Illustrated Physics
physics, drawn
Concept

Locality — where it appears

The assumption that what happens in one place is unaffected by a choice made at the same moment somewhere distant. It is one of the two premises Bell's theorem shows incompatible with measured correlations, the other being that outcomes exist before anybody looks.

Named by 5 essays across 2 fields — each of them below, with the objects they name alongside it.

Angular momentum that was in nothing at all. A ring carrying 10⁻⁶ C on a freely pivoted disc, with a solenoid on the axis threading 0.002 Wb through it, switched off over 1 second. Nothing is turning at the start and nothing has been touched. The collapsing flux drives a circumferential electric field round the ring, the ring is torqued, and the disc ends up spinning with 3.183·10⁻¹⁰ kg m²/s of angular momentum. Where was it? The two curves are the field's share, ε₀∫r × (E × B), and the matter's share integrated from the torque — computed by different routes and summing to a constant to 4.2e-15 of the total throughout. So the angular momentum was there before the switch was thrown, in a static electric field crossed with a static magnetic one, in a room where nothing whatever was moving. It is qΦ/2π, it does not depend on the radius of the ring or the shape of the solenoid, and it is the plainest demonstration available that the field is not a bookkeeping device for forces between distant charges.

The angular momentum that is in nothing at all

A charged ring and a solenoid, both at rest, with nothing moving anywhere. Switch the solenoid off and the ring starts to turn. Angular momentum is conserved, so it was there before the switch was thrown — and it was not in the matter, because nothing was moving. It was in the field, and it is qΦ over 2π whatever the geometry.

electromagnetism · Field energy Four predictions no list of answers can keep. The four measurements a three-particle GHZ state predicts with certainty, and what the best possible list of pre-agreed answers does with them. Each row is a choice of which quantity to measure on each of the three particles; the quantum value is not an average but a certainty, so a single run of any row has a determined outcome. Every list of answers assigns a value to X and to Y at each particle, which is sixty-four lists in all, and the enumeration finds that 32 of them get three of the four right and 32 get one. None gets four, and none can: multiplying the four left-hand sides together gives every X and every Y twice, so the product is +1 for any list whatever, while the product of the four quantum values is −1. The column on the right is one such list, which agrees with the first three rows and is then forced into the opposite of the fourth. That is the whole argument, and it needs no inequality, no average and no repetition: measure the first three rows on three copies, and the fourth is predicted with certainty and comes out the other way.

The disagreement that one run settles

Bell's argument is a statistical one — a correlation of 2.828 where a pre-agreed list of answers is stuck at 2, dug out of hundreds of coincidences. Add a third particle and the argument stops being about how often. Three measurements predict a fourth with certainty, every list of answers that gets the three right gets the fourth exactly backwards, and one run of the experiment is enough.

quantum · Entanglement Outside the winding, where nothing is supposed to be. The mid-plane of a solenoid 20 radii long, wound at 8 turns per radius, with the field summed turn by turn rather than assumed. The upper curve is the axial field against distance from the axis: it holds up across the winding and collapses outside, reaching 0.47 per cent of its central value at 2 radii. The lower curve is the flux enclosed by a circle of that radius, which is what the vector potential integrates to. The two behave completely differently, and that difference is the whole subject: the field an electron outside can feel has effectively gone, and the flux it encircles has not. The enclosed flux does fall, by 3.29 per cent out to four radii, because the lines that leave the ends come back through the plane outside the coil — that return flux is the leak a real experiment has to defeat, and the reason the definitive versions used a closed toroidal magnet with no ends at all.

The phase a magnet leaves on a path it never touched

An electron beam split around a solenoid comes back with its fringes displaced, although neither path ever entered a magnetic field. What the electron responds to is the flux it went round, and the only local quantity that knows about that flux is the potential.

quantum · Matter waves Two pairs, and only one of them may cheat. The CHSH value a party shares with a second, against the value the same party shares with a third. Every quantum state lies inside a quarter circle whose radius is Tsirelson's bound, 2.8284, because the sum of the two squared values cannot exceed eight. The classical limit is 2 on each axis, and the square that would hold both violations sticks out of the circle everywhere except at its corner: the best both can manage at once is exactly 1.999998, which is the classical value and no violation at all. So a party maximally entangled with one other is correlated with everybody else exactly as a classical object would be. Nothing about the measurement or the apparatus was assumed; this follows from the state alone.

What two have they cannot give a third

Entanglement will not be shared. A pair that violates a Bell inequality is correlated with everything else exactly as a classical object would be, and the trade is exact enough to be drawn: two CHSH values must fit inside a circle of radius 2√2.

quantum · Entanglement Four outcomes, one of which happened. The correlation between the two outer particles' measurements, against the angle between their analysers, for each of the four results the middle measurement can give. Every one of the four leaves the outer pair maximally entangled — each curve reaches one and minus one — so every outcome is as good as any other, and the outer parties have a perfect Bell pair whichever it was. What differs is which correlation they have, and the four are shifted and reflected versions of each other. The flat line is their average, which is zero at every angle, checked here at seven hundred and twenty angles to twelve figures. That vanishing is the whole reason the operation cannot be used to send anything: until the middle party's two classical bits arrive by an ordinary channel, the outer parties' data is indistinguishable from noise, and no correlation appears at all. The entanglement is created instantly and is useless until a message travelling no faster than light says which of the four it is.

A link between two that never met

Take two entangled pairs sharing no particle, measure the two inner particles jointly, and the two outer ones — which have never interacted, never been in the same place, and have no history in common — are entangled. Nothing travelled between them. What has to travel is two classical bits saying which of four results occurred, and until those arrive the outer parties see nothing at all.

quantum · Entanglement

Named alongside it

The objects these essays reach for when they reach for this one.

SuperpositionBell inequalityCorrelationEntanglementMeasurementQuantum stateHidden variablesNo-cloningAngular momentumConservationDecoherenceDensity matrix

All concepts