Illustrated Physics
physics, drawn
Concept

Anderson localisation — where it appears

The trapping of a wave in a disordered medium by interference among its scattered paths, so that it decays away from where it started instead of spreading. Philip Anderson predicted it for electrons in 1958; in one dimension any disorder at all localises every wave.

Named by 2 essays across 2 fields — each of them below, with the objects they name alongside it.

With interference kept, transmission falls exponentially; without it, only as one over the thickness. Light through stacks of randomly thick transparent layers, alternating indices 1 and 2.6, with thicknesses scattered by ±50 per cent about a quarter wave, on a logarithmic scale against the number of layers. The falling line is the transmission with the waves' interference kept, computed exactly by multiplying transfer matrices and averaged as the logarithm over 40 random stacks and five wavelengths. It falls in a straight line: the transmission drops by a factor of e every 17 layers, however thick the stack, which is exponential decay — localisation. The upper curve is the same stacks with every surface's reflection and transmission added as intensities, so that no interference survives. It falls only as one over the thickness, checked to grow in exact proportion, which is the diffusion of light through a cloud: at 400 layers it still transmits 1.0 per cent where the coherent stack typically transmits 4.5·10⁻¹¹.

The walk that interference can stop

Light scattered many times walks through a cloud, and a walk always gets through eventually — a slab twice as thick lets through half as much. Keep the waves' interference instead of adding intensities, and in one dimension the same disorder does something a walk cannot: it stops the light exponentially, traps it in modes with nothing special about where they sit, and turns transmission from a number into a spread over powers of ten. Whether the same can happen to light in three dimensions has been claimed, retracted and argued for thirty years.

optics · Scattering A pile of glass plates, added two ways. The transmission of light at normal incidence through a pile of N glass plates (index 1.5) in air, on a logarithmic axis, against N. Dashed: Stokes's 1862 result for light whose reflections add as intensities, T = (1 − R)/(1 + (2N − 1)R) with R = 0.040 per surface, which falls only as 1/N: 0.107 at 100 plates, 0.029 at 400. Solid: the same pile with the reflections added as waves and every plate and gap of random thickness, as ⟨ln T⟩ over 200 random piles (red) and for one pile (grey). It falls in a straight line, by 0.0843 per plate, an exponential decay with a localisation length of 24 plates: 10⁻³ at 100 plates and 10⁻¹⁴ at 400. Interference with random phases does not average away; it traps.

The pile of glass that stops every colour

A sheet of window glass reflects about eight per cent of the light that falls on it. A pile of a hundred sheets, George Stokes calculated in 1862, should still let through a tenth, because each extra sheet only adds a little more reflection to the total. That is right for sunlight, whose colours are too mixed to interfere. For a single colour, with every sheet and every gap a slightly different thickness, the same pile lets through a thousandth, and a pile of four hundred a hundred-millionth of a millionth. Interference with random phases does not average away into the intensity sum. In one dimension it traps every wave, at every wavelength, however weak each reflection is.

waves · Periodic media

Named alongside it

The objects these essays reach for when they reach for this one.

DisorderInterferenceMultiple scatteringRandom walkTransfer matrixCoherent backscatteringDiffusionLocalisation lengthPhotonic crystal

All concepts