Illustrated Physics
physics, drawn
Series

Velocity-addition — the series

10 essays on one idea, from the one that introduces it to the one that assumes the rest.
  1. Composing a boost with a speed, and never passing one. The speed one observer measures when a body moving at v is seen from a frame already moving at u, for u = 0.4, 0.6, 0.9, 1 times the speed of light. Every curve ends at one and none crosses it. The straight dashed line is the Galilean answer, u + v, which reaches 1.4c and is wrong. The flat line at the top is light: composing c with anything gives c back.

    Speeds that refuse to add, and the quantity that does

    Run at half the speed of light, throw something forward at half the speed of light, and the result is not the speed of light. It is four-fifths of it, and there is a variable in which the arithmetic is still simple addition.

    part 1 · relativity
  2. The rotation two boosts leave behind. The angle through which a frame's axes are turned after two boosts of equal size, against the angle between the two boosts, for 4 speeds. Two boosts in the same direction compose to a boost and nothing else, which is the zero at the left; two in different directions do not. What is left over is a rotation, and it is not small at large speeds: at β = 0.3 it peaks at 2.7° when the boosts are 91° apart, at β = 0.6 it peaks at 12.8° when the boosts are 96° apart, at β = 0.85 it peaks at 36.1° when the boosts are 108° apart, at β = 0.95 it peaks at 63.2° when the boosts are 122° apart. Each curve here is computed by multiplying the two boost matrices and pulling the rotation out of the product, not by evaluating a formula; the closed form for perpendicular boosts is used to check the extraction and appears nowhere in the drawing. The consequence is that the Lorentz boosts do not form a group by themselves — compose two and you leave the set — and that an object carried round a closed path in velocity space comes back turned.

    The turn that two pushes leave behind

    Two boosts in different directions do not compose to a boost. The product carries a rotation, so a frame carried once round a closed path comes back turned — and the size of that turn was the factor of two standing between the calculated and the measured splitting of a spectral line.

    part 2 · relativity
  3. How fast something looks as it moves across the sky. The apparent transverse speed of a source, in units of the speed of light, against the angle between its motion and the line of sight, at β = 0.8, β = 0.95, β = 0.99. Every curve rises above one over a range of angles, reaching 1.33 at 36.8°, 3.04 at 18.4°, 7.02 at 8.1° — and those maxima are γβ at arccos β, found by searching the drawn curves rather than put into them. Nothing is moving faster than light. What has happened is that the source has come closer between the two observations, so the second flash had less far to travel and arrived sooner than it would have done; dividing the transverse distance by the interval between arrivals therefore gives too large a speed. Below β = 1/√2 no angle produces the illusion at all, so seeing it is a measurement: it puts a floor under the speed and a ceiling on the angle at once.

    The motion that measures faster than light

    Take two photographs of a jet a year apart, measure how far a blob moved across the sky, divide by a year, and the answer can be seven times the speed of light. Nothing has broken. The blob came closer between the two pictures, so the second flash had less far to travel and arrived early, and the interval between arrivals is not the interval between departures.

    part 3 · relativity
  4. Every speed there is, on one disc. The whole of velocity space drawn as a disc: the boundary is the speed of light and every possible velocity is a point inside. The rings are equal steps of rapidity — 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5 — and they sit at speeds 0.4621, 0.7616, 0.9051, 0.9640, 0.9866 of light. Equal steps of rapidity crowd towards the edge, checked ring by ring, which is the same fact as speeds refusing to add: a boost is a fixed step in rapidity and a shrinking step in speed. The drawing is the Poincaré model, in which angles are true and distances are not — so a shape near the rim is drawn small and is not small, and the boundary is infinitely far away in the geometry although it is a finite circle on the page.

    The space that speeds live in

    Speeds do not add, and the reason is that the set of all possible velocities is not a flat space. It is a hyperbolic plane of curvature minus one in rapidity — and the rotation two boosts leave behind is exactly the area of the triangle they make in it.

    part 4 · relativity
  5. The fringes a flow of water moves. The interference fringe shift against the speed of the water, for two tubes 1.5 m long, an index of 1.333, and light of 526 nm — Fizeau's apparatus. The beam is split, each half goes with the flow in one tube and against it in the other, and the two are recombined; the shift is the difference in transit time counted in wavelengths. Three predictions are drawn and they are not close together. If the water did not affect the light at all the shift would be zero, flat along the bottom. If the water carried the light with it completely the shift would be the steepest line. Fresnel's partial drag is the middle one, and at 7 m/s it gives 0.207 of a fringe — which is what was measured, to the accuracy of an eye reading a fringe pattern in 1851. The experiment therefore did not merely detect an effect; it chose between three quantitative possibilities that differ by factors of two, which is why a fraction of a fringe settled something.

    The drag that was only an addition

    Light in moving water is carried along by it, but only partly — by a fraction of the water's speed that depends on the refractive index in a way nobody could account for. Fresnel invented the coefficient to save a theory, Fizeau measured it in 1851, and it sat unexplained for half a century. It is the first term of the relativistic velocity addition and nothing else.

    part 5 · relativity
  6. Sound cones that tip over. Time against position for sound in a fluid that speeds up from 0.55 to 1.3 times the speed of sound, drawn as the cone of places a sound made at each point can reach: its edges move at v − c and v + c. Upstream, where the flow is slow, the cones straddle the vertical and sound can go either way. At x = 0.20, where the flow reaches the speed of sound, the upstream edge stands vertical. Beyond it both edges point downstream: sound made there can no longer reach anywhere upstream of where it was made. That is a horizon, drawn in the same way as the light cones of a black hole, and it arises from nothing but the ordinary addition of a sound's speed to the speed of the water that carries it.

    The river that sound cannot swim up

    Sound travels at a fixed speed through the air or water carrying it, so a flowing medium adds its own speed to the sound's: faster downstream, slower upstream. That is the plainest velocity addition there is. Where the flow speeds up past the speed of sound, upstream-going sound is carried backwards, and nothing made beyond that point can be heard before it. The point is a horizon. Sound cones tip over there exactly as light cones do at a black hole, and the rate at which the flow speeds up plays the part of the surface gravity. A kitchen sink under a running tap makes the reverse kind of horizon, a white hole for ripples.

    part 6 · relativity
  7. The orbit an observer would reconstruct. The star's velocity along the line of sight, measured from the Doppler shift of its spectrum, as a fraction of its true orbital speed, plotted against the time the light arrives, in orbital periods, if light left the star at c plus the star's velocity. With light at c (dotted) the curve is the sine wave of a circular orbit. At 0.6 times the critical distance (solid) the same circular orbit arrives as a lopsided curve — a slow rise and a steep fall — that an astronomer would fit with a highly eccentric orbit that is not there. At twice the critical distance (dashed) the curve doubles back on itself: at some moments the spectrum would show two or three velocities at once, as if the star were in several places. Willem de Sitter pointed out in 1913 that spectroscopic binaries show nothing of the kind.

    The binary star that would be seen twice

    If light thrown forward by a moving source travelled faster, the way a ball thrown from a moving train does, then light from a star swinging towards the Earth in a binary orbit would catch up with light it had sent out earlier. From far enough away the two would arrive together, and the star would be seen in two places at once. Willem de Sitter pointed out in 1913 that nothing of the kind is seen, and that this settles whether the speed of light depends on its source. The argument had a loophole that took half a century to notice — interstellar gas re-emits light at its own speed — and closing it needed X-ray stars.

    part 7 · relativity
  8. Where the spot is, and when, for three sweep speeds. A spacetime diagram of the spot a turning beam makes on a flat screen at distance D: position along the screen across, the time at which light arrives there up, both in units of D and D/c, for beams sweeping the screen's nearest point at ωD = 0.5c, 1.0c, 3.0c. Each curve is the arrival time t(x) = atan(x/D)/ω + √(D² + x²)/c. Every curve has a lowest point on the approaching side — at x = −1.25, −0.79, −0.32 D respectively — because far out the beam strikes the screen obliquely and its sweep along the screen outruns light whatever ω is. Light reaches that point first: the spot is born there, as a pair, one running back up the screen and one forward. The faster the sweep, the nearer the centre the birth. The faint dashed lines are light signals, slope one. Wherever a spot's track is flatter than they are, it is a sequence of events no signal could connect.

    The spot that outruns light and carries nothing

    Flick a laser pointer across the face of the Moon and the spot it makes crosses the Moon faster than light. Nothing is wrong with relativity: the spot is not a thing, and no part of it travels from one side to the other. Each lit point is lit by its own light, sent from the hand. What makes the spot worth studying is how strange such a non-thing is allowed to be. It can be born in the middle of the screen as a pair running apart; its speed can be made infinite, or reversed, merely by watching it from a moving frame; and the composition of velocities that caps everything real has nothing to say about it.

    part 8 · relativity
  9. How fast each point of a fast wheel moves. The speed through the ground of each point on the rim of a rolling wheel, in units of the speed of light, against the point's angle round the rim measured from the bottom, for axles moving at 0.5c, 0.8c, 0.95c. The dashed curves are the everyday answer, 2v sin(α/2), which puts the top at twice the axle's speed and would carry it past light. Composed relativistically, the bottom is still at rest and the top moves at 2v/(1 + v²/c²): 0.800c, 0.976c, 0.999c, always below c. Every point of the rim stays slower than light, and the fast part of the wheel is flattened into a broad plateau over the top.

    The wheel whose top cannot go twice as fast

    The top of a rolling wheel moves at twice the speed of its axle, and the bottom is momentarily at rest — two facts every cyclist's spokes show, blurred at the top and sharp at the bottom. Roll the wheel at a large fraction of the speed of light and the second fact survives exactly while the first cannot: the top moves at 2v/(1 + v²/c²), never as fast as light. Caught at one instant of the ground's time the spokes are bent, and over one turn the wheel advances not the circumference measured from its axle but γ times it — the rim's own length, laid down on the ground by a contact point that does not move.

    part 9 · relativity
  10. One spray of particles, seen from two frames. Massless particles sprayed evenly in every direction from a source, as distributions in two variables. Left: against the cosine of the angle from the beam axis, for the source at rest (flat) and the same source moving along the axis at 0.8c (peaked forward), which crowds the particles forward until 81 times as many go straight ahead as straight back. Right: the same two sprays against pseudorapidity, η = −ln tan(θ/2). In η the moving spray is the resting one moved over by 1.099, the rapidity of 0.8c, with its shape — ½ sech² η, a peak of 0.5 and a width of 1.76 at half height — unchanged. A boost along the beam that distorts every distribution in angle or velocity only translates a distribution in rapidity.

    The angle a collider counts in logarithms

    The two proton beams of the Large Hadron Collider meet head on with equal energies, so the collisions ought to happen at rest in the laboratory. They do not. Each collision is really between two fragments of protons carrying unknown, unequal shares of the momentum, and every one is moving along the beam at a different speed. Particle physicists therefore describe what comes out in a variable that a boost along the beam simply shifts: rapidity, the quantity in which speeds add. A detector cannot measure rapidity directly. It measures an angle, and converts it to a logarithm.

    part 10 · relativity

All series