Generator

Four paths, one answer

One function in the fields library, called 30 times across 6 essays. Below: what it draws at its defaults, what it draws at every branch an essay asks for, whether the site's own gate puts a claim to it, and everywhere it is called.

At its defaults it draws four paths, one answer. The field of a straight wire carrying 10 A, summed step by step around four closed paths in 4000 pieces each. Three of them enclose the wire and each returns 12.566 µT·m, which is μ₀I; the fourth does not enclose it and returns zero, because the outward stretch of the path and the return stretch cross the same field lines in opposite senses. Nothing about the shape survives into the answer — not the radius, not the centring, not the corners — which is what makes the law usable and also what makes it useless without a symmetry to hand.

ampere-loop is one function in lib/figures/fields.js — charge, current, flux and the lines drawn between them. Everything below came out of it during this build, at parameters taken from the essays rather than invented for this page. A figure here is the figure a reader meets in an essay, and if the generator changes, this page changes with it.

At its defaults

Drawn even though every essay passes options, because a default nothing exercises is a trap for the next essay to call this with none — which has happened here twice.

Four paths, one answer. The field of a straight wire carrying 10 A, summed step by step around four closed paths in 4000 pieces each. Three of them enclose the wire and each returns 12.566 µT·m, which is μ₀I; the fourth does not enclose it and returns zero, because the outward stretch of the path and the return stretch cross the same field lines in opposite senses. Nothing about the shape survives into the answer — not the radius, not the centring, not the corners — which is what makes the law usable and also what makes it useless without a symmetry to hand.

The field of a straight wire carrying 10 A, summed step by step around four closed paths in 4000 pieces each. Three of them enclose the wire and each returns 12.566 µT·m, which is μ₀I; the fourth does not enclose it and returns zero, because the outward stretch of the path and the return stretch cross the same field lines in opposite senses. Nothing about the shape survives into the answer — not the radius, not the centring, not the corners — which is what makes the law usable and also what makes it useless without a symmetry to hand.

A potential that is lower every time round

The options are the ones A potential that does not come back to itself passes. A branch drawn at its own defaults instead would be a picture no essay asked for and no assertion has been run against.

A potential that is lower every time round. The magnetic scalar potential along a path circling a wire carrying 10 amps, against the angle turned through, for 2 complete circuits. Away from the wire the magnetic field has no circulation round any small loop, so it is the gradient of something — and it is, except that the something does not come back to its own value. Each circuit lowers it by exactly the current, 10 amps, and a second circuit lowers it by 10 again. The potential is perfectly good locally and has no single value globally, and the amount by which it fails to close is the current threaded. So nothing has been lost in going from a circulation to a potential: Ampère's law has been rewritten as a statement about the shape of the region the potential lives in.

The magnetic scalar potential along a path circling a wire carrying 10 amps, against the angle turned through, for 2 complete circuits. Away from the wire the magnetic field has no circulation round any small loop, so it is the gradient of something — and it is, except that the something does not come back to its own value. Each circuit lowers it by exactly the current, 10 amps, and a second circuit lowers it by 10 again. The potential is perfectly good locally and has no single value globally, and the amount by which it fails to close is the current threaded. So nothing has been lost in going from a circulation to a potential: Ampère's law has been rewritten as a statement about the shape of the region the potential lives in.

A loop counts how many times it went round, and nothing else

The options are the ones A potential that does not come back to itself passes. A branch drawn at its own defaults instead would be a picture no essay asked for and no assertion has been run against.

A loop counts how many times it went round, and nothing else. The circulation of H round 5 different closed paths, with the current fixed at 10 amps in each wire. The answer for each is the current multiplied by how many times the path winds round the wire — a whole number, with a sign — and nothing about the path's length, its shape or how far from the wire it runs appears anywhere. A path that goes round twice counts twice; one that goes round and comes back the same way counts nothing at all; and one enclosing two wires counts their sum, which is zero if they oppose. That is why the scalar potential's failure to close is a topological statement rather than a geometric one: it depends on what the path encircles and not on where it went.

The circulation of H round 5 different closed paths, with the current fixed at 10 amps in each wire. The answer for each is the current multiplied by how many times the path winds round the wire — a whole number, with a sign — and nothing about the path's length, its shape or how far from the wire it runs appears anywhere. A path that goes round twice counts twice; one that goes round and comes back the same way counts nothing at all; and one enclosing two wires counts their sum, which is zero if they oppose. That is why the scalar potential's failure to close is a topological statement rather than a geometric one: it depends on what the path encircles and not on where it went.

The potential of a circuit is the angle it fills in the sky

The options are the ones A potential that does not come back to itself passes. A branch drawn at its own defaults instead would be a picture no essay asked for and no assertion has been run against.

The potential of a circuit is the angle it fills in the sky. Along the axis of a circular loop of current: the solid angle the loop subtends, divided by 4π, and the field that is minus the gradient of the potential built from it. The potential is the current times the solid angle over 4π and nothing else — which turns finding a magnetic field into a problem in geometry, with no integral over the wire anywhere in it. The solid angle runs from zero far on one side to 4π far on the other, passing through 2π at the plane of the loop, and it is that steady climb whose slope is the field. Crossing any surface the loop spans changes the solid angle by 4π at a stroke, so the potential jumps by exactly the current — which is the same multivaluedness the straight wire has, with the place it happens now a surface anybody may choose rather than a half-plane.

Along the axis of a circular loop of current: the solid angle the loop subtends, divided by 4π, and the field that is minus the gradient of the potential built from it. The potential is the current times the solid angle over 4π and nothing else — which turns finding a magnetic field into a problem in geometry, with no integral over the wire anywhere in it. The solid angle runs from zero far on one side to 4π far on the other, passing through 2π at the plane of the loop, and it is that steady climb whose slope is the field. Crossing any surface the loop spans changes the solid angle by 4π at a stroke, so the potential jumps by exactly the current — which is the same multivaluedness the straight wire has, with the place it happens now a surface anybody may choose rather than a half-plane.

The potential of a circuit is the angle it fills in the sky

The options are the ones A potential that does not come back to itself passes. A branch drawn at its own defaults instead would be a picture no essay asked for and no assertion has been run against.

The potential of a circuit is the angle it fills in the sky. Along the axis of a circular loop of current: the solid angle the loop subtends, divided by 4π, and the field that is minus the gradient of the potential built from it. The potential is the current times the solid angle over 4π and nothing else — which turns finding a magnetic field into a problem in geometry, with no integral over the wire anywhere in it. The solid angle runs from zero far on one side to 4π far on the other, passing through 2π at the plane of the loop, and it is that steady climb whose slope is the field. Crossing any surface the loop spans changes the solid angle by 4π at a stroke, so the potential jumps by exactly the current — which is the same multivaluedness the straight wire has, with the place it happens now a surface anybody may choose rather than a half-plane.

Along the axis of a circular loop of current: the solid angle the loop subtends, divided by 4π, and the field that is minus the gradient of the potential built from it. The potential is the current times the solid angle over 4π and nothing else — which turns finding a magnetic field into a problem in geometry, with no integral over the wire anywhere in it. The solid angle runs from zero far on one side to 4π far on the other, passing through 2π at the plane of the loop, and it is that steady climb whose slope is the field. Crossing any surface the loop spans changes the solid angle by 4π at a stroke, so the potential jumps by exactly the current — which is the same multivaluedness the straight wire has, with the place it happens now a surface anybody may choose rather than a half-plane.

A potential that is lower every time round

The options are the ones A potential that does not come back to itself passes. A branch drawn at its own defaults instead would be a picture no essay asked for and no assertion has been run against.

A potential that is lower every time round. The magnetic scalar potential along a path circling a wire carrying 5 amps, against the angle turned through, for 3 complete circuits. Away from the wire the magnetic field has no circulation round any small loop, so it is the gradient of something — and it is, except that the something does not come back to its own value. Each circuit lowers it by exactly the current, 5 amps, and a second circuit lowers it by 5 again. The potential is perfectly good locally and has no single value globally, and the amount by which it fails to close is the current threaded. So nothing has been lost in going from a circulation to a potential: Ampère's law has been rewritten as a statement about the shape of the region the potential lives in.

The magnetic scalar potential along a path circling a wire carrying 5 amps, against the angle turned through, for 3 complete circuits. Away from the wire the magnetic field has no circulation round any small loop, so it is the gradient of something — and it is, except that the something does not come back to its own value. Each circuit lowers it by exactly the current, 5 amps, and a second circuit lowers it by 5 again. The potential is perfectly good locally and has no single value globally, and the amount by which it fails to close is the current threaded. So nothing has been lost in going from a circulation to a potential: Ampère's law has been rewritten as a statement about the shape of the region the potential lives in.

What checks it

physicscheck asserts something about ampere-loop that could fail — it draws it and measures the result against a value reached some other way.

Across the library: 100 interrogated, 2 exercised only, 1 untouched, of 103. Read out of the gate's source by the gate's own two patterns — and the gate's last claim fails the build if that read disagrees with what it was handed while running.

Where it is called

Changing this generator changes every figure on this list. That is what makes the list worth publishing rather than keeping in a check script.

Electromagnetism

A potential that does not come back to itself

Where no current flows, the magnetic field has no circulation round any small loop, so it is the gradient of something and a magnetic problem becomes an electrostatic one. The catch is not that the potential fails to exist. It is that walking once round a wire lowers it by the current, and walking round again lowers it by the current again — so Ampère's law survives the translation as a statement about what the path encircles rather than about where it went.

Electromagnetism

The field outside the solenoid, which is not zero

Ampère's law says the field outside a solenoid vanishes, and every step of that argument is exact — for a winding of infinite length. A real one is a bar magnet seen from outside, its external field falls as the inverse square of its length rather than to nothing, and the "exactly zero" that makes the derivation so satisfying is the one part of it a laboratory cannot have.

Electromagnetism

The field that points against the magnet it is in

There are two magnetic fields in use and the difference between them is which currents a loop is allowed to count. The consequence nobody expects on being told the definitions: inside a permanent magnet H points the other way from B. It has to — a loop inside the magnet threads no wire, so its H circulation is zero, and the only arrangement left has H running backwards.

Electromagnetism

The field that wraps a current

Ampère's law says that going once round a closed path and adding up the field counts the current threaded through it, and nothing else about the path survives into the answer. Four different loops round one wire return the same number to five decimal places — which is exactly why the law is both easy and treacherous.

Electromagnetism

The law that is always true and rarely useful

Ampère's law holds for every loop and every current. Apply it to a wire of finite length and it gives an answer that is wrong by half — until the displacement current of the charge piling up at the wire's two ends is put back in, whereupon the two terms sum to μ₀I exactly at every length. The law was never approximate. It was never a computation either.

Electromagnetism

The loop that behaves like a needle

Far enough away, a current going round in a circle is indistinguishable from a bar magnet, and one number describes both. That number tells a uniform field how to turn the loop and gives it no way to pull on it at all — which is why two magnets attract by the fourth power of the distance and not the second.

The whole library · All essays