Contrast — where it appears
Named by 3 essays across one field — each of them below, with the objects they name alongside it.
The grain that is in the light
Point a laser at a wall and the wall appears to be covered in a fine boiling texture. Nothing on the wall is that size and nothing about the wall decides it: the grain belongs to the aperture looking at it, the statistics are the same for every rough surface there is, and the most likely brightness anywhere in the pattern is zero.
The rings that belong to the edge
Every account of diffraction so far asks what the size of an aperture does. The rings around a star are not about its size: they are the transform of a discontinuity, they do not shrink relative to the core when the telescope grows, and the only way to remove them is to stop the transmission falling to zero abruptly. Softening the edge buys forty-five decibels of contrast and costs eighty per cent of the resolution.
How far the air lets a mountain be seen
A dark mountain on the horizon fades not because its light grows too faint to see but because the air between it and the eye glows. Sunlight scattered into the line of sight fills the dark ridge in until it matches the sky behind it, and its contrast falls as a simple exponential of the distance. With the eye's threshold at two per cent, that gives a visual range of 3.912 divided by the air's scattering coefficient: about 337 kilometres for perfectly clean air in green light, far less in the hazes real air carries. The same arithmetic makes near ridges blue and far ones pale.
Named alongside it
The objects these essays reach for when they reach for this one.
ApertureDiffractionAerial perspectiveAerosolApodisationAutocorrelationCircular gaussianCoherenceCoronagraphDynamic rangeExtinctionFourier transform