it emerges as a thin bright line of light, a core a few tens of micrometres wide that keeps its width for half a metre, where a beam focused to the same width by a lens would have doubled in a few millimetres. It seems to defeat diffraction. It does not. The core is not made of the light that was in it a moment before; every point along it is fed by a fresh ring of the aperture, and the core holds about one per cent of the beam's power. The rest is in the rings, and the rings are what pays for the line.

optics · Diffraction

Named alongside it

The objects these essays reach for when they reach for this one.

DiffractionInterferenceThe Lorentz factorWavevectorAngular spectrumBessel functionCanonical momentumCompton scatteringConservation lawCritical fieldDepth of focusEvanescent wave

All concepts