Illustrated Physics
physics, drawn
Series

Gauss's law — the series

8 essays on one idea, from the one that introduces it to the one that assumes the rest.
  1. A closed surface with the charge inside. Every field line from the enclosed charge crosses the surface exactly once on its way out, so the net flux counts the charge.

    Counting what comes out, and never looking inside

    Draw any closed surface. The field crossing it depends only on the charge enclosed — not on where that charge sits, not on its shape, not on anything outside.

    part 1 · electromagnetism
  2. The same law, three shapes of source. Field strength against distance on logarithmic axes, for a point, a long line and a wide plane carrying charge. The exponent is the slope, and it is set by how the area of the enclosing surface grows rather than by anything about the force law.

    The shape decides the falloff, and the force law never changes

    A point charge gives an inverse square, a line gives an inverse, a plane gives a constant. All three come from the same law, and the exponent belongs to the geometry of the source rather than to the physics.

    part 2 · electromagnetism
  3. The gravity that grows on the way down. The acceleration due to gravity inside the Earth against distance from the centre, from Gauss's law applied to the Preliminary Reference Earth Model's density: g(r) = G M(r)/r², counting only the mass inside each radius. The model reproduces the Earth's mass to 0.02 per cent, a surface gravity of 9.82 m/s² and a moment-of-inertia factor of 0.3308, none of which it was fitted to. For a uniform Earth, drawn dashed, gravity would fall in a straight line to zero at the centre. The real one does the opposite for the first 2891 km: it rises through the whole mantle to 10.69 m/s² at the core–mantle boundary, 8.8 per cent above its surface value, and only then falls to zero through the core. Going down through the mantle removes very little mass and brings the dense core much closer, and the second effect wins.

    The pull that grows on the way down

    Inside a uniform ball, gravity falls in a straight line from the surface to nothing at the centre, and that is the answer usually given for the Earth. It is wrong for almost three thousand kilometres. Going down through the mantle, gravity rises, reaching nearly nine per cent above its surface value where the core begins — because Gauss's law counts only the mass inside, and the local form of the law says gravity grows inward wherever the rock is lighter than two thirds of the average beneath it.

    part 3 · electromagnetism
  4. Three bodies of one mass, one field outside, three fields inside. The gravitational field against distance from the centre, both in units of the body's surface values, for 3 spherical bodies of the same mass and radius: a uniform ball; a dense core under a light mantle; a hollow shell. Outside the surface the three curves are one curve — checked at 1.7 radii by adding up the pull of every mass element in each body, which agrees with the pull of a point of the same mass to better than a part in five hundred. Inside they part: the uniform ball's field falls in a straight line, the layered body's rises to 1.24 times the surface value at the top of its core, and the hollow shell's is zero throughout its cavity. Their moment-of-inertia factors are 0.400 (uniform ball), 0.330 (dense core under a light mantle), 0.551 (hollow shell) — a number that no measurement of the field outside can supply.

    The field outside that cannot find the core

    Gauss's law gives the field outside a body from what it encloses, and read backwards it is a limit. A uniform ball, a planet with an iron core and a hollow shell of the same mass have identical gravity everywhere outside. The field fixes a list of numbers — the mass, the flattening, higher moments — and leaves free everything else, including the moment of inertia; the Earth's core was weighed by its wobble, not by its pull.

    part 4 · electromagnetism
  5. The same nudge in four kinds of space. A body on a circular orbit given 5 per cent more speed, integrated for up to 6 turns in the field a point mass would have in spaces of 2, 3, 4, 5 dimensions. In 2 dimensions it stays between 1.00 and 1.10 of the original radius; in 3 dimensions it stays between 1.00 and 1.23 of the original radius; in 4 dimensions it leaves after 1.93 turns; in 5 dimensions it leaves after 1.19 turns. In three dimensions the orbit is an ellipse that closes; in two it is a rosette that does not close but never wanders far; from four dimensions up there are no stable orbits at all, and a planet nudged by anything would spiral away or plunge.

    The number of dimensions a planet can orbit in

    Gauss's law says that a point source's field is its strength spread over the surface around it, and the size of that surface depends on how many dimensions space has. In three it grows as the square of the distance, and the field falls as the inverse square. Count differently and the field falls differently — and above three dimensions it falls so steeply that no planet could hold a stable orbit and no atom could hold its electron. The inverse-square law is not a fact about gravity or electricity. It is a fact about space, and it is one of the conditions for there being anything in space to orbit.

    part 5 · electromagnetism
  6. Two ways to be wrong, and the apparatus that sees each. The fractional sag of the potential at the centre of a charged spherical shell below the shell's own, on a logarithmic axis, against the shell's radius in metres, also logarithmic, for two different departures from Coulomb's law. If the force fell as 1/r^(2+ε) with ε = 10⁻¹⁶, the sag is 3.07·10⁻¹⁷ whatever the shell's size (dashed): the law has no length in it, so neither does its failure. If the photon had a mass of 10⁻¹⁴ eV, the sag is (μR)²/6 (solid): 4.3·10⁻²⁰ for a centimetre shell and 4.3·10⁻¹⁶ for a metre. A mass introduces a length, and the signal grows as the square of the apparatus compared with it — so the strongest bounds on a photon mass come from the largest fields, not the most sensitive laboratories.

    The mass that would make Gauss's law leak

    Gauss's law says the flux out of any closed surface counts the charge inside, whatever the surface's size. If the photon had even a tiny mass, that would stop being true: the field of a charge would die off exponentially beyond a length ħ/mc, the flux through a large sphere would fall short of the charge, and the inside of a charged shell would no longer be field-free. There are two different ways Coulomb's law could fail, and they are caught by opposite strategies. A wrong exponent has no length in it and shows equally in any apparatus; a mass has a length, and shows as the square of the apparatus's size. That is why the tightest limit on the photon's mass comes not from a laboratory but from the magnetic field the solar wind carries past Pluto.

    part 6 · electromagnetism
  7. How much a tiny imbalance of charge would take off a body's weight. The electric repulsion between the parts of any body, as a fraction of their mutual gravity, if every nucleon carried an unbalanced charge δ (in units of the electron's), on logarithmic axes. It is (δ/δc)², with δc = 8.93 × 10⁻¹⁹, for a grain of sand, a planet or a galaxy alike. At the imbalance Lyttleton and Bondi proposed, 2 × 10⁻¹⁸, repulsion would beat gravity 5.0 times over, everywhere — their mechanism for an expanding universe. Experiments with gas let out of tanks had bounded the imbalance near 10⁻²⁰ within a year, where the ratio is 1.3·10⁻⁴, and modern ones near 10⁻²¹, 1.3·10⁻⁶.

    The imbalance of charge that would outweigh gravity

    Gravity and electricity both fall as the inverse square, so Gauss's law treats them identically: the field of any round body counts what is inside it. If every nucleon in ordinary matter carried a tiny unbalanced charge, the body's charge would follow its mass everywhere, and its electric repulsion would be a fixed fraction of its gravity at every size from a grain of sand to the universe. Below about one part in a billion billion of an electron's charge, gravity always wins; above it, repulsion always does. In 1959 two astronomers proposed that the universe expands because the true imbalance is just above that line.

    part 7 · electromagnetism
  8. The potential a stream of charge bends. The potential and electric field across a vacuum gap of width d with a voltage V across it, drawn in units of V and V/d. With no charge in the gap the potential is a straight line and the field uniform. With a stream of charge crossing, the charge's own field pushes the potential curve down, and the current can rise only until the field at the emitter falls to zero: past that the next particle would be pushed back. At that limit the potential goes as the four-thirds power of the distance and the field as the cube root, so the emitter sees no field at all and the far side sees four-thirds of what it saw before. Child and Langmuir found the same curve independently, in 1911 and 1913, and it fixes the current completely.

    The current a vacuum will not carry

    A vacuum has no resistance, and yet a gap of empty space will carry only so much current for a given voltage, however freely its cathode offers electrons. The charge already crossing cancels the field that would pull the next one off. Gauss's law gives the result in a few lines, and it says something odd about ion engines: their thrust per square metre does not depend on what the ion is, and it is exactly the electric stress on their grid.

    part 8 · electromagnetism

All series