Field

Relativity

Space and time, drawn on the same axes.
A spacetime diagram at β = 0.5. Position across, time up, in units where light travels at 45°. The shaded wedges are the future and past reachable by light; the tilted axes belong to an observer moving at 0.5 of the speed of light.

Two axes, one speed, and a diagram that does the arguing

Put position across and time up, insist that light travels at forty-five degrees for everyone, and nearly every result in special relativity becomes something to read off rather than derive.

A light clock at β = 0.6. The same clock at rest and moving. Light covers the hypotenuse rather than the height, and since its speed is the same for both observers, the moving clock must take longer to tick.

The clock that has to slow, and why no clock can refuse

One constant speed and one right-angled triangle force a moving clock to tick slower. The argument is Pythagoras, which is what makes it inescapable rather than merely surprising.

Simultaneity at β = 0.5. Two events on the same horizontal line happen at the same time for the stationary observer. The moving observer slices spacetime along the tilted line, and for them one event happens before the other.

Now is a choice of slicing

Two events happening at the same time is not a fact about the events. It is a fact about who is asking, and different observers slice spacetime at different angles.

A spacetime diagram at β = 0.5. Position across, time up, in units where light travels at 45°. The shaded wedges are the future and past reachable by light; the tilted axes belong to an observer moving at 0.5 of the speed of light.

The length that depends on when, and is not really about length

A moving object is measured shorter. The contraction is real, it is not an illusion of light travel time, and it turns out to be a disagreement about simultaneity wearing a different costume.

Total energy against speed, in units of the rest energy. The total energy of a moving body divided by its rest energy, against speed as a fraction of the speed of light. The Newtonian answer, one plus half v squared over c squared, is drawn beside it: the two agree to 0.004 per cent at a tenth of light speed and disagree by 39 per cent at nine-tenths. The relativistic curve has a vertical asymptote at c, which is why nothing with mass reaches it.

Mass is a form of energy, which is not the same as a source of it

The famous equation is usually read as a promise that mass can be turned into energy. It says something stricter and stranger — that a mass is an energy already, sitting there, whether or not anything ever releases it.

Composing a boost with a speed, and never passing one. The speed one observer measures when a body moving at v is seen from a frame already moving at u, for u = 0.4, 0.6, 0.9, 1 times the speed of light. Every curve ends at one and none crosses it. The straight dashed line is the Galilean answer, u + v, which reaches 1.4c and is wrong. The flat line at the top is light: composing c with anything gives c back.

Speeds that refuse to add, and the quantity that does

Run at half the speed of light, throw something forward at half the speed of light, and the result is not the speed of light. It is four-fifths of it, and there is a variable in which the arithmetic is still simple addition.

A spacetime diagram at β = 0.6. Position across, time up, in units where light travels at 45°. The shaded wedges are the future and past reachable by light; the tilted axes belong to an observer moving at 0.6 of the speed of light.

The twin who comes back younger

If motion slows a clock, and motion is relative, each twin should find the other younger — and yet when they meet, one of them has aged less. The asymmetry is not in the speed and not in the acceleration; it is in which worldline is straight.

Three answers where sound has two, and one where it has none. The factor by which an approaching source's frequency is raised, against its speed as a fraction of the wave speed. For sound it matters which of the two is moving: a moving source gives 1/(1 − β) and a moving observer gives 1 + β, and at 0.5 of the wave speed those are 2.000 and 1.500. For light there is one answer, 1.732 — the geometric mean of the other two, exactly — because there is no medium to be moving with respect to. The fourth curve is the transverse shift, which happens at closest approach when the distance is not changing at all: 0.866, and nothing classical predicts it.

The shift that survives at right angles

For sound it matters which of the two is moving, and the two answers differ. For light there is one answer — their geometric mean — and a term with no classical counterpart at all: a source going past at closest approach, with its distance not changing, is still shifted.

What puts a scale on a tilted axis. A spacetime diagram with a second observer's axes at β = 0.6. The curves are the sets of events at a fixed interval from the origin — c²t² − x² = s², one branch each for s = 0.5, s = 1, s = 1.5 — and the whole point of them is where they cross. A unit of the moving observer's time is wherever the s = 1 curve meets the tilted time axis, and on the page that point is 1.250 times as far from the origin as the stationary observer's own unit. Without the hyperbolae the tilted axes carry no scale at all, and every argument about which of two clocks is behind is unreadable off the diagram. Each drawn crossing reads back as its own interval to 0.0e+0.

The quantity nobody argues about

Relativity takes away the length of a rod and the duration of an event and hands back exactly one thing in their place. Its hyperbolae are what put a scale on the tilted axes of a spacetime diagram — without which the diagram is a picture with no units on it.

The same wire, seen twice at 0.6c. Above: the wire in the laboratory. The lattice is at rest and the electrons drift, so the electrons are the contracted ones — and the wire is neutral, which means their contracted spacing is what the manufacture of a neutral wire produced. Below: the same wire seen by something moving with the electrons at 0.6c. Now the electrons are at rest and the spacing between them stretches by γ = 1.250, while the lattice moves and its spacing contracts by the same factor. The two densities no longer cancel and the wire is charged. Nothing was done to the wire; the only thing that changed is who is looking, and the magnetic force in the first frame is the electric force in the second.

Magnetism is electricity seen sideways

The force on a charge moving beside a current-carrying wire is magnetic in the laboratory and purely electrostatic in the charge's own frame. Both calculations give the same answer, and the drift speed that makes them agree corresponds to a Lorentz factor differing from one in the twenty-sixth decimal place.

What puts a scale on a tilted axis. A spacetime diagram with a second observer's axes at β = 0.6. The curves are the sets of events at a fixed interval from the origin — c²t² − x² = s², one branch each for s = 0.5, s = 1, s = 1.5 — and the whole point of them is where they cross. A unit of the moving observer's time is wherever the s = 1 curve meets the tilted time axis, and on the page that point is 1.250 times as far from the origin as the stationary observer's own unit. Without the hyperbolae the tilted axes carry no scale at all, and every argument about which of two clocks is behind is unreadable off the diagram. Each drawn crossing reads back as its own interval to 0.0e+0.

The invariant that survives a boost

Energy and momentum are both answers to the question "how fast is it going, and according to whom". One combination of them is not, and that combination is the mass — which is why two photons of 511 keV can be a thing of mass 1.022 MeV or a thing of no mass at all, depending only on the angle between them.

Simultaneity at β = 0.866. Two events on the same horizontal line happen at the same time for the stationary observer. The moving observer slices spacetime along the tilted line, and for them one event happens before the other.

The pole that fits and does not fit

A twenty-metre pole is carried through a ten-metre barn at 0.866 of light speed, and both doors shut behind it. In the pole's own frame the barn is five metres long and there is plainly no room. Both accounts are correct, and the doors' closings are 57.8 nanoseconds apart in one of them.

Where the light that was sideways ends up. The direction a photon is seen to travel in the laboratory, against the direction it was emitted in the frame of the source, for a source moving at 0.5c, 0.9c, 0.99c. The straight diagonal is what would happen if a boost only changed frequencies; every curve lies well below it, which is aberration. The number that matters is where the emitted right angle lands, because half of everything emitted is on that side of it: 60.0° at 0.5c, 25.8° at 0.9c, 8.1° at 0.99c. The usual shorthand for that angle is 1/γ, which gives 49.6°, 25.0°, 8.1° — good to a few per cent only once the source is genuinely relativistic, and wrong by 17% at 0.5c. Nothing is emitted differently in any of these cases: the source is radiating exactly as it always did, and it is the map from its angles to ours that has changed.

The sky that crowds into a cone

A boost does not only shift frequencies. It remaps directions, so half of everything a fast traveller can see is squeezed into a forward cone of half-angle about 1/γ — and because brightness carries four powers of the Doppler factor, what lies ahead is overwhelming and what lies behind has effectively gone.

Two corrections, opposite in sign and different in size. How fast a clock in a circular orbit runs compared with one on the ground, in microseconds a day, against the height of the orbit — with the two effects drawn apart rather than added. Being high speeds a clock up, by an amount that saturates: the potential term is bounded because there is only so much potential to climb out of. Moving slows it down, and a higher orbit is a slower one, so that term shrinks toward zero. They cancel at 3186 km — a radius of exactly 1.5 Earth radii, which follows from setting the sum to zero and contains neither G, nor the Earth's mass, nor the speed of light. At 20200 km the gravitational term is 45.7 µs a day and the speed term −7.2, leaving 38.5. Left uncorrected, that is 11.5 km of position error a day, growing without limit, from a clock that is working perfectly.

The clock that is wrong in two directions

A satellite clock loses 7.2 microseconds a day to its speed and gains 45.9 to its height. The two effects have opposite signs, different sizes and different dependence on the orbit, so there is exactly one altitude where they cancel — and 38.6 microseconds a day, left alone, is eleven and a half kilometres of position error.

The curve that makes both fusion and fission release energy. Binding energy per nucleon against mass number: how much energy would have to be supplied, per particle, to take a nucleus apart into free protons and neutrons. The curve is the semi-empirical mass formula, evaluated at whichever proton number binds most tightly for each mass number rather than at a guessed one; the points are measured values. It rises steeply at the light end, peaks at mass number 58, and falls slowly thereafter. Everything about nuclear energy follows from that shape and from nothing else. Two light nuclei joined move up the curve and release the difference; one heavy nucleus split moves up it too, from the other side. Both directions are downhill in energy because the peak is in the middle, and the peak is in the middle because two effects fight — the surface term, which penalises small nuclei for having most of their nucleons on the outside, and the Coulomb term, which penalises large ones because every proton repels every other. The energy released is the height climbed times the number of nucleons carried, and it is a million times a chemical bond for the same reason the vertical axis is in millions of electronvolts rather than in single ones.

The mass that is missing

A helium nucleus weighs less than the two protons and two neutrons it is made of. The shortfall is not an error in the weighing; it is the binding energy, converted at the going rate. One curve of that shortfall against size explains why both fusion and fission release energy.

Which happened first, asked of several observers. Two events on a spacetime diagram: one at the origin and one 3 light-seconds away and 1 second later, so that light leaving the first cannot reach the second. Through the second event runs a family of lines, each one the set of events some observer calls simultaneous with it; an observer moving at a fraction β of the speed of light has such a line of slope β on these axes. Where a line meets the vertical axis is the time that observer assigns to the second event. For a slow observer that meeting point is above the origin and the second event happens later; for a fast one it is below and the second event happens EARLIER. The changeover is at β = 0.3333, which is the time separation divided by the space separation, and it is a legal speed only because the separation is spacelike. So the order of these two events is not a property of the events. What every observer does agree on is that neither could have caused the other, because the two lie outside each other's light cones — drawn here as the diagonals — and that agreement is what causality rests on rather than on any shared notion of before.

Which came first, and who decides

Two events far apart can happen in either order, depending on who is asked, and both answers are correct. That is not a loophole in causality but the reason causality survives at all — because the pairs whose order is negotiable are exactly the pairs neither of which could have caused the other.

A cube photographed at four speeds. The outline a camera records of a cube passing at β = 0, β = 0.4, β = 0.7, β = 0.9, moving to the right, seen at the moment it passes. The dashed square is what the usual picture shows: the cube flattened along its motion by the Lorentz factor. It is not what the camera gets. Light from the far face left earlier than light from the near face, by the time it needed to cross the extra distance, and the cube moved in that interval — so the far face appears displaced backwards and the side of the cube comes into view. The two effects together are exactly a rotation: at β = 0.4 the cube photographs as one turned 23.6°, at β = 0.7 the cube photographs as one turned 44.4°, at β = 0.9 the cube photographs as one turned 64.2°. The contraction has not gone anywhere — a ruler laid alongside still reads 43.6 per cent of the proper length at the highest speed drawn — but it is a statement about two positions at one time, and a photograph is not that.

The contraction no photograph shows

Every textbook picture of a relativistically moving object drawn between 1905 and 1959 showed it squashed. A camera would have shown it turned. The contraction is entirely real in the measurement that defines it, and a photograph is not that measurement.

The rotation two boosts leave behind. The angle through which a frame's axes are turned after two boosts of equal size, against the angle between the two boosts, for 4 speeds. Two boosts in the same direction compose to a boost and nothing else, which is the zero at the left; two in different directions do not. What is left over is a rotation, and it is not small at large speeds: at β = 0.3 it peaks at 2.7° when the boosts are 91° apart, at β = 0.6 it peaks at 12.8° when the boosts are 96° apart, at β = 0.85 it peaks at 36.1° when the boosts are 108° apart, at β = 0.95 it peaks at 63.2° when the boosts are 122° apart. Each curve here is computed by multiplying the two boost matrices and pulling the rotation out of the product, not by evaluating a formula; the closed form for perpendicular boosts is used to check the extraction and appears nowhere in the drawing. The consequence is that the Lorentz boosts do not form a group by themselves — compose two and you leave the set — and that an object carried round a closed path in velocity space comes back turned.

The turn that two pushes leave behind

Two boosts in different directions do not compose to a boost. The product carries a rotation, so a frame carried once round a closed path comes back turned — and the size of that turn was the factor of two standing between the calculated and the measured splitting of a spectral line.

Pushing one way and going another. The angle between an applied force and the acceleration it produces, against the angle between the force and the body's velocity, at four speeds. At 0° and 90° the two are parallel, because those are the two directions the γ³ and γ divisors do not mix. Everywhere between, they are not: at 0.99c the worst case is 73.9°, reached with the force at 8.0°. A body under a steady sideways-ish push does not travel along it.

The push that does not point where the body goes

Newton's second law survives relativity in the form F = dp/dt and in no other. Written as F = ma it fails outright, and not merely by a factor — at high speed a body pushed at forty-five degrees accelerates at eighty, because the same force is divided by γ³ along the motion and by γ across it.

What a boost can and cannot do to a field. The electric and magnetic magnitudes of three fields, plotted against each other as the observer is boosted from -0.98c to 0.98c across them. Each field slides along a hyperbola, because E² − c²B² does not change: the recomputed value drifts by at most 2.6e-15 over every point drawn. The diagonal is E = cB, and which side of it a field starts on is permanent. Below it there is a speed at which the electric field vanishes; above it, one at which the magnetic field does; on it, a wave that no observer can slow, dim or unbalance.

The field nobody can transform away

A wire's magnetic field is an electric field seen from the wrong frame, and a charged plate's electric field is a magnetic one seen the same way. Neither trick works on a light wave. Two combinations of E and B are the same for every observer, and which side of one line a field sits on is a fact nothing about the observer can alter.

Two rockets that keep their distance, and the string that does not. Two rockets 0.5 unit apart in the laboratory, given identical acceleration programmes there, drawn in units where the light speed is one and c²/a is one. Their laboratory separation is constant for ever — the two worldlines are the same curve shifted sideways, and every horizontal line meets them 0.5 apart. The slanted lines are the rockets' own lines of simultaneity, and the distance between the worldlines measured along those is what a string tied between them has to span: at 0.3c it is 0.512, a stretch of 2 per cent; at 0.6c it is 0.557, a stretch of 11 per cent; at 0.8c it is 0.631, a stretch of 26 per cent; at 0.9c it is 0.710, a stretch of 42 per cent. The γL that is always quoted — 0.524, 0.625, 0.833, 1.147 here — is the limit of that measurement for a vanishing gap, and at a gap of 0.5 in these units it overstates the stretch by up to 38.1 per cent; shrinking the gap a hundredfold brings the two within 0.46 per cent. Either way the string is stretched and breaks, while the gap in the laboratory never changes by a millimetre. Length contraction is not something that happens to a rod. It is a statement about which events count as simultaneous, and a rod that is not allowed to contract is a rod that is being pulled apart.

The string that breaks between two rockets

Two rockets a metre apart, given identical acceleration programmes, stay a metre apart in the laboratory for ever. A string tied between them breaks anyway. Nothing pulls on it, nothing in the laboratory moves relative to anything else, and the string is stretched — because the distance it has to span is measured on the rockets' slices of simultaneity and not on the laboratory's.

What a collision has to spend, against what it is given. The energy available in a proton–proton collision, against the energy of one beam, on logarithmic axes. Against a stationary target the available energy is √(2mE) and the line has slope one half; head-on it is 2E and the slope is one. Bevatron at 6.2 GeV per beam reaches 3.7 GeV; SPS fixed target at 450 GeV per beam reaches 29.1 GeV; LEP at 104.5 GeV per beam reaches 209.0 GeV; Tevatron at 980 GeV per beam reaches 1960.0 GeV; LHC at 6500 GeV per beam reaches 13000.0 GeV. The gap is the whole architecture of the subject: the LHC's beams give 13000 GeV head-on and would give 110 GeV against a stationary proton, a factor of 118. Reaching the same 13000 GeV in fixed-target mode would need a beam of 90.1 million GeV. What the missing energy has gone into is not lost: it is the kinetic energy of the centre of mass, which every product has to carry away and which no experiment can use.

The collision that wastes most of the energy

The LHC's two beams carry 6,500 GeV each and 13,000 GeV are available. Fire one of those beams at a stationary block of copper instead and 110 GeV are available — the other 12,890 have gone into the motion of the wreckage and cannot be used for anything. The difference is a square root, and every accelerator built since 1970 is a consequence of it.

The mass of two things that have none. The invariant mass of a pair of photons of equal energy, in units of E/c², against the angle between them. It is computed from the total energy and the vector sum of the two momenta, and agrees with 2E·sin(θ/2) to 1.0e-14. at 0° the pair weighs 0.000 E/c²; at 30° the pair weighs 0.518 E/c²; at 60° the pair weighs 1.000 E/c²; at 90° the pair weighs 1.414 E/c²; at 120° the pair weighs 1.732 E/c²; at 180° the pair weighs 2.000 E/c². Two photons flying in the same direction have no mass between them at all, because their momenta add to exactly the energy over c; anything else and they do. Nothing has been added: the constituents are massless at every angle, and the mass of the system is a property of the arrangement. At 180° the pair weighs 2E/c², which is every joule it contains — the case of a sealed box of light, where the two beams cancel in momentum and the whole energy shows up on the scales.

The box of light that weighs something

Two photons flying apart have a mass between them, though neither has one. Seal them in a mirrored box and the box is heavier than it was empty, by exactly the energy inside divided by c². Mass is not a property of stuff and it does not add up — it is a property of a system, and 99 per cent of the mass of everything anybody has ever weighed is of this kind.

One expression over 3 decades of area times rate. Sagnac time difference against the product of enclosed area and rotation rate, both logarithmic. The relation Δt = 4AΩ/c² is linear in that product — the fitted slope of the drawn points is 1.0000 — and it contains no refractive index, no shape of the loop and no position of the axis inside it. a 1 km fibre gyroscope on a 10 cm coil: 1.62e-19 s, 3.14e-5 fringes; Sagnac's own ring, 1913: 4.84e-17 s, 0.0666 fringes against a reported 0.07; a laboratory turntable at one revolution a second: 6.99e-17 s, 0.0331 fringes; Michelson and Gale, 1925: 4.50e-16 s, 0.2364 fringes against a reported 0.23. Michelson and Gale's rectangle in Illinois is the one that carries the check: 0.236 fringes predicted from its own dimensions and the vertical component of the Earth's rotation at its latitude, and 0.230 reported.

The ring where the two beams disagree

Send light both ways round a closed loop on a turntable and the two beams come back at different times, by 4AΩ/c² — an expression with no refractive index in it, no shape of the loop and no position of the axis. The same number is what a set of clocks round the rim fails to close by, which is the sharper statement — on a rotating platform there is no global simultaneity to be had.

A horizon 0.97 light years behind, made by nothing but the motion. Position across and time up, in units where light travels at 45°, for a rocket holding a constant proper acceleration of 1 gravity. The worldline is the hyperbola x² − c²t² = (c²/a)², asymptotic to the light line it never crosses. Three light signals are drawn: one released at x = 0.55 catches up at t = 0.63, one released at x = 0 never arrives, one released at x = -0.6 never arrives. The dividing line is the asymptote itself. Everything at or behind it is permanently out of reach, and for one gravity that boundary sits 0.97 light years behind the rocket's starting point. Nothing is there — no mass, no field, no surface. The horizon is a consequence of never stopping.

The wall of silence behind a rocket that never stops

Hold a constant acceleration and the worldline is a hyperbola asymptotic to a light ray — so there is a light ray that never catches it. An observer who never stops accelerating has a horizon a distance c²/a behind, made by nothing but the motion, and at one gravity it sits 0.97 light years back. Nothing is there. No mass, no surface, no field.

How far a 1-gravity ship gets, against its own clock. The distance covered by a ship accelerating steadily at 1 gravity for half the trip and braking for the other half, against the time on its own clock, on a logarithmic vertical axis. The curve is a cosine hyperbolic and therefore an exponential once the ship is relativistic, which it is after about a year: Proxima Centauri in 3.5 shipboard years, Sirius in 4.6 shipboard years, the Pleiades in 11.9 shipboard years, the galactic centre in 19.8 shipboard years, Andromeda in 28.6 shipboard years. Nothing about this violates anything. The speed never reaches c — it is the hyperbolic tangent of the rapidity and after 3.5 years it is 0.9495 at turnover — and every one of those journeys takes slightly more than the distance in years as measured from home. What is growing exponentially is not the speed but the length contraction, and the traveller's honest description of the trip is that the distance shrank. The rapidity is what accumulates steadily: it grows by one unit every 0.969 years of shipboard time, for ever, with no ceiling anywhere in the arithmetic. That is the whole reason the numbers come out survivable, and the reason the fuel does not.

The ship that never arrives at c

Accelerate at one gravity and never stop. The speed creeps toward light and never reaches it, and meanwhile the galactic centre is twenty shipboard years away and Andromeda twenty-nine. What makes the journey survivable is that rapidity has no ceiling; what makes it impossible is that the fuel goes as the exponential of the same quantity.

The clock that gains going one way and loses going the other. The rate at which a flown clock gains on a clock left at 30° latitude, in nanoseconds per hour, against the aeroplane's ground speed, with east taken as positive. Two terms are drawn and then their sum. Height alone gives 3.5 nanoseconds an hour at 9 km and does not care which way the aircraft is pointed. Motion costs time, and because the ground is already moving eastward at 402 metres a second, flying east adds to that speed and flying west subtracts from it — so the kinematic term is much larger going east and can change sign going west. The sum crosses zero at 180 metres a second eastward, which is the ground speed at which an aeroplane's clock keeps the time of the airfield it left. Over the two flights Hafele and Keating actually made, this simple model gives -61 nanoseconds eastward and +304 westward, against their own predictions of -40 and +275 and their measurements of -59 and +273. The model here uses one average altitude, one average speed and one latitude, where the real prediction integrated the flight logs; getting the signs and the rough sizes out of three lines of arithmetic is the point, and the last twenty per cent is what the logs are for. What no amount of arithmetic supplies is the thing the experiment settled: that the effect is real, that it acts on a caesium clock in a passenger seat, and that a difference of a few hundred nanoseconds after two days is measurable.

The two clocks that flew in opposite directions

Two caesium clocks were flown round the world in 1971, one each way, and came back disagreeing with the clock left behind — one having lost 59 nanoseconds and the other gained 273. Height alone would have made both gain. The sign flip comes from the ground already moving eastward at 400 metres a second before the aircraft took off.

The temperature of an acceleration. The Unruh temperature against proper acceleration, both axes logarithmic. An observer accelerating through empty space finds it is not empty: the state that an inertial observer calls the vacuum, an accelerated one finds populated, with a thermal spectrum at T = ħa/2πck — which is 4.06e-21 kelvin for every metre per second squared. The line is straight because the relation is exactly proportional, and the numbers on it are what make the effect so hard to see: one gravity gives 3.98·10⁻²⁰ K, a centrifuge at 10⁵ g gives 3.97·10⁻¹⁵ K, an electron in a strong laser gives 40.6 K, the surface of a solar-mass hole gives 6.17·10⁻⁸ K. Reaching one kelvin requires 2.5·10²⁰ m/s², which is 2.5·10¹⁹ gravities and beyond anything that can be sustained. What makes the effect worth taking seriously despite that is not its size but its structure: it says the number of particles present is not a property of the field alone but of the observer as well, and the same expression with a black hole's surface gravity in place of the acceleration is the Hawking temperature exactly, checked here to a part in 10¹².

The temperature of an acceleration

Empty space is empty for an observer who is not accelerating. For one who is, the same state of the same field is a thermal bath at a temperature proportional to the acceleration — and the constant of proportionality is 4 × 10⁻²¹ kelvin for every metre per second squared, which is why nobody has felt it. What the effect changes is not what can be measured but what a particle is.

Where to put the far clock's zero. Two clocks three light-seconds apart, synchronised by radar: a pulse leaves the near clock at 0, bounces off the far one, and returns at 6 seconds. The far clock must be set to some time between those, and every choice is drawn. Einstein's convention puts it at 3 — halfway — and gives the same speed of light in both directions. Any other value is equally consistent with every measurement that can be made, because everything measurable involves a round trip and the round trip takes 6 seconds under every one of them: computed here across the five conventions, the round-trip times differ by 0e+0 seconds. The lines are the resulting surfaces of simultaneity, which fan out from the halfway choice. What each choice fixes is the one-way speed of light — ε = 0.25 makes it 2.00c outward and 0.67c back, ε = 0.4 makes it 1.25c outward and 0.83c back, ε = 0.5 makes it 1.00c outward and 1.00c back, ε = 0.6 makes it 0.83c outward and 1.25c back, ε = 0.75 makes it 0.67c outward and 2.00c back — and no experiment distinguishes them, because measuring a one-way speed requires two synchronised clocks and synchronising them requires the answer.

The speed that cannot be measured one way

Every measurement of the speed of light ever made has sent it out and brought it back. Measuring it one way needs two clocks that agree, and making two distant clocks agree needs a rule about when the far one should read what — which is a choice, not a discovery. The constancy of c is a fact about round trips; its isotropy is a convention, chosen because it makes the equations simple.

The far end that has not been told yet. A rod 3 metres long, pushed at one end at time zero. On the left, position across and time upwards, for the two fastest disturbance speeds drawn here, with the light cone beside them: nothing may lean further to the right than that line, which crosses the rod in 10.0 nanoseconds. A rigid rod would be the vertical dashed line — the far end moving at the same instant as the near one — and it is not a limit that a hard material approaches. It is a signal at infinite speed. On the right, how long the far end actually waits, against how fast the disturbance travels, both logarithmic, with every material on it: 8.8 ms at 3.4e+2 m/s, 600.0 μs at 5.0e+3 m/s, 250.0 μs at 1.2e+4 m/s, 100.0 ns at 3.0e+7 m/s, 20.0 ns at 1.5e+8 m/s. The line has slope −1 and the light cone is a hard floor beneath it. Ordinary materials sit four to five decades above that floor, which is why rigidity is such a good approximation and why it is still not a limit: steel's delay is not small compared with light's, it is 6e+4 times larger. Everything usually derived from rigid bodies survives, because the delay is beneath notice in ordinary circumstances. What does not survive is the use of rigidity in an argument about simultaneity, which is where it does real damage: a rod pushed at one end is compressed for as long as the wave takes to cross it, and there is a frame in which its far end is still at rest while its near end is moving.

Nothing is allowed to be rigid

A rigid body would move its far end at the instant its near end was pushed, which is a signal at infinite speed. Relativity forbids it — not approximately, and not as a limit that a hard enough material approaches. What follows is a ceiling on how stiff matter may be, and that ceiling caps the mass of every neutron star.

The fuel a starship needs, which is most of the universe. The mass of fuel a rocket must start with, divided by the mass it ends with, against the final speed as a fraction of light's — the vertical axis being the number of decades in that ratio, because the numbers do not fit on any other scale. Each solid curve is one exhaust speed, and each dashed one beside it is what Tsiolkovsky's Newtonian formula would have said. Below about a tenth of light speed the two are indistinguishable; above it they part, and the relativistic curve turns upward without limit as the final speed approaches light's, because what adds linearly is the rapidity rather than the velocity. The photon rocket — exhaust at exactly the speed of light, which is the best any engine can do — needs a mass ratio of 1.7321 to reach half light speed, which is √3 exactly, and 4.4 to reach nine tenths. Those are modest numbers and they are the whole of the good news. A chemical exhaust at 4 km/s needs 10^2968 even to reach a tenth of light speed, which is not a difficult engineering problem but an arithmetic impossibility — there are about 10⁵⁰ atoms in the Earth. What the chart cannot show is the other half of the trip: stopping at the far end squares the ratio, and coming home squares it again.

The fuel a starship needs

Tsiolkovsky's logarithm survives relativity with one substitution: what adds is the rapidity rather than the velocity. The result is that a photon rocket reaches half light speed on a mass ratio of the square root of three, and a chemical one reaches a tenth of it on a mass ratio with three thousand digits.

How fast something looks as it moves across the sky. The apparent transverse speed of a source, in units of the speed of light, against the angle between its motion and the line of sight, at β = 0.8, β = 0.95, β = 0.99. Every curve rises above one over a range of angles, reaching 1.33 at 36.8°, 3.04 at 18.4°, 7.02 at 8.1° — and those maxima are γβ at arccos β, found by searching the drawn curves rather than put into them. Nothing is moving faster than light. What has happened is that the source has come closer between the two observations, so the second flash had less far to travel and arrived sooner than it would have done; dividing the transverse distance by the interval between arrivals therefore gives too large a speed. Below β = 1/√2 no angle produces the illusion at all, so seeing it is a measurement: it puts a floor under the speed and a ceiling on the angle at once.

The motion that measures faster than light

Take two photographs of a jet a year apart, measure how far a blob moved across the sky, divide by a year, and the answer can be seven times the speed of light. Nothing has broken. The blob came closer between the two pictures, so the second flash had less far to travel and arrived early, and the interval between arrivals is not the interval between departures.

The same source, seen coming and seen going. The observed flux of a moving source, relative to the same source at rest, against the angle between its motion and the line of sight, on a logarithmic scale, at β = 0.5, β = 0.9, β = 0.99. The curves span 8.1e+1, 1.3e+5, 1.6e+9 between the approaching and receding directions, which is ((1+β)/(1−β))⁴ exactly. The fourth power comes from the one quantity every observer agrees about: the specific intensity divided by the cube of the frequency. Three powers of the Doppler factor come from that invariance and the fourth from integrating over frequency. Two consequences are worth reading off. A source seen side-on is fainter than the same source at rest, by γ⁴ — a factor of 2.5e+3 at the fastest speed drawn. And half the light arrives inside a cone of 60.0°, 25.8°, 8.1°, which for a fast source is one over γ.

The brightness that is not the same for everyone

A moving source is not merely shifted in colour. Its light is concentrated forwards, so the same lamp is enormously brighter seen coming than seen going — by the fourth power of one number, which for a jet at ninety-nine per cent of light speed is a factor of a thousand million. The reason is that only one combination of intensity and frequency is the same for every observer, and everything else follows from it.

A circumference that is more than 2π times the radius. The ratio of a rotating disc's measured circumference to 2π times its measured radius, against the speed of the rim, together with the rate of a clock carried on the rim. Rulers laid round the rim lie along their own direction of motion and are contracted; rulers laid along a radius lie across it and are not. So the circumference takes more of them than a stationary observer counts and the radius takes the same number, and the ratio is γ: 1.091 at β = 0.4, 1.400 at β = 0.7, 2.294 at β = 0.9. The geometry a rotating observer measures is therefore not Euclidean, and it is not Euclidean by an amount that depends on where on the disc the measurement is made. That is the observation Einstein said set him on the road to describing gravity with curved geometry: here is an accelerated frame, and here is a geometry in it that no choice of Cartesian coordinates can flatten. The rim's clock runs slow by the same factor, so a rotating frame has neither a common time nor a flat space.

The disc that cannot be spun

Set a disc turning and measure its circumference with rulers carried on the rim. They lie along their own direction of motion and are contracted, so more of them fit; rulers along a radius lie across the motion and are not. The ratio of circumference to radius is therefore not two pi, in a frame where nothing is happening but rotation — and Einstein said that was what set him looking for gravity in geometry.

One factor, defined by an experiment rather than by a transformation. A observer A stays at x = 0 and flashes a light every 1 second by their own clock. B recedes at 0.6c. The flashes are the diagonal lines; where each meets B's worldline is where B receives it. B's clock reads a longer gap between arrivals than A's read between departures, by the factor k = 2.0000, and it is the same factor between every consecutive pair — measured here off the drawn meetings rather than assumed. That single number is the whole apparatus. Nobody has written down a coordinate transformation, chosen a convention for distant simultaneity, or drawn a tilted axis; the only thing used is that light travels on the diagonals and that neither observer is special, so B's flashes reach A stretched by the same k. From it: γ = (k + 1/k)/2 = 1.2500, and β = (k² − 1)/(k² + 1) = 0.6000.

Everything from an exchange of pulses

Send a flash every second and ask how often the far observer receives them. That one measured ratio generates time dilation, the composition of velocities and the twin result, with no coordinate transformation written down anywhere and no convention chosen about what "at the same time" means far away.

The turnaround, made gentler and gentler, and the difference that does not move. A round trip to a star 4 light-years away at 0.6c, with the turnaround done at nine different accelerations from a tenth of a gravity to a thousand. The upper curve is the age difference between the twins and the lower one is how much of that difference the turnaround itself contributes. At 0.1 g the turn accounts for 51 per cent of it; at 1000 g it accounts for 0.00 per cent, and it keeps falling. The total does not follow it down: it tends to 2.67 years, which is what the instantaneous-turnaround cartoon gives. So the acceleration is not what makes the twins differ. It is what makes one twin's path the bent one, and a bent path through spacetime is shorter for the same reason a bent path on a map is longer — but the amount is in the legs, not in the corner, and the corner's contribution can be made as small as anyone likes without the difference going away.

The clock that does not feel the turn

Proper time is the integral of dt over gamma, which presumes that a clock's rate depends on its speed and on nothing else — not on its acceleration, not on how long it has been accelerating. That is an assumption about clocks rather than a theorem about spacetime, and the twin result is empty without it.

Where the second tick actually goes. A spacetime diagram with a second observer's axes at β = 0.6. The hyperbolae are the sets of events one second and one metre from the origin — invariantly, by the interval — and every observer's unit tick is where their own axis crosses them. That is checked here rather than drawn by eye. The moving observer's one-second mark sits 1.458 times further from the origin on the page than the stationary one's, so a ruler laid on this picture reads the two frames on different scales. The picture is not distorted; the page is Euclidean and spacetime is not. The Lorentz factor here is 1.2500.

The diagram a ruler cannot read

A spacetime diagram is drawn on flat paper, and the geometry it depicts is not flat. The tick marking one second on a moving observer's axis sits further from the origin than the stationary observer's, by an amount that is not the Lorentz factor and means nothing at all.

The point that does not notice the collision. Two bodies of rest mass 1 and 2, approaching at 0.8c and -0.3c, colliding elastically and leaving at -0.6168c and 0.5969c — speeds obtained by reversing the motion in the zero-momentum frame, with the total energy and momentum checked to a part in a million million. The third line is the energy-weighted centre. It runs straight through the collision at 0.1872c, which is the total momentum divided by the total energy, and it has no kink — verified at two hundred instants. Nothing here is the centre of mass: the rest masses are unchanged by the collision but the energies are redistributed, and it is the energies that do the weighting.

The centre that is not a place

The centre of mass is replaced in relativity by the centre of energy, which moves uniformly and does everything the old point did — except be the same point for everybody. Boost a spinning body and its centre moves, so a spinning object has no centre at all.

Two things that change and one that does not. How a boost treats a piece of charged matter: the charge density rises by the Lorentz factor because the same charges occupy a contracted length, and the length falls by the same factor. At β = 0.6 the density is 1.250 times what it was and the length is 0.800 times, and their product is one to fourteen decimals across the whole range drawn. So the total charge is the same number in every frame, and it is the only quantity in the transformation that is. Charge density is the time component of a four-vector and transforms like an energy; charge itself is a scalar, and nothing about the observer changes it.

The one quantity a boost leaves alone

Energy, momentum, length, duration, density and field strength all change when the observer moves. Electric charge does not, and the whole of the field-transformation argument rests on it — so it is worth asking what the evidence is.

Every speed there is, on one disc. The whole of velocity space drawn as a disc: the boundary is the speed of light and every possible velocity is a point inside. The rings are equal steps of rapidity — 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5 — and they sit at speeds 0.4621, 0.7616, 0.9051, 0.9640, 0.9866 of light. Equal steps of rapidity crowd towards the edge, checked ring by ring, which is the same fact as speeds refusing to add: a boost is a fixed step in rapidity and a shrinking step in speed. The drawing is the Poincaré model, in which angles are true and distances are not — so a shape near the rim is drawn small and is not small, and the boundary is infinitely far away in the geometry although it is a finite circle on the page.

The space that speeds live in

Speeds do not add, and the reason is that the set of all possible velocities is not a flat space. It is a hyperbolic plane of curvature minus one in rapidity — and the rotation two boosts leave behind is exactly the area of the triangle they make in it.

Every detour costs time. 4 routes between the same two events, 10 seconds apart in the frame drawn, each swinging out and back 1 time on the way. The proper time each carries is the integral of the square root of one minus the speed squared, computed by Simpson's rule along each curve: the straight route, 10.0000 s; wandering 1 light-seconds, 9.7485 s; wandering 2 light-seconds, 8.9245 s; wandering 3 light-seconds, 7.0935 s. The straight one carries the most, and every other one carries less — checked, on each drawn route. That is the opposite of what a length behaves like on paper, where the straight line is the shortest, and the whole difference is the minus sign in front of the space term.

The longest way round is the shortest clock

Of all the routes between two events, the one with no acceleration in it carries the most time on its own clock. That is the opposite of the Euclidean statement about straight lines, it comes entirely from one minus sign, and in a gravitational field it is why a thrown ball follows the path it does.

The fringes a flow of water moves. The interference fringe shift against the speed of the water, for two tubes 1.5 m long, an index of 1.333, and light of 526 nm — Fizeau's apparatus. The beam is split, each half goes with the flow in one tube and against it in the other, and the two are recombined; the shift is the difference in transit time counted in wavelengths. Three predictions are drawn and they are not close together. If the water did not affect the light at all the shift would be zero, flat along the bottom. If the water carried the light with it completely the shift would be the steepest line. Fresnel's partial drag is the middle one, and at 7 m/s it gives 0.207 of a fringe — which is what was measured, to the accuracy of an eye reading a fringe pattern in 1851. The experiment therefore did not merely detect an effect; it chose between three quantitative possibilities that differ by factors of two, which is why a fraction of a fringe settled something.

The drag that was only an addition

Light in moving water is carried along by it, but only partly — by a fraction of the water's speed that depends on the refractive index in a way nobody could account for. Fresnel invented the coefficient to save a theory, Fizeau measured it in 1851, and it sat unexplained for half a century. It is the first term of the relativistic velocity addition and nothing else.

The one number the boost leaves alone. The mass of a lambda into a proton and a pion, reconstructed from the two products' laboratory energies and momenta alone, against how fast the parent was moving — for five different rest-frame emission angles. Every curve is the same horizontal line. The lab energies vary by more than a factor of ten across this range and the angles between the products vary from almost 180° to a few degrees; the combination E² − p² of the pair does not vary at all, to 3.2e-15, which the figure requires before drawing anything. The light curves are the energies of the two products, on the same axis and to a different scale, drawn to show how much is moving while the invariant does not. This is the whole method of particle physics. A parent that lives for 10⁻²³ seconds is never detected; what is detected is two tracks, and their invariant mass is computed and histogrammed over millions of events. A parent that exists shows up as a peak at its own mass, at the same place whatever the beam energy, which is what makes the peak believable.

The cone a decay cannot leave

A particle at rest breaks into two and they go opposite ways. Set the parent moving and the whole pattern folds forward — into a cone with a hard edge, beyond which nothing is emitted at any rest-frame angle at all. The energy spectrum that comes out is exactly rectangular, and the one number the boost leaves alone is how the parent is identified at all.

One boost, three constants, three pictures. The axes of a frame moving at 0.5 in units where the constant is one, drawn for the three signs the constant can have. The faint cross is the original frame's axes; the two heavy lines are the moving frame's, obtained by boosting them rather than by tilting them by hand. With a positive constant the two axes close in on one another symmetrically, and the line they are closing on is the invariant speed. With a zero constant only the time axis tilts and the space axis stays where it was, which is absolute simultaneity — every frame agrees which events are at the same time. With a negative constant the pair rotates rigidly, like a pair of axes turned in a plane. Nothing about light has been used to draw any of them. The three are the whole of what homogeneity, isotropy, the group property and the relativity principle permit, and choosing between them is a measurement rather than a postulate.

The transformation that never mentions light

Assume space and time are homogeneous, that space is isotropic, that two changes of frame compose into a third, and that the relativity principle holds. Those four leave exactly one free constant — and three possible worlds, one of them Galileo's and one of them Einstein's. Light appears nowhere in the derivation; it enters only when the constant has to be measured.

Charge density and current, mixing like time and space. The charge density and the current density of a wire, against the rapidity of the frame they are measured in, starting from cρ = 0 and J = 2. They mix by exactly the transformation that mixes a time and a space coordinate — a hyperbolic rotation — and the combination c²ρ² − J² is unchanged at every rapidity, checked here to nine decimal places. A wire that is neutral in the laboratory is charged in every other frame, at exactly one rapidity out of all of them, and that single fact is the mechanism the first rung of this ladder tells as a story about two contracted lattices. Here it is a coordinate change.

Charge and current are one thing

Ask what a boost leaves alone and the answer is charge. That answer forces the next one: a fixed charge in a contracting volume gives a density that transforms like a time component, and a current that transforms like a space one. So charge density and current density are the four parts of one object — and conservation of charge stops being an extra law and becomes the condition that makes the object exist.

Six numbers, one object. The electromagnetic field tensor written out as the four-by-four array it is, for a field with E = (0.4, 1.2, 0) and cB = (0, 0, 0.7), and again after a boost of rapidity 0.9 along the first axis. The array is antisymmetric — checked entry by entry — so of its sixteen slots only six are independent, and those six are the three components of E and the three of cB. The boost does not act on E and B separately; it acts on the array, mixing the top row into the lower block, which is what 'the electric field in one frame is partly magnetic in another' means written down. Its two scalars, E·B = 0.000 and E² − c²B² = 1.110, are unchanged, and they are the only two an antisymmetric rank-two tensor has.

Six numbers, one object

Three components of E and three of B mix into each other under a boost and never into anything else. Six numbers that transform among themselves are the independent entries of a four-by-four antisymmetric array, and writing them that way is not notation — it turns Maxwell's four equations into two, makes the two invariants the only two there could be, and shows that "electric" is a choice of axes rather than a kind of field.

A map that keeps every cone and bends every worldline. Left: a grid of inertial worldlines, drawn solid, lines of simultaneity, faint, and light lines at 45°, dashed, in one space dimension. Right: the same grid after a map that stretches the light-cone coordinates u = t − x and v = t + x by two different increasing functions, u + 0.45·tanh(1.5u) and sinh(0.45v)/0.45. Light lines go to light lines, still at 45° to within a part in a billion, and the causal order of every one of 4000 sampled pairs of events is unchanged: whatever could influence what still can, and nothing new can. But the straight worldlines are bent — the one through x = 1 by 0.19 across the window — and the lines of simultaneity are no longer straight. In one space dimension the light cones cannot tell this picture from the inertial one.

What the light cones alone can decide

Keep nothing of spacetime but its light cones — which events could influence which — and ask how much geometry survives. With one dimension of space, almost none: any pair of increasing stretches of the two families of light lines preserves every cone and bends every straight worldline. With two or more, almost all of it: the only maps that keep every cone are Lorentz transformations, shifts and a uniform stretch, and nothing about straightness has to be assumed.

All of flat spacetime in a diamond. The whole of flat spacetime with one space dimension, squeezed into a finite diamond by applying arctan separately to the two light-cone coordinates u = t − x and v = t + x. Solid curves are the worldlines of observers at rest at x = −3, −2, −1, 0, 1, 2, 3; faint curves are the instants t equal to the same values; the dashed lines are the two light rays through the origin, still at 45°, as every light line is — checked to a part in a billion — and the causal order of 4000 sampled pairs is unchanged. Infinity is not one place. Every worldline at rest runs from the bottom corner i⁻ to the top corner i⁺; every instant runs between the side corners i⁰; and light rays begin on the lower edges ℐ⁻ and end on the upper edges ℐ⁺. Each of these limits is checked at ten million units out.

The five places infinity turns out to be

Flat spacetime goes on for ever in every direction, and it can still be drawn whole on a page. Squeeze each family of light rays with a function that keeps their order and the infinite plane becomes a diamond with every light cone still at 45°. The price is distance, which the picture no longer shows. What it shows instead is that infinity is not one place: observers slower than light all end at a single point, instants end at another, and light ends along a whole edge of its own.

The rectangle a spin tilts. The laboratory energy of the pion from a tau into a pion and a neutrino moving at 0.8 of the speed of light, for samples of 60,000 decays whose parents have αP = +1, 0, −1 along their line of flight. Every sample fills the same interval, 313 to 2667 MeV: the edges are set by the masses and the speed, and they do not move. Inside that interval an unpolarised sample is flat and a polarised one is tilted, its height at each energy 1 + αP times the cosine of the rest-frame angle that energy corresponds to. Reading the slope back from each sample gives +0.993, −0.010, −1.006, each with a standard error near 0.006. A parent spinning along its flight throws the pion forwards in its own frame, and the boost turns forwards into more energetic, so the tilt of an energy spectrum measures a polarisation without any angle being measured at all.

The slope a spin leaves in a spectrum

An unpolarised parent decaying in flight gives its products a rectangle of energies. Give the parent a spin along its line of flight and the rectangle tilts, while its two edges stay exactly where they were. The tilt is the polarisation, it can be read without ever seeing which way the parent was going — and which variable it is read from decides how many decays the reading costs.

Resonances drawn as bands. 60,000 decays of a D⁰ decaying to K⁻π⁺π⁰, accepted from 1,287,365 flat ones in proportion to the square of an amplitude built from 3 short-lived intermediate states, each decaying to two of the three products. A ρ⁺(770) in m²(π⁺π⁰), 67.0 per cent of the rate on its own; a K⁻(892) in m²(K⁻π⁰), 25.5 per cent of the rate on its own; a K⁰(892) in m²(K⁻π⁺), 33.2 per cent of the rate on its own. Each appears as a band at its own mass squared — vertical, horizontal or diagonal according to which pair it decays to — holding 51 per cent, 19 per cent, 23 per cent of the decays within one width of its mass, where phase space alone would put 34, 10, 9. The separate fractions add to 126 per cent, not 100, because the amplitudes interfere where the bands overlap. The magnitudes and phases are a model chosen to make all three visible, not a fit to data.

The plane in which three bodies are flat

A particle breaking into two gives each product a fixed energy; one breaking into three gives none of them one. What it gives instead is a plane of two invariant masses in which a decay with no forces spreads perfectly evenly inside a curved boundary — so every band, dark stripe and bright crossing a real decay draws there is a force, its spin, or a phase between two routes to the same three particles.

What a beam's energy buys, three ways. The speed reached against the energy intercepted, measured in the body's own rest energy, for a perfect mirror pushed by a beam, a perfect absorber pushed by the same beam, and a photon rocket that carries the same energy as fuel and throws it out behind. The mirror's curve is γ(1 + β) = 1 + 2E/mc², a rapidity of ln(1 + 2E/mc²); the dots integrate the reflected beam's force, (2P/c)(1 − β)/(1 + β), and agree with it to 10⁻¹⁵. To reach 0.2c the mirror needs 0.1124 of its rest energy, the absorber 0.2500 and the photon rocket 0.2247 — for a 1 g sail, 10.1 terajoules against 20.2. The rocket's rapidity is ln(1 + E/mc²), so the mirror is the rocket with its fuel left at home and each joule used twice, once arriving and once leaving. The absorber does worst, because the energy it keeps becomes rest mass it then has to carry.

The rocket that leaves its fuel at home

A mirror pushed by a beam from the ground carries no propellant, and relativity gives its speed in closed form: its rapidity is ln(1 + 2E/mc²), the photon rocket's equation with the fuel left behind and every joule used twice. What stops it is not the energy, which can be stored for days, but diffraction, which fixes the distance over which the energy can be handed over — and so demands an acceleration of tens of thousands of g.

How large now is, on this planet. By how much a synchronisation carried around a region of the rotating Earth fails to come back to itself, against the size of that region — from a metre to the whole planet, both axes logarithmic. The three horizontal lines are what three kinds of clock can resolve, and where each crosses the curve is where that clock can detect that 'now' is not a global notion: a good wristwatch at 785 thousand km, a quartz oscillator at 25 thousand km, a caesium clock at 785 km. Carried the whole way round the equator the defect is 207 nanoseconds, which is sixty metres of light travel and is the correction every satellite-navigation system applies. The effect is not small and not exotic; it is a routine engineering term, and the reason it was not an engineering term before 1955 is that nothing could measure it. A wristwatch's now is global out past the Moon; a caesium clock's reaches about the width of a large country.

How big now is

Three earlier arguments have established that a global now is a choice, that part of the choice is convention, and that for a rotating observer no consistent global choice exists at all. What survives is a size. Every observer has a local now, and how local is computable: on the rotating Earth it is 785 kilometres to the nanosecond, and a freely falling frame is inertial over the tolerance times the distance to the centre, divided by two.

A blackbody in every direction, at a different temperature in each. The spectrum of a blackbody at 100 kelvin in its own frame, seen by an observer it is moving past at 0.5 of the speed of light, in 5 directions. Each curve is a Planck spectrum exactly — the Planck form survives a Doppler shift, with the temperature multiplied by the shift — and the temperatures run from 57.74 kelvin looking one way to 173.21 looking the other. So the body is a perfect blackbody in each direction and has no single temperature. A thermometer placed in the radiation reads something between, and what it reads depends on where it is put and on how much of the sky it sees — which is the reason a transformation law for temperature was argued about for sixty years without being found.

The body that has no temperature when it moves

Energy, momentum, length, duration and field strength all change when the observer moves. Temperature was argued about for sixty years, with three transformation laws proposed and each defended by people making no mistake. The resolution is that a moving blackbody is a perfect blackbody in every direction at a different temperature in each — so a thermometer's reading depends on where it is put, and the quantity the law was for is not there.

What a boost leaves alone, and what it does not. How each quantity of a box of blackbody radiation changes when the observer moves at 0.8 of the speed of light, a Lorentz factor of 1.667, on a logarithmic axis with one at the centre. The top four do not change at all, and the reason is the same in each case: they are counts, or logarithms of counts, or invariants built from four-vectors. A number of photons is a number, and every observer arrives at the same number. The rest change, by powers of the Lorentz factor that follow from the first four. And the entry that matters is the last two together: the energy density rises as the square of the factor while the entropy density rises as the factor itself, so the ratio between them that would define a temperature does not stay fixed — which is why the boosted radiation cannot be a blackbody at any temperature at all.

The count that no observer can disagree about

A moving body, it turns out, has no temperature. What it does have is an entropy, and every observer agrees about it — because entropy is the logarithm of a count of arrangements, and a count is a number. That one invariant, with energy and momentum being parts of one object, is enough to compute everything a temperature could not: what happens to the energy density, the entropy density, and the relation between them that having a temperature consists of.

The bath does push back, by an unmeasurable amount. The retarding force on a perfectly absorbing body moving through isotropic radiation at 2.725 kelvin, against its speed, for three areas. Moving through a bath of radiation is not free: the radiation arriving from ahead is blue-shifted and more intense and the radiation from behind is red-shifted and weaker, so the body absorbs more momentum from the front than from the back and decelerates. A square metre at half the speed of light feels 3.7e-14 newtons. That is the reason a preferred frame exists without relativity being violated: the laws are the same in every frame and the radiation is not — it is a physical system with a state, and its state picks out the frame in which it is isotropic, exactly as a body of water does.

The bath that pushes back

Moving through a bath of radiation is not free. The light arriving from ahead is blue-shifted and more intense and the light from behind is weaker, so a body absorbs more momentum from the front than from the back and slows down. That drag picks out the frame in which the radiation is isotropic — without violating relativity, because the laws are the same in every frame and the radiation is not.

The paths in space: orbits of one period, and a throw straight up. The same free falls drawn in space around the Earth, which is the filled disc. All start at the marked point 2 Earth radii from the centre. The circle is the circular orbit. The ellipses, of eccentricity 0.2 and 0.4, have the same period, so they come back to the start at the same moment. The straight line is the thrown clock's path: straight up to 4.46 Earth radii and back down the same line, arriving as the orbits complete one revolution. The Earth's rotation is ignored and it is treated as a point mass for the paths that pass close to it.

The orbit that ages less than a throw

A clock in orbit and a clock thrown straight up leave the same point at the same moment and meet there again one period later. Both fall freely the whole way, so both follow paths of stationary proper time — and the thrown clock comes back 4.1 microseconds older. Even a clock held still by a rocket, which is not falling at all, beats the orbit. Free fall picks out a path that is stationary, not one that is longest.

Equilibrium is where the entropy peaks, and there the temperatures differ. Two cavities of radiation, one high in a gravitational field and one low, free to exchange energy, with the clock at the bottom running at 0.8 of the rate of the one at the top. What is conserved is the energy either would deliver to a distant observer, so energy held at the bottom counts for 0.8 of its local value. Across: the share of that conserved energy held at the top. Above: the total entropy of the two gases. Below: the temperature a thermometer in the top cavity reads, as a fraction of one in the bottom cavity. The entropy peaks at a share of 0.339, found by search, and there the top cavity is at 0.800 of the bottom's temperature — the clock-rate ratio exactly. Where the two local temperatures are equal, at a share of 0.556, the entropy is 1.82 per cent below its peak and energy still flows downward, into the deeper cavity.

The column that is hotter at the bottom

Two bodies in equilibrium have the same temperature — that is what equilibrium was supposed to mean. In a gravitational field it is false. A column left alone until nothing in it changes is warmer at the bottom by exactly the factor by which clocks there run slow, a part in ten million billion per metre on the Earth and more than a per cent across the outer kilometre of a neutron star, and near a black hole's horizon the equilibrium temperature grows without limit.

Equal masses, one at rest, struck head on at four energies. A particle striking an identical particle at rest and scattering elastically, with the two leaving at equal angles either side of the incoming line, at four incident kinetic energies measured in units of the particle's rest energy. At 0.001 mc² the two tracks open at 90.0°. At 0.5 mc² the two tracks open at 83.6°. At 2 mc² the two tracks open at 70.5°. At 10 mc² the two tracks open at 44.4°. Slowly, the angle between them is a right angle, as every billiards player knows. Fast, it closes, because the incoming particle's energy is part of its inertia and the pair is carried forward. A proton at 2 mc² — about 1.9 GeV — and an electron at 1 MeV are both well inside the narrowing.

The right angle a fast collision closes

When one billiard ball strikes an identical one at rest, the two always leave at right angles — a fact every snooker player uses without knowing its proof. The proof is Newton's, and it fails for fast particles. Two protons leaving a collision at 1.9 GeV open at 70 degrees, not 90, and the narrowing follows one law, tan θ₁ tan θ₂ = 2/(γ + 1), in which the right angle is the slow limit. The circle that forced the right angle has been squashed into an ellipse by the energy the incoming particle carries as inertia.

A relativistic mass on a spring, at four amplitudes, scaled to one size. The displacement of a mass on an ideal spring against time, over two periods, with the mass's inertia growing with its energy as relativity requires, at amplitudes of 0.2, 1, 3, 10 times c/ω₀ — the distance light travels in one radian of the slow oscillation. Each curve is divided by its own amplitude and its own period so that shape alone is compared. The small swing is the familiar sine. The large one is a triangle: the mass spends almost the whole cycle moving at nearly the speed of light, turning round abruptly at each end. Periods: 1.007, 1.175, 2.132, 6.431 times the slow period.

The spring that becomes a light-clock

A mass on an ideal spring keeps the same period however far it swings — that is what makes it a clock. Give the mass the inertia relativity demands, pull it back far enough, and the clock breaks. The speed can never pass c, so a large swing spends almost all its time moving at nearly the speed of light, turning round abruptly at each end: the sine becomes a triangle, the period grows until it is simply the time light takes to cross the swing four times, and a clock riding on the mass ages a small fraction of what one beside it does.

How much slower a warm atom ticks. The fraction by which a free atom's clock runs slow on average because of its thermal motion, (3/2)kT/mc², against temperature on logarithmic axes, for five atoms used in clocks or tests of relativity: hydrogen 4.1 × 10⁻¹¹ at 300 K, aluminium ion 1.5 × 10⁻¹² at 300 K, strontium 4.8 × 10⁻¹³ at 300 K, caesium 3.1 × 10⁻¹³ at 300 K, mercury ion 2.1 × 10⁻¹³ at 300 K. Every line falls in proportion to the temperature and to one over the mass. A clock aiming at one part in 10¹⁸ must hold strontium below 0.63 mK and hydrogen below 7.3 µK — or know their temperature well enough to correct for it. Pound and Rebka's gravitational shift across 22.5 m, 2.46 × 10⁻¹⁵, is marked for scale.

The clock that runs slow because it is warm

Every atom in a gas is moving, and every moving clock runs slow. The first-order Doppler shifts of a hot gas cancel on average; the time dilation does not, because it has only one sign. A hydrogen maser at 40 °C runs slow by four parts in a hundred billion from this alone, a nucleus in a crystal runs slow even at absolute zero, and the first test of gravitational time dilation nearly drowned in a one-kelvin temperature difference.

A charge going past, as the field it delivers. The electric field across the line of motion at a point a distance b from the path of a passing charge, against time in units of b/c, on a logarithmic field axis in units of q/4πε₀b², for Lorentz factors of 1.2, 3, 10, 30. The peak is γ times the Coulomb field at rest and the width at half height is 2.311 b/c at γ = 1.2, 0.542 b/c at γ = 3, 0.154 b/c at γ = 10, 0.0511 b/c at γ = 30: taller by γ and shorter by γ, so the area under each curve — the sideways impulse the passing charge delivers, 2q²/4πε₀bv — is the same for all of them to within the integration's precision. A fast charge's field arrives as a thin, intense flash.

The charge that passes as a flash of light

A charge at rest has a field that no change of frame can turn into light. A charge going past at nearly the speed of light delivers a field that is, for every practical purpose, a pulse of light anyway: thin, perpendicular to the motion, with its electric and magnetic parts equal and crossed. Enrico Fermi saw in 1924 that such a field could be counted as photons, and the Large Hadron Collider now collides lead nuclei's photons with each other.

The stiffness that falls below four-thirds. The first adiabatic exponent Γ₁ — how steeply pressure rises when a gas is squeezed without heat escaping — of hot oxygen with its radiation and its equilibrium electron–positron pairs, against temperature, at densities of 10³, 10⁴, 10⁵, 10⁶ g/cm³. At 10³ g/cm³ its least value is 1.222, near 1.2 billion kelvin; at 10⁴ g/cm³ its least value is 1.235, near 1.3 billion kelvin; at 10⁵ g/cm³ its least value is 1.285, near 1.8 billion kelvin; at 10⁶ g/cm³ its least value is 1.339, near 3.1 billion kelvin. A star can hold itself up only if its core's Γ₁ averages above 4/3, the value for a gas of light alone; a core that dips below it has no stable size, and the pair production that pulls it below is strongest where the gas is hot and thin — the cores of the most massive stars.

The heat that turns into matter

Thermodynamics counts particles and relativity lets them be made. Heat a gas to a billion kelvin and its light carries enough energy to create electrons and positrons, which the gas then holds in equilibrium like any other ingredient. The heat spent making them raises neither the temperature nor the pressure, so the gas grows soft — softer, in the cores of the most massive stars, than a star can survive. Those stars collapse, ignite their oxygen all at once and blow themselves entirely apart; and the same pairs, vanishing a few seconds after the Big Bang, left the universe's light hotter than its neutrinos by a factor that is the cube root of eleven over four.

Two straight worldlines that meet twice. A spacetime diagram of a universe whose space is a circle 10 light-years round, drawn unrolled: the shaded strip is the whole of space, and the strips beside it are the same space again, so the dashed lines are the same stay-at-home twin A seen in the copies. Twin B leaves A at 0.6c and never changes speed or direction. After 16.67 years by A's clock B has gone once round and meets A again — the line reaches A's copy at 10 light-years. Neither twin has accelerated at any moment; both worldlines are straight. A has aged 16.67 years and B 13.33, less by the factor 1/γ = 0.800. The usual resolution of the twin paradox, that the travelling twin is the one who turned round, is not available: here nobody turned.

The twin who never turns round

The twin paradox is usually settled by pointing at the turn: the travelling twin is the one who fired the engines and came back, and so the one whose worldline is not straight. Put the twins in a universe whose space closes on itself, like the surface of a cylinder, and the traveller can come home by going straight on. Neither twin ever accelerates, both worldlines are straight, and the traveller still comes back younger. What decides it is not any motion but the shape of space, which picks out one state of motion as special — and hands every observer a way to measure it.

Two pushes that nearly cancel. The forces between two equal charges moving side by side at the same speed, measured in the laboratory, in units of the Coulomb force the same two charges exert at rest, against their speed. Electric repulsion grows as γ, because a moving charge's field is stronger across its motion: 2.29 at β = 0.9, 7.1 at 0.99. The magnetic attraction of two parallel currents grows as γβ² and eats it almost entirely: the net push is γ(1 − β²) = 1/γ — 0.436 at 0.9 and 0.141 at 0.99. Measured in the pair's own frame the push is exactly the Coulomb force at every speed; the difference is not a force that exists in one frame and not another but a difference in how fast the two frames' clocks run while the charges drift apart.

The beam that stops pushing itself apart

A beam of electrons is a crowd of like charges, and a crowd of like charges flies apart. A slow beam does, within centimetres. A fast one hardly does at all: at a gigaelectronvolt the same current travels kilometres before its width doubles. The electric repulsion has not weakened — it has grown, by the factor γ. What has grown faster is a magnetic attraction between parallel currents, which cancels all but 1/γ² of the push. Seen from the beam itself there is no magnetism at all, only Coulomb repulsion acting while the beam's clocks run slow.

The orbits of an electron in a travelling wave. The possible motions of an electron in a plasma wave whose phase moves at γₚ = 10 and whose field is 0.2 of the cold wave-breaking field, drawn as its energy against its position in the wave over two wavelengths — the level curves of H = γ − βₚ u − ε cos ψ, which the electron's motion conserves. Inside the separatrix (thick) an electron is trapped: it slides back and forth through the wave, gaining energy while it outruns the wave and losing it while the wave outruns it. The separatrix reaches γ = 99 at its top, near 4γₚ²ε = 80, starting from electrons moving at the wave's own speed. Outside it, electrons that are too slow are overtaken by the wave and those that are fast enough outrun it; neither gains energy on average.

The wave an electron rides to a gigaelectronvolt

A laser pulse fired into a thin plasma pushes its electrons aside and leaves them oscillating behind it, a wave of charge travelling at nearly the speed of light. The field in that wave is a thousand times stronger than any metal accelerator can hold, and an electron caught in it at the right moment is carried along like a surfer, gaining a gigaelectronvolt in a few centimetres. Then it outruns the wave. The distance it can ride, and the energy it can gain, are both set by how nearly the wave keeps pace with it — which is to say, by relativity.

Sound cones that tip over. Time against position for sound in a fluid that speeds up from 0.55 to 1.3 times the speed of sound, drawn as the cone of places a sound made at each point can reach: its edges move at v − c and v + c. Upstream, where the flow is slow, the cones straddle the vertical and sound can go either way. At x = 0.20, where the flow reaches the speed of sound, the upstream edge stands vertical. Beyond it both edges point downstream: sound made there can no longer reach anywhere upstream of where it was made. That is a horizon, drawn in the same way as the light cones of a black hole, and it arises from nothing but the ordinary addition of a sound's speed to the speed of the water that carries it.

The river that sound cannot swim up

Sound travels at a fixed speed through the air or water carrying it, so a flowing medium adds its own speed to the sound's: faster downstream, slower upstream. That is the plainest velocity addition there is. Where the flow speeds up past the speed of sound, upstream-going sound is carried backwards, and nothing made beyond that point can be heard before it. The point is a horizon. Sound cones tip over there exactly as light cones do at a black hole, and the rate at which the flow speeds up plays the part of the surface gravity. A kitchen sink under a running tap makes the reverse kind of horizon, a white hole for ripples.

An orbit that flattens without being told to. The path of a classical electron relative to its nucleus, in the laboratory, before and after the nucleus has been accelerated gently — over 200 orbits — from rest to 0.6 of the speed of light along the horizontal, computed from Maxwell's field of a moving charge and the relativistic law of motion alone. Before, the orbit is a circle of radius 1. After, it is an ellipse 0.810 wide along the motion and 1.012 across it, a ratio of 0.8003 against 1/γ = 0.8000, and one turn takes 1.2504 times as long as before, against γ = 1.2500. Nothing in the calculation assumed a contraction or a slowing clock: the forces between the moving charges produced both.

The contraction the forces work out for themselves

Relativity usually introduces length contraction as a consequence of how moving observers disagree about simultaneity, not as something that happens to matter. There is a second way to reach the same number, and it is worth knowing because it is the way the idea was first found. Take an atom, accelerate its nucleus gently, and compute what the electron does using only Maxwell's field of a moving charge and the law of motion. Nobody tells the orbit to contract, and it does, by exactly 1/γ, while each turn takes exactly γ times as long. The forces holding matter together work out the contraction for themselves.

Heat that arrives everywhere at once, and heat that waits. The temperature spread from a point of heat released at time zero, in one dimension, at times 0.5, 2, 8 relaxation times, from the diffusion equation (dashed) and from Cattaneo's telegraph equation (solid) with the same diffusivity, distances in units of the signal speed times the relaxation time. At 0.5, the diffusion equation has put 62 per cent of the heat beyond the reach of any signal; the telegraph equation none, and 78 per cent is still in the two fronts; at 2, the diffusion equation has put 32 per cent of the heat beyond the reach of any signal; the telegraph equation none, and 37 per cent is still in the two fronts; at 8, the diffusion equation has put 5 per cent of the heat beyond the reach of any signal; the telegraph equation none, and 1.8 per cent is still in the two fronts. The fronts, drawn as the vertical marks, carry heat outward at the signal speed and decay; behind them the telegraph solution fills in and, after many relaxation times, becomes the diffusion equation's Gaussian.

The heat that arrives before it could

Release a pulse of heat at one point, and the diffusion equation — the law that has described heat flow since Fourier — says the temperature rises everywhere at once, however far away. A thermometer a kilometre off registers a change the instant the heat is released. That is an infinite signal speed, and relativity forbids it. The flaw is harmless for a kettle and fatal for a relativistic fluid. The repair is a relaxation time: heat flow takes a moment to respond to a temperature gradient. With it the equation carries heat at a finite speed, sends a sharp front ahead of the spreading warmth, and turns short-wavelength heat into a damped wave.

The crests of one wave, meeting an observer who never stops accelerating. A spacetime diagram, time up and distance across, both scaled by the acceleration: the worldline of an observer with constant proper acceleration (a hyperbola), its horizon (the dashed light line it approaches and never crosses), and the crests of a plane wave of a single frequency travelling in the same direction, as parallel lines at 45°. Within the drawing the observer meets crests at proper times −0.18, −0.05, 0.11, 0.29, 0.51, 0.80, 1.20, 1.90 in units of c/a: the gaps lengthen, each crest having to chase the observer further, and after the last of them, at 1.90, it meets no more — every later crest lies beyond its horizon. One wave of one frequency therefore arrives as a signal whose frequency falls as e^(−aτ/c) for ever. Nothing about the wave is random, and the observer's clock is perfectly regular.

The heat hidden in a Doppler shift

An observer who accelerates without stopping sees empty space as warm. The usual derivation takes quantum field theory and several pages. There is a shorter one, and it needs no quanta at all. Watch a single wave of a single frequency from a steadily accelerating rocket: it is redshifted, and because the rocket keeps speeding away, the redshift grows exponentially. Take the spectrum of that fading signal, and it is exactly a Planck spectrum, at a temperature set by the acceleration and nothing else — the same whatever frequency the wave started with. The thermal distribution was hidden in the geometry of the horizon all along.

A beam of light pulls hardest on what comes towards it. The sideways pull of a long, thin beam of light on a body moving parallel to it at velocity βc, as a multiple of the pull the same body would feel from a static mass with the same energy per unit length, against β: 2(1 − β)²/(1 + β²). A body at rest beside the beam is pulled twice as hard as by a static mass — the beam's pressure along its length counts. A body moving with the beam is pulled less, and a ray of light running alongside it is not pulled at all (β = 1). A ray running against it is pulled 4 times as hard as a static mass of the same energy would pull it. Tolman, Ehrenfest and Podolsky found this in 1931. Two parallel laser beams do not attract each other; two opposed ones do.

The light that pulls twice as hard as its mass

Energy has mass, E/c², and a box of light weighs that much more than an empty one. But the gravity something produces is not set by its energy alone. Pressure counts too, three times over, and light's pressure is a third of its energy — so a beam of light pulls on things beside it twice as hard as its mass would suggest. The box weighs only E/c² because its walls, straining to hold the light in, pull with a negative amount that exactly cancels the difference. Two parallel beams of light do not attract each other at all; two opposed ones attract four times as hard. And a substance whose pressure is negative enough does not pull at all — it pushes.

The orbit an observer would reconstruct. The star's velocity along the line of sight, measured from the Doppler shift of its spectrum, as a fraction of its true orbital speed, plotted against the time the light arrives, in orbital periods, if light left the star at c plus the star's velocity. With light at c (dotted) the curve is the sine wave of a circular orbit. At 0.6 times the critical distance (solid) the same circular orbit arrives as a lopsided curve — a slow rise and a steep fall — that an astronomer would fit with a highly eccentric orbit that is not there. At twice the critical distance (dashed) the curve doubles back on itself: at some moments the spectrum would show two or three velocities at once, as if the star were in several places. Willem de Sitter pointed out in 1913 that spectroscopic binaries show nothing of the kind.

The binary star that would be seen twice

If light thrown forward by a moving source travelled faster, the way a ball thrown from a moving train does, then light from a star swinging towards the Earth in a binary orbit would catch up with light it had sent out earlier. From far enough away the two would arrive together, and the star would be seen in two places at once. Willem de Sitter pointed out in 1913 that nothing of the kind is seen, and that this settles whether the speed of light depends on its source. The argument had a loophole that took half a century to notice — interstellar gas re-emits light at its own speed — and closing it needed X-ray stars.

The stiffness a two-solar-mass star demands. The heaviest neutron star the model matter can support, in solar masses, against the constant square of the sound speed assumed above 300 MeV/fm³, as a fraction of c². At the conformal value, one-third (dashed), it is 1.92 solar masses; the heaviest star the model can make rises to 2.97 at the causal limit. To hold up the 2.08 solar masses of J0740+6620 (shaded) the square of the sound speed must exceed 0.394 of c² somewhere above that density — above the conformal one-third, by this model's reckoning. The conclusion depends on the model's low-density part, which the next figure varies.

The sound speed a neutron star needs

Heat any gas without limit and the speed of sound in it climbs towards a ceiling: not the speed of light, but light's speed divided by the square root of three, the sound speed of a gas of massless particles. For decades it was a natural guess that no matter could beat that ceiling, since the densest matter ought to behave like a gas of free quarks. Neutron stars say otherwise. A star of twice the Sun's mass, packed into a ball twenty-five kilometres across, can only be held up if its core is stiffer than the ceiling allows — unless nuclear physics fails at densities where it is believed to hold. Somewhere inside the heaviest neutron stars, sound almost certainly travels faster than it can in any free gas.

A muon's spin lapping its own momentum round a storage ring. Snapshots of a muon circling a storage ring at γ = 29.3, taken every four turns (not to scale in time: the muon is drawn at a different place on the ring for each snapshot so they do not overlap). The dashed arrow is the direction of motion, tangent to the ring; the solid arrow is the spin. On each turn the spin gains 12.3° on the momentum — 2πaγ — so after 29.3 turns it has gained a full lap. That lap takes 4.37 microseconds, and the muon, whose lifetime is stretched from 2.2 to 64.4 microseconds by its speed, lives for about fifteen of them.

The spin that runs ahead of its own motion

A charged particle circling in a magnetic field has two directions that turn: the direction it is moving, and the direction its spin points. If the particle's magnetism were exactly what Dirac's equation first gave — a g-factor of exactly two — the two would turn together at every speed, the spin locked to the motion as a compass needle is locked to a car. The muon's g is not quite two, and its spin creeps ahead by a fixed rate that is the same at a crawl and at 99.94 per cent of the speed of light. That constancy is a delicate cancellation between a magnetic field made stronger by motion and a rotation that exists only because the particle is being turned, and it is what made the most precise measurements of the muon possible — at one magic speed, where the electric fields that steer the particles stop affecting the spin at all.

Two factors of γ between a magnet and an X-ray. An electron of 6 GeV (γ = 11742) crossing an undulator, a row of magnets alternating every λᵤ = 3 cm. Top: the laboratory, where the electron wiggles once per period. Middle: the electron's own frame, where the row is contracted by γ to 2.55 μm and rushes past at nearly the speed of light; to the electron it is a wave of that wavelength, and the electron radiates at it, in the infrared. Bottom: that light, emitted forward and seen back in the laboratory, is Doppler-shortened by a further factor of about 2γ, to λᵤ/2γ² = 1.088 Å; the wiggle's own slowing of the electron adds a factor (1 + K²/2), giving 1.632 Å for a deflection parameter K = 1 — hard X-rays from centimetre magnets. The drawing is schematic: the three periods differ by factors of about twelve thousand and a hundred million, and cannot be drawn to one scale.

The magnet period that comes out as an X-ray

A row of permanent magnets alternating every three centimetres, with a beam of six-gigaelectronvolt electrons sent down the middle, shines X-rays with a wavelength of an ångström and a half — two hundred million times shorter than the spacing of the magnets that made them. The factor is γ squared, and the two γ's come from two different frames. In the electron's frame the row of magnets is contracted by γ and rushes past it as a wave; the electron shakes in step and radiates; and that light, sent forward, comes back to the laboratory shortened by another factor of 2γ. Length contraction is half of every X-ray a modern synchrotron makes.

The neutrino's energy against the pion's, at four angles. The energy of the neutrino from a pion's decay against the pion's energy, for neutrinos going exactly forward and at 1°, 2.5° and 4° to the pion's line of flight. Straight ahead the neutrino takes a fixed share, 0.427, of the pion's energy, so pions of every energy give neutrinos of every energy. Off axis the curve rises, flattens and falls: at 2.5° it peaks at 0.683 GeV for a pion of 3.2 GeV, and every pion between 2 and 10 GeV gives a neutrino between 0.61 and 0.68 GeV. The flat top is where γθ = 1. Its height, p*/θ, depends on the angle alone — the rest-frame momentum of the decay, 29.8 MeV/c, divided by the angle in radians.

The neutrino energy an angle fixes

A pion breaks into a muon and a neutrino, and the neutrino carries off a fixed 29.8 MeV in the pion's own frame. In the laboratory, straight along the pion's path, it carries a fixed share of whatever energy the pion had, so a beam of pions of every energy makes neutrinos of every energy. Two and a half degrees to one side, something else happens. The neutrino's energy, as a function of the pion's, rises to a maximum and falls again, and around the maximum pions from two to ten GeV all give neutrinos within a tenth of a GeV of each other. An experiment in Japan builds its detector deliberately off the axis of its own beam for that reason — trading most of its neutrinos for the ones at the energy it needs.

What the heat shares out, and what it does not. Two averages per particle in the Maxwell–Jüttner gas, in units of kT, against kT/mc² on a logarithmic scale: the momentum times the velocity, p·v, whose average over the three directions gives the pressure, and the kinetic energy. The first is 3 at every temperature, computed here by averaging over the distribution and equal to 3 to four decimal places across the whole figure — so the pressure is exactly nkT, the ideal gas law, from a gas colder than a star to one hotter than the early universe. The kinetic energy is not shared out the same way. It is 1.506 kT when the gas is cold, Boltzmann's 3/2, and rises to 3.00 kT when it is ultra-relativistic, because for a fast particle the energy is p·c and p·v, which is what equipartition hands out, is the whole of it rather than twice it.

The gas law relativity leaves exact

Heat a gas until its particles move at nearly the speed of light and almost everything Maxwell and Boltzmann said about it changes. The speeds pile up just below c instead of spreading out. The energy per particle climbs from three halves of kT to three. The heat capacity doubles, and the ratio of heat capacities falls from five-thirds to four-thirds. One law survives untouched: the pressure is still exactly nkT, at a thousand degrees or a hundred thousand million. The reason it survives is the reason the others change. What heat hands out equally to every way of moving is not energy but momentum times velocity, and for slow particles those happen to differ only by a factor of two.

An atom's line and a nucleus's, on one scale. Three energies, in electronvolts on a logarithmic scale, for an atomic transition, sodium's yellow line, and a nuclear one, the 14.4 keV gamma ray of iron-57: the amount by which emission and absorption by free atoms miss each other because of recoil, E²/Mc²; the natural width of the line, ħ over the excited state's lifetime; and the Doppler width from thermal motion at room temperature. For sodium the recoil miss is 2.1·10⁻¹⁰ eV, 197 times smaller than the natural width, so an atom absorbs its neighbour's light. For iron-57 it is 0.00392 eV, 839,015 times its natural width of 4.67·10⁻⁹ eV. The recoil grows as the square of the transition energy and the width does not, so a gamma ray emitted by a free nucleus misses an identical nucleus by nearly a million line widths.

The gamma ray its own kind cannot absorb

An atom can absorb the light another atom of its kind emits; that is how a sodium flame casts a shadow in sodium light. A nucleus cannot. When it emits a gamma ray it loses the photon's energy as mass, and the photon's momentum kicks it backward, taking a small share of the energy with it; to absorb the same gamma ray, an identical nucleus would need that share added rather than removed. For iron-57's 14.4 keV line the shortfall is nearly a million times the line's own width. In 1958 Rudolf Mössbauer found that a nucleus held in a crystal can hand its recoil to the whole crystal and lose almost nothing — and the resulting line is so sharp that it could weigh the fall of light down a twenty-two metre tower.

The speed that stops while the energy keeps coming. The speed of an electron, as a fraction of the speed of light, against the kinetic energy given to it, from special relativity (solid) and from Newton's ½mv² (dashed); dots at the five energies Bertozzi used in 1964. Newton's speed passes the speed of light at a quarter of a megaelectronvolt and is 7.7 times it at 15 MeV. Relativity's speed is 0.863 c at 0.5 MeV, 0.967 c at 1.5 MeV, 0.9948 c at 4.5 MeV and 0.99946 c at 15 MeV. Between 1.5 and 15 MeV the energy grows tenfold and the speed by three and a half per cent. The energy does not stop arriving; the speed stops answering it.

The speed that stops while the energy keeps coming

In 1964 William Bertozzi gave electrons energies from half a megaelectronvolt to fifteen, timed them over eight and a half metres, and caught them in an aluminium disc to measure the heat they brought. By Newton the fastest should have crossed in under four nanoseconds, seven times faster than light. They took twenty-eight, and so did the slower ones, more or less. The heat, meanwhile, rose in proportion to the energy put in. The experiment is famous for showing that nothing outruns light, but its sharper result is the second half: the energy did arrive, all of it, carried at very nearly the same speed.

Two clocks that slow together. For a muon circling a 1.45 T magnetic field, its mean life as the laboratory measures it and the time it takes to go round once, against its Lorentz factor γ, on logarithmic scales. Time dilation stretches the life to γ × 2.197 μs: 6.6 μs at γ = 3, 64.4 μs at γ = 29.3, the muon g − 2 experiments' value. The orbit grows with the momentum, so the revolution takes γ times longer too: 15.3 ns at γ = 3, 149 ns at γ = 29.3. The two lines are parallel. Their ratio, the number of turns in one mean life, is 431 at every energy — set by the field and the muon's own properties, eBτ/2πm, with γ cancelled out.

The turns a muon makes at any energy

A muon lives two microseconds, and in a storage ring it lives longer the faster it goes, because its clock runs slow. Its orbit runs slow too: a faster muon carries more momentum, bends less in the same field and takes longer to go round. The two slowings are the same factor of gamma, so they cancel. A muon in a 1.45 tesla ring makes 431 turns in a mean life whether it is moving at nine-tenths of the speed of light or at nine nines, and the only way to more turns is a stronger magnet. The same cancellation is why the first cyclotrons stopped working near twenty million electronvolts.

In the rod's frame: a long rod threads through, front first. The same events seen from the rod's own frame, computed by transforming each point's motion from the hole's frame. Here the rod is its full length and the hole is the contracted one, 0.60 of it, sweeping left at 0.8c — a long rod over a short hole. But the moment each point starts to fall is not one moment in this frame: the front end starts at t′ = −1.07, the rear end at −0.27, and each point then falls at γu = 0.50c. While the start of the fall runs back along it the rod is bent, level behind and sloping in front; once every point is falling it is straight again and tilted, front down, by 21.8°. It threads through the hole front first as the hole slides under it, each part dropping below the plate just before the plate's far edge reaches it. It passes through in both frames; only the order of events along it differs.

The rod that is level for only one observer

A metre rod slides at high speed over a metre-wide hole in a thin plate. In the plate's frame the rod is contracted and drops through. In the rod's frame the hole is contracted, the rod is far too long for it, and it drops through anyway — because the instruction 'every point starts to fall now' names a different now for the rod. Its front end starts first, the start runs back along it, and the rod tips into the hole like a spear. Whether a moving thing is level is a question about which events are simultaneous, and so it has an answer only for an observer.

Light inside an accelerating rocket travels on circles. Rays of light leaving one point inside a rocket with constant acceleration, drawn in the rocket's own coordinates: height above the horizon up the page, in units of c²/a (one light-year for one gravity), and distance across. Each ray is a straight line in an inertial frame, transformed event by event. Launched across the rocket (0°) or at +30°, +60°, −30°, −60°, every ray is an exact semicircle centred on the horizon, with radius 1.000, 1.155, 2.000, 1.155, 2.000: the rays bend down towards the horizon and meet it at right angles. A ray sent straight up stays straight. These are the straight lines of the hyperbolic plane, although the spacetime inside the rocket is flat.

The rocket in which light travels on circles

Inside a rocket that accelerates for ever at a constant rate, a beam of light sent across the cabin sags towards the floor, as Einstein argued it must if acceleration and gravity are indistinguishable. Followed further than any cabin, the sag turns out to be exact geometry: every ray inside the rocket is a perfect semicircle centred on the horizon below, and the rays obey the rules of a non-Euclidean plane in which the angles of a triangle add to less than two right angles. The spacetime in the rocket is flat; the curvature belongs to the clocks.

Where the spot is, and when, for three sweep speeds. A spacetime diagram of the spot a turning beam makes on a flat screen at distance D: position along the screen across, the time at which light arrives there up, both in units of D and D/c, for beams sweeping the screen's nearest point at ωD = 0.5c, 1.0c, 3.0c. Each curve is the arrival time t(x) = atan(x/D)/ω + √(D² + x²)/c. Every curve has a lowest point on the approaching side — at x = −1.25, −0.79, −0.32 D respectively — because far out the beam strikes the screen obliquely and its sweep along the screen outruns light whatever ω is. Light reaches that point first: the spot is born there, as a pair, one running back up the screen and one forward. The faster the sweep, the nearer the centre the birth. The faint dashed lines are light signals, slope one. Wherever a spot's track is flatter than they are, it is a sequence of events no signal could connect.

The spot that outruns light and carries nothing

Flick a laser pointer across the face of the Moon and the spot it makes crosses the Moon faster than light. Nothing is wrong with relativity: the spot is not a thing, and no part of it travels from one side to the other. Each lit point is lit by its own light, sent from the hand. What makes the spot worth studying is how strange such a non-thing is allowed to be. It can be born in the middle of the screen as a pair running apart; its speed can be made infinite, or reversed, merely by watching it from a moving frame; and the composition of velocities that caps everything real has nothing to say about it.

How fast each point of a fast wheel moves. The speed through the ground of each point on the rim of a rolling wheel, in units of the speed of light, against the point's angle round the rim measured from the bottom, for axles moving at 0.5c, 0.8c, 0.95c. The dashed curves are the everyday answer, 2v sin(α/2), which puts the top at twice the axle's speed and would carry it past light. Composed relativistically, the bottom is still at rest and the top moves at 2v/(1 + v²/c²): 0.800c, 0.976c, 0.999c, always below c. Every point of the rim stays slower than light, and the fast part of the wheel is flattened into a broad plateau over the top.

The wheel whose top cannot go twice as fast

The top of a rolling wheel moves at twice the speed of its axle, and the bottom is momentarily at rest — two facts every cyclist's spokes show, blurred at the top and sharp at the bottom. Roll the wheel at a large fraction of the speed of light and the second fact survives exactly while the first cannot: the top moves at 2v/(1 + v²/c²), never as fast as light. Caught at one instant of the ground's time the spokes are bent, and over one turn the wheel advances not the circumference measured from its axle but γ times it — the rim's own length, laid down on the ground by a contact point that does not move.

The share of its energy a particle can hand to one electron. The largest fraction of its kinetic energy a muon, a pion, a proton or an alpha particle can give a free electron in one collision, against its Lorentz factor γ, on logarithmic axes. A slow proton can give at most 0.22 per cent, 4m/M, which is why a proton slows down through tens of thousands of gentle collisions rather than a few hard ones. The share rises as γ grows and reaches a half at γ = 916 for a proton and 101 for a muon — near M/2m, where the electron's energy in the centre-of-momentum frame has grown comparable to the projectile's, so that the two meet as equals and a head-on reversal can hand the electron most of the energy.

The kick a fast particle can give an electron

A slow proton crossing matter can give any one electron at most a fifth of a per cent of its energy, because an electron struck head-on by something two thousand times heavier rebounds at no more than twice the heavier one's speed. That rule of thumb fails at relativistic speeds, and fails upward: the electron's speed is capped below light, but its energy is not, and the largest kick grows as the square of the projectile's Lorentz factor until, above a teraelectronvolt, one collision can take more than half of everything a proton carries.

The pattern in which a spinning Earth turns gyroscopes. The direction in which the Earth's rotation turns a gyroscope near it, in a plane through the Earth's axis (spin upward): the lines are those of the precession rate Ω = (G/c²r³)[3(J·r̂)r̂ − J], which has exactly the shape of the magnetic field of a spinning charged ball. On the circle of a polar orbit 650 km up, arrows show the direction and relative size of the turning at twelve points. Over the poles a gyroscope is turned the same way the Earth spins, twice as fast as anywhere else at that distance; over the equator it is turned the opposite way. Averaged round a polar orbit, what is left is half the size of the over-the-equator rate and opposite to it — in the sense of the Earth's spin.

The gyroscope a spinning Earth turns

A moving charge makes a magnetic field, and a spinning charged ball makes a dipole field around it. Gravity has the same structure one level down: a spinning mass drags the local standards of rotation around with it, and a perfect gyroscope near the Earth turns, very slightly, in the pattern of a dipole field — with the Earth's spin over the poles and against it over the equator. Averaged round a polar orbit the turning is 41 milliarcseconds a year. It took forty-four years and a satellite carrying the roundest objects ever made to measure it.

The photon a fast electron throws back. The highest energy of a laser photon scattered straight back by an electron it meets head-on, against the electron's energy, for a carbon-dioxide laser, an infrared and a green one, on logarithmic axes: dashed, 4γ² times the laser photon's energy, the double Doppler shift of a mirror moving at the electron's speed; solid, the exact edge with the electron's recoil, E·x/(1 + x) with x = 4γε/mc²; dotted, the electron's own energy, which no scattered photon reaches. A 1 GeV electron turns 1.17-eV infrared photons into gamma rays of 17.6 MeV, within 1.8 per cent of the mirror's figure. At 46.6 GeV and 2.35 eV the mirror's figure is 78.2 GeV, more than the electron has to give; the photon actually comes back with 29.2 GeV.

The photon a fast electron throws back

Shine an infrared laser at a beam of gigaelectronvolt electrons and gamma rays come back out of the collision, each carrying seventeen million times the energy of the laser photon it started as. The electron acts as a mirror moving at nearly the speed of light, and a moving mirror multiplies the energy of light by two Doppler factors. Push the electron's energy far enough and the mirror arithmetic promises photons more energetic than the electron itself — and the photon's own momentum, which the mirror ignored, steps in to stop it.

Pushed forward, and left at rest. The path of an electron, initially at rest, overtaken by a 6-cycle pulse of linearly polarised light travelling to the right, for peak field strengths a₀ = 0.5, 1, 2, where a₀ = 1 is the strength at which the electron's quiver becomes relativistic; lengths in wavelengths of the light, the vertical axis along the electric field. While the pulse passes, the electron quivers across the beam and is pushed along it. When the pulse has gone it is at rest again — not moving, with none of the light's energy — but displaced forward by 0.14, 0.56, 2.25 wavelengths respectively, a distance growing as a₀². The quiver's width grows only as a₀: at a₀ = 2 the electron is pushed forward several times further than it swings sideways.

The light that moves an electron and pays it nothing

A pulse of light strong enough to throw an electron forward at a large fraction of the speed of light passes over it, and the electron is left exactly as it was found — at rest, with none of the light's energy — except that it is somewhere else. The reason is two quantities the electron cannot change while a plane wave is passing, and the same two quantities fix the figure eight it traces inside the wave and the angle at which it leaves a real, focused beam carrying the energy it managed to keep.

One lever, two frames, two different torques. A right-angled lever pivoted at its corner, with arms of length L, held still by a force F at the end of each arm, perpendicular to it. Left, in the lever's own frame: torque FL anticlockwise from the horizontal arm's force, FL clockwise from the vertical arm's, and they cancel. Right, the same lever seen moving to the right at 0.8 of the speed of light: the horizontal arm, along the motion, is contracted to L/γ = 0.60L, and the force on it, which is across the motion, is reduced to F/γ = 0.60F; the vertical arm and its force, along the motion, are unchanged. The torques are now 0.36FL and FL, and the lever is twisted clockwise by 0.64FL — the square of its speed as a fraction of light's. It does not turn.

The lever that is twisted and does not turn

A right-angled lever held still by two equal forces has no net torque on it. Watch the same lever go by at high speed and one arm is shorter, one force is weaker, and the torques no longer cancel — yet the lever goes by without turning. Nothing is wrong with either frame's arithmetic. The forces are doing work on the moving lever, the energy they put in is flowing through its arms, and a flow of energy carries momentum that points across the lever's motion: a body that moves straight with a momentum that does not.

The travelling twin's surfaces of now. Surfaces of equal radar time for a twin who leaves at 0.6c and turns round after 4 years of their own time, every half-year of the twin's time from 0.5 to 7.5, drawn in the home frame; each surface is every event the twin would time, by echo, at that moment. On the outbound leg, far from the turnaround's influence, the surfaces are the tilted lines of the outbound rest frame; on the way back, those of the return frame. In between they bend, with a corner where they cross the light rays from the turnaround, and they sweep up the home worldline smoothly: the home clock read at radar times 3.5, 4 and 4.5 is 4.00, 5.00 and 6.00. No two surfaces cross, so no event is given two times, and none is skipped.

The now a travelling twin can measure

The standard account of the twin paradox has the traveller's sense of “now on Earth” lurch forward by years at the moment of turning round. That lurch belongs to a recipe — borrow the simultaneity of whatever inertial frame the traveller happens to be in — and the recipe is not something the traveller can measure. Timing the home clock by echo, as a radar does, gives a now that the traveller can measure, that never jumps and never crosses itself, and that during the turnaround coincides, surprisingly, with the stay-at-home's own.

An electron that runs into light and loses its energy to it. The energy of an electron of 511 MeV (γ = 1000) as it passes head-on through a 10-cycle pulse of 0.8 µm light, as a fraction of its starting energy, against the number of laser cycles it has crossed, for normalised field strengths a₀ = 30 and 100: with radiation reaction (solid) and without (dashed). Without it, the electron is shaken sideways while in the light and leaves with exactly the energy it brought, as a plane wave requires. With it, each half-cycle near the pulse's peak radiates away a slice: the electron leaves with 76 per cent of its energy at a₀ = 30 and 22 per cent at a₀ = 100, the rest gone as gamma rays.

The light that takes back an electron's energy

An electron at rest in the most intense laser light ever made feels its own radiation as a force a millionth of the light's push — the textbook reason radiation reaction never matters. Send the electron into the light at nearly the speed of light and the arithmetic turns over. In its own frame the light is stronger by twice its Lorentz factor, the power it radiates grows as the square of that, and a pulse a few tens of femtoseconds long can strip it of most of its energy as gamma rays. That is where the classical theory of a radiating charge, argued over for a century, finally has to answer to experiment — and where it starts to fail for quantum reasons.

One spray of particles, seen from two frames. Massless particles sprayed evenly in every direction from a source, as distributions in two variables. Left: against the cosine of the angle from the beam axis, for the source at rest (flat) and the same source moving along the axis at 0.8c (peaked forward), which crowds the particles forward until 81 times as many go straight ahead as straight back. Right: the same two sprays against pseudorapidity, η = −ln tan(θ/2). In η the moving spray is the resting one moved over by 1.099, the rapidity of 0.8c, with its shape — ½ sech² η, a peak of 0.5 and a width of 1.76 at half height — unchanged. A boost along the beam that distorts every distribution in angle or velocity only translates a distribution in rapidity.

The angle a collider counts in logarithms

The two proton beams of the Large Hadron Collider meet head on with equal energies, so the collisions ought to happen at rest in the laboratory. They do not. Each collision is really between two fragments of protons carrying unknown, unequal shares of the momentum, and every one is moving along the beam at a different speed. Particle physicists therefore describe what comes out in a variable that a boost along the beam simply shifts: rapidity, the quantity in which speeds add. A detector cannot measure rapidity directly. It measures an angle, and converts it to a logarithm.

The tick an elliptical orbit adds to a clock. The periodic part of the time a satellite clock gains or loses against one on the ground, after its constant rate offset is removed, against hours from closest approach, for the two Galileo satellites stranded in 2014 on orbits of eccentricity 0.156 and period 12.9 hours, a GPS satellite at 0.01 and a Galileo satellite on its intended near-circular orbit. The stranded satellites' clocks run ahead and behind by ±367 ns every orbit: slow near closest approach, where they are deepest and fastest, fast near the far point. A GPS clock wobbles by ±23 ns, and a satellite on a circular orbit by almost nothing. The wobble is −2√(GMa) e sin E/c², fixed by the orbit alone, which is what makes it a test.

The satellites launched into the wrong orbit

In August 2014 two European navigation satellites were left on the wrong orbit by a frozen fuel line in their rocket's upper stage: an ellipse instead of a circle. For navigation they were nearly useless. For relativity they were a gift. A clock on an elliptical orbit dips deeper into the Earth's gravity and speeds up as it falls, then climbs and slows, and both effects make it lose time near the bottom of the ellipse and gain it back near the top — a wobble of 367 nanoseconds every 12.9 hours, set by the orbit alone. Watching that wobble for three years checked the gravitational slowing of clocks five times more closely than anything had in the forty years before.

What one scattering does to a photon's energy. The average fractional change in a photon's energy when it scatters off an electron in a gas at temperature T, against the photon's energy: (4kT − ε)/mc², for gases at 10⁶, 10⁷ and 10⁸ K. A photon below 4kT gains energy, taking it from the electrons' motion; one above loses it, as recoil, to the electrons. The crossing sits at ε = 4kT: 0.34 keV at 10⁶ K, 3.45 keV at 10⁷ K, 34.47 keV at 10⁸ K. The changes per scattering are small, a few per cent at most here, but a gas whose electrons scatter each photon many times, or that is bathed in light for long enough, is heated or cooled until the gains and losses balance over the whole spectrum.

The temperature a gas takes from the light around it

A thin, ionised gas bathed in light settles at a temperature that has nothing to do with how much light there is and everything to do with its colour. Every time a photon scatters off an electron, the two exchange a little energy: a photon softer than four times the electrons' thermal energy gains, a harder one loses by recoil. Balanced over a spectrum, the rule sets the gas at a quarter of the light's mean photon energy. That puts gas near a quasar at tens of millions of kelvin, and it caps the heating once photons approach the electron's own rest energy. For blackbody light the rule falls four per cent short, and the shortfall is the photon being a boson.

A peak at half the mass, made by a sine. The momentum across the beam of the electron from 200,000 simulated W decays, as a probability density per GeV, for a W of mass 80.37 GeV. For a W exactly at rest across the beam, of exactly its mass (dashed), the electron carries M/2 = 40.19 GeV in the W's frame and shows a fraction sin θ of it across the beam, so the distribution climbs to a sharp peak at M/2 and stops: the Jacobian peak, piled up because sin θ hardly changes near θ = 90°. The W's natural width of 2.1 GeV rounds the peak (solid, peak at 39.9 GeV); its motion across the beam, a few GeV on average, smears it further and pushes a tail past M/2 (lighter). The position of the peak measures the mass, and is shifted by anything that moves the W.

The mass weighed without one of its pieces

A W boson decays into an electron and a neutrino, and the neutrino leaves every detector without a trace. Its mass cannot be found the usual way, by adding up the energy and momentum of what it decayed into, because half of what it decayed into is missing. What survives is the part of the motion across the beam, where the neutrino's momentum can be inferred from the imbalance it leaves. There the electron's momentum piles up at half the W's mass, and a quantity built from both particles ends at a sharp edge at the full mass. The world's best measurements of that edge disagree by seventy-five parts in eighty thousand.

Thrown across a uniform field, a fast charge does not draw a parabola. The paths of a charge launched across a uniform electric field (which points up the page) at 0.30, 0.60, 0.90, 0.99 of the speed of light, from the exact relativistic motion (solid), beside the parabolas Newton's law gives for the same launches (dashed); lengths are in units of mc²/qE, the distance over which the field does work equal to the charge's rest energy. Near its launch each exact path is a parabola, but one with the inertia γ₀m in place of m, so it is deflected less than Newton says — 1.05, 1.25, 2.29, 7.09 times less for the four. Further out each turns steeply along the field: one unit across, the 0.3c charge is 11.6 units along where Newton says 5.6, because its sideways speed has fallen while the field kept pushing. Each exact path is a hyperbolic cosine. The field adds to the momentum along it while the sideways momentum stays fixed, and the charge's growing energy is a growing inertia that slows its sideways progress.

The throw a uniform field bends into a chain

Throw a stone sideways across the Earth's gravity and it draws a parabola. Throw a charge sideways across a uniform electric field and, at low speed, it does the same. At high speed it draws a different curve, a hyperbolic cosine — the shape of a chain hanging between two posts, stretched — and the reason is that nothing pushes it sideways yet its sideways speed falls. Its sideways momentum is fixed, the field keeps adding energy, and energy is inertia. The charge gets only logarithmically far across the field however long it flies, and its sideways distance turns out to be a reading of its own clock.

Loops that swell as the electric field approaches cB. A charge starting from rest in crossed uniform fields — the electric field up the page, the magnetic field out of it — for E/cB = 0.3, 0.6, 0.85, integrated exactly; lengths in units of mc/qB. Each traces a chain of loops drifting to the right at E/B. Newton's law gives loops of height 2mE/qB² — 0.6, 1.2, 1.7 — whatever the speed. The exact loops are 0.66, 1.88, 6.13 high, larger by γ² of the drift speed, 1.10, 1.56, 3.60: in the frame moving at the drift the electric field vanishes and the magnetic field is weakened to B/γ, and the charge circles at the drift speed on a larger orbit than a weaker field would explain alone. As E approaches cB the drift approaches c and the loop grows without limit.

The orbit that opens when E reaches cB

A charge in crossed electric and magnetic fields drifts sideways at E/B, looping as it goes, and the textbook leaves it there. The textbook result has a speed in it that can be made larger than light, and something has to give. What gives is the loop. As the electric field approaches c times the magnetic one, the loops swell without limit, and at E = cB the charge stops looping and is carried off for ever. Above that ratio no frame can make the electric field vanish; one can make the magnetic field vanish instead, and in that frame the charge simply runs away. The transition from a bound orbit to a run-away is decided by a single quantity every observer agrees on, E² − c²B².

A cloud thrown from one event into empty space. A spacetime diagram, time up, one space dimension across, light at 45° (the edges of the shaded cone). Particles leave one event at the bottom with 13 different speeds, equally spaced in rapidity from −2.10 to 2.10 — from 0.970c one way to the same the other — and coast in straight lines (thin). The curves are the hyperbolas on which every particle's own clock reads 1, 2, 3: the cloud's own instants. Measured along any one of them, the particles are evenly spaced — the cloud is uniform — and the spacing grows in proportion to the clock: it is expanding. Nothing here is curved and nothing is created; it is special relativity in flat spacetime, and every particle, the central one included, sees the same thing.

The universe one explosion makes in empty space

Throw particles out of a single event at every speed below light's and let them coast. Drawn on a spacetime diagram, nothing curves and nothing expands — it is special relativity in an empty box. Yet the particles, slicing their history by their own clocks, find themselves in a universe that is the same everywhere, expanding, obeying an exact Hubble law with no speed limit, and filling a space of constant negative curvature. Edward Milne built a cosmology on this in 1933, and it shows that 'space expanding' and 'galaxies moving' are two slicings of one set of worldlines.

The readings of the moving clocks along one instant: a wave. The cosine of each moving clock's phase, read along a single laboratory instant, against position in light-periods of the clock, for clocks moving at 0.3c, 0.6c, 0.85c. The readings make a wave whose wavelength, measured from the drawing, is 3.18, 1.33, 0.62 light-periods: c²/(γvν₀), shrinking as the clocks move faster. For a clock that ticks at its rest energy over Planck's constant, ν₀ = mc²/h, that is h/γmv — de Broglie's wavelength, h over the momentum. Nothing about waves was assumed: only clocks, synchronised where they rest, read from a frame in which they move.

The wave a row of moving clocks leaves on an instant

Line up identical clocks, synchronise them where they stand, and send the whole row past a laboratory at a steady speed. On any one laboratory instant the clocks do not agree: the ones further ahead read less, by an amount that grows steadily along the row. The readings form a wave laid out in space, its crests are the moving row's instants, and they sweep along faster than light. Give each clock the frequency of its rest energy and the wavelength is exactly h/p. De Broglie's matter wave began, in 1923, as an argument about the relativity of simultaneity.

The parabola a family of isobars lies on. The atomic masses of the nuclei with 91 nucleons, as energy above the lightest, against the number that are protons, from the semi-empirical mass formula: a parabola with zirconium-91 at the bottom, which is where the stable isobar is. Left of the floor the nuclei have too many neutrons and β-decay towards it, each step turning a neutron into a proton and releasing the mass difference — 8.2 MeV from Kr, 5.8 MeV from Rb, 3.4 MeV from Sr, 1.0 MeV from Y — the steps shrinking as the floor nears, because the slope of a parabola does. Right of it the nuclei have too many protons and decay the other way, by capturing an electron or, where the drop exceeds 1.022 MeV, by emitting a positron: 6.2 MeV from Tc, 3.8 MeV from Mo, 1.4 MeV from Nb. Every arrow points downhill in mass, and nothing else decides its direction.

The parabola that decides which way a nucleus decays

A weak decay turns a neutron into a proton or a proton into a neutron and leaves the number of nucleons alone, so it moves a nucleus sideways among its isobars. Whether it can happen, and in which direction, is settled by weighing: a decay goes wherever the atom ends up lighter, by any amount at all, except that emitting a positron needs two electron masses more. Laid out against proton number, the masses of a family of isobars fall on a parabola — or, for an even number of nucleons, on two — and the shape of that parabola is why potassium-40 decays both ways and germanium-76 can only take two steps at once.

A longer road against a faster car. For a proton with 0.1% more momentum than the design proton in a ring 628 m round, the change in its time per turn, in picoseconds, against the Lorentz factor: from its longer orbit, which adds about 56 ps a turn at every energy; from its higher speed, which subtracts 605 ps at γ = 2 but only 5.2 ps at γ = 20, because near the speed of light more momentum buys almost no more speed; and the net, computed exactly. The speed wins below γₜ = 6.1 and the path wins above it. In special relativity a body can always be given more momentum, but its speed is capped, and that is the whole cause.

The energy above which faster arrives later

In a racing circuit a faster car laps sooner. In a proton synchrotron it does too, at first — and then, past a definite energy, the faster proton laps later. Extra momentum sends a proton round a slightly longer orbit and makes it slightly faster, and relativity decides which wins: at low energy the speed does, but near the speed of light more momentum buys almost no more speed, and the longer road takes over. At the crossing, called transition, a spread of momenta stops producing a spread of arrival times, the bunch stops oscillating in time, and the accelerating wave has to jump from one slope to the other in a few turns. The first machine to try it did so in 1959.

A mass that goes missing as light. For six captures of a slow neutron — ¹H to ²H, ¹²C to ¹³C, ⁵⁶Fe to ⁵⁷Fe, ²⁸Si to ²⁹Si, ³⁵Cl to ³⁶Cl and ³²S to ³³S — the mass that disappears, the atom plus the neutron less the atom formed, in thousandths of an atomic mass unit, against the energy released as gamma rays, in MeV, both computed from the tabulated atomic masses. All six lie on the line Δm = E/c², whose slope is one atomic mass unit per 931.494 MeV: ¹H → ²H loses 2.388 mu and releases 2.225 MeV; ¹²C → ¹³C loses 5.310 mu and releases 4.946 MeV; ⁵⁶Fe → ⁵⁷Fe loses 8.208 mu and releases 7.646 MeV; ²⁸Si → ²⁹Si loses 9.097 mu and releases 8.474 MeV; ³⁵Cl → ³⁶Cl loses 9.211 mu and releases 8.580 MeV; ³²S → ³³S loses 9.277 mu and releases 8.642 MeV. Drawn this way the line is a definition — the energies were computed from the masses. The experiment of 2005 measured the two quantities for silicon and sulphur independently, the masses as frequencies and the energies as angles, and asked whether they still fell on it.

The test of mass and energy that needs a ruler

The most direct test of E = mc² weighed two silicon atoms and measured a gamma ray. A silicon-28 nucleus that captures a slow neutron becomes silicon-29 and loses three ten-thousandths of its mass as gamma rays; weigh both atoms in a trap where they circle a magnetic field, measure the gamma rays by the angle at which a silicon crystal diffracts them, and the two sides agree to four parts in ten million. What the comparison needed is the interesting part: the recoil of the atom, a correction four hundred times larger than the precision, computed from the momentum relativity gives to light; angles of a few hundred picoradians; and a chain of constants tying a frequency and a ruler to the same number.

The peak no pion spectrum can move. The photon spectrum from a population of neutral pions, summed from their boxes, for pion spectra falling as three different powers of the energy. Whatever the pion spectrum, each curve peaks at the same 67.5 MeV and is symmetric on the logarithmic axis, since every box contains that point and a box's height falls as it widens; checked here at the point and its mirror, the ratio is 1.000. This is the shape, known as the pion bump, that Floyd Stecker worked out in 1971. Gamma-ray telescopes found it in 2013 in two supernova remnants, which was taken as direct evidence that such remnants accelerate protons, because the electrons that produce most other gamma rays have no reason to make a peak here.

The flat spectrum a fast pion must paint

A neutral pion falls apart into two photons, each with half its rest energy, in a hundred-million-billionth of a second. Seen in flight, those photons could have any energy between two edges, and every energy in that range is equally likely, whatever the pion's speed. Add up a whole population of pions and something unexpected appears: a peak at exactly the 67.5 MeV that no individual decay shows. Astronomers took it as evidence of where cosmic rays are made.

The price of a pair depends on who pays it. The lowest energy of a photon that can make an electron–positron pair when struck on a stationary partner, against the partner's mass: 2mc²(1 + m/M), from requiring that the total four-momentum have the invariant mass of what is left at rest in the centre of momentum. For a lead nucleus it is 2mc² to better than one part in a hundred thousand, the figure every textbook quotes. For a proton it is 0.054 per cent above. For a free electron it is exactly twice, 4mc², or 2.04 MeV, even though the partner is the very same mass as the pair's members. The rest energy created is unchanged; what rises is what has to be carried off by the partner and the pair together.

The partner that sets the price of a pair

Every textbook says it takes 1.02 MeV to make an electron and a positron from light, twice the electron's rest energy. Done in empty space, it cannot be done at any energy at all. Next to a lead nucleus it costs 1.02 MeV. Next to a lone electron, a particle exactly as heavy as the ones being made, it costs 2.04. Nothing about the pair has changed. What changes the price is who has to carry the momentum away.

All essays