Illustrated Physics
physics, drawn
Series

Maxwell equations — the series

7 essays on one idea, from the one that introduces it to the one that assumes the rest.
  1. The same loop, spanned two ways. A 100 cm² capacitor with a 2 mm gap, charged at 1.0 million volts per second. A loop drawn round the wire can be spanned by a flat surface, which the current of 44.271 µA passes through, or by a bag-shaped surface that passes between the plates, which no charge crosses at all. Ampère's law as it stood gave two different answers for one circulation. The rate of change of electric flux between the plates, multiplied by ε₀, is 44.271 µA — the same number to every figure, because C = ε₀A/d is the same ε₀A/d either way. That is the term, and it is not an approximation or a correction: it is what makes the law consistent at all.

    The term that made light

    Ampère's law contradicts itself the moment a current stops being steady, and the contradiction is visible in one picture: two surfaces on the same loop, with a current through one of them and nothing through the other. The term that repairs it turns four equations into a wave, whose speed is two constants measured in a room with the lamps off.

    part 1 · electromagnetism
  2. Three vector potentials for one magnetic field. Three different vector potentials, drawn as arrow fields over the same square, every one of which describes the same uniform magnetic field of 1 tesla out of the page. The symmetric gauge circulates about the origin; the two Landau gauges are unidirectional and point in perpendicular directions, and neither has any circulation about anything a reader can see. Underneath each is the field recovered from its own arrows, by adding up the potential round a small square and dividing by the area enclosed — which is what the curl is. The three numbers 1.000000, 1.000000, 1.000000 agree to the last digit computed. The picture is the argument: a vector potential has no physical direction, no physical magnitude and no physical circulation of its own, because a change of gauge alters all three and alters nothing that can be measured. What survives is the curl, and the curl is the field.

    The potentials that are not unique

    Nobody solves Maxwell's equations for the fields. They are solved for potentials instead, and the potentials are not unique — three completely different vector potentials describe the same uniform magnetic field, and one of them changes everywhere the instant a charge moves, at any distance, without anything having outrun light.

    part 2 · electromagnetism
  3. Two quantities that are never computed and never change. A two-dimensional field integrated for 110 steps using only the two equations that contain a time derivative — Faraday's and Ampère's. The two that do not, Gauss's law for the electric field and the statement that there are no magnetic charges, are never imposed and never checked during the run. Their residuals are plotted: the divergence of B stays below 2.4e-16 of the field's own size and the divergence of E below 2.4e-16, over the whole run, while the field itself moves and changes by a factor of 8.59. That is not a numerical coincidence. Taking the divergence of Faraday's law gives the divergence of a curl, which vanishes identically, so ∂(∇·B)/∂t is zero whatever the fields are doing; the same manoeuvre on Ampère's law gives ∂(∇·D)/∂t = −∇·J. So the two constraints are initial conditions, propagated for ever by the two that are laws of motion, and Maxwell's four equations are two dynamical ones and two statements about how the field was set up.

    The two equations that are not laws of motion

    Maxwell's equations are usually presented as four laws of equal standing. Two of them contain no time derivative at all, which means they cannot be evolution equations: they are conditions on the field at one instant. What makes them consistent with the other two is that the other two preserve them exactly — and one of the two preservations holds only because charge is conserved.

    part 3 · electromagnetism
  4. The rotation that mixes electricity into magnetism. The two Lorentz invariants of a field — E² − c²B² across and 2E·cB up — as the field is rotated by the duality transformation that takes E into cB and cB into −E. Every configuration moves on a circle, so the combination of the two invariants is preserved while neither is. A light wave sits at the origin and stays there, which is why a wave cannot be turned into anything else by this rotation; a static charge starts on the positive axis and is carried round to a pure magnetic field a quarter turn later. The source-free equations are unchanged by the whole family, so a universe with no charges in it has no way to say which field is which.

    The symmetry one missing charge would complete

    Maxwell's equations with no sources are unchanged by rotating the electric field into the magnetic one. With sources they are not, and the only thing missing is magnetic charge — which, if one existed anywhere, would force every electric charge in the universe to be a multiple of a fixed unit.

    part 4 · electromagnetism
  5. How much reflected light keeps its handedness. Circularly polarised light reflected from a flat surface: the fraction of the reflected power that keeps its handedness, against the angle of incidence, for a perfect conductor, for glass, n = 1.5, for a medium with ε = μ = 1.5 (the same index, and the same impedance as empty space), and for one in between. A metal mirror reverses the handedness of every photon at every angle. Glass reverses it at normal incidence, returns an even split at Brewster's angle (56.3°, where only one linear polarisation reflects), and keeps 60 per cent at 60°. The medium with ε = μ keeps it at every angle: it respects the duality symmetry, and so conserves what the symmetry conserves.

    The handedness a mirror cannot keep

    Maxwell's equations in empty space do not change if the electric field is turned partly into the magnetic field and the magnetic partly into the electric. A symmetry that exact must hand over a conserved quantity, and this one hands over the handedness of light — how many more photons spin one way than the other. Every mirror breaks it: circularly polarised light comes back from a mirror with its handedness reversed. Only a material that responds to the magnetic field exactly as strongly as to the electric one keeps it, and such a material, it turns out, sends nothing straight back.

    part 5 · electromagnetism
  6. Jefimenko's two sources of a magnetic field. The magnetic field one metre from a long wire whose current is switched on, against time in light-metres, split into the two terms of Jefimenko's equation: the current at the retarded time divided by the square of the distance (solid blue), which is Biot and Savart's law with each piece of the wire seen as it was when its light left; and the rate of change of the current at the retarded time divided by c times the distance (solid green). Their sum (red) is the field. Nothing arrives before one metre of light-time. At 1.5 light-metres the two terms are 0.68 and 0.78; at 4, 0.97 and 0.07; the second term dies away as the switch-on recedes along the wire, and the first grows to the steady field. Neither term contains a changing electric field.

    The field a changing field does not make

    Faraday's law says a changing magnetic field comes with a curling electric field, and Maxwell's correction to Ampère's law says the reverse, and the two are almost always read as a chain of causes: each field makes the other, and that is how light carries itself across empty space. Solved for what the fields actually are, Maxwell's equations say something different. Every field at every place is an integral over the charges and currents on the observer's past light cone, and over nothing else. The changing fields are not sources; they are two descriptions of the same retarded currents, and the laws that relate them hold because both are computed from one history.

    part 6 · electromagnetism
  7. Where the two theories part: the magnetic permeability. The voltage across the spinning wall as a fraction of a metal's, against the material's relative permeability μ, for a permittivity ε = 6. Lorentz's electron theory (flat) polarises the material only through the force on its charges, so μ does not enter: (ε − 1)/ε = 0.833 at every μ. Relativity gives (εμ − 1)/εμ, which agrees exactly at μ = 1 — so no ordinary insulator, such as the ebonite H. A. Wilson spun in 1904, can tell them apart — and climbs towards a metal's value as μ grows. At μ = 3 (dot) the relativistic voltage is 13.3 per cent larger. That is why Wilson and Wilson needed an insulator that was also magnetic, and made one from steel spheres set in wax.

    The voltage a moving magnet adds to an insulator

    Spin a hollow cylinder of insulator in a magnetic field along its axis and a voltage appears between its inner and outer surfaces, because every piece of it is moving through the field. How large that voltage is turns out to depend on whether the insulator is magnetic, and the dependence was predicted by one theory and missed by the other. Maxwell's equations hold in a moving material only if the material's response is written in its own frame and carried into the laboratory by relativity — and then a moving magnet is also an electric dipole.

    part 7 · electromagnetism

All series