Generator

The index that depends on which way the light is going

One function in the optics library, called 40 times across 7 essays. Below: what it draws at its defaults, what it draws at every branch an essay asks for, whether the site's own gate puts a claim to it, and everywhere it is called.

At its defaults it draws the index that depends on which way the light is going. The two refractive indices of 3 uniaxial crystals, against the angle between the wave normal and the crystal's optic axis. The flat lines are the ordinary index, which is the same in every direction because the ordinary wave's field is always perpendicular to the axis. The curves are the extraordinary index, which runs from the ordinary value along the axis — where the two waves are identical and the crystal behaves like glass — to its extreme value at right angles to it. calcite (CaCO₃) has n_o = 1.6584 and n_e = 1.4864, so n_e − n_o = -0.1720; quartz (SiO₂) has n_o = 1.5443 and n_e = 1.5534, so n_e − n_o = 0.0091; lithium niobate has n_o = 2.3005 and n_e = 2.2075, so n_e − n_o = -0.0930. The sign of that difference is what makes a crystal positive or negative, and it decides which of the two images in a double-refracting crystal is the one that moves.

birefringence is one function in lib/figures/optics.js — rays, lenses, mirrors and what light does to a surface. Everything below came out of it during this build, at parameters taken from the essays rather than invented for this page. A figure here is the figure a reader meets in an essay, and if the generator changes, this page changes with it.

At its defaults

Drawn even though every essay passes options, because a default nothing exercises is a trap for the next essay to call this with none — which has happened here twice.

The index that depends on which way the light is going. The two refractive indices of 3 uniaxial crystals, against the angle between the wave normal and the crystal's optic axis. The flat lines are the ordinary index, which is the same in every direction because the ordinary wave's field is always perpendicular to the axis. The curves are the extraordinary index, which runs from the ordinary value along the axis — where the two waves are identical and the crystal behaves like glass — to its extreme value at right angles to it. calcite (CaCO₃) has n_o = 1.6584 and n_e = 1.4864, so n_e − n_o = -0.1720; quartz (SiO₂) has n_o = 1.5443 and n_e = 1.5534, so n_e − n_o = 0.0091; lithium niobate has n_o = 2.3005 and n_e = 2.2075, so n_e − n_o = -0.0930. The sign of that difference is what makes a crystal positive or negative, and it decides which of the two images in a double-refracting crystal is the one that moves.

The two refractive indices of 3 uniaxial crystals, against the angle between the wave normal and the crystal's optic axis. The flat lines are the ordinary index, which is the same in every direction because the ordinary wave's field is always perpendicular to the axis. The curves are the extraordinary index, which runs from the ordinary value along the axis — where the two waves are identical and the crystal behaves like glass — to its extreme value at right angles to it. calcite (CaCO₃) has n_o = 1.6584 and n_e = 1.4864, so n_e − n_o = -0.1720; quartz (SiO₂) has n_o = 1.5443 and n_e = 1.5534, so n_e − n_o = 0.0091; lithium niobate has n_o = 2.3005 and n_e = 2.2075, so n_e − n_o = -0.0930. The sign of that difference is what makes a crystal positive or negative, and it decides which of the two images in a double-refracting crystal is the one that moves.

A repeat in space gaps the frequencies; a repeat in time gaps the wavenumbers

The options are the ones The crystal made of moments passes. A branch drawn at its own defaults instead would be a picture no essay asked for and no assertion has been run against.

A repeat in space gaps the frequencies; a repeat in time gaps the wavenumbers. Two media with the same modulation depth, 0.2, computed the same way. Left: permittivity repeating in space, a stack of layers. For each frequency the wave equation is integrated across one spatial period, and the Bloch wavenumber drawn against frequency; between frequencies 0.478 and 0.526 (in units of c over the period) there is no real wavenumber, so light of those frequencies cannot travel and is reflected. Right: permittivity repeating in time. For each wavenumber the equation is integrated across one period, and the frequency drawn against wavenumber; between wavenumbers 0.474 and 0.518 there is no real frequency. The axes of the two panels are swapped, and so is everything else: the spatial gap is a band of frequencies that decays in space, the temporal gap is a band of wavenumbers that grows in time.

Two media with the same modulation depth, 0.2, computed the same way. Left: permittivity repeating in space, a stack of layers. For each frequency the wave equation is integrated across one spatial period, and the Bloch wavenumber drawn against frequency; between frequencies 0.478 and 0.526 (in units of c over the period) there is no real wavenumber, so light of those frequencies cannot travel and is reflected. Right: permittivity repeating in time. For each wavenumber the equation is integrated across one period, and the frequency drawn against wavenumber; between wavenumbers 0.474 and 0.518 there is no real frequency. The axes of the two panels are swapped, and so is everything else: the spatial gap is a band of frequencies that decays in space, the temporal gap is a band of wavenumbers that grows in time.

A medium modulated in time opens gaps in wavenumber

The options are the ones The crystal made of moments passes. A branch drawn at its own defaults instead would be a picture no essay asked for and no assertion has been run against.

A medium modulated in time opens gaps in wavenumber. A uniform medium whose permittivity is modulated as 1 + 0.2 cos Ωt. Across: the wavenumber of a wave in it, in units of the modulation frequency divided by the speed of light. Up: the frequency the wave oscillates at, in units of the modulation frequency, folded into the range the modulation cannot distinguish. Each point comes from integrating the wave equation for that wavenumber over one period of the modulation. For most wavenumbers there is a real frequency. In one band of wavenumber there is none — from 0.475 to 0.521 — and a wave there grows instead, by up to 0.159 in its logarithm per modulation period; that band is shaded. The first gap is centred where the wave's own frequency is half the modulation's.

A uniform medium whose permittivity is modulated as 1 + 0.2 cos Ωt. Across: the wavenumber of a wave in it, in units of the modulation frequency divided by the speed of light. Up: the frequency the wave oscillates at, in units of the modulation frequency, folded into the range the modulation cannot distinguish. Each point comes from integrating the wave equation for that wavenumber over one period of the modulation. For most wavenumbers there is a real frequency. In one band of wavenumber there is none — from 0.475 to 0.521 — and a wave there grows instead, by up to 0.159 in its logarithm per modulation period; that band is shaded. The first gap is centred where the wave's own frequency is half the modulation's.

How fast a wave in the gap grows, and how wide the gap is

The options are the ones The crystal made of moments passes. A branch drawn at its own defaults instead would be a picture no essay asked for and no assertion has been run against.

How fast a wave in the gap grows, and how wide the gap is. The growth rate of waves across the first wavenumber gap, in the logarithm of their amplitude per period of the modulation, for modulation depths of 0.1, 0.2, 0.4. At depth 0.1 the gap spans 4.8 per cent of its central wavenumber and the fastest growth is 0.079 per period; At depth 0.2 the gap spans 10.0 per cent of its central wavenumber and the fastest growth is 0.159 per period; At depth 0.4 the gap spans 20.3 per cent of its central wavenumber and the fastest growth is 0.333 per period. Both the width and the peak are close to proportional to the depth, and the small-depth estimate for the peak, an eighth of the depth times 2π, was checked against the integration. A wave at the centre of the gap at depth 0.4 grows by a factor of e in 3.0 periods of the modulation.

The growth rate of waves across the first wavenumber gap, in the logarithm of their amplitude per period of the modulation, for modulation depths of 0.1, 0.2, 0.4. At depth 0.1 the gap spans 4.8 per cent of its central wavenumber and the fastest growth is 0.079 per period; At depth 0.2 the gap spans 10.0 per cent of its central wavenumber and the fastest growth is 0.159 per period; At depth 0.4 the gap spans 20.3 per cent of its central wavenumber and the fastest growth is 0.333 per period. Both the width and the peak are close to proportional to the depth, and the small-depth estimate for the peak, an eighth of the depth times 2π, was checked against the integration. A wave at the centre of the gap at depth 0.4 grows by a factor of e in 3.0 periods of the modulation.

Outside the gap a wave only wobbles; inside it grows without limit

The options are the ones The crystal made of moments passes. A branch drawn at its own defaults instead would be a picture no essay asked for and no assertion has been run against.

Outside the gap a wave only wobbles; inside it grows without limit. The amplitude of a single wave in the medium modulated to depth 0.2, on a logarithmic scale, over 30 periods of the modulation, integrated directly. At wavenumber 0.462 (in units of the modulation frequency over c), outside the gap, it wobbles with the modulation and returns to its starting size; at wavenumber 0.500 (in units of the modulation frequency over c), inside the gap, it grows by a factor of 73, matching the growth rate the one-period calculation predicts. The energy of the growing wave is supplied by whatever drives the modulation, and nothing in the equation limits it.

The amplitude of a single wave in the medium modulated to depth 0.2, on a logarithmic scale, over 30 periods of the modulation, integrated directly. At wavenumber 0.462 (in units of the modulation frequency over c), outside the gap, it wobbles with the modulation and returns to its starting size; at wavenumber 0.500 (in units of the modulation frequency over c), inside the gap, it grows by a factor of 73, matching the growth rate the one-period calculation predicts. The energy of the growing wave is supplied by whatever drives the modulation, and nothing in the equation limits it.

How fast the medium has to be changed

The options are the ones The crystal made of moments passes. A branch drawn at its own defaults instead would be a picture no essay asked for and no assertion has been run against.

How fast the medium has to be changed. The frequency at which a medium's permittivity must be modulated to open a gap for waves of each kind, which is twice the waves' own frequency, on a logarithmic scale. Microwaves, 10 GHz: 2·10¹⁰ hertz; terahertz, 1 THz: 2·10¹² hertz; mid-infrared, 10 µm: 6·10¹³ hertz; telecom light, 1550 nm: 3.9·10¹⁴ hertz; green light, 530 nm: 1.1·10¹⁵ hertz. A gap for microwaves needs a modulation at tens of gigahertz, which electronic switches supply. A gap for visible light needs the index of a material to swing by a useful fraction of itself about a thousand million million times a second, faster than the response of any known optical material.

The frequency at which a medium's permittivity must be modulated to open a gap for waves of each kind, which is twice the waves' own frequency, on a logarithmic scale. Microwaves, 10 GHz: 2·10¹⁰ hertz; terahertz, 1 THz: 2·10¹² hertz; mid-infrared, 10 µm: 6·10¹³ hertz; telecom light, 1550 nm: 3.9·10¹⁴ hertz; green light, 530 nm: 1.1·10¹⁵ hertz. A gap for microwaves needs a modulation at tens of gigahertz, which electronic switches supply. A gap for visible light needs the index of a material to swing by a useful fraction of itself about a thousand million million times a second, faster than the response of any known optical material.

What checks it

physicscheck asserts something about birefringence that could fail — it draws it and measures the result against a value reached some other way.

Across the library: 100 interrogated, 2 exercised only, 1 untouched, of 103. Read out of the gate's source by the gate's own two patterns — and the gate's last claim fails the build if that read disagrees with what it was handed while running.

Where it is called

Changing this generator changes every figure on this list. That is what makes the list worth publishing rather than keeping in a check script.

Optics

The crystal made of moments

A stack of layers that repeats in space refuses a band of frequencies and reflects them. A medium that repeats in time — its refractive index swung up and down everywhere at once — refuses a band of wavenumbers instead, and a wave with a wavenumber in that band does not reflect. It grows, exponentially, drawing on whatever is swinging the index. The construction is exact, the gap is computable from one period of the modulation, and the obstacle to building one for light is how fast a material would have to change.

Optics

The crystal that answers twice

Lay a piece of calcite on a printed page and the print appears twice. One image sits still when the crystal is turned and the other goes round it. Nothing has been done to the light except pass it through a material whose response to a field is not a number.

Optics

The law that only asks about one component

A boundary between two media cannot change the part of a wave that runs along it, because both sides have to agree on the phase at every point of the surface at every instant. That single restriction produces the refracted ray, the critical angle, the evanescent field and every order of a diffraction grating, out of one drawing made with a compass.

Optics

The phase that is only a shape

Take a beam of polarised light through a sequence of elements that returns it to the polarisation it started with, and it comes back with a phase it did not have before. That phase is not an optical path length — it does not depend on the thickness of anything, or on the wavelength, or on how slowly the sequence was carried out. It is minus half the area the path enclosed on the sphere of polarisation states, and nothing else.

Optics

The ray on the wrong side of the normal

The phase-matching construction draws a circle and a line, and the line crosses the circle twice. Every earlier construction silently took the upper intersection. Which one is physical is decided by where the energy goes rather than by where the wavevector points, and in a medium whose group velocity opposes its phase velocity the answer is the other one — so the refracted ray leaves on the same side of the normal it arrived on, a flat slab focuses, and a lens can beat the diffraction limit until loss stops it.

Optics

The reflection that needs no surface

Change the refractive index of a whole medium at one instant and a wave already travelling through it splits in two, one part running on and one running back, though there is no surface anywhere for it to reflect from. A boundary in time is Snell's law with space and time exchanged: the wavelength is kept and the frequency changes, momentum is conserved and energy is not.

Optics

The rotation a return trip doubles

Quartz turns the plane of polarisation and so does glass in a magnetic field. The two look identical on the way through and are opposites on the way back — the crystal undoes its own rotation exactly, and the magnet adds to it. That difference is the whole of why a one-way street for light can be built at all, and why nothing passive will ever be one.

The whole library · All essays