Generator

One puck, two frames

One function in the mechanics library, called 28 times across 5 essays. Below: what it draws at its defaults, what it draws at every branch an essay asks for, whether the site's own gate puts a claim to it, and everywhere it is called.

At its defaults it draws one puck, two frames. A puck slides outward from the centre of a turntable at 1.4 m/s across a table of radius 1 m, which turns through 0.55 of a revolution in the 0.71 seconds the crossing takes. On the left, in the room: a straight line, because no force acts along it. On the right, on the turntable: a spiral, because the coordinates turned underneath it. The two panels are the same numbers with the same clock — the second is the first with the angle rotated by −Ωt — so whatever is bending the path on the right is arithmetic, and it is still worth a name, because on a turning planet the right-hand panel is the one everybody lives in.

rotating-frame is one function in lib/figures/mechanics.js — motion, force, energy and rotation. Everything below came out of it during this build, at parameters taken from the essays rather than invented for this page. A figure here is the figure a reader meets in an essay, and if the generator changes, this page changes with it.

At its defaults

Drawn even though every essay passes options, because a default nothing exercises is a trap for the next essay to call this with none — which has happened here twice.

One puck, two frames. A puck slides outward from the centre of a turntable at 1.4 m/s across a table of radius 1 m, which turns through 0.55 of a revolution in the 0.71 seconds the crossing takes. On the left, in the room: a straight line, because no force acts along it. On the right, on the turntable: a spiral, because the coordinates turned underneath it. The two panels are the same numbers with the same clock — the second is the first with the angle rotated by −Ωt — so whatever is bending the path on the right is arithmetic, and it is still worth a name, because on a turning planet the right-hand panel is the one everybody lives in.

A puck slides outward from the centre of a turntable at 1.4 m/s across a table of radius 1 m, which turns through 0.55 of a revolution in the 0.71 seconds the crossing takes. On the left, in the room: a straight line, because no force acts along it. On the right, on the turntable: a spiral, because the coordinates turned underneath it. The two panels are the same numbers with the same clock — the second is the first with the angle rotated by −Ωt — so whatever is bending the path on the right is arithmetic, and it is still worth a name, because on a turning planet the right-hand panel is the one everybody lives in.

The deflection is a circle, not a bend

The options are the ones The deflection that closes on itself passes. A branch drawn at its own defaults instead would be a picture no essay asked for and no assertion has been run against.

The deflection is a circle, not a bend. Trajectories integrated from Newton's law in a rotating frame with the Coriolis term and nothing else — no pressure gradient, no friction, no force of any kind. 0.5 m/s at 45°, 0.3 m/s at 30°. Each path closes on itself after one inertial period, checked to a millionth of its own radius, and the radius is the speed divided by the Coriolis parameter: 4.85 km, 4.11 km. The deflection usually described as a curving of the path is a complete circle, traversed clockwise in the northern hemisphere in half a pendulum day, and a body left alone in a rotating frame goes nowhere at all.

Trajectories integrated from Newton's law in a rotating frame with the Coriolis term and nothing else — no pressure gradient, no friction, no force of any kind. 0.5 m/s at 45°, 0.3 m/s at 30°. Each path closes on itself after one inertial period, checked to a millionth of its own radius, and the radius is the speed divided by the Coriolis parameter: 4.85 km, 4.11 km. The deflection usually described as a curving of the path is a complete circle, traversed clockwise in the northern hemisphere in half a pendulum day, and a body left alone in a rotating frame goes nowhere at all.

Half a pendulum day, and why it runs away at the equator

The options are the ones The deflection that closes on itself passes. A branch drawn at its own defaults instead would be a picture no essay asked for and no assertion has been run against.

Half a pendulum day, and why it runs away at the equator. The period of an inertial oscillation against latitude, which is π divided by the Earth's rotation rate and the sine of the latitude. It is exactly half a pendulum day — checked here at five latitudes against the Foucault period computed independently — so a free parcel's velocity vector and a swinging pendulum's plane turn at the same rate, which is a coincidence only until the two are recognised as the same rotation. At the pole the period is 11.97 hours; at 45° it is 16.93; at four degrees of latitude it is over ten days and rising, because the Coriolis parameter vanishes at the equator. Peaks at exactly this frequency are the largest feature in almost every long record of ocean current, and they were first noticed in Nansen's drift measurements.

The period of an inertial oscillation against latitude, which is π divided by the Earth's rotation rate and the sine of the latitude. It is exactly half a pendulum day — checked here at five latitudes against the Foucault period computed independently — so a free parcel's velocity vector and a swinging pendulum's plane turn at the same rate, which is a coincidence only until the two are recognised as the same rotation. At the pole the period is 11.97 hours; at 45° it is 16.93; at four degrees of latitude it is over ten days and rising, because the Coriolis parameter vanishes at the equator. Peaks at exactly this frequency are the largest feature in almost every long record of ocean current, and they were first noticed in Nansen's drift measurements.

The loops that do not quite close

The options are the ones The deflection that closes on itself passes. A branch drawn at its own defaults instead would be a picture no essay asked for and no assertion has been run against.

The loops that do not quite close. The same integration as the closed circle, with one change: the Coriolis parameter is allowed to vary with latitude, as it does. Over 30 loops at 30° the parcel drifts 3.6 kilometres west and 0.4 south, because the northern half of each circle happens where f is larger and is therefore tighter than the southern half. With β set to zero the identical integrator returns to the origin, which is how the drift is shown to be the physics rather than the timestep. Surface drifters in the real ocean draw exactly this: loops at the local inertial period, slowly migrating, and the migration is a direct measurement of the gradient of the Earth's rotation.

The same integration as the closed circle, with one change: the Coriolis parameter is allowed to vary with latitude, as it does. Over 30 loops at 30° the parcel drifts 3.6 kilometres west and 0.4 south, because the northern half of each circle happens where f is larger and is therefore tighter than the southern half. With β set to zero the identical integrator returns to the origin, which is how the drift is shown to be the physics rather than the timestep. Surface drifters in the real ocean draw exactly this: loops at the local inertial period, slowly migrating, and the migration is a direct measurement of the gradient of the Earth's rotation.

Sideways drift over 0.8 km

The options are the ones The deflection that closes on itself passes. A branch drawn at its own defaults instead would be a picture no essay asked for and no assertion has been run against.

Sideways drift over 0.8 km. The Coriolis deflection of something moving horizontally at 20 m/s for 40 seconds — a range of 0.80 km — against the latitude it does it at. The term is 2Ω×v, so the horizontal part carries sin φ and vanishes at the equator; at the pole the drift is 2.3 m, which is 0.29% of the range. It is quadratic in the time, so over a few seconds it is nothing and over a day it is the whole circulation of the atmosphere.

The Coriolis deflection of something moving horizontally at 20 m/s for 40 seconds — a range of 0.80 km — against the latitude it does it at. The term is 2Ω×v, so the horizontal part carries sin φ and vanishes at the equator; at the pole the drift is 2.3 m, which is 0.29% of the range. It is quadratic in the time, so over a few seconds it is nothing and over a day it is the whole circulation of the atmosphere.

How long a Foucault pendulum takes to come back

The options are the ones The deflection that closes on itself passes. A branch drawn at its own defaults instead would be a picture no essay asked for and no assertion has been run against.

How long a Foucault pendulum takes to come back. The time for the swing plane of a Foucault pendulum to turn once, against latitude. The rate is Ω sin φ — the component of the planet's rotation about the local vertical — so the period is a sidereal day divided by sin φ: 23.9 hours at the pole, 31.8 hours at 48.85°, and longer than a week below 8.2°. The curve rises without limit toward the equator, where the plane never turns at all. The axis starts at 12° for that reason rather than at zero.

The time for the swing plane of a Foucault pendulum to turn once, against latitude. The rate is Ω sin φ — the component of the planet's rotation about the local vertical — so the period is a sidereal day divided by sin φ: 23.9 hours at the pole, 31.8 hours at 48.85°, and longer than a week below 8.2°. The curve rises without limit toward the equator, where the plane never turns at all. The axis starts at 12° for that reason rather than at zero.

What checks it

physicscheck asserts something about rotating-frame that could fail — it draws it and measures the result against a value reached some other way.

Across the library: 100 interrogated, 2 exercised only, 1 untouched, of 103. Read out of the gate's source by the gate's own two patterns — and the gate's last claim fails the build if that read disagrees with what it was handed while running.

Where it is called

Changing this generator changes every figure on this list. That is what makes the list worth publishing rather than keeping in a check script.

Mechanics

The deflection that closes on itself

The Coriolis term is usually described as bending a path to the right. Integrated rather than described, it does not bend the path — it closes it. A body left alone in a rotating frame travels a circle of radius U/f and comes back to where it started in half a pendulum day, having gone nowhere at all, and drifting buoys in every ocean draw exactly that.

Mechanics

The forces that are not there

Writing Newton's law in a frame that is turning produces three extra terms. Nothing was added to the world to make them appear and nothing is removed by calling them fictitious — one of them flattens the planet, one of them turns the weather, and both are computable to four figures.

Mechanics

The ratio that decides whether the planet is turning

Whether the rotating terms matter is not a question about size. It is one dimensionless ratio, U over fL, and it runs from ten thousand in a teacup to a millionth in the Earth's core. Where it is small the pressure gradient stops accelerating the fluid and starts balancing a force on fluid already moving across it — so the flow runs along the pressure contours instead of down them, and a weather map is a streamline plot.

Fluids

The surface a spin decides

Spin a dish of liquid and its surface settles into a paraboloid — exactly, with nothing about the liquid in the shape. A parabola of that form has a focal length of g over twice the spin rate squared, so a bucket of mercury turning at twenty revolutions a minute is a telescope mirror figured by a clock instead of by grinding.

Mechanics

Turning is an acceleration, and constant speed does not help

An object going round a circle at unchanging speed is accelerating hard, all the time, toward a point it never reaches. The construction that shows this needs two arrows and no calculus.

The whole library · All essays