Series

Blackbody — the series

8 essays on one idea, from the one that introduces it to the one that assumes the rest.
  1. The blackbody spectrum, against what classical physics predicted. Spectral exitance against wavelength for a blackbody at 3000, 4000, 5000 kelvin, in kilowatts per square metre per nanometre. Each curve peaks at the wavelength Wien's displacement law gives — 966 nm at 3000 K, 724 nm at 4000 K, 580 nm at 5000 K — and falls to nothing at short wavelengths.

    The curve that would not come down

    Classical physics predicted that a warm object radiates infinite power at short wavelengths. Every step of the derivation was correct, the prediction was absurd, and closing the gap required assuming that energy comes in lumps.

    part 1 · quantum
  2. What a thermal camera reads off a shiny surface. The temperature a camera calibrated for a black body reports, against the emissivity of the surface it is pointed at, for surfaces truly at 323 K, 373 K, 473 K in a room at 293 K. Every curve begins at the true temperature when the emissivity is one and ends at the room's temperature when it is zero, because a surface that emits nothing reflects everything and the camera is then looking at the room. polished aluminium at 0.05 reads 312 K; stainless steel, oxidised at 0.8 reads 451 K; matt black paint at 0.95 reads 468 K; human skin at 0.98 reads 471 K for a surface truly at 473 K. That is not a fault in the instrument. It follows from Kirchhoff's law — a poor emitter is a poor absorber and therefore a good reflector — so the shortfall in a shiny surface's own glow is made up almost exactly by whatever is reflected in it, and no measurement of the light leaving a surface can separate the two without knowing the emissivity in advance.

    The glow that says nothing about the surface

    A thermal camera pointed at a saucepan of boiling water reads a hundred degrees. Pointed at a polished aluminium block at the same temperature it reads about twenty-five, and the instrument is working perfectly. What it is measuring is emissivity as much as temperature — and a surface's emissivity is forced to equal its absorptivity, at every wavelength and every angle, by an argument with no physics of matter in it at all.

    part 2 · thermodynamics
  3. Energy, pressure and entropy of a gas nobody counted. The energy density, pressure and entropy density of blackbody radiation against temperature, on logarithmic axes, together with the pressure a monatomic gas of the same energy density would have. Every curve is a power of the temperature — the fourth for energy and pressure, the third for entropy — because the only length in the problem is the thermal wavelength and the only energy is kT. The pressure is exactly a third of the energy density, where an ordinary gas's is two thirds, a factor of 2: a photon carries momentum E/c and a slow molecule carries √(2mE), and that difference is the whole of it. Some values: at room temperature the radiation pressure is 1.86e-6 pascals, which is a ten thousand millionth of an atmosphere; at 1e+7 kelvin it is 2.52e+12, which is where radiation rather than matter holds a star up.

    The gas that nobody counted

    A box of gas holds however many molecules were put in it. A box of radiation holds however many photons the temperature says, because the walls make and destroy them until the free energy is least — and one dropped assumption changes every result. The pressure becomes a third of the energy density instead of two thirds, the entropy goes as the cube of the temperature, and the adiabatic index comes out at exactly four thirds.

    part 3 · thermodynamics
  4. The temperature a planet ought to be. Each body's measured surface temperature against the temperature at which it would radiate away exactly the sunlight it absorbs — computed from two numbers, the sunlight reaching it and the fraction it reflects, with no other property of the body used. Points on the diagonal are bodies the one-line argument gets right. the Moon: balance 270 K, surface 250 K, −20 K with no atmosphere; Mercury: balance 433 K, surface 340 K, −93 K with no atmosphere; Mars: balance 210 K, surface 210 K, +0 K; Earth: balance 255 K, surface 288 K, +33 K; Venus: balance 227 K, surface 737 K, +510 K. The airless bodies fall below the line rather than on it, and the reason is the fourth power: a surface running from noon heat to night cold radiates like its hottest parts and averages like its coldest, so a mean thermometer reading is lower than the temperature that matches the emitted flux. Mars, whose atmosphere is thin and whose surface is nearly isothermal by comparison, sits on the line. Everything with a substantial atmosphere sits above it, by tens of kelvin on Earth and hundreds on Venus, and always in the same direction. Nothing here explains why. What the figure fixes is the size and the sign of what has to be explained.

    The height a planet is seen from

    A body in sunlight settles where it radiates away what it absorbs, and that takes two numbers and one line of arithmetic. It gets the Moon right and Earth wrong by thirty-three kelvin. The correction is not that the atmosphere traps heat but that it moves the level space sees the planet from, and the rest is done by a lapse rate that is not a radiative quantity at all.

    part 4 · thermodynamics
  5. Each wavelength sees from a different height. The weighting functions of 7 infrared channels in a carbon-dioxide band — how much each height contributes to the radiance a satellite measures in that channel — for absorption strengths chosen so that the peaks sit at 3, 8, 14, 20, 27, 35, 43 km. Each is scaled to its own maximum. A channel's peak is where the carbon dioxide above that height amounts to one optical depth: deeper, its emission is absorbed on the way out; higher, there is too little gas to emit. Each function is about 17 km wide at half its peak, the same for every channel, because the absorber's density falls with one scale height, 7 km. The dotted curve is the temperature profile of the standard atmosphere, on its own scale from 180 to 300 K, whose cold tropopause and warm stratosphere the channels between them straddle.

    The spectrum that is a thermometer at every height

    A satellite looking down at the Earth in the infrared sees, at each wavelength, the glow of whatever layer of air that wavelength escapes from. In the wings of carbon dioxide's great absorption band the air is transparent and the satellite sees the ground; towards the band's centre the gas grows opaque and each wavelength escapes from higher up. A single spectrum is therefore a stack of thermometers at different heights, and weather forecasts are built on reading it. What cannot be read from it is anything much thinner than the ten to twenty kilometres of air each of those thermometers averages over.

    part 5 · quantum
  6. The heat two surfaces exchange when they almost touch. The radiative heat-transfer coefficient between two parallel half-spaces at 300 K, in W/m²K on a logarithmic axis, against the width of the vacuum gap between them, also logarithmic, from fluctuational electrodynamics: silicon carbide (solid) and gold (dashed), with two perfect black bodies, 4σT³ = 6.12 W/m²K, for comparison (dotted). Far apart, silicon carbide exchanges 3.3 W/m²K — less than black — and gold, a good mirror, only 0.024. Closer than the thermal wavelength, about 17 µm, waves that cannot leave either surface begin to tunnel across the gap. At 100 nm silicon carbide exchanges 137 W/m²K, at 10 nm 9338, at 1 nm 9.3·10⁵ — rising as the inverse square of the gap, 1.5·10⁵ times the black-body value at 1 nm. Gold exceeds black only below a few hundred nanometres and then grows much more slowly: 1284 at 10 nm, 2561 at 1 nm.

    The heat that crosses a gap too narrow for light

    Stefan and Boltzmann's law is usually read as a ceiling: no surface can radiate more heat than a perfect black body at the same temperature, 6.1 watts per square metre for every degree of difference at room temperature. It is a ceiling only for surfaces that are far apart. Bring two of them closer than the wavelength of their thermal glow and they begin to exchange waves that never leave either surface — waves that cling to it and die away within a wavelength — and those waves tunnel across the gap. Two plates of silicon carbide ten nanometres apart exchange fifteen hundred times what two black bodies can, almost all of it in a single colour, and the colour is the one in which silicon carbide is too shiny to glow at all.

    part 6 · quantum
  7. Each foil divides the heat by one more. The radiant heat flowing from a wall at 293 K to one at 77 K — room temperature to liquid nitrogen — in watts per square metre on a logarithmic axis, against the number of thin shields placed between them, for walls and shields all black-painted, dull metal and aluminised film. With nothing between them, black walls exchange 340 W/m²; aluminised walls 6.3. Each shield adds one more equal resistance in series, so N shields divide the flux by N + 1: thirty aluminised foils bring it to 204 milliwatts per square metre. Between black walls a single aluminised foil passes 6.2 W/m², less than thirty black shields do, 11.0 W/m², because a shield's resistance is 2/ε − 1 and a shiny one is worth 54 black.

    The thin foils that stop radiant heat

    In a vacuum, heat can cross a gap only as radiation, and a single sheet of foil a few hundredths of a millimetre thick, hung in the gap and touching nothing, halves it. Two sheets cut it to a third, thirty to a thirty-first. The foil does not need to be thick or cold or clever; it needs only to be shiny, because a sheet that absorbs little also emits little, and each one becomes a radiator in its own right, floating at a temperature between its neighbours. The golden blankets on spacecraft and the silvering inside a vacuum flask are the same arithmetic of resistances in series.

    part 7 · thermodynamics
  8. The spectrum two rates would make. Balance absorption against spontaneous emission alone, with level populations in the Boltzmann ratio, and the radiation comes out as x³ times e to the minus x, Wien's law; add stimulated emission, and the same balance gives x³ over e to the x minus one, which is Planck's. The two agree on the right, where a photon is much more energetic than the thermal energy and stimulated emission is negligible, and disagree on the left, where only Planck's approaches the classical count of waves. At x = 1 Planck's is 1.58 times Wien's. Measurements around 1900 at long wavelengths had already found that Wien's law failed, so experiment required the third rate seventeen years before anyone saw it in a laser or a maser.

    The third process equilibrium demands

    In 1916, with general relativity just finished, Einstein asked how atoms and light could reach equilibrium at all. Absorption and emission, balanced against each other, gave the wrong spectrum. A third process was needed, in which light makes an excited atom emit a copy of itself. Nobody had seen it, and it took forty years to be put to use. It also fixes a ratio that goes as the cube of the frequency, which is why X-ray lasers are so hard.

    part 8 · quantum

All series