One equation, and the number that decides what it does
At its defaults it draws one equation, and the number that decides what it does. The same oscillator released from rest at one unit of displacement, with 4 different amounts of velocity-proportional loss. Every curve is a numerical integration of a single equation with no case analysis in it; what changes between them is one dimensionless number, the damping ratio. Below one, the two exponents are a complex conjugate pair and the motion crosses zero over and over inside a decaying envelope. At one they collide into a real double root and the trace reaches the axis and stops. Above one they are two distinct real numbers, the slower of them dominates, and the return is sluggish — an overdamped system takes longer to come back than a critically damped one, which is the thing the word 'over' is doing in its name. The ratios drawn are 0.15, 0.5, 1, 2, and the first zero crossing happens at 1.75 s for ζ = 0.15, 2.42 s for ζ = 0.5, never for ζ = 1, never for ζ = 2.
damped-response is one function in lib/figures/mechanics.js —
motion, force, energy and rotation. Everything below came out
of it during this build, at parameters taken from the essays rather than invented for this
page. A figure here is the figure a reader meets in an essay, and if the generator changes,
this page changes with it.
At its defaults
Drawn even though every essay passes options, because a default nothing exercises is a trap for the next essay to call this with none — which has happened here twice.
The same oscillator released from rest at one unit of displacement, with 4 different amounts of velocity-proportional loss. Every curve is a numerical integration of a single equation with no case analysis in it; what changes between them is one dimensionless number, the damping ratio. Below one, the two exponents are a complex conjugate pair and the motion crosses zero over and over inside a decaying envelope. At one they collide into a real double root and the trace reaches the axis and stops. Above one they are two distinct real numbers, the slower of them dominates, and the return is sluggish — an overdamped system takes longer to come back than a critically damped one, which is the thing the word 'over' is doing in its name. The ratios drawn are 0.15, 0.5, 1, 2, and the first zero crossing happens at 1.75 s for ζ = 0.15, 2.42 s for ζ = 0.5, never for ζ = 1, never for ζ = 2.
Response against driving frequency
The options are the ones The frequency that gets an answer, and the quarter cycle nobody mentions passes. A branch drawn at its own defaults instead would be a picture no essay asked for and no assertion has been run against.
The steady-state amplitude of a driven oscillator against driving frequency, at three damping ratios. Lighter damping gives a taller and narrower peak, and the peak sits slightly below the natural frequency.
The phase of the response
The options are the ones The frequency that gets an answer, and the quarter cycle nobody mentions passes. A branch drawn at its own defaults instead would be a picture no essay asked for and no assertion has been run against.
The phase by which a driven oscillator lags its driver, against driving frequency. The lag is a quarter cycle at resonance whatever the damping, and approaches half a cycle well above it.
Response against driving frequency
The options are the ones The frequency that gets an answer, and the quarter cycle nobody mentions passes. A branch drawn at its own defaults instead would be a picture no essay asked for and no assertion has been run against.
The steady-state amplitude of a driven oscillator against driving frequency, at three damping ratios. Lighter damping gives a taller and narrower peak, and the peak sits slightly below the natural frequency.
The same number read off a decay and off a linewidth
The options are the ones The frequency that gets an answer, and the quarter cycle nobody mentions passes. A branch drawn at its own defaults instead would be a picture no essay asked for and no assertion has been run against.
A lightly damped oscillator released and left alone, above, and the power spectrum of exactly those samples, below. The decay falls to 1/e of its starting amplitude after 8.0 cycles, which makes the quality factor π times that, or 25.0. The spectrum peaks at 1.0000 radians per second and falls to half its power 0.04001 radians per second wide, which makes the quality factor the peak divided by the width, or 25.0. The two disagree by 0.02 per cent, which is the resolution of the frequency grid rather than a difference in the physics. They cannot disagree by more, because they are the same statement: a resonance is narrow because its ringing is long, and the transform that turns one into the other is not an approximation but an identity. A measurement of either is a measurement of both — which is why a bell can be characterised by hitting it and listening, or by driving it and sweeping, and why the two instruments never argue.
Response against driving frequency
The options are the ones The mass that makes another stand still passes. A branch drawn at its own defaults instead would be a picture no essay asked for and no assertion has been run against.
The steady-state amplitude of a driven oscillator against driving frequency, at three damping ratios. Lighter damping gives a taller and narrower peak, and the peak sits slightly below the natural frequency.
What checks it
physicscheck asserts something about damped-response that
could fail — it draws it and measures the result against a value reached some other
way.
Across the library: 100 interrogated, 2 exercised only, 1 untouched, of 103. Read out of the gate's source by the gate's own two patterns — and the gate's last claim fails the build if that read disagrees with what it was handed while running.
Where it is called
Changing this generator changes every figure on this list. That is what makes the list worth publishing rather than keeping in a check script.
The frequency that gets an answer, and the quarter cycle nobody mentions
Push an oscillator at its own frequency and the response grows enormously. The reason is not that the push is in step with the motion — at resonance it is a quarter cycle out, and that is precisely why it works.
WavesThe mass that makes another stand still
Bolt a small mass on a spring to a machine that is shaking itself apart, tune it to the frequency that is doing the damage, and the machine stops moving. Not moves less — stops, exactly, at that one frequency. The price is two new resonances either side of it, and the whole device is a bet that the drive stays where it was put.
WavesThe resonance that refuses to leak
A resonance that sits at a frequency where waves can escape has a width, because it leaks. Put two such resonances into the same channel and let them talk to each other, and at one precise detuning one of their combinations stops leaking altogether — a mode with no width, surrounded by a continuum it could escape into and does not. It cannot be seen from outside, it traps whatever energy lands in it, and if a symmetry is what forbids the leak, it survives any change that keeps the symmetry.
WavesThe resonance with a zero in it
Where a resonance is the only way through a system, the response is a symmetric peak. Where there is also a smooth path that does not care about the frequency, the two add before anything is squared — and the result is lopsided, with a frequency at which nothing gets through at all.
MechanicsThe three ways of coming to rest
An oscillator with friction in it can swing and fade, arrive and stop, or crawl back so slowly it looks stuck. One equation and one number decide which. The number is not what most people would guess, and neither is the value that returns fastest.
WavesThe width that is a lifetime
Hit a bell and time how long it rings; drive it and measure how narrow its response is. The two numbers are the same number, and they cannot disagree — not because the physics conspires but because a decay and a linewidth are one function seen in two coordinate systems.