Series

Gravitational redshift — the series

8 essays on one idea, from the one that introduces it to the one that assumes the rest.
  1. Where a clock gains, and where it loses. The rate of a clock in a circular orbit against one on the ground, in microseconds per day, plotted against altitude. Height makes it gain and speed makes it lose, and the two cancel exactly at 3186 km — where a satellite keeps the same time as the ground for two reasons that have nothing to do with each other. At 20200 km the total is 38.5 µs a day, which is about ten kilometres of position error if it is ignored.

    The clock that runs slow lower down

    Two identical clocks, one on the floor and one on a shelf, do not keep the same time — and the difference is large enough that a satellite navigation system which ignored it would be useless within a morning. The derivation needs nothing but a photon and a conservation law.

    part 1 · astrophysics
  2. The figure a static field is not allowed to close. A spacetime diagram of two clocks held at fixed heights 22.5 metres apart, drawn as though spacetime were flat: time upward, height to the right, light at forty-five degrees. The lower clock sends two pulses; the upper clock receives them. Because the field does not change with time, nothing about the second pulse's journey differs from the first's, so the two null lines are congruent and the four worldlines bound a parallelogram. Opposite sides of a parallelogram in flat spacetime have equal length, so the proper time between emissions must equal the proper time between receptions, and the two clocks must agree. They do not: the measured fractional difference across a tower this tall is 2.455e-15, which Pound and Rebka established in 1960 and Pound and Snider confirmed to one per cent in 1964. Every step above is either a definition, an assumption of staticity, or a theorem of flat geometry — so the measurement refutes the flatness. No field equation has been written down, and none is needed: a laboratory result twenty-two metres tall is already incompatible with a flat spacetime.

    The parallelogram that will not close

    Two clocks twenty-two metres apart in a lift shaft run at different rates, by two parts in a thousand million million. That measurement, on its own, is enough to prove that spacetime cannot be flat — and the proof needs no field equation, no curvature tensor and no astronomy. It needs one drawing and the fact that opposite sides of a parallelogram are the same length.

    part 2 · astrophysics
  3. The height a clock can see. The fractional difference in rate between two clocks against how far apart in height they are, on logarithmic axes — a straight line of slope one, since the shift is gh/c² and comes to 1.09e-16 per metre near the ground. a caesium fountain, good to 1e-16, resolves 91.6 cm; an optical lattice clock, good to 1e-18, resolves 0.9 cm; the best clocks built, good to 8e-19, resolves 0.7 cm. The caesium fountains that define the second reach about a metre. The optical clocks that will replace them reach a centimetre, and the best of them a few millimetres. That is the whole of why this has stopped being a test of relativity and become a way of measuring the ground. A shift once so small that it took a Mössbauer experiment in a tower to see at all is now large enough to be a nuisance: two clocks in the same building disagree, and the disagreement has to be corrected for before either can be used to keep time.

    The clock that measures a height

    A clock a metre higher runs faster by a part in ten thousand million million million. That was once so small it took a tower and a Mössbauer source to see; the best clocks now resolve a centimetre of height, at any distance, without a line of sight. What began as a test of general relativity has become a surveying instrument that measures the quantity surveying actually wants.

    part 3 · astrophysics
  4. Both clocks move, and their ratio does not. Two years of a clock's fractional frequency against a distant clock (upper panel), and of the ratio of two unlike clocks kept side by side (lower panel). Above, both clocks slow as the Earth nears the Sun, with an amplitude of 1.65·10⁻¹⁰, and if the redshift is universal the two curves are one curve. Below, the ratio: the flat line is what universality predicts, and the sinusoid is what a clock responding to the potential 10⁻⁶ more strongly than the other would produce — an annual term of 1.65·10⁻¹⁶, a million times smaller than the shift both clocks share and within reach of clocks that compare to parts in 10¹⁷.

    The clocks that must all slow together

    Every clock on the Earth runs slower in January than in July, by three parts in ten thousand million, because the orbit carries the planet deeper into the Sun's potential at perihelion. No clock on the Earth can see this, and that invisibility is the claim worth testing. If the redshift is a property of time rather than of clocks, two clocks built on different physics must slow by exactly the same fraction, and their ratio must not move with the seasons. A ratio that did move would mean the constants of nature depend on where they are measured.

    part 4 · astrophysics
  5. The slice through a mass that a ruler has to climb. A plane through the centre of a uniform body whose compactness 2GM/Rc² is 0.34 — about a neutron star's — drawn as a curved surface on which distances along the surface are the distances rulers measure. The body's edge is a circle whose circumference is 2πR; a ruler laid from the centre to that edge along the surface measures 1.068 R, 6.8 per cent more. Outside the body the surface is Flamm's paraboloid; inside it is a cap of a sphere. The flat line beneath is what Euclid would give. The height of the surface means nothing; only lengths along it are measured. For the Earth the same excess is 1.5 mm in 6,371 km and the surface would be indistinguishable from the flat line.

    The radius a mass adds that no circumference shows

    Walk round the Earth's equator and divide by 2π, and the number is the Earth's radius. Dig to the centre and measure the same radius with a tape, and the tape comes out about two millimetres longer. Nothing is wrong with either measurement. A mass does not only slow the clocks near it; it stretches the rulers too, and the stretch is exactly as large as the slowing. Clocks cannot see it. Light can, and half of every bend and every delay that light suffers near the Sun is this.

    part 5 · astrophysics
  6. The redshift of a white dwarf weighs it. The gravitational redshift at the surface of a cold white dwarf, expressed as the velocity that would give the same Doppler shift, against the star's mass; computed from the radius each mass is forced to have. The Sun's surface redshift is 636 m/s. A white dwarf of 0.6 solar masses shifts its light by 30.1 km/s, one of 1.0 by 77.6, of 1.2 by 128 and of 1.35 by 223. Because the radius is not free, the curve is single-valued and steepening: a measured shift returns one mass. The cold model puts Sirius B, at 1.018 solar masses, at 80.8 km/s; its measured mass and radius together give 80.0.

    The redshift that weighs a dead star

    Light leaving the surface of an ordinary star is reddened by gravity, but the shift alone says little, because a star's radius is free and the shift depends on mass over radius. A white dwarf has no free radius. Degenerate electrons fix its size from its mass, so one measured line shift returns one mass — and the gauge grows sharper the closer the star is to collapse. The first measurement of it, in 1925, was hailed as a confirmation of general relativity and was wrong by a factor of four, in agreement with a forecast that was wrong by the same factor.

    part 6 · astrophysics
  7. The shift a member galaxy shows against the centre. The predicted gravitational shift of a cluster member's light relative to the central galaxy's, in km/s, against the member's projected distance from the centre, averaged along the line of sight with the members assumed to follow the mass out to twice R200, for clusters of 1 × 10¹⁴ M☉, 3 × 10¹⁴ M☉, 1 × 10¹⁵ M☉. Every member is blueshifted relative to the centre, because its light climbs out of a shallower part of the well. For the heaviest the shift is −13.2 km/s at half a megaparsec and −21.6 at two; for the lightest, whose members end at 1.9 Mpc, −4.4 and −5.7 at one and a half. Projection blunts the profile: members seen near the centre include many that lie far in front or behind it.

    The light that climbs out of a cluster of galaxies

    A cluster of galaxies is a well a few megaparsecs wide, and its galaxies sit at different depths in it. Light from the one at the bottom climbs furthest, so every other member should look slightly blue beside it — by ten kilometres a second, against galaxies that rush about at a thousand. No single cluster can show it. Thousands stacked together can, but only once a second effect of exactly the same size, the slowing of the galaxies' own moving clocks, has been taken out — and it cannot be separated by choosing heavier clusters, because both are set by the same depth.

    part 7 · astrophysics
  8. The deeper the line, the closer to gravity. The shift of a solar line in sunlight seen from the Earth, against the line's depth, in the two-stream model with the convective velocities dying away above the photosphere over 150 km and a deeper line taken to form higher (600 km × depth²). Weak lines, formed low among the fastest flows, show 411 m/s — about two-thirds of the gravitational value; the deepest lines, whose cores form in the upper photosphere where the granules' motion has nearly stopped, show 627 m/s and are still climbing towards the 633 m/s that gravity alone gives, drawn as the dashed line. That is the measurement made with integrated sunlight reflected from the Moon and calibrated with a laser frequency comb: plot the shift against line depth, and read the gravitational redshift off where the strongest lines are heading. Its published value, 638 ± 6 m/s, agrees with general relativity.

    The redshift the Sun's boiling hides

    Light leaving the Sun climbs out of a gravitational well and should arrive redder by 633 metres a second in velocity terms — a prediction Einstein made in 1907, before he had general relativity. It took half a century to confirm, and the reason was not the size of the effect but the Sun's surface, which boils. Bright hot gas rising in granules and fainter cool gas sinking between them blueshift every line by a few hundred metres a second, by an amount that depends on the line and on where on the disc it is seen. The gravitational shift was found by treating that nuisance as a second measurement: deeper lines and lines near the limb both converge on the same number.

    part 8 · astrophysics

All series