Series

Circular motion — the series

9 essays on one idea, from the one that introduces it to the one that assumes the rest.
  1. Velocity and acceleration in uniform circular motion. Velocity drawn tangent to a circular path and acceleration drawn toward its centre, at eight points around the circle. The speed never changes and the acceleration is never zero; the two vectors are perpendicular everywhere.

    Turning is an acceleration, and constant speed does not help

    An object going round a circle at unchanging speed is accelerating hard, all the time, toward a point it never reaches. The construction that shows this needs two arrows and no calculus.

    part 1 · mechanics
  2. One puck, two frames. A puck slides outward from the centre of a turntable at 1.4 m/s across a table of radius 1 m, which turns through 0.55 of a revolution in the 0.71 seconds the crossing takes. On the left, in the room: a straight line, because no force acts along it. On the right, on the turntable: a spiral, because the coordinates turned underneath it. The two panels are the same numbers with the same clock — the second is the first with the angle rotated by −Ωt — so whatever is bending the path on the right is arithmetic, and it is still worth a name, because on a turning planet the right-hand panel is the one everybody lives in.

    The forces that are not there

    Writing Newton's law in a frame that is turning produces three extra terms. Nothing was added to the world to make them appear and nothing is removed by calling them fictitious — one of them flattens the planet, one of them turns the weather, and both are computable to four figures.

    part 2 · mechanics
  3. The deflection is a circle, not a bend. Trajectories integrated from Newton's law in a rotating frame with the Coriolis term and nothing else — no pressure gradient, no friction, no force of any kind. 0.5 m/s at 45°, 0.3 m/s at 30°. Each path closes on itself after one inertial period, checked to a millionth of its own radius, and the radius is the speed divided by the Coriolis parameter: 4.85 km, 4.11 km. The deflection usually described as a curving of the path is a complete circle, traversed clockwise in the northern hemisphere in half a pendulum day, and a body left alone in a rotating frame goes nowhere at all.

    The deflection that closes on itself

    The Coriolis term is usually described as bending a path to the right. Integrated rather than described, it does not bend the path — it closes it. A body left alone in a rotating frame travels a circle of radius U/f and comes back to where it started in half a pendulum day, having gone nowhere at all, and drifting buoys in every ocean draw exactly that.

    part 3 · mechanics
  4. Pushed one way, travelling another. A parcel released from rest under a steady pressure-gradient acceleration of 2.0e-4 metres per second squared pointing east, integrated for 36 hours at 60°, 30°, 10°. Without rotation it would accelerate east indefinitely. With it, the motion is an inertial circle about a mean velocity at right angles to the push, and the mean over a whole number of inertial periods is measured off each path and matches the geostrophic value a/f to two per cent. At high latitude the loops are tight and the drift is almost purely along the isobars; near the equator the parcel travels a long way down the gradient before the rotation has had time to turn it, which is why geostrophic balance is a high-latitude statement and the tropics need a different set of approximations.

    The ratio that decides whether the planet is turning

    Whether the rotating terms matter is not a question about size. It is one dimensionless ratio, U over fL, and it runs from ten thousand in a teacup to a millionth in the Earth's core. Where it is small the pressure gradient stops accelerating the fluid and starts balancing a force on fluid already moving across it — so the flow runs along the pressure contours instead of down them, and a weather map is a streamline plot.

    part 4 · mechanics
  5. Why the meander has to move west. A line of fluid columns at 45° pushed into a meander 3,000 km long and 300 km in amplitude, seen from above with north up and east to the right. Columns pushed north find the planet spinning faster beneath them and turn clockwise; columns pushed south turn anticlockwise. Each turning column drives the fluid north on one side of it and south on the other, and the arrows are that flow, from integrating the columns' spin along the line: it peaks at 2.32 m/s, a quarter of a wavelength west of each crest, so the columns just west of a crest are carried north and the crest itself is rebuilt further west. The dashed meander is the same pattern 2 days later, moved 638 km west at β/k² = 3.69 m/s. Nothing in the argument depends on which way the meander was first pushed.

    The wave that can only travel west

    A column of air or water on a spinning planet keeps one quantity as it moves: its total spin divided by its depth. Carry it north, where the planet's own spin about the local vertical is larger, and it must turn the other way to compensate. That single bookkeeping rule makes a wave that exists nowhere else — one whose crests can only ever move west — and the same rule holds the jet stream's meanders still over the mountains, makes the ocean take decades to notice a change in the wind, and pins the Gulf Stream to the western side of the Atlantic.

    part 5 · mechanics
  6. Every path a rolling ball can take on a turntable, seen from the room. The paths, seen from the room, of four solid balls rolling without slipping on a turntable of radius 15 cm turning at 33.3 revolutions a minute (grey disc), over 6.3 seconds. A ball set down at rest relative to the room stays exactly where it is, spinning on the spot while the table turns under it. Every other ball moves on a circle, turning the same way as the table at 2/7 of its rate — once every 3.5 turns of the table — and comes back to where it started, whatever the push. A ball set down moving with the table does not ride with it: it circles on a path three and a half times the radius it started at, and the circle's centre is on the other side of the axis.

    The ball a turntable will not throw off

    Set a marble down on a spinning turntable and the expectation is that it will be flung off the edge. It is not. Placed at rest relative to the room, it stays exactly where it is, spinning on the spot while the table turns beneath it. Given a push, it moves in a circle, turning the same way as the table at two-sevenths of the table's rate, and comes back to where it started. Tilt the turntable and the marble does not roll downhill: it wanders across the slope in a chain of loops. A rolling ball on a rotating surface obeys exactly the equation of an electric charge in a magnetic field, and the two-sevenths is how much of every push goes into turning the ball rather than moving it.

    part 6 · mechanics
  7. A gas pressed against the wall of a spinning tube. The density of uranium hexafluoride gas in a rotor spinning at a steady rate, relative to its density on the axis, on a logarithmic scale, against the distance from the axis as a fraction of the radius, for wall speeds of 300, 450 and 600 m/s at 300 K. In the turning frame the gas sits in the centrifugal potential −½mω²r² and settles into the same exponential that thins the atmosphere with height: n ∝ exp(mω²r²/2kT). At 600 m/s the density at the wall is e^25.4 — about 10¹¹ — times that on the axis; at 300 m/s, e^6.4. Almost all the gas lies in a thin layer against the wall, and the middle of the rotor is close to vacuum.

    The spin that sorts by a difference of mass

    In a spinning tube a gas settles against the wall the way the atmosphere settles towards the ground, with an exponential whose scale is set by the rotor's speed rather than by gravity. Heavier molecules settle more steeply, and the ratio of two isotopes changes from axis to wall by a factor that depends on the difference of their masses, not on the ratio. That one change from a ratio to a difference is why a spinning rotor separates uranium-235 from uranium-238 more than fifty times as strongly per stage as the porous barriers that first did it — and why the history of the machine is a history of how fast a material can turn before it flies apart.

    part 7 · mechanics
  8. A governor that hunts. The speed of an engine with a centrifugal governor after its load is suddenly increased, against time in units of √(ℓ/g), for three amounts of friction in the governor's linkage: damping 0, 0.25, 0.6, against Vyshnegradsky's minimum for this governor, 0.397. With no friction the speed oscillates about its new, slightly lower value with a growing swing — the governor hunts, opening and closing the throttle out of step with the engine — until the arms hit their stops and the curve ends. At damping 0.25, below the minimum, it still hunts, more slowly. At damping 0.6, above the minimum, the oscillation dies away and the engine settles at its new speed. The friction that seems to spoil the mechanism is what makes it work.

    The governor that needed friction to work

    James Watt's steam engines were kept at a steady speed by two heavy balls on hinged arms, spun by the engine itself: run faster and the balls fly out and close the steam valve; run slower and they drop and open it. The balls stand at a height set by the speed alone. As engines grew and governors were made more sensitive, many began to hunt — speeding and slowing in a growing rhythm, the governor always too late. In 1868 James Clerk Maxwell wrote the equations down and showed why: a governor with no friction cannot settle at all, and the more precisely it is meant to hold the speed, the more friction it needs.

    part 8 · mechanics
  9. The force a rider feels on the way up a loop. The force of the seat on a rider, in multiples of the rider's weight, against how far the track has turned on the way from the bottom (0) to the top of the loop (1), for the 20 m circle and clothoid of the previous figure, each entered at the speed that leaves 0.5 g at the top. On the circle the force jumps the moment the car enters the loop, from 1 g on the straight to 6.5 g, and falls steadily to the top. On the clothoid it starts at 1 g, because the curvature starts at zero, and rises smoothly to 4.3 g partway round before falling. The clothoid's car also enters more slowly — 22.7 m/s against 23.2 — because its tighter top needs less speed to hold the car on.

    The loop that is not a circle

    A roller coaster's vertical loop looks circular from a distance and is not. A circular loop, entered fast enough for the car to stay on the track at the top, presses its riders into their seats at six times their weight at the bottom — six, whatever the circle's size — and slams that force on in an instant at the entry. The fix, found for railways a century earlier, is a curve whose curvature grows steadily with distance, the Euler spiral: the same curve that describes how light spreads round the edge of a shadow. Tight at the top, gentle at the bottom, it lets the force build instead of arriving all at once.

    part 9 · mechanics

All series