Memorylessness — where it appears
Named by 4 essays across 3 fields — each of them below, with the objects they name alongside it.
A nucleus with no clock
A half-life is a precise number and no individual nucleus has one. Each has the same chance of decaying in the next second as it had on the day it formed, and the exponential curve is a property of the population rather than of any member of it.
How far a wave can remember
Split a beam, delay one half, and put them back together. The fringes are bright while the delay is short and fade as it grows, and the distance at which they die is fixed by nothing but the width of the source's spectral line. Watching them fade is reading the line shape.
The exponential that is only true in the middle
A decay law is not an assumption about nuclei; it is the Fourier transform of an energy distribution. Do that transform honestly and the exponential fails at both ends — flat at the start, because the state is normalisable, and an inverse square at the end, because no system has states of arbitrarily negative energy. Neither departure is a correction that could be made small.
The outlet that jams by chance
A hopper whose outlet is a few grains wide does not flow slowly. It flows at the full rate and then stops dead, when a handful of grains wedge into an arch across the opening, and it flows again only when something knocks the arch down. The number of grains that pass between one jam and the next is random and exponentially distributed, as if every grain leaving had the same small chance of being the last. Its average rises so steeply with the opening's size that it looks like a threshold, and whether there is one is still argued: two laws agree wherever an outlet can be watched, and they part only after millions of grains.
Named alongside it
The objects these essays reach for when they reach for this one.
BandwidthFourier transformHalf-lifeSpectrumBeatsCloggingCoherenceCritical pointDecayDecoherenceEnvelopeExponential decay