Generator

The bargain no optical system gets out of

One function in the optics library, called 50 times across 8 essays. Below: what it draws at its defaults, what it draws at every branch an essay asks for, whether the site's own gate puts a claim to it, and everywhere it is called.

At its defaults it draws the bargain no optical system gets out of. A beam entering an aperture 208 units across, filling a half-angle of 12°, and leaving one 3 times smaller. The angle it fills on the way out is not 12° but 38.6°, because the product of the aperture and the sine of the angle is the same at both ends — that product is the étendue, and no lossless system can reduce it. Measured off the drawing, 43.246 at the entrance against 43.246 at the exit. The consequence is the one that matters: flux divided by étendue is the radiance, so a smaller spot is a larger angle and never a brighter image. No lens, no mirror and no arrangement of either has ever made anything brighter than the thing it was looking at.

concentration-limit is one function in lib/figures/optics.js — rays, lenses, mirrors and what light does to a surface. Everything below came out of it during this build, at parameters taken from the essays rather than invented for this page. A figure here is the figure a reader meets in an essay, and if the generator changes, this page changes with it.

At its defaults

Drawn even though every essay passes options, because a default nothing exercises is a trap for the next essay to call this with none — which has happened here twice.

The bargain no optical system gets out of. A beam entering an aperture 208 units across, filling a half-angle of 12°, and leaving one 3 times smaller. The angle it fills on the way out is not 12° but 38.6°, because the product of the aperture and the sine of the angle is the same at both ends — that product is the étendue, and no lossless system can reduce it. Measured off the drawing, 43.246 at the entrance against 43.246 at the exit. The consequence is the one that matters: flux divided by étendue is the radiance, so a smaller spot is a larger angle and never a brighter image. No lens, no mirror and no arrangement of either has ever made anything brighter than the thing it was looking at.

A beam entering an aperture 208 units across, filling a half-angle of 12°, and leaving one 3 times smaller. The angle it fills on the way out is not 12° but 38.6°, because the product of the aperture and the sine of the angle is the same at both ends — that product is the étendue, and no lossless system can reduce it. Measured off the drawing, 43.246 at the entrance against 43.246 at the exit. The consequence is the one that matters: flux divided by étendue is the radiance, so a smaller spot is a larger angle and never a brighter image. No lens, no mirror and no arrangement of either has ever made anything brighter than the thing it was looking at.

The brightness N lasers can be made into

The options are the ones The beams that add only if they differ passes. A branch drawn at its own defaults instead would be a picture no essay asked for and no assertion has been run against.

The brightness N lasers can be made into. The greatest radiance — power per unit area per unit solid angle — that N identical single-mode lasers can be combined into by lossless optics, as a multiple of one laser's, against N, for four arrangements. Laid side by side and passed through any lenses and mirrors, they fill N modes and are never brighter than one: the étendue of the combination is at least N times one beam's. Two can share a mode if their polarisations are crossed, so polarisation doubles it once. Beams of N different wavelengths can be overlapped into one spatial mode by a grating, and beams with their phases locked together can be made into one mode outright; either way the radiance grows as N, because the beams are no longer N copies of the same mode.

The greatest radiance — power per unit area per unit solid angle — that N identical single-mode lasers can be combined into by lossless optics, as a multiple of one laser's, against N, for four arrangements. Laid side by side and passed through any lenses and mirrors, they fill N modes and are never brighter than one: the étendue of the combination is at least N times one beam's. Two can share a mode if their polarisations are crossed, so polarisation doubles it once. Beams of N different wavelengths can be overlapped into one spatial mode by a grating, and beams with their phases locked together can be made into one mode outright; either way the radiance grows as N, because the beams are no longer N copies of the same mode.

Each colour arriving at its own angle, all leaving together

The options are the ones The beams that add only if they differ passes. A branch drawn at its own defaults instead would be a picture no essay asked for and no assertion has been run against.

Each colour arriving at its own angle, all leaving together. A diffraction grating of 1480 lines per millimetre used backwards to combine lasers of different wavelengths: the angle at which each wavelength must arrive, against wavelength from 1000 to 1100 nm, so that all leave the grating in the same direction, 60° from its normal, in the first order. The angle changes by 0.117° per nanometre near 1,050 nm, so lasers spaced a nanometre apart in wavelength are fed in from directions 0.12° apart and leave as one beam. A grating is a lossless device, and it can do this without breaking the étendue bound because the beams are not in the same mode: each is a different colour, and the output beam is one spatial mode holding many.

A diffraction grating of 1480 lines per millimetre used backwards to combine lasers of different wavelengths: the angle at which each wavelength must arrive, against wavelength from 1000 to 1100 nm, so that all leave the grating in the same direction, 60° from its normal, in the first order. The angle changes by 0.117° per nanometre near 1,050 nm, so lasers spaced a nanometre apart in wavelength are fed in from directions 0.12° apart and leave as one beam. A grating is a lossless device, and it can do this without breaking the étendue bound because the beams are not in the same mode: each is a different colour, and the output beam is one spatial mode holding many.

Eight beams added in phase and added anyhow

The options are the ones The beams that add only if they differ passes. A branch drawn at its own defaults instead would be a picture no essay asked for and no assertion has been run against.

Eight beams added in phase and added anyhow. The far-field intensity of 8 identical beams side by side, each filling 50 per cent of its share of the aperture, against the angle in units of the wavelength over the beams' spacing, as a fraction of the phase-locked peak. With random phases (dashed) the intensities add: the pattern is 8 times one beam's, as broad as a single beam's. With the phases locked (solid) the fields add: the central peak is 8 times higher again, 64 times one beam's, and as narrow as the whole array's width allows rather than one beam's, with side peaks at whole multiples of the wavelength over the spacing. The side peaks are the price of the gaps between the beams: power the array cannot put in the central peak because the beams do not fill the aperture.

The far-field intensity of 8 identical beams side by side, each filling 50 per cent of its share of the aperture, against the angle in units of the wavelength over the beams' spacing, as a fraction of the phase-locked peak. With random phases (dashed) the intensities add: the pattern is 8 times one beam's, as broad as a single beam's. With the phases locked (solid) the fields add: the central peak is 8 times higher again, 64 times one beam's, and as narrow as the whole array's width allows rather than one beam's, with side peaks at whole multiples of the wavelength over the spacing. The side peaks are the price of the gaps between the beams: power the array cannot put in the central peak because the beams do not fill the aperture.

The share of the light the gaps give away

The options are the ones The beams that add only if they differ passes. A branch drawn at its own defaults instead would be a picture no essay asked for and no assertion has been run against.

The share of the light the gaps give away. For 8 phase-locked beams side by side, the fraction of the total power in the central peak of the far field, against the fill factor — the fraction of the aperture the beams actually cover. With the beams filling half the aperture the central peak holds 46 per cent; at 90 per cent, 82 per cent; completely filled, 90 per cent. In one dimension the share rises nearly in proportion to the fill factor, and for a two-dimensional array it goes roughly as its square. Locked phases do make the beams one mode, but only a mode of the whole aperture, gaps included, and the gaps' share is diffracted away.

For 8 phase-locked beams side by side, the fraction of the total power in the central peak of the far field, against the fill factor — the fraction of the aperture the beams actually cover. With the beams filling half the aperture the central peak holds 46 per cent; at 90 per cent, 82 per cent; completely filled, 90 per cent. In one dimension the share rises nearly in proportion to the fill factor, and for a two-dimensional array it goes roughly as its square. Locked phases do make the beams one mode, but only a mode of the whole aperture, gaps included, and the gaps' share is diffracted away.

How exactly the phases have to be held

The options are the ones The beams that add only if they differ passes. A branch drawn at its own defaults instead would be a picture no essay asked for and no assertion has been run against.

How exactly the phases have to be held. The share of the combined power that lands in the single coherent beam, against the RMS error of each laser's phase, in radians, for 2, 8, 64 beams with independent random errors. To keep 90 per cent the phases must agree to about 0.32 radian RMS — 0.052 of a wavelength, some 55 nm at 1,060 nm — and with many beams the share falls exponentially with the square of the error. Lasers drift in phase by whole wavelengths in milliseconds as their fibres warm and vibrate, so coherent combining needs every beam's phase measured and corrected continuously, thousands of times a second.

The share of the combined power that lands in the single coherent beam, against the RMS error of each laser's phase, in radians, for 2, 8, 64 beams with independent random errors. To keep 90 per cent the phases must agree to about 0.32 radian RMS — 0.052 of a wavelength, some 55 nm at 1,060 nm — and with many beams the share falls exponentially with the square of the error. Lasers drift in phase by whole wavelengths in milliseconds as their fibres warm and vibrate, so coherent combining needs every beam's phase measured and corrected continuously, thousands of times a second.

What checks it

physicscheck asserts something about concentration-limit that could fail — it draws it and measures the result against a value reached some other way.

Across the library: 100 interrogated, 2 exercised only, 1 untouched, of 103. Read out of the gate's source by the gate's own two patterns — and the gate's last claim fails the build if that read disagrees with what it was handed while running.

Where it is called

Changing this generator changes every figure on this list. That is what makes the list worth publishing rather than keeping in a check script.

Optics

The beams that add only if they differ

Take two identical lasers and try to merge their beams into one beam twice as bright. No arrangement of lenses, mirrors and prisms will do it: the brightness of light cannot be increased by passive optics, and two copies of the same beam can only ever be put side by side. The escape is to make the beams not copies. Give them crossed polarisations and two will merge. Give each a different colour and a grating will stack dozens into a single beam. Lock their phases so that they stop being separate beams at all, and they add — but only as well as the gaps between them allow and only while their phases are held to a twentieth of a wavelength.

Optics

The brightness no lens can increase

A lens can make an image smaller and therefore hotter, and there is a temperature at which it stops — the temperature of the source. Every arrangement of glass and mirrors ever built obeys a bound that contains no wavelength, no aperture and no material — only the angle the receiver is allowed to accept — and the bound comes from thermodynamics rather than from optics.

Optics

The cone a fibre will accept

A fibre takes light from a cone whose half-angle depends on two refractive indices and nothing else — not on how thick it is, not on how long, not on what is shining into it. That single number, squared and multiplied by the core's area, is all the light it will ever carry.

Optics

The cone light has to find to get out

Inside a dense material the whole hemisphere of directions outside a flat face shrinks to a narrow cone, and light made inside can leave only if it happens to be travelling within it. For gallium arsenide that is two per cent of the light. Turned round, the same cone keeps light in: a slab of silicon with a rough surface holds the light it admits for fifty-one passes. Both numbers are the n² the optical invariant carries, and neither one breaks it.

Optics

The invariant that is a count

Étendue is an area times a solid angle, and ray optics gives it no floor — nothing in a ray has a size. Divide it by the square of the wavelength and it becomes a number of modes, its conservation becomes the conservation of a count, and the count has a least value of one. That is where the ray bound hands over to diffraction, and the handover is the same number written two ways.

Optics

The nebula no telescope can brighten

A telescope eight metres across gathers a million times more light than the eye, and a star seen through it is a million times brighter. The Orion nebula seen through it is not brighter at all. It is bigger, and spread over a bigger patch of the retina, and the two exactly cancel: no instrument made of lenses and mirrors can show an extended object brighter than the naked eye sees it. What a telescope does is decided by the small disc of light behind its eyepiece, the exit pupil, and by whether that disc is larger or smaller than the pupil of the eye looking through it.

Optics

The same cone, and a different arrival

The invariant fixes what a guide accepts and says nothing about when it arrives, and the two turn out to be nearly independent. Shaping the index so that the rays which travel furthest also travel fastest cuts the spread in arrival times by a factor of five hundred, at the cost of exactly half the light — and the acceptance cone the invariant governs is untouched throughout.

Optics

The work a diluted beam will not do

Sunlight at the top of the atmosphere has the spectrum of a body at 5,762 kelvin and the energy flux of one at 394. The mismatch is not an accident of units: the light has been spread over a hundred thousand times more modes than it left in, and that dilution is entropy. Run it through a heat engine unconcentrated and five per cent of it is available as work.

The whole library · All essays