Concept

Contrast — where it appears

The ratio of a faint feature's brightness to the bright thing beside it, and the quantity that decides whether the faint one can be seen at all. It is limited by the light a system scatters rather than by its resolution, and the two are traded against each other.

Named by 3 essays across one field — each of them below, with the objects they name alongside it.

A grain that is not on the object. A speckle pattern, computed as the far field of a circular aperture 421 samples in area filled with random phases — which is what a rough surface does to coherent light, and nothing else. The texture is not a picture of the surface: change the phases and the grains move, but their size and their statistics do not. Five shades are drawn here, from the darkest fifth of the range to the brightest. The measured contrast — the standard deviation of the intensity divided by its mean — is 1.0101, against exactly one for a fully developed speckle, and that is a strong statement: it says the most likely intensity anywhere in this pattern is zero, and that the bright grains are as far above the mean as the dark ones are below. Anybody who has pointed a laser at a wall has seen this and most take it for a property of the wall. It is a property of the light and of the aperture looking at it — including, when the aperture is an eye, of the pupil, which is why the pattern swims when the head moves and why its grain size tells an optometrist about the eye rather than about the wall.

The grain that is in the light

Point a laser at a wall and the wall appears to be covered in a fine boiling texture. Nothing on the wall is that size and nothing about the wall decides it: the grain belongs to the aperture looking at it, the statistics are the same for every rough surface there is, and the most likely brightness anywhere in the pattern is zero.

optics · Coherence
The rings belong to the edge, not to the size. The far-field intensity of 3 apertures of the same width, against angle in units of the diffraction limit, on a logarithmic intensity axis spanning ten decades. They differ only in how the transmission falls off toward the rim. With a hard edge the first sidelobe is 13.3 decibels down and the core is 0.89 wide. With a Hann taper the first sidelobe is 31.5 decibels down and the core is 1.44 wide. With a Blackman taper the first sidelobe is 58.1 decibels down and the core is 1.64 wide. The hard edge's rings are not a defect of the optics and are not reduced by making it larger — they are the transform of a discontinuity, and the only way to remove them is to remove the discontinuity. What it costs is the width of the core, which is the resolution.

The rings that belong to the edge

Every account of diffraction so far asks what the size of an aperture does. The rings around a star are not about its size: they are the transform of a discontinuity, they do not shrink relative to the core when the telescope grows, and the only way to remove them is to stop the transmission falling to zero abruptly. Softening the edge buys forty-five decibels of contrast and costs eighty per cent of the resolution.

optics · Diffraction
How a dark ridge fades into the sky. The apparent contrast against the horizon sky of a black ridge at a given distance, seen in green light (550 nm) along a level path at sea level, on a logarithmic scale: e^(−βx), the light from the ridge scattered out of the path and the sky's light scattered in. The dashed line is the eye's threshold, a contrast of 2%. Clean air: β = 0.0116 per km, visible to 337 km; light haze, 0.05 per km: β = 0.06 per km, visible to 64 km; haze, 0.3 per km: β = 0.31 per km, visible to 13 km. Pure air sets a limit of a few hundred kilometres to how far anything can be seen; in practice haze shortens it to tens.

How far the air lets a mountain be seen

A dark mountain on the horizon fades not because its light grows too faint to see but because the air between it and the eye glows. Sunlight scattered into the line of sight fills the dark ridge in until it matches the sky behind it, and its contrast falls as a simple exponential of the distance. With the eye's threshold at two per cent, that gives a visual range of 3.912 divided by the air's scattering coefficient: about 337 kilometres for perfectly clean air in green light, far less in the hazes real air carries. The same arithmetic makes near ridges blue and far ones pale.

optics · Scattering

Named alongside it

The objects these essays reach for when they reach for this one.

ApertureDiffractionAerial perspectiveAerosolApodisationAutocorrelationCircular gaussianCoherenceCoronagraphDynamic rangeExtinctionFourier transform

All concepts