Generator

What a scale reads while a chain falls onto it

One function in the mechanics library, called 37 times across 8 essays. Below: what it draws at its defaults, what it draws at every branch an essay asks for, whether the site's own gate puts a claim to it, and everywhere it is called.

At its defaults it draws what a scale reads while a chain falls onto it. The reading of a scale, in units of the whole chain's weight, against the length of chain that has already landed, for two ways of putting the same chain down. Lowered gently, the scale reads the weight of what is resting on it and nothing else, so the reading climbs along the diagonal to one and stops. Dropped from rest with its lower end just touching, the scale reads three times that at every instant of the fall: one part is the pile's weight and two parts is the force needed to stop the links that are arriving, which is λv² with v² = 2gx and is therefore exactly twice λgx however far the fall has got. The peak, read off the drawn curve, is 3.00 chain weights. It is reached at the instant the last link lands, and the reading then falls discontinuously to one, because the momentum flux stops all at once. The discontinuity is the part a real experiment does not show — a real chain has links of a finite size and a scale has a response time — and it is the reason a chain dropped into a bucket on a kitchen scale reads high and then settles.

chain-fall is one function in lib/figures/mechanics.js — motion, force, energy and rotation. Everything below came out of it during this build, at parameters taken from the essays rather than invented for this page. A figure here is the figure a reader meets in an essay, and if the generator changes, this page changes with it.

At its defaults

Drawn even though every essay passes options, because a default nothing exercises is a trap for the next essay to call this with none — which has happened here twice.

What a scale reads while a chain falls onto it. The reading of a scale, in units of the whole chain's weight, against the length of chain that has already landed, for two ways of putting the same chain down. Lowered gently, the scale reads the weight of what is resting on it and nothing else, so the reading climbs along the diagonal to one and stops. Dropped from rest with its lower end just touching, the scale reads three times that at every instant of the fall: one part is the pile's weight and two parts is the force needed to stop the links that are arriving, which is λv² with v² = 2gx and is therefore exactly twice λgx however far the fall has got. The peak, read off the drawn curve, is 3.00 chain weights. It is reached at the instant the last link lands, and the reading then falls discontinuously to one, because the momentum flux stops all at once. The discontinuity is the part a real experiment does not show — a real chain has links of a finite size and a scale has a response time — and it is the reason a chain dropped into a bucket on a kitchen scale reads high and then settles.

The reading of a scale, in units of the whole chain's weight, against the length of chain that has already landed, for two ways of putting the same chain down. Lowered gently, the scale reads the weight of what is resting on it and nothing else, so the reading climbs along the diagonal to one and stops. Dropped from rest with its lower end just touching, the scale reads three times that at every instant of the fall: one part is the pile's weight and two parts is the force needed to stop the links that are arriving, which is λv² with v² = 2gx and is therefore exactly twice λgx however far the fall has got. The peak, read off the drawn curve, is 3.00 chain weights. It is reached at the instant the last link lands, and the reading then falls discontinuously to one, because the momentum flux stops all at once. The discontinuity is the part a real experiment does not show — a real chain has links of a finite size and a scale has a response time — and it is the reason a chain dropped into a bucket on a kitchen scale reads high and then settles.

A collision with restitution 0.6

The options are the ones Collisions are easier than forces, and momentum is the reason passes. A branch drawn at its own defaults instead would be a picture no essay asked for and no assertion has been run against.

A collision with restitution 0.6. Two bodies before and after a head-on collision. Momentum is the same on both rows by construction; kinetic energy is only preserved when the collision is elastic.

Two bodies before and after a head-on collision. Momentum is the same on both rows by construction; kinetic energy is only preserved when the collision is elastic.

An elastic collision

The options are the ones Collisions are easier than forces, and momentum is the reason passes. A branch drawn at its own defaults instead would be a picture no essay asked for and no assertion has been run against.

An elastic collision. Two bodies before and after a head-on collision. Momentum is the same on both rows by construction; kinetic energy is only preserved when the collision is elastic.

Two bodies before and after a head-on collision. Momentum is the same on both rows by construction; kinetic energy is only preserved when the collision is elastic.

An elastic collision

The options are the ones Collisions are easier than forces, and momentum is the reason passes. A branch drawn at its own defaults instead would be a picture no essay asked for and no assertion has been run against.

An elastic collision. Two bodies before and after a head-on collision. Momentum is the same on both rows by construction; kinetic energy is only preserved when the collision is elastic.

Two bodies before and after a head-on collision. Momentum is the same on both rows by construction; kinetic energy is only preserved when the collision is elastic.

A perfectly inelastic collision

The options are the ones Collisions are easier than forces, and momentum is the reason passes. A branch drawn at its own defaults instead would be a picture no essay asked for and no assertion has been run against.

A perfectly inelastic collision. Two bodies before and after a head-on collision. Momentum is the same on both rows by construction; kinetic energy is only preserved when the collision is elastic.

Two bodies before and after a head-on collision. Momentum is the same on both rows by construction; kinetic energy is only preserved when the collision is elastic.

A collision with restitution 0.6

The options are the ones Collisions are easier than forces, and momentum is the reason passes. A branch drawn at its own defaults instead would be a picture no essay asked for and no assertion has been run against.

A collision with restitution 0.6. Two bodies before and after a head-on collision. Momentum is the same on both rows by construction; kinetic energy is only preserved when the collision is elastic.

Two bodies before and after a head-on collision. Momentum is the same on both rows by construction; kinetic energy is only preserved when the collision is elastic.

What checks it

physicscheck asserts something about chain-fall that could fail — it draws it and measures the result against a value reached some other way.

Across the library: 100 interrogated, 2 exercised only, 1 untouched, of 103. Read out of the gate's source by the gate's own two patterns — and the gate's last claim fails the build if that read disagrees with what it was handed while running.

Where it is called

Changing this generator changes every figure on this list. That is what makes the list worth publishing rather than keeping in a check script.

Mechanics

Collisions are easier than forces, and momentum is the reason

Nobody knows what happens inside a collision. Momentum conservation makes that ignorance irrelevant, which is the whole trick — and energy, deliberately, is not conserved.

Mechanics

Five balls, and the law that does not choose

The usual account of a Newton's cradle says that momentum and energy conservation force one ball out at the striking speed. For three balls or more they do no such thing: the two laws leave a whole curve of possible outcomes, and what picks one is the shape of the force between two touching spheres.

Mechanics

The energy that depends on the observer

A moving train has kinetic energy. Watched from a second train alongside it, it has none. Both statements are correct, neither can be corrected, and the whole of mechanics still works — because what conservation laws constrain is not how much energy there is but how much of it changes.

Mechanics

The floor that does no work

A jumper leaves the ground with three hundred joules of kinetic energy, supplied by a floor that does exactly zero work — because work is a force times the displacement of its own point of application, and the patch of floor under the foot never moves. Newton's second law integrated over the centre of mass gives the right kinetic energy and is not the work-energy theorem, and telling the two apart is what the first law of thermodynamics is for.

Mechanics

The pile that lands heavier than it weighs

Drop a chain onto a scale and the reading is three times the weight of the part that has landed — not approximately, exactly, all the way through the fall. The extra two parts are the force needed to stop links that are still arriving, and the same arithmetic run backwards says that picking a chain up wastes exactly half the energy it takes to get it moving.

Mechanics

The point that keeps moving as if nothing had happened

Newton's third law makes every internal force cancel against its own partner, which leaves the external sum governing a single mass-weighted average of positions. In the collision below the total momentum stays at 4.00 kg·m/s while 63 per cent of the kinetic energy leaves, and the average travels at 1.00 m/s throughout, before and after.

Mechanics

The push that needs nothing to push against

A rocket engine produces more thrust in vacuum than at sea level — fifteen per cent more, for the engine drawn here, and the extra is exactly the ambient pressure times the nozzle's exit area. The account in which the exhaust shoves against the atmosphere does not merely overstate a coefficient. It has the sign wrong, and every engine ever fired has said so.

Mechanics

The quantity that survives a change of shape

A skater pulls her arms in and spins four times faster. Angular momentum is conserved, which is the usual explanation, and it accounts for only half of what happened — because the kinetic energy has gone up by the same factor, and something had to pay for it.

The whole library · All essays