The collection

Every essay — page 5

One idea per essay, ordered so that the earlier ones set up the later ones — but nothing here depends on being read in sequence.

Mechanics

Motion, force, and the quantities that refuse to change.

A collision with restitution 0.4. Two bodies before and after a head-on collision. Momentum is the same on both rows by construction; kinetic energy is only preserved when the collision is elastic.

The point that keeps moving as if nothing had happened

Newton's third law makes every internal force cancel against its own partner, which leaves the external sum governing a single mass-weighted average of positions. In the collision below the total momentum stays at 4.00 kg·m/s while 63 per cent of the kinetic energy leaves, and the average travels at 1.00 m/s throughout, before and after.

5 figures · part 2 on Momentum

The two normal modes of a coupled pair at kc/k = 0.1. Two equal masses, each held to a wall by a spring of stiffness k and to each other by a coupling spring of 0.1k. Above: the in-phase mode, in which both masses move the same way by the same distance, the coupling spring never changes length, and the frequency is therefore 1.0000√(k/m) — the coupling does not appear in it at all. Below: the out-of-phase mode, in which the coupling spring changes length by twice the displacement, so each mass feels k + 2kc and the frequency rises to 1.0954√(k/m), a ratio of 1.0954. Both displacement patterns are the eigenvectors of the pair's stiffness matrix, obtained from its trace and determinant and checked against those two square roots. The red arrows are the force each mass is pulled back by, computed as −Kx: 1.00kA in the first mode against 1.20kA in the second, a factor of 1.20, which is the square of the frequency ratio because ω² is a stiffness over a mass. Any motion of the pair whatsoever is a sum of these two and nothing else.

The two pendulums that will not stop swapping

Coupled oscillators joined by a weak spring appear to hand energy back and forth. Nothing is handed anywhere: the system has only a pair of motions that keep their shape, at √(k/m) and √((k+2kc)/m), and the apparent traffic is the beat between them — 51 swings from one handover to the next at a coupling of one part in fifty. Extend the same arithmetic to N masses and it produces a dispersion relation with a hard ceiling, near 7 THz in copper.

6 figures · part 2 on Harmonic approximation

Waves

Oscillation, and everything that turns out to be an oscillation.

Why a straight front stays straight. A plane wavefront, with 9 points on it treated as sources and a wavelet of radius vt drawn about each. The envelope of those circles — the curve touching all of them — is a second straight line, parallel to the first and displaced by exactly vt. That is the whole of straight-line propagation: nothing else has to be assumed, and in particular nothing has to be said about rays, which are afterwards defined as the normals to these fronts. The construction is drawn with the wavelets left in, because they are the part that does the work.

Every front is a source

Treat each point of a wavefront as though it were a little source of its own, and take the envelope of what they produce. That one rule gives straight-line propagation, reflection, Snell's law and diffraction — and its most famous failure is what told everyone what was missing from it.

7 figures · part 1 on Huygens

Reflected upside down. A pulse arriving at a join where the impedance rises by a factor of 3, drawn at three moments. The amplitudes are read off the marched wave: the reflected pulse is -0.500 of the incident one and the transmitted pulse is 0.500, against (1−Z₂/Z₁)/(1+Z₂/Z₁) = -0.500 and 2/(1+Z₂/Z₁) = 0.500 from the two matching conditions. The reflection is inverted, which is the same fact as a pulse on a string flipping when it reaches a wall: a wall is a medium of infinite impedance, and the inversion is what keeps the displacement at the join equal to zero. Note that the transmitted amplitude exceeds one where the second medium is lighter, and that this is not a violation of anything: amplitude is not energy.

What happens where the medium changes

Two conditions at a join — the displacement is continuous, and so is the transverse force — fix the reflected and transmitted amplitudes completely. What decides them is one quantity, the impedance, and not the stiffness or the density separately: two quite different media with the same impedance are, to a wave, the same medium.

6 figures · part 1 on Impedance

Three geometries, three exponents. Amplitude against distance for a wave spreading in one, two and three dimensions, on logarithmic axes, over 3 decades. The same power crosses every surface round the source, so the intensity falls as one over the area of that surface and the amplitude as one over its square root. The fitted slopes are 0.000 along a line, -0.500 over a cylinder, -1.000 over a sphere, each fitted by least squares to the drawn curve rather than written on it. A ripple on water is the middle case and a sound in a room is the last, which is why a ripple stays visible so much further than a shout carries.

How a wave thins out

A wave gets weaker with distance for two quite different reasons, and only one of them is a loss. Geometry alone fixes the first exactly — three exponents for three dimensions, with nothing about the medium in them — and whatever is left over is the medium eating the wave.

5 figures · part 3 on Wave motion

The equation that lets a shape travel

Newton's second law applied to a piece of string a millimetre long gives T·y″ = µ·ÿ, and the derivation never once asks what the string is made of. Two things fall out immediately: the speed is √(T/µ) and belongs to the medium, and the general solution holds two arbitrary functions rather than one. The second of them is the reflection, which is why a boundary condition can be met at all.

5 figures · part 4 on Wave motion $6 modes of a drum, and their frequency ratios. Nodal-line diagrams for 6 modes of a circular membrane, each labelled with its frequency as a multiple of the lowest mode's. A mode (m, n) has m nodal diameters and n − 1 nodal circles, and the circles are drawn at the radii where the computed radial function J_m(j(m,n)·r/R) crosses zero — not at guessed fractions of the radius. The two tints are the two directions the head is moving in at that instant, and the lines between them are the parts of it that never move. The ratios are 1.000, 1.593, 2.136, 2.295, 2.653, 2.917: each one is a quotient of two zeros of Bessel functions, computed here from the power series and checked against their published values to 4.4e-7. Not one is a whole number, which is why a drum has no harmonic series and no pitch in the sense a string has one — and why these same ratios belong to every circular membrane ever stretched, whatever it is made of and however tightly it is pulled.$

The drum that has no harmonics

A string's allowed frequencies are 1, 2, 3, 4 times its lowest, because counting half-wavelengths is arithmetic. Clamp a membrane round a circle and the same reasoning returns 1.000, 1.593, 2.136, 2.295 instead — zeros of Bessel functions, not integers. And those numbers belong to the shape of the boundary alone, which raises a question nobody could answer until 1992.

5 figures · part 3 on Standing waves

Optics

Light, and the small number of rules it obeys.

The path that does not change

Reflection, refraction and the angle of the rainbow are not three laws. They are one condition — that the optical path length is stationary — and the word stationary rather than shortest is the whole of what makes an elliptical mirror and a rainbow the same statement.

5 figures · part 1 on Fermat

The dip that decides it. Two equally bright points seen through a circular aperture, their Airy patterns added, at 0.7, 1, 1.6 times the Rayleigh separation. Below each is the depth of the dip between the peaks, measured off the drawn sum: 0.0%, 26.5%, 91.6%. At exactly the Rayleigh separation the dip is 26.5% — the criterion is a convention about how much of a dip a detector can see, not a threshold anything crosses. Below it the two peaks merge into one and the pair is gone; above it the answer was never in doubt.

How far apart two things have to be

An instrument's ability to tell two things apart is not set by the quality of its glass. It is set by the width of the hole light comes through, by a factor that is the first zero of a Bessel function — and the threshold everyone quotes is a convention laid over a computed dip of 26.5 per cent.

7 figures · part 2 on Diffraction

A grating of 20 slits. Intensity against angle behind a grating of 20 slits spaced 4 wavelengths apart, from I = [sin(Nu)/(N sin u)]² with u = π d sinθ/λ. The principal maxima sit at sinθ = mλ/d — -14.48°, 0.00°, 14.48° for m = -1, 0, 1 — and those angles contain no N at all, so they are exactly where two slits put them. What N changes is the width: the central maximum measures 0.635 degrees between its half-maximum points, measured off the drawn curve, against 0.635 degrees from bisection on the pattern itself. That width goes as 1/N — N times it is 12.692°, 12.691°, 12.691° at N = 64, 256, 1024, and 12.705° here, which is more, because the 1/N law is asymptotic and few slits are the far end of it: two slits give a peak 13 per cent wider than the limit. So a grating's resolving power R = mN is bought with the number of lines illuminated and with nothing else. In first order this grating resolves λ/Δλ = 20; the sodium doublet needs 982. Away from the maxima the pattern stays below 4.8 per cent of one, because there it is bounded by 1/(N sin u)².

What a thousand slits buy that two cannot

The bright directions behind a grating are fixed by its ruling pitch and the wavelength alone, and no count of lines appears in them. What the count changes is the width of each maximum, which falls as 1/N — so resolving power is mN, and 1,200 illuminated lines separate the sodium D lines with a dip of 53.4 per cent where 300 show one line and no dip at all.

10 figures · part 3 on Diffraction

Two sources 4 wavelengths apart. Circular wavefronts from two sources, with the lines along which they arrive in step drawn through the pattern. Those lines are where the path difference is a whole number of wavelengths.

Why two lamps never interfere

Adding amplitudes is unconditional; fringes are not. What decides is whether the phase difference holds still for longer than a detector takes to record it — and a 10 nm slice of white light holds it for 100 femtoseconds, across a path of 30 micrometres.

4 figures · part 1 on Coherence

Electromagnetism

Charge, field, and the lines drawn between them.

The same loop, spanned two ways. A 100 cm² capacitor with a 2 mm gap, charged at 1.0 million volts per second. A loop drawn round the wire can be spanned by a flat surface, which the current of 44.271 µA passes through, or by a bag-shaped surface that passes between the plates, which no charge crosses at all. Ampère's law as it stood gave two different answers for one circulation. The rate of change of electric flux between the plates, multiplied by ε₀, is 44.271 µA — the same number to every figure, because C = ε₀A/d is the same ε₀A/d either way. That is the term, and it is not an approximation or a correction: it is what makes the law consistent at all.

The term that made light

Ampère's law contradicts itself the moment a current stops being steady, and the contradiction is visible in one picture: two surfaces on the same loop, with a current through one of them and nothing through the other. The term that repairs it turns four equations into a wave, whose speed is two constants measured in a room with the lamps off.

5 figures · part 1 on Maxwell equations

The energy of a capacitor, booked as a density. The energy stored by a parallel-plate capacitor of 200 square centimetres — 0.0200 square metres — against the separation of its plates, drawn twice. Held at 15 nC the energy rises in proportion to the separation; held at 169 V it falls as the inverse. Both curves are obtained by integrating the energy density ½ε₀E² over the volume between the plates, and each agrees with ½QV to better than a part in 10¹². The two describe the same capacitor at 2.00 mm, where they cross at 1.27 µJ, and there their slopes are equal and opposite: the attraction between the plates is 635 µN, or 6.353·10⁻⁴ N, whichever quantity is held fixed. That force is Q²/2ε₀A — a property of the field in the gap and of the area it crosses, with no reference to the plates at all.

Where the energy of a field actually is

A charged capacitor holds 1.27 µJ, and two entirely different accounts agree on the number: one built from charges and potentials, one built from joules per cubic metre of empty space. They part company at a resistor, where the power arrives sideways through the surface at 1.67 W.

5 figures · part 1 on Field energy

Equipotentials, with the field lines that cross them. Contours of constant potential, traced by marching squares, with field lines traced along the gradient of the same potential. The two families meet at right angles everywhere, which is a consequence of the field being the gradient rather than a property of the drawing.

The attraction that needs no charge

Gauss's law says nothing comes out of a neutral molecule, and yet water's field one nanometre away reaches 1.1 × 10⁸ V/m. What survives when the monopole vanishes is a separation, and every step down the tower of falloffs below it is paid for with one more order of cancellation.

7 figures · part 3 on The field concept

Thermodynamics

Heat, disorder, and the one law with a direction in it.

The staircase equipartition cannot climb. The heat capacity of hydrogen at constant volume, in units of R, against temperature on a logarithmic axis. The three translational directions contribute 3/2 at every temperature. The two rotations switch on near 85.4 K — the temperature at which kT matches the first rotational step — taking the total to 5/2, computed here by summing the rigid rotor's partition function over two hundred levels rather than by assuming the plateau. The vibration switches on near 6332 K, taking it to 7/2. At 50 K the value is 2.469; at 300 K the value is 2.502; at 5000 K the value is 3.376. Classical equipartition predicts 7/2 at every temperature, including at four kelvin, and the size of the steps is set by ħ — which is how a heat capacity measures a quantum constant.

Half a kT for every way of moving

A heat capacity ought to be a count. Every quadratic term in a system's energy carries half a kT of it, so warming a gas is a matter of enumerating the ways its molecules can move — and the fact that the count comes out wrong for hydrogen is how a thermometer measured Planck's constant.

7 figures · part 1 on Equipartition

A ratio in the exponent. The Boltzmann factor against the energy of a state measured in units of kT, with the logarithm up the axis so that the straight line is the whole content. Every kT of energy costs a factor of e, so 10, 20, 30 times kT are factors of 10^-4.3, 10^-8.7, 10^-13.0. At 300 K, kT is 25.9 meV, so a barrier of 0.35 eV is 13.5 kT and a factor of 1.3e-6. That is the sense in which a third of an electronvolt is not a small energy: it is small compared with a chemical bond and enormous compared with kT, and it is the second comparison that decides whether anything happens.

The exponential that decides everything

Maximising the number of ways a reservoir can arrange what is left after taking E out of it gives one factor, e to the minus E over kT. Its exponent is a ratio, which is why a barrier of a third of an electronvolt — nothing at all by chemical standards — is the difference between instantly and never.

5 figures · part 3 on Entropy

Ways to arrange 12 coins. The number of distinct arrangements giving each number of heads, for 12 coins. Every individual arrangement is equally likely; the middle wins because there are more ways to reach it.

What a system actually minimises

A ball falls to the bottom of a bowl and a gas fills a room, and neither of those is the rule. A system in contact with a large reservoir minimises U − TS, and the minus sign is the reservoir's own entropy written in the system's variables — which is why a rubber band pulls harder when it is heated.

7 figures · part 4 on Entropy

The phase boundary of water, from one equation. Pressure against temperature for water on a logarithmic pressure axis spanning 6.6 decades. The vaporisation curve is integrated from Clausius–Clapeyron between the triple point at 273.16 kelvin and 611.7 Pa and the critical point at 647.096 kelvin, with a single latent heat of 43.32 kilojoules per mole — the value the two published points on the curve imply. The measured latent heats are 45.05 at the triple point and 40.65 at the reference point, and the fitted value sits between them, because a constant latent heat is an average over the interval. The sublimation curve below the triple point is not measured but predicted, from the two latent heats adding where all three boundaries meet: 51.1 kilojoules per mole, which reaches 103.2 Pa at 253.1 kelvin against a measured 253.15. The melting curve is drawn at the slope Clapeyron gives it, -13.5 megapascals per kelvin, which is a volume ratio and nothing else: water's solid is 917 against 1000 kilograms per cubic metre for its liquid, so melting shrinks it and the line leans backwards. Across the whole 6.6 decades of this axis that line moves 5.2 kelvin, and one atmosphere shifts the melting point by 0.0075 kelvin. At 1 atmosphere the boundary is crossed at 373.1 kelvin, where water boils. The one place the curve fails is its top end: a constant latent heat reaches 37.4 MPa at the critical temperature where the measured critical pressure is 22.1 MPa, 70 per cent high, because the latent heat falls to zero at the critical point and this curve does not know that.

A boiling point is a pressure, not a temperature

Nothing about water names one hundred degrees; the air does. Where a liquid turns to vapour in its bulk is fixed by what pushes on it, which makes the familiar figure a coordinate on a curve — 71 °C on Everest, 119.5 °C in a sealed pot — and one latent heat draws the whole curve.

7 figures · part 2 on Phase change

Relativity

Space and time, drawn on the same axes.

What puts a scale on a tilted axis. A spacetime diagram with a second observer's axes at β = 0.6. The curves are the sets of events at a fixed interval from the origin — c²t² − x² = s², one branch each for s = 0.5, s = 1, s = 1.5 — and the whole point of them is where they cross. A unit of the moving observer's time is wherever the s = 1 curve meets the tilted time axis, and on the page that point is 1.250 times as far from the origin as the stationary observer's own unit. Without the hyperbolae the tilted axes carry no scale at all, and every argument about which of two clocks is behind is unreadable off the diagram. Each drawn crossing reads back as its own interval to 0.0e+0.

The quantity nobody argues about

Relativity takes away the length of a rod and the duration of an event and hands back exactly one thing in their place. Its hyperbolae are what put a scale on the tilted axes of a spacetime diagram — without which the diagram is a picture with no units on it.

5 figures · part 2 on Spacetime diagram

The same wire, seen twice at 0.6c. Above: the wire in the laboratory. The lattice is at rest and the electrons drift, so the electrons are the contracted ones — and the wire is neutral, which means their contracted spacing is what the manufacture of a neutral wire produced. Below: the same wire seen by something moving with the electrons at 0.6c. Now the electrons are at rest and the spacing between them stretches by γ = 1.250, while the lattice moves and its spacing contracts by the same factor. The two densities no longer cancel and the wire is charged. Nothing was done to the wire; the only thing that changed is who is looking, and the magnetic force in the first frame is the electric force in the second.

Magnetism is electricity seen sideways

The force on a charge moving beside a current-carrying wire is magnetic in the laboratory and purely electrostatic in the charge's own frame. Both calculations give the same answer, and the drift speed that makes them agree corresponds to a Lorentz factor differing from one in the twenty-sixth decimal place.

7 figures · part 1 on Field transformation

The invariant that survives a boost

Energy and momentum are both answers to the question "how fast is it going, and according to whom". One combination of them is not, and that combination is the mass — which is why two photons of 511 keV can be a thing of mass 1.022 MeV or a thing of no mass at all, depending only on the angle between them.

5 figures · part 2 on Mass-energy

Simultaneity at β = 0.866. Two events on the same horizontal line happen at the same time for the stationary observer. The moving observer slices spacetime along the tilted line, and for them one event happens before the other.

The pole that fits and does not fit

A twenty-metre ladder is carried through a ten-metre barn at 0.866 of light speed, and both doors shut behind it. In the ladder's own frame the barn is five metres long and there is plainly no room. Both accounts are correct, and the doors' closings are 57.8 nanoseconds apart in one of them.

5 figures · part 2 on Length contraction

Fluids

Matter that will not hold a shape, and the forces that act in it anyway.

One volume of liquid, several solids. 4 drops of the same 5 µL of liquid, on 4 solids it meets at 20°, 60°, 90°, 140°. Each is the spherical cap that volume and that angle force, so the footprint radius is computed rather than chosen: 20° gives 2.61 mm, 60° gives 1.71 mm, 90° gives 1.34 mm, 140° gives 0.69 mm. At every contact line the three interfacial tensions are drawn to scale, and only their horizontal components balance — γsv = γsl + γlv cos θ. The vertical pull of the liquid surface is taken up by the solid, which is why the angle belongs to three interfaces at once and to no single liquid: change the solid and nothing about the water has changed.

The angle a liquid makes with what it sits on

Everything capillarity does — climbing, beading, wicking, waterproofing — is the sign and size of one cosine, and that cosine belongs to three interfaces at once rather than to the water. Change the solid and nothing about the water has changed, yet the same five microlitres goes from a footprint 2.61 mm across to one of 0.69 mm.

7 figures · part 2 on Capillarity

Astrophysics

Gravity read as geometry, and the laws carried where no laboratory can follow.

The term that abolishes the inner orbits. The effective potential of the Schwarzschild geometry per unit mass, in units of c², at 4 angular momenta, against radius in Schwarzschild radii. Newton's version has a minimum — a stable circular orbit — at L̃²/GM for every angular momentum there is, however small, and it is the dashed curve at the same L̃, here with its minima at 10.13, 7.61, 6.00, 5.12 rs. General relativity adds one term, −GM L̃²/c²r³, and that minimum stops existing below a definite angular momentum. At L̃ = 4.50 GM/c the barrier and the well are still separate, at 1.83 and 8.29 rs. The two merge at L̃ = √12 GM/c, at 3 rs = 6GM/c² — the innermost stable circular orbit, where the curve drawn here has neither a maximum nor a minimum but a single inflection. Below that momentum — the curve at L̃ = 3.20 GM/c — there is no stationary point anywhere outside the horizon, so no circular orbit exists at all, at any angular momentum whatever. None of that is a property of matter; it is a statement about the geometry, and it fixes the energy of the innermost orbit at √(8/9) = 0.94281 of mc², so 5.719% of the rest mass has been radiated by anything that reached it. Every well drawn here was located on the emitted curve by golden section and checked against the closed form.

The orbit that cannot be made smaller

Newtonian gravity allows a stable circular path at every radius, however tight, and there is no innermost one. General relativity adds a single term to the expression that says so, and below 6GM/c² no stable circular path exists at any angular momentum whatever. Anything arriving there has radiated 5.72% of its rest mass, which is eight times what hydrogen fusion converts.

5 figures · part 1 on Orbit stability

Every field · every reading path · every object named · every figure · what is taught wrongly · search