Illustrated Physics
physics, drawn
Series

Buoyancy — the series

5 essays on one idea, from the one that introduces it to the one that assumes the rest.
  1. Where the upward force comes from. A block submerged with its top 1.2 m down. The pressure on the bottom face (19.6 kPa) exceeds that on the top (11.8 kPa) by exactly the weight of a column of water as tall as the block, and the sideways pressures cancel in pairs. Nothing has been added to the physics of pressure to get buoyancy out of it.

    The weight of the water that is not there

    A submerged object is pushed up by the weight of the fluid it has displaced — not by something like it, not approximately, but exactly. The reason is that the pressures on its faces do not cancel, and the sum that survives has forgotten everything about the object except its shape.

    part 1 · fluids
  2. A heeled hull, and the couple it makes. A rectangular hull of beam 3 m heeled 18°, with the waterline solved so that it displaces the same volume it did upright. The centre of buoyancy has moved 0.244 m to the low side, and weight and buoyancy now act along two lines 0.059 m apart — a couple that turns the hull back upright.

    Why a ship comes back upright

    Whether a floating body rights itself or rolls over is not decided by its weight, its density or how deep it sits. It is decided by the shape of the slice the water cuts through it, and the number that settles it can be worked out before the vessel is built.

    part 2 · fluids
  3. Buoyancy that falls away as the body sinks. The net upward force on a body containing a little gas, against how deep it has been taken, for 3 gas fractions. The weight does not change with depth. The buoyancy does, because the gas obeys Boyle's law and the pressure rises by an atmosphere every ten metres, so a body that displaced its own weight at the surface displaces less at depth. Every curve therefore slopes downward, and that slope is the whole point: where a curve crosses zero the body is in equilibrium, and the crossing is always from above, which makes every one of these equilibria unstable. Push the body a little deeper and the force does not push back — it turns downward and grows. The crossings drawn are at 8.2 m, 10.0 m, 13.6 m, and a body sitting at one of them is balanced in the sense that a pencil is balanced on its point. This is why a diver at neutral buoyancy has to keep adjusting, why a submarine's depth is held by hydroplanes and not by ballast alone, and why a fish that loses the use of its swim bladder sinks rather than drifting.

    The depth past which it must sink

    A body carrying a pocket of gas can be trimmed to hang motionless in water at exactly one depth. Push it a little deeper and it does not come back — the gas compresses, the buoyancy falls, and the equilibrium turns out to have been balanced on its point.

    part 3 · fluids
  4. The same block, one of them with no upthrust at all. Two identical blocks 0.8 m tall with their tops 1.2 m under the surface, drawn with the pressure on every wetted face at its true relative size. On the right the block is clear of the floor and the pressure on its underside exceeds that on its top by 7.8 kPa, which is ρgh and is exactly Archimedes' 7.8 kPa. On the left the bedding is perfect and there is no water under it, so nothing pushes up: the resultant is 11.8 kPa downward and the block presses on the floor with more than its own weight. Buoyancy is not something the fluid has. It is what the bottom face is doing, and a face the fluid cannot reach does nothing.

    The block the water does not lift

    A block bedded flat on the bottom of a tank, with no water underneath it, feels no upthrust at all. It is fully submerged, Archimedes' principle is not suspended, and it presses on the floor with more than its own weight — because buoyancy is not something a fluid has, it is what the bottom face is doing, and a face the water cannot reach does nothing.

    part 4 · fluids
  5. A body at an interface, and the difference that holds it. The net upward force on a ten-centimetre cube straddling the boundary between two fluids, against how far its underside sits below that boundary — each curve scaled by its own largest value so that three very different cases fit on one axis. The displaced weight has to be counted twice, once with each density, so the force is linear in the displacement with a stiffness set by gravity, the cube's cross-section and the difference of the two densities — the difference, and neither of them alone. air over water holds the cube with its underside 60 per cent of the way through, at a stiffness of 97.8 newtons per metre; oil over water holds the cube with its underside 47 per cent of the way through, at a stiffness of 14.5 newtons per metre; water over mercury holds the cube with its underside 24 per cent of the way through, at a stiffness of 1229.4 newtons per metre. Both numbers are read off the drawn curve rather than substituted. The consequence is the one worth the figure: a body at an oil–water interface is held six times less stiffly than the same body at an air–water one, because the density difference is six times smaller, and the ordinary intuition that a denser fluid holds a body more firmly is exactly wrong — what matters is the contrast across the surface the body is sitting in.

    The body that displaces two things

    Every earlier argument has a body wetted by one fluid, so the displaced weight is a volume times a density. A body at an interface displaces two, and what holds it is the *difference* between them — so the same block is held six times less stiffly at an oil–water boundary than at an air–water one. In a continuously stratified column the neutral depth becomes stable, which is the exact opposite of the compressible case.

    part 5 · fluids

All series