Illustrated Physics
physics, drawn
Concept

Invariant mass — where it appears

The length of a system's total four-momentum, and the one measure of mass every observer agrees on. It is not the sum of the masses of the parts: two photons have none each and up to 2E/c² between them, depending on the angle between their paths.

Named by 8 essays across one field — each of them below, with the objects they name alongside it.

What a collision has to spend, against what it is given. The energy available in a proton–proton collision, against the energy of one beam, on logarithmic axes. Against a stationary target the available energy is √(2mE) and the line has slope one half; head-on it is 2E and the slope is one. Bevatron at 6.2 GeV per beam reaches 3.7 GeV; SPS fixed target at 450 GeV per beam reaches 29.1 GeV; LEP at 104.5 GeV per beam reaches 209.0 GeV; Tevatron at 980 GeV per beam reaches 1960.0 GeV; LHC at 6500 GeV per beam reaches 13000.0 GeV. The gap is the whole architecture of the subject: the LHC's beams give 13000 GeV head-on and would give 110 GeV against a stationary proton, a factor of 118. Reaching the same 13000 GeV in fixed-target mode would need a beam of 90.1 million GeV. What the missing energy has gone into is not lost: it is the kinetic energy of the centre of mass, which every product has to carry away and which no experiment can use.

The collision that wastes most of the energy

The LHC's two beams carry 6,500 GeV each and 13,000 GeV are available. Fire one of those beams at a stationary block of copper instead and 110 GeV are available — the other 12,890 have gone into the motion of the wreckage and cannot be used for anything. The difference is a square root, and every accelerator built since 1970 is a consequence of it.

relativity · Relativistic dynamics The mass of two things that have none. The invariant mass of a pair of photons of equal energy, in units of E/c², against the angle between them. It is computed from the total energy and the vector sum of the two momenta, and agrees with 2E·sin(θ/2) to 1.0e-14. at 0° the pair weighs 0.000 E/c²; at 30° the pair weighs 0.518 E/c²; at 60° the pair weighs 1.000 E/c²; at 90° the pair weighs 1.414 E/c²; at 120° the pair weighs 1.732 E/c²; at 180° the pair weighs 2.000 E/c². Two photons flying in the same direction have no mass between them at all, because their momenta add to exactly the energy over c; anything else and they do. Nothing has been added: the constituents are massless at every angle, and the mass of the system is a property of the arrangement. At 180° the pair weighs 2E/c², which is every joule it contains — the case of a sealed box of light, where the two beams cancel in momentum and the whole energy shows up on the scales.

The box of light that weighs something

Two photons flying apart have a mass between them, though neither has one. Seal them in a mirrored box and the box is heavier than it was empty, by exactly the energy inside divided by c². Mass is not a property of stuff and it does not add up — it is a property of a system, and 99 per cent of the mass of everything anybody has ever weighed is of this kind.

relativity · Mass-energy The one number the boost leaves alone. The mass of a lambda into a proton and a pion, reconstructed from the two products' laboratory energies and momenta alone, against how fast the parent was moving — for five different rest-frame emission angles. Every curve is the same horizontal line. The lab energies vary by more than a factor of ten across this range and the angles between the products vary from almost 180° to a few degrees; the combination E² − p² of the pair does not vary at all, to 3.2e-15, which the figure requires before drawing anything. The light curves are the energies of the two products, on the same axis and to a different scale, drawn to show how much is moving while the invariant does not. This is the whole method of particle physics. A parent that lives for 10⁻²³ seconds is never detected; what is detected is two tracks, and their invariant mass is computed and histogrammed over millions of events. A parent that exists shows up as a peak at its own mass, at the same place whatever the beam energy, which is what makes the peak believable.

The cone a decay cannot leave

A particle at rest breaks into two and they go opposite ways. Set the parent moving and the whole pattern folds forward — into a cone with a hard edge, beyond which nothing is emitted at any rest-frame angle at all. The energy spectrum that comes out is exactly rectangular, and the one number the boost leaves alone is how the parent is identified at all.

relativity · Relativistic dynamics Resonances drawn as bands. 60,000 decays of a D⁰ decaying to K⁻π⁺π⁰, accepted from 1,287,365 flat ones in proportion to the square of an amplitude built from 3 short-lived intermediate states, each decaying to two of the three products. A ρ⁺(770) in m²(π⁺π⁰), 67.0 per cent of the rate on its own; a K⁻(892) in m²(K⁻π⁰), 25.5 per cent of the rate on its own; a K⁰(892) in m²(K⁻π⁺), 33.2 per cent of the rate on its own. Each appears as a band at its own mass squared — vertical, horizontal or diagonal according to which pair it decays to — holding 51 per cent, 19 per cent, 23 per cent of the decays within one width of its mass, where phase space alone would put 34, 10, 9. The separate fractions add to 126 per cent, not 100, because the amplitudes interfere where the bands overlap. The magnitudes and phases are a model chosen to make all three visible, not a fit to data.

The plane in which three bodies are flat

A particle breaking into two gives each product a fixed energy; one breaking into three gives none of them one. What it gives instead is a plane of two invariant masses in which a decay with no forces spreads perfectly evenly inside a curved boundary — so every band, dark stripe and bright crossing a real decay draws there is a force, its spin, or a phase between two routes to the same three particles.

relativity · Relativistic dynamics Equal masses, one at rest, struck head on at four energies. A particle striking an identical particle at rest and scattering elastically, with the two leaving at equal angles either side of the incoming line, at four incident kinetic energies measured in units of the particle's rest energy. At 0.001 mc² the two tracks open at 90.0°. At 0.5 mc² the two tracks open at 83.6°. At 2 mc² the two tracks open at 70.5°. At 10 mc² the two tracks open at 44.4°. Slowly, the angle between them is a right angle, as every billiards player knows. Fast, it closes, because the incoming particle's energy is part of its inertia and the pair is carried forward. A proton at 2 mc² — about 1.9 GeV — and an electron at 1 MeV are both well inside the narrowing.

The right angle a fast collision closes

When one billiard ball strikes an identical one at rest, the two always leave at right angles — a fact every snooker player uses without knowing its proof. The proof is Newton's, and it fails for fast particles. Two protons leaving a collision at 1.9 GeV open at 70 degrees, not 90, and the narrowing follows one law, tan θ₁ tan θ₂ = 2/(γ + 1), in which the right angle is the slow limit. The circle that forced the right angle has been squashed into an ellipse by the energy the incoming particle carries as inertia.

relativity · Relativistic dynamics A peak at half the mass, made by a sine. The momentum across the beam of the electron from 200,000 simulated W decays, as a probability density per GeV, for a W of mass 80.37 GeV. For a W exactly at rest across the beam, of exactly its mass (dashed), the electron carries M/2 = 40.19 GeV in the W's frame and shows a fraction sin θ of it across the beam, so the distribution climbs to a sharp peak at M/2 and stops: the Jacobian peak, piled up because sin θ hardly changes near θ = 90°. The W's natural width of 2.1 GeV rounds the peak (solid, peak at 39.9 GeV); its motion across the beam, a few GeV on average, smears it further and pushes a tail past M/2 (lighter). The position of the peak measures the mass, and is shifted by anything that moves the W.

The mass weighed without one of its pieces

A W boson decays into an electron and a neutrino, and the neutrino leaves every detector without a trace. Its mass cannot be found the usual way, by adding up the energy and momentum of what it decayed into, because half of what it decayed into is missing. What survives is the part of the motion across the beam, where the neutrino's momentum can be inferred from the imbalance it leaves. There the electron's momentum piles up at half the W's mass, and a quantity built from both particles ends at a sharp edge at the full mass. The world's best measurements of that edge disagree by seventy-five parts in eighty thousand.

relativity · Mass-energy The peak no pion spectrum can move. The photon spectrum from a population of neutral pions, summed from their boxes, for pion spectra falling as three different powers of the energy. Whatever the pion spectrum, each curve peaks at the same 67.5 MeV and is symmetric on the logarithmic axis, since every box contains that point and a box's height falls as it widens; checked here at the point and its mirror, the ratio is 1.000. This is the shape, known as the pion bump, that Floyd Stecker worked out in 1971. Gamma-ray telescopes found it in 2013 in two supernova remnants, which was taken as direct evidence that such remnants accelerate protons, because the electrons that produce most other gamma rays have no reason to make a peak here.

The flat spectrum a fast pion must paint

A neutral pion falls apart into two photons, each with half its rest energy, in a hundred-million-billionth of a second. Seen in flight, those photons could have any energy between two edges, and every energy in that range is equally likely, whatever the pion's speed. Add up a whole population of pions and something unexpected appears: a peak at exactly the 67.5 MeV that no individual decay shows. Astronomers took it as evidence of where cosmic rays are made.

relativity · Relativistic dynamics The price of a pair depends on who pays it. The lowest energy of a photon that can make an electron–positron pair when struck on a stationary partner, against the partner's mass: 2mc²(1 + m/M), from requiring that the total four-momentum have the invariant mass of what is left at rest in the centre of momentum. For a lead nucleus it is 2mc² to better than one part in a hundred thousand, the figure every textbook quotes. For a proton it is 0.054 per cent above. For a free electron it is exactly twice, 4mc², or 2.04 MeV, even though the partner is the very same mass as the pair's members. The rest energy created is unchanged; what rises is what has to be carried off by the partner and the pair together.

The partner that sets the price of a pair

Every textbook says it takes 1.02 MeV to make an electron and a positron from light, twice the electron's rest energy. Done in empty space, it cannot be done at any energy at all. Next to a lead nucleus it costs 1.02 MeV. Next to a lone electron, a particle exactly as heavy as the ones being made, it costs 2.04. Nothing about the pair has changed. What changes the price is who has to carry the momentum away.

relativity · Mass-energy

Named alongside it

The objects these essays reach for when they reach for this one.

Four-momentumConservationAngular distributionCentre of massDecayEnergyKinematicsThe Lorentz transformationMeasurementMomentumReference framesRelativistic dynamics

All concepts