Generator

How much each colour is scattered

One function in the optics library, called 57 times across 10 essays. Below: what it draws at its defaults, what it draws at every branch an essay asks for, whether the site's own gate puts a claim to it, and everywhere it is called.

At its defaults it draws how much each colour is scattered. Scattering strength against wavelength, as the inverse fourth power, normalised to one at 550 nanometres. Light at 450 nanometres is scattered 4.35 times as strongly as light at 650 nanometres — which is the whole reason the sky is the colour it is.

scattering-spectrum is one function in lib/figures/optics.js — rays, lenses, mirrors and what light does to a surface. Everything below came out of it during this build, at parameters taken from the essays rather than invented for this page. A figure here is the figure a reader meets in an essay, and if the generator changes, this page changes with it.

At its defaults

Drawn even though every essay passes options, because a default nothing exercises is a trap for the next essay to call this with none — which has happened here twice.

How much each colour is scattered. Scattering strength against wavelength, as the inverse fourth power, normalised to one at 550 nanometres. Light at 450 nanometres is scattered 4.35 times as strongly as light at 650 nanometres — which is the whole reason the sky is the colour it is.

Scattering strength against wavelength, as the inverse fourth power, normalised to one at 550 nanometres. Light at 450 nanometres is scattered 4.35 times as strongly as light at 650 nanometres — which is the whole reason the sky is the colour it is.

Why only a sideways scattered wave takes anything away

The options are the ones Everything a scatterer removes, from one direction passes. A branch drawn at its own defaults instead would be a picture no essay asked for and no assertion has been run against.

Why only a sideways scattered wave takes anything away. The transmitted amplitude behind a thin scatterer, drawn as a phasor: the incident wave of unit length along the axis, plus a forward-scattered wave of length 0.12 at 0°, 60°, 90°, 150°. What a detector reads is the square of the total length. A scattered wave along the incident one lengthens or shortens the sum in proportion to itself; one at right angles changes the length only in second order, because a small perpendicular addition to a long vector barely alters its length. So a scatterer that removes energy from the beam at first order must scatter forward with a component perpendicular to the incident wave, and the size of that component is the whole extinction — which is the optical theorem.

The transmitted amplitude behind a thin scatterer, drawn as a phasor: the incident wave of unit length along the axis, plus a forward-scattered wave of length 0.12 at 0°, 60°, 90°, 150°. What a detector reads is the square of the total length. A scattered wave along the incident one lengthens or shortens the sum in proportion to itself; one at right angles changes the length only in second order, because a small perpendicular addition to a long vector barely alters its length. So a scatterer that removes energy from the beam at first order must scatter forward with a component perpendicular to the incident wave, and the size of that component is the whole extinction — which is the optical theorem.

A large particle removes twice its own shadow

The options are the ones Everything a scatterer removes, from one direction passes. A branch drawn at its own defaults instead would be a picture no essay asked for and no assertion has been run against.

A large particle removes twice its own shadow. The extinction efficiency of a sphere of refractive index 1.33 — the light it removes, divided by what its geometrical shadow would remove — against its size in units of the wavelength over two pi. A small particle removes far less than its shadow. A large one removes twice as much: half by the shadow itself and half by the light diffracted out of the beam at the shadow's edge, which is a wave effect with no ray counterpart at all. Between the two the efficiency overshoots to 3.17 at a size parameter of 6.2, because the wave through the middle of the particle and the wave round the outside come out in step and then out of step as the particle grows. That is interference between two parts of one beam, and it is why a haze of a particular droplet size is much whiter than a haze of any other.

The extinction efficiency of a sphere of refractive index 1.33 — the light it removes, divided by what its geometrical shadow would remove — against its size in units of the wavelength over two pi. A small particle removes far less than its shadow. A large one removes twice as much: half by the shadow itself and half by the light diffracted out of the beam at the shadow's edge, which is a wave effect with no ray counterpart at all. Between the two the efficiency overshoots to 3.17 at a size parameter of 6.2, because the wave through the middle of the particle and the wave round the outside come out in step and then out of step as the particle grows. That is interference between two parts of one beam, and it is why a haze of a particular droplet size is much whiter than a haze of any other.

The refractive index is forward scattering, added up

The options are the ones Everything a scatterer removes, from one direction passes. A branch drawn at its own defaults instead would be a picture no essay asked for and no assertion has been run against.

The refractive index is forward scattering, added up. How much a gas slows light, computed from the forward scattering amplitude of a single molecule, against how many molecules there are in a cubic metre. The refractive index is not a separate property: the transmitted wave is the incident wave plus everything scattered forward, and adding a small wave that is a quarter turn behind the incident one retards the sum without changing its size — which is exactly what a phase delay is. The same amplitude whose imaginary part gives the extinction gives, through its real part, the index. At the density of air at sea level this route predicts n − 1 = 2.785e-4, and a refractometer measures 2.780e-4.

How much a gas slows light, computed from the forward scattering amplitude of a single molecule, against how many molecules there are in a cubic metre. The refractive index is not a separate property: the transmitted wave is the incident wave plus everything scattered forward, and adding a small wave that is a quarter turn behind the incident one retards the sum without changing its size — which is exactly what a phase delay is. The same amplitude whose imaginary part gives the extinction gives, through its real part, the index. At the density of air at sea level this route predicts n − 1 = 2.785e-4, and a refractometer measures 2.780e-4.

N when the phases are random, N² when they are not

The options are the ones Everything a scatterer removes, from one direction passes. A branch drawn at its own defaults instead would be a picture no essay asked for and no assertion has been run against.

N when the phases are random, N² when they are not. Scattered intensity against the number of scatterers, both logarithmic, for two ways of adding the same amplitudes. The lower curve averages 400 draws of N unit amplitudes with independent random phases and grows as N^0.990; the upper one adds them in phase and grows as N². At 1000 scatterers the two differ by a factor of 1065. Nothing about the scatterers is different between the two — same number, same strength, same wavelength. Only the arrangement is, and it is worth three decades here.

Scattered intensity against the number of scatterers, both logarithmic, for two ways of adding the same amplitudes. The lower curve averages 400 draws of N unit amplitudes with independent random phases and grows as N^0.990; the upper one adds them in phase and grows as N². At 1000 scatterers the two differ by a factor of 1065. Nothing about the scatterers is different between the two — same number, same strength, same wavelength. Only the arrangement is, and it is worth three decades here.

What survives the journey, against how much air it crossed

The options are the ones Everything a scatterer removes, from one direction passes. A branch drawn at its own defaults instead would be a picture no essay asked for and no assertion has been run against.

What survives the journey, against how much air it crossed. The fraction of sunlight of each wavelength that reaches the eye after crossing 1, 3, 20 atmospheres, computed from a Rayleigh optical depth of 0.0973 at 550 nanometres scaled as the inverse fourth power of wavelength. Overhead, the mean wavelength of what arrives is 548 nanometres; at the horizon, after 20 atmospheres, it is 623 nanometres.

The fraction of sunlight of each wavelength that reaches the eye after crossing 1, 3, 20 atmospheres, computed from a Rayleigh optical depth of 0.0973 at 550 nanometres scaled as the inverse fourth power of wavelength. Overhead, the mean wavelength of what arrives is 548 nanometres; at the horizon, after 20 atmospheres, it is 623 nanometres.

What checks it

physicscheck asserts something about scattering-spectrum that could fail — it draws it and measures the result against a value reached some other way.

Across the library: 100 interrogated, 2 exercised only, 1 untouched, of 103. Read out of the gate's source by the gate's own two patterns — and the gate's last claim fails the build if that read disagrees with what it was handed while running.

Where it is called

Changing this generator changes every figure on this list. That is what makes the list worth publishing rather than keeping in a check script.

Optics

Everything a scatterer removes, from one direction

How much light a particle takes out of a beam — by scattering it anywhere at all, and by absorbing it — is fixed entirely by what it does in the forward direction, where its scattered wave cannot be told apart from the incident one. The mechanism is interference, and it also gives the refractive index.

Optics

How far the air lets a mountain be seen

A dark mountain on the horizon fades not because its light grows too faint to see but because the air between it and the eye glows. Sunlight scattered into the line of sight fills the dark ridge in until it matches the sky behind it, and its contrast falls as a simple exponential of the distance. With the eye's threshold at two per cent, that gives a visual range of 3.912 divided by the air's scattering coefficient: about 337 kilometres for perfectly clean air in green light, far less in the hazes real air carries. The same arithmetic makes near ridges blue and far ones pale.

Optics

The cloud light has to walk through

A beam crossing thirty scattering lengths of anything should keep e⁻³⁰ of itself — a ten-millionth of a millionth. A cloud thirty scattering lengths thick lets through nearly a third of the sunlight falling on it. The light has not crossed; it has walked, one scattering at a time, and a walk through a slab obeys a law with the shape of Ohm's rather than of an exponential.

Optics

The full moon that is too bright

Half a moon shows half the lit disc, so it ought to be about half as bright as a full one — a little less, allowing for the angle. It is a tenth as bright. In the last few days before full the Moon brightens far faster than its growing area can explain, and the extra light is not reflected any more strongly. It comes from shadows disappearing. The lunar soil is a loose heap of grains, and when the Sun is directly behind the observer every grain hides its own shadow.

Optics

The light that comes back bluer when it is warm

Shine a green laser on a crystal and a tiny fraction of the light comes back with a different colour: a little redder, having given a quantum of energy to one of the crystal's vibrations, or a little bluer, having taken one. Losing energy is always possible. Gaining it needs a vibration already excited, so the bluer light is fainter, and fainter still the colder the crystal. The ratio of the two is a Boltzmann factor, fixed by quantum statistics and nothing else. It is a thermometer that needs no contact and no calibration — and in a long glass fibre, it is thousands of thermometers at once.

Optics

The sand that darkens when it is wet

Wet sand is darker than dry sand, a wet stone darker than a dry one, a splashed pavement darker in patches, and a wet white shirt turns grey and then see-through. Water is clear and absorbs almost nothing, so it cannot be adding darkness. What it does is change where the light goes. A film of water on a surface traps light that has been scattered back up, returning most of it for another chance to be absorbed. Water in the pores between grains replaces air with something closer to the grains' own refractive index, so each grain turns light aside less, and light wanders deeper before it gets out. Both lengthen the path, and on a longer path more light is absorbed by the material that was there all along.

Optics

The walk that interference can stop

Light scattered many times walks through a cloud, and a walk always gets through eventually — a slab twice as thick lets through half as much. Keep the waves' interference instead of adding intensities, and in one dimension the same disorder does something a walk cannot: it stops the light exponentially, traps it in modes with nothing special about where they sit, and turns transmission from a number into a spread over powers of ten. Whether the same can happen to light in three dimensions has been claimed, retracted and argued for thirty years.

Optics

When the particle is the size of the wave

The sky is blue because small things scatter short wavelengths far more strongly. A cloud is made of the same water and scatters every colour alike. Nothing about the material changed — only the size, and one dimensionless number crossing one.

Optics

Why a litre of water is not blue for the reason the sky is

The same molecules that make the sky blue also make the refractive index of air, and the two numbers agree because the sideways sum has random phases and the forward one does not. Condense those molecules into a liquid and the sideways sum collapses by a factor of sixteen — and what is left is thirty-four times smaller than the absorption that actually colours the water.

Optics

Why the sky is blue and the sunset is not, from one exponent

Scattering goes as the inverse fourth power of wavelength, and that single number produces a blue sky and a red sun without any second explanation. The two facts look opposite and are the same arithmetic.

The whole library · All essays